Hepatic arterial chemoembolization using drug-eluting beads in gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumor metastatic to the liver

Chemoembolization Beyond Hepatocellular Carcinoma: What Tumors Can We Treat and When?

Liver metastases are the most common malignancy found in the liver and are 20 to 40 times more common than primary hepatic tumors, including hepatocellular carcinoma. Patients with liver metastases often present with advanced disease and are not eligible for curative-intent surgery or ablative techniques. The unique hepatic arterial blood supply of liver metastases allows interventional radiologists to target these tumors with transarterial therapies. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been studied in the treatment of liver metastases originating from a variety of primary malignancies and has demonstrated benefits in terms of hepatic progression-free survival, overall survival, and symptomatic relief, among other benefits. Depending on the primary tumor from which they originate, liver metastases may have different indications for TACE, may utilize different TACE regimens and techniques, and may result in different post-procedural outcomes. This review offers an overview of TACE techniques and specific considerations in the treatment of liver metastases, provides an in-depth review of TACE in the treatment of liver metastases originating from colorectal cancer, neuroendocrine tumor, and uveal melanoma, which represent some of the many tumors beyond hepatocellular carcinoma that can be treated by TACE, and summarizes data regarding when one should consider TACE in their treatment algorithms.

Conventional Transarterial Chemo embolization Using Streptozocin in Patients with Unresectable Neuroendocrine Liver Metastases

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical, biological and radiological responses to, and tolerability of, conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) using streptozocin for unresectable neuroendocrine liver metastases.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 52 patients with predominant liver disease were treated with cTACE using an emulsion of streptozocin, Lipiodol and embolization particles. A sequential approach was favored in patients with high liver tumor burden. Clinical, biological and radiological responses were evaluated using carcinoid symptoms, biomarkers and mRecist criteria, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 127 procedures were performed with a sequential approach in 65% of patients. All patients received streptozocin and Lipiodol. Carcinoid syndrome was improved in 69% of patients after treatment (p = 0.01). Post-embolization syndrome was reported in 78% of patients. At the end of all cTACE, objective response and non-progressive disease were 32% and 70%, respectively. Progression-free survival was 18.3 ± 13.3 months (median 14.9) and median overall survival (OS) from start of treatment was 74 months. The OS at 1 year, 2 years, 3 years and 5 years was 91% (IC = 84-99%), 84% (CI = 72-95%), 69% (CI = 53-84%) and 63% (C = 46-81%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

cTACE using streptozocin is an effective and well-tolerated palliative option for patients with neuroendocrine liver metastases, associated with prolonged survival and delayed time to progression.

Neuroendocrine liver metastases: The role of liver transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Neuroendocrine tumor (NET) metastasis localized to the liver is an accepted indication for liver transplantation as such tumors have a low biological aggressiveness in terms of malignancy and are slow growing.

RECENT FINDINGS

The long-term results are comparable with and in some cases even better than those of transplantations performed for primary liver cancer. However, compared with nonmalignant conditions, neuroendocrine liver metastasis (NELM) may result in an inferior outcome of transplantation. In the face of the scarcity of donated organs and recent improved results of non-surgical treatment for NELM, controversy over patient selection and timing for liver transplantation continues.

SUMMARY

In this review, we provide an overview of the diagnostic work-up and selection criteria of patients with NELM being considered for liver transplantation. Thereafter, we provide a critical analysis of the reported outcomes of OLT.

Chemoembolization Versus Radioembolization for Neuroendocrine Liver Metastases: A Meta-analysis Comparing Clinical Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Studies have shown intra-arterial therapies to be effective in controlling neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELMs), but the evidence supporting the selection of specific methods is limited. This meta-analysis is the first to compare survival outcomes between transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and transarterial radioembolization (TARE) in the treatment of NELM.

METHODS

A systematic search according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines in PubMed and Embase databases was conducted in February 2020 for published studies comparing survival outcomes between TACE and TARE in the treatment of NELM.

