Monitoring Liver Function of Patients Undergoing Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE) by a 13C Breath Test (LiMAx)

Peri-interventional LiMAx test for liver ablation - A feasibility study

BACKGROUND

Local ablation is an important treatment for liver cancer in cases of cirrhosis. Liver failure may occur after ablation, especially in advanced liver diseases. Currently, there is no standardization for peri-interventional risk assessment. The liver maximum capacity test (LiMAx) is used to assess functional liver capacity, but there is a lack of exploration of its use in this context.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the usefulness of peri-interventional LiMAx measurements in patients with primary or secondary liver cancer who underwent ablation treatment.

METHODS

A LiMAx test was performed at 24 hours pre- and postablation in 49 patients. Blood parameters were collected to determine liver function using MELD and ALBI scores. The results of the LiMAx test were related with these scores and to critical postintervention LiMAx values.

RESULTS

LiMAx values correlated strongly with MELD and ALBI scores before the intervention and reflected the change in liver function, as shown by an increase in scores after the intervention. Notably, LiMAx values decreased during the intervention. AUC analysis for patients at risk of reaching a critical liver level after the intervention showed a cutoff value of 186μg/kg/h.

CONCLUSIONS

The LiMAx test may be a valuable tool in liver ablation for both peri-interventional monitoring of liver function and preintervention risk assessment.

Liver Function-How to Screen and to Diagnose: Insights from Personal Experiences, Controlled Clinical Studies and Future Perspectives

Acute and chronic liver disease is a relevant problem worldwide. Liver function plays a crucial role in the course of liver diseases not only in estimating prognosis but also with regard to therapeutic interventions. Within this review, we discuss and evaluate different tools from screening to diagnosis and give insights from personal experiences, controlled clinical studies and future perspectives. Finally, we offer our novel diagnostic algorithm to screen patients with presumptive acute or chronic liver disease in the daily clinical routine.

13 C-Methacetin Breath Test Predicts Survival in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing Transarterial Chemoembolization

INTRODUCTION

The 13 C-methacetin breath test ( 13 C-MBT) is a dynamic method for assessing liver function. This proof-of-concept study aimed to investigate the association between 13 C-MBT values and outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).

METHODS

A total of 30 patients with HCC were prospectively recruited. Of these, 25 were included in baseline and 20 in longitudinal analysis. 13 C-MBTs were performed before the first and second TACE session. Patients were followed for at least 1 year.

RESULTS

At baseline, the median 13 C-MBT value was 261 μg/kg/hr (interquartile range 159-387). 13 C-MBT, albumin-bilirubin, Child-Pugh, and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores were associated with overall survival in extended univariable Cox regression ( 13 C-MBT: standardized hazard ratio [sHR] 0.297, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.111-0.796; albumin-bilirubin score: sHR 4.051, 95% CI 1.813-9.052; Child-Pugh score: sHR 2.616, 95% CI 1.450-4.719; Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score: sHR 2.781, 95% CI 1.356-5.703). Using a cutoff of 140 μg/kg/hr at baseline, 13 C-MBT was associated with prognosis (median overall survival 28.5 months [95% CI 0.0-57.1] vs 3.5 months [95% CI 0.0-8.1], log-rank P < 0.001). Regarding prediction of 90-day mortality after second 13 C-MBT, the relative change in 13 C-MBT values yielded an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 1.000 ( P = 0.007).

DISCUSSION

Baseline and longitudinal 13 C-MBT values predict survival of patients with HCC undergoing TACE. The relative change in 13 C-MBT values predicts short-term mortality and may assist in identifying patients who will not benefit from further TACE treatment.

LiMAx Prior to Radioembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma as an Additional Tool for Patient Selection in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis

