Incidence of Post-ablation Syndrome Following Image-Guided Percutaneous Cryoablation of Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Prospective Study

Evaluation of paravertebral blocks in improving post-procedural pain and decreasing hospital admission after microwave ablation of liver tumors

Although ablations are performed with conscious sedation or general anesthesia, microwave ablations can be painful post procedure. Newer analgesic modalities, including regional blocks, have promoted the proliferation of less invasive anesthesia care for ablative procedures. This study evaluates whether bilateral paravertebral blocks reduce the need for additional analgesics in comparison to unilateral blocks in microwave ablations. In this retrospective study, individuals undergoing microwave ablation who underwent unilateral versus bilateral nerve blocks at a single institution from 2017 to 2019 were compared. Categorical variables were analyzed using Pearson's chi-squared tests. Comparisons of means were completed using multiple T-tests corrected using the Holm-Sidak method with α = 0.05. Regression modeling was used to identify factors related to increased MME (milligram morphine equivalent) usage and post-procedure admission rates. A total of 106 patients undergoing 112 liver MWA procedures were included in this analysis, with patients receiving either a bilateral or unilateral block. Pre-procedural characteristics demonstrated no significant differences in age or gender. Bilateral blocks were associated with decreased usage of gabapentin (14% vs. 0%, p = 0.01) and a lower rate of post-procedure admissions (OR 0.23, p = 0.003). Therefore, when using paravertebral blocks, bilateral blocks are superior to unilateral blocks, as demonstrated by decreased rates of hospital admission and reduced use of systemic neuropathic pain medication. Additionally, reducing post-procedural MME may reduce the rate of admission to the hospital.

In-situ tumor vaccination by percutaneous ablative therapy and its synergy with immunotherapeutics: An update on combination therapy

Percutaneous tumor ablation is now a widely accepted minimally invasive local treatment option offered by interventional radiology and applied to various organs and tumor histology types. It utilizes extreme temperatures to achieve irreversible cellular injury, where ablated tumor interacts with surrounding tissue and host via tissue remodeling and inflammation, clinically manifesting as post-ablation syndrome. During this process, in-situ tumor vaccination occurs, in which tumor neoantigens are released from ablated tissue and can prime one’s immune system which would favorably affect both local and remote site disease control. Although successful in priming the immune system, this rarely turns into clinical benefits for local and systemic tumor control due to intrinsic negative immune modulation of the tumor microenvironment. A combination of ablation and immunotherapy has been employed to overcome these and has shown promising preliminary results of synergistic effect without significantly increased risk profiles. The aim of this article is to review the evidence on post-ablation immune response and its synergy with systemic immunotherapies.

Percutaneous cryoablation combined with prior transcatheter arterial embolization for renal cell carcinomas of 3 cm or larger: a prospective study

BACKGROUND

We prospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy of percutaneous cryoablation combined with transcatheter renal arterial embolization for the treatment of tumors ≥ 3 cm in diameter.

METHODS

We included patients aged ≥ 20 years with histologically proven renal cell carcinoma with a tumor diameter ≥ 3 cm who were inoperable or refused surgery. Prior to ablation, transcatheter arterial embolization was performed using a mixture of absolute ethanol and iodized oil. All cryoablation procedures were performed percutaneously under computed tomography fluoroscopy guidance. The primary endpoint was safety, which was evaluated for adverse events using CTCAE version 4.0. The secondary endpoint was survival; overall survival, progression-free survival, and cancer-specific survival were calculated.

RESULTS

From October 2013 to March 2016, 19 patients (mean age, 75 ± 13 years; 5 women, 14 men) were prospectively enrolled. The mean tumor diameter was 3.9 ± 0.7 (range 3.1-5.3) cm. Four grade 3 hematologic adverse events occurred, while no symptomatic grade ≥ 3 events occurred. The median follow-up period was 68 (range 52-84) months. During the follow-up period, two patients developed local tumor progression at 3 and 42 months after the initial ablative procedure; no patient showed distant metastasis. Two patients died from causes other than RCC. Overall survival, progression-free survival, and cause-specific survival were 100%, 95%, and 100% at 3 years, and 95%, 84%, and 100% at 5 years, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous cryoablation combined with prior TAE for the treatment of tumors ≥ 3 cm in diameter was safe and achieved favorable survival.

Percutaneous ablation techniques for renal cell carcinoma: current status and future trends

Percutaneous ablation is an increasingly applied technique for the treatment of localized renal tumors, especially for elderly or co-morbid patients, where co-morbidities increase the risk of traditional nephrectomy. Ablative techniques are technically suited for the treatment of tumors generally not exceeding 4 cm, which has been set as general consensus cutoff and is described as the upper threshold of T1a kidney tumors. This threshold cutoff is being challenged, but with still limited evidence. Percutaneous ablation techniques for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) include radiofrequency ablation, cryoablation, laser or microwave ablation; the main advantage of all these techniques over surgery is less invasiveness, lower complication rates and better patient tolerability. Currently, international guidelines recommend percutaneous ablation either as intervention for frail patients or as a first line tool, provided that the tumor can be radically ablated. The purpose of this article is to describe the basic concepts of percutaneous ablation in the treatment of RCC. Controversies concerning techniques and products and the need for patient-centered tailored approaches during selection among the different techniques available will be discussed.

Active surveillance and focal ablation for small renal masses: a better solution for comorbid patients

The natural history of small renal masses (SRM) is still not well understood and they are frequently incidentally diagnosed in elderly patients. Therefore, there is a need for less invasive options sparing the patient from the side-effects related to conventional surgical treatment. PubMed and Medline database search was performed to look for new findings on active surveillance and focal therapy for SRM. Sixty-one articles published between 2002 and 2018 were selected for the purpose of the review. There is growing evidence confirming the safety of active surveillance in patients at surgical risk and there appears to be a satisfactory intermediate-term outcome of focal treatment of SRM. In the group of elderly patients with a decreased life expectancy active surveillance appears to be the most appropriate approach. The future of minimally invasive therapy appears bright, especially with the improvement of new imaging modalities.