RESULTS

Six eligible cohort studies with a total of 643 patients were identified. The TACE and TARE groups were similar in terms of age, sex, hepatic tumor burden, tumor grade, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score. The patients treated with TACE had significantly better overall survival (odds ratio [OR], 1.92; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14-3.22, p = 0.014) than those treated with TARE. Overall survival ranged from 16.8 to 81.9 months with TACE and from 14.5 to 66.8 months with TARE. No significant differences in hepatic progression-free survival (OR, 1.01; 95% CI 0.75-1.35; p = 0.96) or tumor response were observed within the first 3 months (OR, 2.87; 95% CI 0.81-10.21; p = 0.10) or thereafter (OR, 0.98; 95% CI 0.12-7.86; p = 0.99). The complication rates were similar between the two groups, with 6.9% of the TACE patients versus 8.5% of TARE patients reporting major complications (OR, 1.16; 95% CI 0.54-2.48; p = 0.71) and respectively 44.6% and 58.8% of the TACE and TARE patients reporting minor adverse events (OR, 1.08; 95% CI 0.39-2.99; p = 0.88).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite similar tumor responses, an overall survival benefit was associated with TACE treatment of NELM compared with TARE treatment. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm this finding and clarify whether certain subpopulations benefit from different transarterial methods.

Liver Embolisation for Patients with Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Liver embolisation is one of the treatment options available for patients diagnosed with neuro-endocrine neoplasms (NEN). It is still uncertain whether the benefits of the various types of embolisation treatments truly outweigh the complications in NENs. This systematic review assesses the available data relating to liver embolisation in patients with NENs.

METHODS

Eligible studies (identified using MEDLINE-PubMed) were those reporting data on NEN patients who had undergone any type of liver embolisation. The primary end points were best radiological response and symptomatic response; secondary end-points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity.

RESULTS

Of 598 studies screened, 101 were eligible: 16 were prospective (15.8%). The eligible studies included a total of 5,545 NEN patients, with a median of 39 patients per study (range 5-214). Pooled rate of partial response was 36.6% (38.9% achieved stable disease) and 55.2% of patients had a symptomatic response to therapy when pooled data were analysed. The median PFS and OS were 18.4 months (95% CI 15.5-21.2) and 40.7 months (95% CI 35.2-46.2) respectively. The most common toxicities were found to be abdominal pain (48.8%) and nausea (48.1%). Outcome did not significantly vary depending on the type of embolisation performed.

CONCLUSION

Liver embolisation provides adequate symptom relief for patients with carcinoid syndrome and is also able to reach partial response in a significant proportion of patients and a reasonable PFS. Quality of studies was limited, highlighting the need of further prospective studies to confirm the most suitable form of liver embolisation in NENs.

The Role of Interventional Radiology for the Treatment of Hepatic Metastases from Neuroendocrine Tumor: An Updated Review

Interventional radiology plays an important role in the management of patients with neuroendocrine tumor liver metastasis (NELM). Transarterial embolization (TAE), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), and selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) are intra-arterial therapies available for these patients in order to improve symptoms and overall survival. These treatment options are proposed in patients with NELM not responding to systemic therapies and without extrahepatic progression. Currently, available data suggest that TAE should be preferred to TACE in patients with NELM from extrapancreatic origin because of similar efficacy and better patient tolerance. TACE is more effective in patients with pancreatic NELM and SIRT has shown promising results along with good tolerance. However, large randomized controlled trials are still lacking in this setting. Available literature mainly consists in small sample size and retrospective studies with important technical heterogeneity. The purpose of this review is to provide an updated overview of the currently reported endovascular interventional radiology procedures that are used for the treatment of NELM.

Non-Pharmacological Therapeutic Options for Liver Metastases in Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors

The incidence of liver metastasis in digestive neuroendocrine tumors is high. Their presence appears as an important prognostic factor in terms of quality of life and survival. These tumors may be symptomatic because of the tumor burden itself and/or the hormonal hyper-secretion induced by the tumor. Surgery is the treatment of choice for resectable tumors and metastasis. Nevertheless, surgery is only possible in a small number of cases. The management of non-resectable liver metastasis is a challenge. The literature is rich but consists predominantly in small retrospective series with a low level of proof. Thus, the choice of one technique over another could be difficult. Local ablative techniques (radiofrequency) or trans-catheter intra-arterial liver-directed treatments (hepatic artery embolization, chemo-embolization, and radio-embolization) are frequently considered for liver metastasis. In the present review, we focus on these different therapeutic approaches in advanced neuroendocrine tumors, results (clinical and radiological), and overall efficacy, and summarize recommendations to help physicians in their clinical practice.

