Can 1H MR Spectroscopy be Used to Assess the Success of Uterine Artery Embolisation?

Choice of primary and secondary outcomes in randomised controlled trials evaluating treatment for uterine fibroids: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Core outcome sets aim to reduce research heterogeneity and standardise reporting, allowing meaningful comparisons between studies.

OBJECTIVES

To report on outcomes used in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating uterine fibroid treatments, towards the development of a core outcome set for fibroid research.

SELECTION STRATEGY

Database search of MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE and CINAHL (inception to July 2021) for all English-language RCTs involving surgical or radiological fibroid treatments.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

A total of 1885 texts were screened for eligibility by two reviewers independently according to PRISMA methodology. JADAD and Management of Otitis Media with Effusion in Cleft Palate (MOMENT) scores were used to assess methodological and outcome reporting quality of studies, respectively. Outcomes were mapped to nine domains. Non-parametric tests for correlation and to compare group medians were undertaken.

MAIN RESULTS

There were 23 primary outcomes (23 outcome measures) and 173 secondary outcomes (95 outcome measures) reported in 60 RCTs (5699 participants). The domains with highest frequency of primary outcomes reported were bleeding and quality of life (QoL). The most frequent primary outcomes were postoperative pain, QoL and menstrual bleeding. No primary outcomes were mapped to fertility domains. Median MOMENT outcome score was 5 (interquartile range 3). There was correlation between MOMENT outcome score and JADAD scores (r = 0.491, P = 0.0001), publishing journal impact factor (r = 0.419, P = 0.008) and publication year (r = 0.332, P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

There is substantial variation in the outcomes reported in fibroid RCTs. There is a need for a core outcome set for fibroid research, to allow improved understanding regarding the effects of different treatments.

Randomised trial of two embolic agents for uterine artery embolisation for fibroids: Gelfoam versus Embospheres (RAGE trial)

Background

Uterine artery embolisation (UAE) is an established treatment option for women with symptomatic uterine fibroids who wish to avoid surgery. However the most efficacious embolic agent remains uncertain.

Methods

We conducted a pilot double blind randomized controlled trial comparing Gelfoam with Embospheres in women undergoing UAE. Outcomes recorded at baseline, 24-h, 1 and 6 months included complications, inflammatory, haematological markers and ovarian function. Contrast enhanced MRI (CEMRI) was acquired at baseline, 24-h and 6 months. Pain score (visual analogue) was measured at 24-h, quality of life (UFS-Qol) at baseline, 1 and 6 months. All patients were followed to 6 months.

Results

Twenty patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either Gelfoam (G) or Embospheres (E). The UFS-Qol symptom score improved in both groups at 6 months mean of 64 ± 18 to 23 ± 16 and 54 ± 15 to 32 ± 26 in the E and G groups respectively. UFS-Qol HRQL also improved in both groups at 6 months, mean 41 ± 28 to 79 ± 20 and 53 ± 19 to 78 ± 21 in the E and G groups respectively.

Uterine volume at 6 months reduced from 1018 ± 666mls to 622 ± 436 (p = 0.001) and from 1026 ± 756 to 908 ± 720 (p = 0.15) in the E and G groups respectively. There was a significant difference between groups for this parameter p = 0.01. All uterine arteries were patent at 24-h and 6 months. Complete (100%) fibroid infarction rates were 5(50%) and 2(20%) in the E and G groups respectively. None of the other outcome measures showed any between group differences. There were no re-interventions in either group.

Conclusion

The only significant between group differences was for a greater reduction in uterine volume at 6 months in the E group. A larger trial (estimate 172 subjects) is required to determine whether other apparent differences are clinically and statistically significant.

Trial registration

ISRCTN67347987

Tris-acryl gelatin microspheres versus gelatin sponge particles in uterine artery embolization for leiomyoma

Background

Tris-acryl gelatin microspheres (TAGM) and gelatin sponge particles (GS) have been used in uterine artery embolization (UAE) for leiomyoma. No direct comparisons of both embolic agents have been reported.

Purpose

To compare the outcomes of UAE with TAGM with those of UAE with GS for uterine leiomyoma.

Material and Methods

This was a non-randomized, single-institute, non-inferiority study. Between July 2008 and August 2015, 67 consecutive patients with symptomatic leiomyoma underwent UAE. GS was used for the first 49 patients and TAGM was used for the following 18 patients. The primary endpoint was tumor infarction on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) 1 week after UAE. The secondary endpoints were changes in symptoms and quality-of-life scores with UFS-QOL questionnaires at 4 months, and adverse events (AEs) in the 4 months after UAE.

Results

The baseline characteristics of both groups were similar. Complete or nearly complete tumor infarction (≥90%) was achieved in 94.4% (17/18) of the TAGM group and 93.6% (44/47) of the GS group. This difference (0.8%; 95% CI, –11.9% to 13.5%) indicated the non-inferiority of the TAGM group to the GS group, with a pre-specified non-inferiority margin of 20%. No significant differences were observed in improvements in symptoms or quality-of-life scores at 4 months ( P = 0.56 and P = 0.19) or in 4-month AEs ( P = 0.29).

Conclusion

The outcomes of UAE with TAGM were comparable to those of UAE with GS, suggesting that both embolic agents are acceptable for the treatment of leiomyoma.