Background and Aims: Radioembolization (RE) has recently demonstrated a non-inferior survival outcome compared to systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Therefore, current guidelines recommend RE for patients with advanced HCC and preserved liver function who are unsuitable for transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or systemic therapy. However, despite the excellent safety profile of RE, post-therapeutic hepatic decompensation remains a serious complication that is difficult to predicted by standard laboratory liver function parameters or imaging modalities. LiMAx® is a non-invasive test for liver function assessment, measuring the maximum metabolic capacity for 13C-Methacetin by the liver-specific enzyme CYP 450 1A2. Our study investigates the potential of LiMAx® for predicting post-interventional decompensation of liver function. Patients and methods: In total, 50 patients with HCC with or without liver cirrhosis and not amenable to TACE or systemic treatments were included in the study. For patients prospectively enrolled in our study, LiMAx® was carried out one day before RE (baseline) and 28 and 90 days after RE. Established liver function parameters were assessed at baseline, day 28, and day 90 after RE. The relationship between baseline LiMAx® and pre-and post-interventional liver function parameters, as well as the ability of LiMAx® to predict hepatic decompensation, were analyzed. Results: We observed a strong association between baseline LiMAx® and bilirubin, albumin, ALBI grade, and MELD score. Patients presenting with Child–Pugh score B 28 days after RE or with a deterioration in Child–Pugh score by at least one point had a significantly lower baseline LiMAx® compared to those with Child–Pugh score A or with stable Child–Pugh score. The ability of LiMAx® to predict hepatic decompensation after RE was determined using ROC curve analysis and was compared to MELD score and ALBI grade. LiMAx® achieved a substantial AUC of 0.8117, comparable to MELD score and ALBI grade. Conclusion: Patients with lower LiMAx® values at baseline have a significantly increased risk for hepatic decompensation after RE, despite being categorized as Child–Pugh A. Therefore, LiMAx® can be used as an additional tool to identify patients at high risk of post-interventional hepatic failure.

The LiMAx Test as Selection Criteria in Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery

Background: Liver failure is a crucial predictor for relevant morbidity and mortality after hepatic surgery. Hence, a good patient selection is mandatory. We use the LiMAx test for patient selection for major or minor liver resections in robotic and laparoscopic liver surgery and share our experience here. Patients and methods: We identified patients in the Magdeburg registry of minimally invasive liver surgery (MD-MILS) who underwent robotic or laparoscopic minor or major liver surgery and received a LiMAx test for preoperative evaluation of the liver function. This cohort was divided in two groups: patients with normal (LiMAx normal) and decreased (LiMAx decreased) liver function measured by the LiMAx test. Results: Forty patients were selected from the MD-MILS regarding the selection criteria (LiMAx normal, n = 22 and LiMAx decreased, n = 18). Significantly more major liver resections were performed in the LiMAx normal vs. the LiMAx decreased group (13 vs. 2; p = 0.003). Hence, the mean operation time was significantly longer in the LiMAx normal vs. the LiMAx decreased group (356.6 vs. 228.1 min; p = 0.003) and the intraoperative blood transfusion significantly higher in the LiMAx normal vs. the LiMAx decreased group (8 vs. 1; p = 0.027). There was no significant difference between the LiMAx groups regarding the length of hospital stay, intraoperative blood loss, liver surgery related morbidity or mortality, and resection margin status. Conclusion: The LiMAx test is a helpful and reliable tool to precisely determine the liver function capacity. It aids in accurate patient selection for major or minor liver resections in minimally invasive liver surgery, which consequently serves to improve patients’ safety. In this way, liver resections can be performed safely, even in patients with reduced liver function, without negatively affecting morbidity, mortality and the resection margin status, which is an important predictive oncological factor.

The Therapeutic Principle of Combined Strengthening Qi and Eliminating Pathogens in Treating Middle-Advanced Primary Liver Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The combination of strengthening Qi and eliminating pathogens is an available therapeutic principle in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) for primary liver cancer (PLC) at middle-advanced stage. However, there is a lack of reasonable evidence to support the proper application of this therapeutic principle. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Chinese medicinal formulas (CMFs), including two subgroup analyses of the principle of strengthening Qi and eliminating pathogens.

Method: Clinical trials were obtained through searching of EMBASE, Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, Chinese Scientific Journal Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, and two clinical trial registries. The randomized controlled trials with the combination of CMFs and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in the experiment group were acceptable, in contrast to the TACE alone in the control group. The statistics analysis was performed on Review Manager 5.4.

Results: A total of eligible 24 trials were accessed in this work. Overall, CMFs could improve the survival duration of 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years, Karnofsky Performance Status, tumor objective response rate (ORR), AFP, and symptom. In the subgroup analysis, trials complying with the principle of single strengthening Qi did not show any significant difference in increasing tumor ORR. Meanwhile, the principle of combined strengthening Qi and eliminating pathogens was uncertain in improving symptoms and 1-year and 2-year survival time. In addition, the outcome indexes of ALT and AST were heterogeneous. In last, the total occurrence of adverse events could not be reduced via using CMFs. Patients treated with CMFs exhibited liver injury, fever, and white blood cell decline, with mild events occurring more frequently and severe events occurring less.