Management of Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are derived from neuroendocrine cell system and can have benign or malignant characteristics. They are rare tumors, but have been increasing in incidence over the past 40 years. Patients with NENs may develop symptoms due to primary tumor invasion, metastasis, or from secretion of hormonally active tumor substances. Multiple imaging modalities are used for diagnosis and staging, including specialty scans such as ¹¹¹In pentetreotide (Octreoscan) and ⁶⁸Gallium-DOTATATE, along with endoscopy, endoscopic ultrasound, and biochemical marker testing. Treatment involves both surgical approach, for both primary and metastatic lesions, as well as medical management for symptom management and disease progression. This article will review the current clinical knowledge regarding the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of these fascinating neoplasms and the associated hormonal syndromes.

Evaluating radiological response in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours treated with sunitinib: comparison of Choi versus RECIST criteria (CRIPNET_ GETNE1504 study)

BACKGROUND

The purpose of our study was to analyse the usefulness of Choi criteria versus RECIST in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PanNETs) treated with sunitinib.

METHOD

A multicentre, prospective study was conducted in 10 Spanish centres. Computed tomographies, at least every 6 months, were centrally evaluated until tumour progression.

RESULTS

One hundred and seven patients were included. Median progression-free survival (PFS) by RECIST and Choi were 11.42 (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.7-15.9) and 15.8 months (95% CI, 13.9-25.7). PFS by Choi (Kendall's τ = 0.72) exhibited greater correlation with overall survival (OS) than PFS by RECIST (Kendall's τ = 0.43). RECIST incorrectly estimated prognosis in 49.6%. Partial response rate increased from 12.8% to 47.4% with Choi criteria. Twenty-four percent of patients with progressive disease according to Choi had stable disease as per RECIST, overestimating treatment effect. Choi criteria predicted PFS/OS. Changes in attenuation occurred early and accounted for 21% of the variations in tumour volume. Attenuation and tumour growth rate (TGR) were associated with improved survival.

CONCLUSION

Choi criteria were able to capture sunitinib's activity in a clinically significant manner better than RECIST; their implementation in standard clinical practice shall be strongly considered in PanNET patients treated with this drug.

Current and emerging therapies for PNETs in patients with or without MEN1

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PNETs) might occur as a non-familial isolated endocrinopathy or as part of a complex hereditary syndrome, such as multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1). MEN1 is an autosomal dominant disorder characterized by the combined occurrence of PNETs with tumours of the parathyroids and anterior pituitary. Treatments for primary PNETs include surgery. Treatments for non-resectable PNETs and metastases include biotherapy (for example, somatostatin analogues, inhibitors of receptors and monoclonal antibodies), chemotherapy and radiological therapy. All these treatments are effective for PNETs in patients without MEN1; however, there is a scarcity of clinical trials reporting the efficacy of the same treatments of PNETs in patients with MEN1. Treatment of PNETs in patients with MEN1 is challenging owing to the concomitant development of other tumours, which might have metastasized. In recent years, preclinical studies have identified potential new therapeutic targets for treating MEN1-associated neuroendocrine tumours (including PNETs), and these include epigenetic modification, the β-catenin-wingless (WNT) pathway, Hedgehog signalling, somatostatin receptors and MEN1 gene replacement therapy. This Review discusses these advances.

Liver transarterial embolizations in metastatic neuroendocrine tumors

The management of patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NET) and non-resectable liver metastases is challenging. Liver-directed transarterial embolization (TAE), transarterial chemo-embolization (TACE) and selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) have a place of choice among other treatment modalities. However, their utilization relies on a low level of proof, due to the lack of prospective data, the absence of comparative studies and considerable heterogeneity between local practices. TAE and TACE generally achieve average symptomatic, biological and radiological responses of 75%, 56% and 50%, with progression-free survival of 12-18 months, with acceptable tolerance. Although not clearly demonstrated, TACE may be more effective than TAE in pancreatic NET, but not in small-intestine NET. SIRT has been developed more recently and may achieve similar results, with improved tolerance, but decreased cost-effectiveness, although no prospective comparison has been published to date. There is currently no strong argument to choose between TAE, TACE and SIRT, and they have not been compared to other treatment modalities. The evaluation of their efficacy has mostly relied on criteria based on size variations, which do not take into account tumor viability and metabolism, and thus may not be relevant. These techniques may be especially effective when performed as first-line therapies, in patients with non-major liver involvement (<75%) and with hypervascular metastases. Finally, studies exploring their combination with systemic therapies are ongoing.

