C-Arm Computed Tomography Compared With Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Treatment Planning Before Radioembolization

Pictorial essay: imaging findings following Y90 radiation segmentectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma

Transarterial radioembolization is a novel therapy that has gained rapid clinical acceptance for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Segmental radioembolization [also termed radiation segmentectomy (RS)] is a technique that can deliver high doses (> 190 Gy) of radiation selectively to the hepatic segment(s) containing the tumor. The aim of this comprehensive review is to provide an illustrative summary of the most relevant imaging findings encountered after radiation segmentectomy. A 62-patient cohort of Child-Pugh A patients with solitary HCC < 5 cm in size was identified. A comprehensive retrospective imaging review was done by interventional radiology staff at our institution. Important imaging findings were reported and illustrated in a descriptive account. For the purposes of completeness, specific patients outside our initial cohort with unique educational imaging features that also underwent segmentectomy were included in this pictorial essay. This review shows that response assessment after RS requires a learning curve with common drawbacks that can lead to false-positive interpretations and secondary unnecessary treatments. It is important to recognize that treatment responses and pathological changes both are time dependent. Findings such as benign geographical enhancement and initial benign pathological enhancement can easily be misinterpreted. Capsular retraction and segmental atrophy are some other examples of unique post-RS response that are not seen in any other treatment.

[18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose PET for Interventional Oncology in Liver Malignancy

[(18)F]Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET is a functional imaging tool that provides metabolic information, which has the potential to detect a lesion before it becomes anatomically apparent. This ability constitutes a strong argument for using FDG-PET/computed tomography (CT) in the management of oncology patients. Many studies have investigated the accuracy of FDG-PET or FDG-PET/CT for these purposes, but with small sample sizes based on retrospective cohorts. This article provides an overview of the role of FDG-PET or FDG-PET/CT in patients with liver malignancies treated by means of surgical resection, ablative therapy, chemoembolization, radioembolization, and brachytherapy, all being liver-directed oncologic interventions.

The role of 18F-FDG-PET and PET/CT in patients with colorectal liver metastases undergoing selective internal radiation therapy with yttrium-90: a first evidence-based review

PURPOSE

To provide a first evidence-based review of the literature on the role of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET and PET/CT) in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) undergoing selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) with yttrium-90 ((90)Y) microspheres.

METHODS

A comprehensive computer literature search was conducted to find relevant published articles on whole-body FDG-PET or PET/CT in patients with CRLM undergoing SIRT.

RESULTS

We identified 19 studies including 833 patients with CRLM undergoing SIRT. The role of FDG-PET or PET/CT was analysed in treatment planning, treatment response evaluation, and as prognostic tool.

CONCLUSION

FDG-PET and PET/CT provide additional information in treatment evaluation of CRLM patients treated with SIRT and may have a role in treatment planning and patient selection. FDG-PET/CT is emerging as good prognostic tool in these patients.

Identifying aberrant hepatic arteries prior to intra-arterial radioembolization

PURPOSE

Failing to identify aberrant hepatic arteries before radioembolization (RE) may compromise its treatment efficacy due to inadequate biodistribution of radioactive microspheres. The purpose of this study was to evaluate how often aberrant hepatic arteries were identified correctly in clinical practice, with computed tomography (CT), and during angiography in patients with liver tumors who received a workup for RE.

METHODS

The presence and vascularization pattern of aberrant (i.e., accessory and replaced) hepatic arteries was assessed on triphasic liver CT in 110 patients. Subsequently, radiological reports on CT and angiographic procedures were reviewed to determine whether aberrant hepatic arteries were identified correctly in clinical practice. The intrahepatic biodistribution of (99m)Tc-MAA and radioactive microspheres was assessed on SPECT/CT and PET/CT in all patients with unidentified aberrant hepatic arteries.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven of 110 patients (34%) had aberrant hepatic arteries. In 18 of 37 (49%) patients, the aberrant hepatic arteries were correctly identified on CT and in 32 of 37 (86%) during angiography. Aberrant right hepatic arteries were identified more frequently than aberrant left hepatic arteries on CT (54 vs. 44%) and during angiography (100 vs. 69%, p = 0.007). In five patients (14%), an aberrant left hepatic artery remained unidentified, resulting in a lack of (99m)Tc-MAA and (90)Y activity in the segmental territory of the unidentified aberrant hepatic arteries.

CONCLUSIONS

Aberrant left hepatic arteries were the most common unidentified aberrant hepatic arteries, resulting in incomplete radiation coverage. We formulated a practical approach to identify aberrant hepatic arteries correctly before RE.

Technical solutions to ensure safe yttrium-90 radioembolization in patients with initial extrahepatic deposition of (99m)technetium-albumin macroaggregates

Purpose

To evaluate the incidence of extrahepatic deposition of technetium-99m–labeled albumin macroaggregates (^99mTc-MAA) after pretreatment angiography, before yttrium-90 radioembolizaton (⁹⁰Y-RE), and to report on technical solutions that can be used to ensure safe delivery of ⁹⁰Y-microspheres in patients with initial extrahepatic deposition.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective analysis of 26 patients with primary and secondary liver malignancies, who were scheduled for treatment with ⁹⁰Y-RE in our institution in 2009, was performed. The angiograms and single-photon emission computed tomography images of all patients were reviewed by an interventional radiologist and a nuclear medicine physician, respectively, to identify and localize extrahepatic deposition of ^99mTc-MAA when present. Subsequently, the technical solutions were used to successfully perform ⁹⁰Y-RE in these patients were evaluated and described.

Results

Extrahepatic deposition of ^99mTc-MAA was observed in 8 of 26 patients (31%). In 7 of 8 patients, a second pretreatment angiography was performed to detect the cause of extrahepatic deposition. The technical solutions to enable safe ⁹⁰Y microspheres delivery included more distal placement of the microcatheter in the proper/right hepatic artery in 4 of 7 (57%) patients; (super)selective catheterization of multiple segmental branches in 2 of 7 (29%); and additional coiling of a newly detected branch in the remaining patient (14%). This was confirmed by a second MAA procedure. ⁹⁰Y-RE was eventually performed in 25 of 26 (96%) patients. No procedure-related complications (<30 days) were observed.

Conclusion

Extrahepatic deposition of ^99mTc-MAA after pretreatment angiography did occur in 8 of 26 (31%) patients. The technical solutions as presented allowed safe ⁹⁰Y-RE delivery in 25 of 26 (96%) patients.