The European Board of Interventional Radiology Examination: A Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey

Medical specialty certification exams studied according to the Ottawa Quality Criteria: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Medical specialty certification exams are high-stakes summative assessments used to determine which doctors have the necessary skills, knowledge, and attitudes to treat patients independently. Such exams are crucial for patient safety, candidates' career progression and accountability to the public, yet vary significantly among medical specialties and countries. It is therefore of paramount importance that the quality of specialty certification exams is studied in the scientific literature.

METHODS

In this systematic literature review we used the PICOS framework and searched for papers concerning medical specialty certification exams published in English between 2000 and 2020 in seven databases using a diverse set of search term variations. Papers were screened by two researchers independently and scored regarding their methodological quality and relevance to this review. Finally, they were categorized by country, medical specialty and the following seven Ottawa Criteria of good assessment: validity, reliability, equivalence, feasibility, acceptability, catalytic and educational effect.

RESULTS

After removal of duplicates, 2852 papers were screened for inclusion, of which 66 met all relevant criteria. Over 43 different exams and more than 28 different specialties from 18 jurisdictions were studied. Around 77% of all eligible papers were based in English-speaking countries, with 55% of publications centered on just the UK and USA. General Practice was the most frequently studied specialty among certification exams with the UK General Practice exam having been particularly broadly analyzed. Papers received an average of 4.2/6 points on the quality score. Eligible studies analyzed 2.1/7 Ottawa Criteria on average, with the most frequently studied criteria being reliability, validity, and acceptability.

CONCLUSIONS

The present systematic review shows a growing number of studies analyzing medical specialty certification exams over time, encompassing a wider range of medical specialties, countries, and Ottawa Criteria. Due to their reliance on multiple assessment methods and data-points, aspects of programmatic assessment suggest a promising way forward in the development of medical specialty certification exams which fulfill all seven Ottawa Criteria. Further research is needed to confirm these results, particularly analyses of examinations held outside the Anglosphere as well as studies analyzing entire certification exams or comparing multiple examination methods.

Complications in Interventional Radiology: the role of clinical governance and iterative hospital systems in quality improvement

As modern Interventional Radiology (IR) evolves, and expands in scope and complexity, it will push the boundaries of existing literature. However, with all intervention comes risk and it is the shared judgement of the risk-benefit analysis which underpins the ethical and legal principles of care in IR.Complications in medicine are common, said to occur in 9.2% of in-hospital healthcare interactions. Healthcare complications also come at considerable cost. It is estimated that in the UK, prolonging hospital stays to manage complications can cost ₤2 billion per year.However, complications can't be viewed in isolation. Clinical governance is the umbrella within which complications are viewed. It can be defined as a broadly integrated and systematic approach to clinical care and accountability, that seeks to focus on quality of healthcare. This concept incorporates complications but acknowledges their interplay within a complex healthcare system in which negative adverse events are influenced by a range of intrinsic and extrinsic factors. It also includes the processes that result from monitoring and learning from complications, with feedback leading to systems-based improvements in care moving forward. The reality is that complications are uncommonly the result of medical negligence, but rather they are an unfortunate by-product of a healthcare industry with inherent risk.It is also important to remember that complications are not just a number on an audit sheet, but a potentially life-changing event for every patient that is affected. The events that follow immediately from an adverse outcome such as open disclosure are vital, and have implications for how that patient experiences healthcare and trusts healthcare professionals for the rest of their life. We must ensure that the patient and their family maintain trust in healthcare professionals into the future.Credentialling and accreditation are imperative for Interventional Radiologists to meet existing standards as well deal with challenging situations. These should integrate and align within the structure of an organization that has a safety and learning culture. It is the many layers of organisational clinical governance that arguably play the most important role in IR-related complications, rather than apportioning blame to an individual IR.

Implementation of the Clinically Oriented Reasoning Evaluation: Impact on the European Diploma in Radiology (EDiR) exam

The aim of the study is to perform an analysis of the results that have been compiled in the nine years that the examination has existed.

Analysis of the French national evaluation of radiology residents

PURPOSE

In France, a national evaluation is given annually to radiology residents. The aim of this study was to perform both a docimological analysis of the quality of the questionnaire and a statistical analysis of the results.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study, which included French radiology residents from Year 1 to Year 5 of residency, was performed from 2015 to 2017 across 25 medical universities in France. Both qualitative and quantitative docimological analyses were performed as assessed by the Cronbach alpha coefficient, the difficulty of question (PDI), and the coefficient of discrimination (Rir). Results to the questionnaire were compared between years of residency.

RESULTS

The results of the analysis confirmed the quality of the questionnaire (Cronbach alpha coefficient=0.71, mean [PDI=0.40]) though the majority of questions could be answered by memory rather than cognitive ability. The mean Rir was 0.02, indicating that students could not be certified using only the questionnaire. The results measuring resident level of knowledge were moderate, with mean results ranging from 9.2/20 at the first year to 11.3/20 at the fifth year of residency (P<0.001). There were no significant differences in results obtained between the third, fourth, and fifth year of residency but results were significantly different among university hospitals.

CONCLUSION

Even if close interactions exist between learning and pedagogic environment, our results suggest that it may be useful to further develop an evaluation process in relation with pedagogic instructions in order to provide more optimal training.