Decision Making for Selection of Transarterial Locoregional Therapy of Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Transarterial locoregional therapies (LRTs) are indispensable components of the modern interventional oncologic therapy of liver-dominant metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). The scope of available LRTs and their nuanced differences mandates a thorough understanding of their relative applicability and effectiveness in certain clinical circumstances to prescribe appropriate, patient-specific, image-guided therapy. This article aims to provide an overview of transarterial LRT options for liver-dominant metastatic NETs and therapy selection by reviewing procedure types, their advantages and disadvantages, and comparative efficacy in common case scenarios.

Safety and efficacy of doxorubicin-eluting superabsorbent polymer microspheres for the treatment of liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumours: preliminary results

Background

The aim of the study was to retrospectively evaluate the symptom control, tumour response, and complication rate in patients with liver-predominant metastatic neuroendocrine tumours treated with transarterial chemoembolization using doxorubicin-eluting superabsorbent polymer (SAP) microspheres.

Patients and methods

Patients with neuroendocrine liver metastases who underwent hepatic transarterial chemoembolization using doxorubicin-eluting SAP-microspheres (50–100 μm Hepasphere/Quadrasphere Microsphere® particles, Merit Medical, South Jordan, Utah, USA) were included in this study. Pre-and post-procedure imaging studies were evaluated to assess short and intermediate-term tumour response using modified RECIST criteria. Symptom relief and procedure-related complications were evaluated.

Results

A total of 27 embolization procedures were performed on 17 patients. Twelve of 17 patients (70%) were symptomatic, including carcinoid syndrome (n = 8) and severe, uncontrollable hypoglycemia (n = 4). Eight of 12 patients (67%) had complete symptom relief, and the remaining 4 (33%) had partial relief. One patient developed ischemic cholecystitis (6%). No other hepatobiliary complications occurred. Short-term and intermediate-term imaging follow-up was available for 15/17 patients (88%) and 12/14 patients (86%) respectively. At short-term follow-up (< 3 months), 14 patients (93%) showed partial response and the remaining patient had progressive disease (7%). At intermediate-term imaging follow-up (> 3 months), partial response, stable disease and progressive disease were found respectively in 7 (58%), 3 (25%) and 2 (17%) patients.

Conclusions

Chemoembolization with doxorubicin-eluting SAP-microspheres is a safe and effective treatment option for neuroendocrine liver metastases and is associated with a low complication rate. In particular, no clinically evident liver necrosis or bile duct complications were encountered.

Selective internal radiation therapy for the treatment of inoperable neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases

Neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases are commonly present at the time of neuroendocrine tumor diagnosis. Surgical resection is potentially curative and achieves the best long-term results but is not feasible in many patients. Angiographic liver-directed treatment modalities such as transarterial embolization, transarterial chemoembolization and selective internal radiotherapy using Yttrium-90 ([90]Y)-labeled microspheres have been shown to be effective treatments with liver predominant disease. Here, we review the management of neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases including selective internal radiotherapy.

Liver Ablation: Best Practice

Tumor ablation in the liver has evolved to become a well-accepted tool in the management of increasing complex oncologic patients. At present, percutaneous ablation is considered first-line therapy for very early and early hepatocellular carcinoma and second-line therapy for colorectal carcinoma liver metastasis. Because thermal ablation is a treatment option for other primary and secondary liver tumors, an understanding of the underlying tumor biology is important when weighing the potential benefits of ablation. This article reviews ablation modalities, indications, patient selection, and imaging surveillance, and emphasizes technique-specific considerations for the performance of percutaneous ablation.

Hepatic-directed Therapies in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract have a propensity for producing hepatic metastases. Most GI NETs arise from the foregut or midgut, are malignant, and can cause severe debilitating symptoms adversely affecting quality of life. Aggressive treatments to reduce symptoms have an important role in therapy. Patients with GI NETs usually present with inoperable metastatic disease and severe symptoms from a variety of hormones and biogenic amines. This article describes intra-arterial hepatic-directed therapies for metastases from NETs, a group of treatments in which the therapeutic and/or embolic agents are released intra-arterially in specific hepatic vessels to target tumors.

Locoregional therapy and systemic cetuximab to treat colorectal liver metastases

AIM: To investigate efficacy and safety of second-line treatment with irinotecan-loaded drug-eluting beads (DEBIRI) and cetuximab (DEBIRITUX) of unresectable colorectal liver metastases.

METHODS: Patients with the following characteristics were included in the study: unresectable hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma (CRC-LM), progression after first line chemotherapy (any type of chemotherapeutic drug and combination was allowed), second line treatment (mandatory), which included for each patient (unregarding the KRas status) two cycles of DEBIRI (using 100-300 μm beads loaded with irinotecan at a total dose 200 mg) followed by 12 cycles of cetuximab that was administered weekly at a first dose of 400 mg/m² and then 250 mg/m²; good performance status (0-2) and liver functionality (alanine aminotransferase and gamma-glutamyl transferase not exceeding three times the upper limit of normal, total bilirubin not exceeding 2.5 mg/mL). Data were collected retrospectively and included: tumor response (evaluated monthly for 6 mo then every 3 mo), overall response rate (ORR), KRas status, type and intensity of adverse events (G according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0, CTCAE), overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS).

RESULTS: Forty consecutive cases of CRC hepatic metastases were included in the study. Median duration of DEBIRITUX was 4.4 mo (range, 4.0-6.5). Sixteen patients (40%) received the planned 2 cycles of DEBIRI and an average of 10 cetuximab cycles. ORR of the whole sample was 50%, in particular 4 patients were complete responders (10%) and 16 (40%) partial responders. The most observed side effects (G2) were: post-embolization syndrome (30%), diarrhea (25%), skin rushes (38%) and asthenia (35%). The retrospective evaluation of KRas status (24 wild type, 16 mutated) showed that the group of patients with wild type KRas had ORR significantly higher than mutant KRas. Median follow-up was 29 mo (8-48 range); median PFS was 9.8 mo and OS was 20.4 mo. Future randomized trials are required in this setting to establish a role for DEBIRITUX compared with systemic chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION: DEBIRITUX seems to be efficacious after first line chemotherapy for the treatment of unresectable CRC-LM.

GEP-NETS update: Interventional radiology: role in the treatment of liver metastases from GEP-NETs

Neuroendocrine tumors from gastro-pancreatic origin (GEP-NET) can be responsible for liver metastases. Such metastases can be the dominant part of the disease as well due to the tumor burden itself or the symptoms related to such liver metastases. Intra-arterial therapies are commonly used in liver only or liver-dominant disease and encompass trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE), trans-arterial embolization (TAE), and radioembolization (RE). TACE performed with drug emulsified in Lipiodol has been used for the past 20 years with reported overall survival in the range of 3-4 years, with objective response up to 75%. Response to TACE is higher when treatment is used as a first-line therapy and degree of liver involvement is lower. Benefit of TACE over TAE is unproven in randomized study, but reported in retrospective studies namely in pancreatic NETs. RE provides early interesting results that need to be further evaluated in terms of benefit and toxicity. Radiofrequency ablation allows control of small size and numbered liver metastases, with low invasiveness. Ideal metastases to target are one metastasis <5 cm, or three metastases <3 cm, or a sum of diameter of all metastases below 8 cm. Ablation therapies can be applied in the lung or in the bones when needed, and more invasive surgery should be probably saved for large-size metastases. Even if the indication of image-guided therapy in the treatment of GEP-NET liver metastases needs to be refined, such therapies allow for manageable invasive set of treatments able to address oligometastatic patients in liver, lung, and bones. These treatments applied locally will save the benefit and the toxicity of systemic therapy for more advanced stage of the disease.

Liver-directed therapy for neuroendocrine liver metastases

Abstract: 

Neuroendocrine tumors are relatively uncommon neoplasms presenting with a wide spectrum of clinical behavior. Many patients may present with or develop liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumors, which significantly influences prognosis and the potential for symptoms. Data suggest that some patients may have symptomatic relief and oncologic benefit from liver-directed therapy for neuroendocrine tumor metastases. Surgical resection, tumor ablation, transarterial therapy such as bland embolization, chemoembolization and radioembolization, as well as liver transplantation have been studied as liver-directed therapies. Data continue to emerge to help guide selection of treatment modality for an individual patient. The spectrum of behavior of neuroendocrine metastases and heterogeneity in the literature are a challenge to arriving at cohesive recommendations for all patients.

Current status of Interventional Radiology in the management of Gastro-Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours (GEP-NETs)

Within the group of Gastro-Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NETs), several heterogeneous malignancies are included with a variety of clinical manifestations and imaging characteristics. Often these cases are inoperable and minimal invasive treatment offered by image-guided procedures appears to be the only option. Interventional radiology offers a valid solution in the management of primary and metastatic GEP-NETs. The purpose of this review article is to describe the current status of the role of Interventional Radiology in the management of GEP-NETs.

Transarterial chemoembolization and yittrium-90 for liver cancer and other lesions

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the recommended treatment of intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Radioembolization with yttrium 90 has overcome the shortcomings of external beam radiation in the treatment of liver cancer. TACE and radioembolization have led to encouraging response, survival, and quality of life outcomes, with reduced toxicity profiles. This result has led to the use of these therapies in patients with hepatic metastases, most commonly from colorectal cancer. This article reviews the current state of the practice of TACE and radioembolization and presents recent scientific data that support their role in the treatment of HCC and hepatic metastatic disease.

Therapeutic strategies for neuroendocrine liver metastases

Patients who have neuroendocrine tumors frequently present with liver metastases. A wide panel of treatment options exists for these patients. Liver resection with curative intent achieves the best long-term results. Highly selected patients may be considered for liver transplantation. Substantial recurrence rates reported after surgical approaches call for neoadjuvant and adjuvant concepts. Liver-directed, locally ablative procedures are recommended for patients with limited, nonresectable tumor burden. Angiographic liver-directed techniques, such as transarterial embolization, transarterial chemoembolization, and selective internal radiotherapy, offer excellent palliation for patients with liver-predominant disease. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy is a promising palliative procedure for patients with hepatic and/or extrahepatic metastases. The efficacy of these treatment options needs to be evaluated in randomized trials. Somatostatin analogues have demonstrated effectiveness not only for symptomatic relief in patients with secreting tumors but also for the control of proliferation in small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors and most recently also in those originating from the pancreas. Chemotherapy is an option mainly for those with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and high-grade tumors irrespective of the origin. Novel drugs targeting specific pathways within the tumor cell have produced improved progression-free survival compared with placebo in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Despite such a diverse armamentarium, there is uncertainty with regard to the optimal treatment regimens. Newly introduced molecular-based markers, along with the conduction of clinical trials comparing the efficacy of treatment modalities, offer a chance to move the treatment of neuroendocrine tumor disease toward personalized patient care. In this report, the authors review the approaches for treatment of neuroendocrine liver metastases, identify shortcomings, and anticipate future perspectives. Furthermore, clinical practice recommendations are provided for currently available treatment options. Although multiple modalities are available for the treatment of neuroendocrine liver metastases, optimal management is unclear. The current knowledge pertaining to these treatment options is analyzed.

Rationale of transcatheter intra-arterial therapies of hepatic cancers

Transcatheter, intra-arterial therapies for primary and metastatic hepatic malignancies comprise angiographically guided procedures that provide for the administration of tumoricidal agents directly to liver tumors. These locoregional therapies have demonstrated encouraging clinical outcomes for liver tumors that are otherwise not amenable or not responsive to standard surgical or systemic treatments. This article provides a review of transcatheter therapies for hepatic cancers and reported clinical outcomes.

Management of patients with hepatic metastases from neuroendocrine tumors

Neuroendocrine tumors have a disposition toward metastasis to the liver. A range of treatment modalities for neuroendocrine liver metastases is available in the clinical arena, the indications for which depend on tumor characteristics such as patterns of metastasis, tumor grade, and anatomical origin. The complete surgical resection of liver deposits represents the only option with the intent to cure and is the gold standard approach, whereas cytoreductive resection (debulking) presents another surgical option aiming to ameliorate the symptoms and prolong survival. Liver transplantation is generally an accepted option for highly selected patients. For patients ineligible for radical surgery, liver-directed therapies-transarterial embolization/chemoembolization, selective internal radiotherapy, and local tumor ablation-present alternative strategies. Systemic therapies include peptide receptor radiotherapy, somatostatin analogues, cytotoxic chemotherapeutics, and novel molecularly targeted drugs. However, despite the variety of treatments available, there exists little evidence to guide optimal clinical practice with currently available data predominantly retrospective in nature. In this review, we discuss the diagnostic procedures that influence the trajectory of treatment of patients with neuroendocrine liver metastases before critically appraising the evidence pertaining to these therapeutic strategies.

Intra-arterial liver-directed therapies for neuroendocrine hepatic metastases

Hepatic metastases, which are frequently seen in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), have a major adverse impact on the patient's quality of life and survival. Surgery is the treatment of choice for hepatic metastases but is possible in only a small percentage of patients. Systemic chemotherapy yields disappointing results. Somatostatin analogs are effective in controlling symptoms in many of these patients; however, the disease can become refractory to treatment. Transcatheter intra-arterial liver-directed therapies, such as hepatic artery embolization, chemoembolization, and radioembolization are frequently used in patients with NETs metastatic to the liver, especially in patients with refractory, unresectable, or recurrent disease. These treatments are effective in palliating the hormonal symptoms as well as achieving objective tumor responses. This review focuses on the technique, safety, and clinical efficacy of hepatic artery embolization, chemoembolization, and radioembolization in patients with metastatic NETs.

Surgery for GEP-NETs

Surgery is the only treatment that may cure the patient with gastroentero-pancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumours (NET) and neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) and should always be considered as first line treatment if R0/R1 resection can be achieved. The surgical and interventional procedures for GEP-NET are accordingly described below. Life-long follow-up should be performed in almost all patients at a specialized NET center.

Embolization of liver tumors: Past, present and future

Curative therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), such as resection and liver transplantation, can only be applied in selected patients with early tumors. More advanced stages require local or systemic therapies. Resection of HCC offers the only hope for cure. Even in patients undergoing resection, recurrences are common. Chemoembolization, a technique combining intra-arterial chemotherapy with selective tumor ischemia, has been shown by randomized controlled trials to be efficacious in the palliative setting. There is now renewed interest in transarterial embolization/transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with regards to its use as a palliative tool in a combined modality approach, as a neoadjuvant therapy, in bridging therapy before transplantation, for symptomatic indications, and even as an alternative to resection. There have also been rapid advances in the agents being embolized trans-arterially (genes, biological response modifiers, etc.). The current review provides an evidence-based overview of the past, present and future trends of TACE in patients with HCC.

Radioembolization and chemoembolization for unresectable neuroendocrine liver metastases - a systematic review

This review examines the clinical efficacy and safety of the use of hepatic arterial chemoembolization, bland embolization and radioembolization in the treatment of unresectable neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases (NETLM). Response to treatment, survival outcome and toxicity were examined in this review of 37 studies comprising 1575 patients. These therapies are safe and effective in the treatment of NETLM. Prospective clinical trials to compare the relative efficacy and toxicity are warranted.

Phase II study of chemoembolization with drug-eluting beads in patients with hepatic neuroendocrine metastases: high incidence of biliary injury

PURPOSE

To evaluate safety in an interim analysis of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with doxorubicin-eluting beads (DEB) in 13 patients with hepatic metastases from neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) as part of a phase II trial.

METHODS

Institutional Review Board approval and informed consent were obtained. Thirteen patients completed preliminary safety analysis. Their mean age was 65 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status was 0/1, tumor burden range was 4-75 %, and mean targeted tumor size was 5.9 cm. Up to four DEB-TACE sessions (100-300 μm beads loaded with ≤100 mg doxorubicin) within 6 months were allowed. Tumor response was assessed by magnetic resonance imaging 1 month after treatment using contrast-enhancement [European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) and size Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)] criteria. Safety was assessed by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria.

RESULTS

DEB-TACE was successfully performed in all 13 patients. At 1 month follow-up, there was a mean 12 % decrease in tumor size (p < 0.0003) and a 56 % decrease in tumor enhancement (p < 0.0001). By EASL criteria, the targeted lesion objective response rate was 78 %. Grade 3 to 4 toxicities were fatigue (23 %), increased alanine amino transferase (15 %), hyperglycemia (15 %), and abdominal pain (8 %). Seven patients developed bilomas (54 %); all of these patients had multiple small (<4 cm) lesions. Subsequently, four underwent percutaneous drainage, three for abscess formation and one for symptoms related to mass effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Although biloma and liver abscess are known risks after TACE, the high incidence in our study population was unexpected and forced interruption of the trial. Although this occurred in a small group of patients, we have changed our technique and patient selection as a result of these findings, thus allowing resumption of the trial.

Liver-directed therapies in liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumors of the gastrointestinal tract

Presence of liver metastases in neuroendocrine tumors is a major factor altering both quality of life and prognosis. Surgery is recognized as the sole curative treatment. When it is not possible, radiological directed therapies are crucial, particularly in liver metastases from the small bowel. Thermal ablative therapies as radiofrequency ablation and microwave are alternative treatments alone or in combination with surgery. Hepatic artery embolization or chemoembolization, as radioembolization, has been shown to have good clinical, biochemical, and morphological responses when liver burden does not permit ablative therapies. However, technical issues are multiple and there is no randomized study to compare their efficacy. The choice of management depends on liver burden and metastases pattern, but also on origin of the primary tumor, tumor differentiation, and tumor proliferative activity. These patients should benefit of a multidisciplinary management to limit morbidity and mortality.

Liver/biliary injuries following chemoembolisation of endocrine tumours and hepatocellular carcinoma: lipiodol vs. drug-eluting beads

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) is usually performed by injecting an emulsion of a drug and iodised oil. Drug-eluting beads (DEBs) have undeniable pharmacological advantages by offering simultaneous embolisation and sustained release of the drug to the tumour. No data are currently available on liver/biliary injury following DEB-TACE. This study describes and compares liver/biliary injuries encountered with TACE in tumours developed in cirrhotic (hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)) and non-cirrhotic (endocrine tumours (NETs)) livers.

METHODS

In consecutive patients treated for a well-differentiated metastatic NET (n=120) or a HCC (n=88), 684 CT- and MR-scans were analysed. Liver/biliary injuries were classified as follows: dilated bile duct, portal vein narrowing, portal venous thrombosis and biloma/liver infarct. A generalised estimating equation logistic regression model was used.

RESULTS

A liver/biliary injury followed 17.2% (82/476) of sessions in 30.8% (64/208) of patients. The occurrence of liver/biliary injury was associated with DEB-TACE (OR=6.63; p<0.001) irrespectively of the tumour type. Biloma/parenchymal infarct was strongly associated with both DEB-TACE (OR=9.78; p=0.002) and NETs (OR: 8.13; p=0.04). Biloma/liver infarcts were managed conservatively but were associated with an increase in serum levels of aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatases, and gamma glutamyl transpeptidase (p=0.005, p=0.005, p=0.012, and p=0.006, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Liver/biliary injuries are independently associated with DEB-TACE. Biloma/liver infarct, the most serious injury, is independently associated with both DEB-TACE and NETs. The absence of such an association in TACE of HCC may be explained by the hypertrophied peribiliary plexus observed in cirrhosis, which protects against the ischemic/chemical insult of bile ducts. We suggest caution when using DEB-TACE in the non-cirrhotic liver.

New treatment strategies in advanced neuroendocrine tumours

Malignant well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours of the pancreas and the gastrointestinal tract are rare and clinically challenging heterogeneous neoplasms. This review focuses on neuroendocrine tumours grade 1 and grade 2 (new WHO classification 2010), in comparison to the neuroendocrine tumours grade 3 group, corresponding to poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas. Surgical resection of the primary and metastases remains the only curative treatment, however many patients with neuroendocrine tumours are diagnosed once unresectable metastases have occurred; management of functioning syndromes with somatostatin analogues remains the priority. Pasireotide, a new somatostatin analogue, is currently undergoing evaluation for carcinoid syndrome. Treatment options for advanced neuroendocrine tumours differ from pancreatic gastrointestinal tract neuroendocrine tumours: (a) in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours, streptozotocin-based chemotherapies are challenged by other cytotoxic agents (dacarbazine, temozolomide and oxaliplatin); two randomized, placebo-controlled phase III studies have demonstrated that everolimus and sunitinib significantly improved progression-free-survival; (b) in midgut neuroendocrine tumours, octreotide improved time-to-progression in patients with a low proliferation index and low liver burden; preliminary data suggesting efficacy of bevacizumab are still to be confirmed; the effect of everolimus associated with octreotide was almost significant on progression-free-survival in a phase III trial. Liver-directed therapies are effective in both tumour types. New techniques of embolization need further evaluation and must be formally compared to other therapies. Finally, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy has shown promising activity in non-comparative studies in advanced neuroendocrine tumours.

Hepatic arterial embolization for the treatment of metastatic neuroendocrine tumors

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) have a high predilection for metastasizing to the liver and can cause severe debilitating symptoms adversely affecting quality of life. Although surgery remains the treatment of choice, many liver metastases are inoperable at presentation. Hepatic arterial embolization procedures take advantage of the arterial supply of NET metastases. The goals of these therapies are twofold: to increase overall survival by stabilizing tumor growth, and to reduce the morbidity in symptomatic patients. Patients treated with hepatic arterial embolization demonstrate longer progression-free survival and have 5-year survival rates of nearly 30%. The safety of repeat embolizations has also been proven in the setting of recurrent symptoms or progression of the disease. Despite not being curative, hepatic arterial embolization should be used in the management of NETs with liver metastases. Long-term survival is not uncommon, making aggressive palliation of symptoms an important component of treatment.