Conclusion: CMFs are an effective treatment method to cure PLC at the middle-advanced stage. Adopting the principle of single strengthening Qi presents better efficacy in the long term by prolonging the survival duration. Following the principle of combined strengthening Qi and eliminating pathogens could be more beneficial to patients in short term by lessening the tumor size. CMFs have the advantage of reducing certain serious adverse events.

A Transarterial Chemoembolization of Balloon-Occluded Alternate Infusions of Cisplatin and Gelatin Particles for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Phase I/II Multicenter Prospective Study of Safety and Efficacy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a newly developed technique of balloon-occluded alternate infusions of cisplatin and gelatin particles in transarterial chemoembolization (BOAI-TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and to evaluate liver damage following BOAI-TACE.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-three patients with HCC from four medical centers were enrolled in this multicenter, prospective study. Of these, 41 patients were observed for 6 months following BOAI-TACE. The primary endpoint was the safety of BOAI-TACE, and the secondary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) of the HCCs at 2 months following treatment.

RESULTS

Three patients experienced adverse events, including one patient with facial swelling and skin rash, dissection of the celiac artery, and a bland portal vein thrombus. No major adverse events were identified. 4.9% of the patients regressed from a Child-Pugh classification of A to B. The BOAI-TACE treatment achieved a 22.0% complete response (CR) rate and a 73.2% ORR (95% confidence interval [CI]: 57.9-84.4%). In a retrospective analysis of 23 patients with HCCs above the up-to-7 criteria, the CR rate and ORR of the BOAI-TACE were 21.7% and 82.6% (95% CI: 62.3-93.6%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

BOAI-TACE is safe and effective for achieving a high ORR while preserving liver function.

Prediction of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) outcome by pre- and postinterventional 13C-methacetin breath test

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Liver function is one of the most important parameters for the outcome of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). The liver maximum capacity (LiMAx) test is a bedside test that provides a real-time option for liver function testing. The objective of this pilot study was to investigate the suitability of the LiMAX test for predicting the TACE outcome.

METHODS

20 patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) received a LiMAx test 24 h pre and post TACE. In addition, laboratory values were collected to determine liver function and model for endstage liver disease (MELD) scores. The success of TACE was assessed 6 weeks post intervention by morphological imaging tests using modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (mRECIST).

RESULTS

Patients with an objective response (OR = CR + PR) according to mRECIST post TACE had significantly higher values in the pre-interventional LiMAx test than patients with a non-OR (PD or SD) post TACE (r(14) = 0.62, p = 0.01). Higher pre-interventional LiMAx values therefore indicate OR. Patients with a disease control (DC = CR + PR + SD) according to mRECIST post TACE had significantly higher values in the pre-interventional LiMAx test than patients with a non-DC (PD) post TACE (r(14) = 0.65, p = 0.01). Higher pre-interventional LiMAx values therefore indicate DC. The point biserial correlations of LiMAx values pre and post TACE with the outcome OR or DC were descriptively stronger than those of MELD with OR or DC. This suggests that the LiMAx test correlates better with the treatment response than the MELD score.

CONCLUSIONS

For the first time, we were able to show in our study that patients who are scheduled for TACE could benefit from a LiMAx test to be able to estimate the benefit of TACE. The higher the pre-interventional LiMAx values, the higher the benefit of TACE. On the other hand, laboratory parameters summarized in the form of the MELD score had significantly less descriptive correlation with the TACE outcome.

European guideline on indications, performance and clinical impact of 13 C-breath tests in adult and pediatric patients: An EAGEN, ESNM, and ESPGHAN consensus, supported by EPC

Introduction

¹³C‐breath tests are valuable, noninvasive diagnostic tests that can be widely applied for the assessment of gastroenterological symptoms and diseases. Currently, the potential of these tests is compromised by a lack of standardization regarding performance and interpretation among expert centers.

Methods

This consensus‐based clinical practice guideline defines the clinical indications, performance, and interpretation of ¹³C‐breath tests in adult and pediatric patients. A balance between scientific evidence and clinical experience was achieved by a Delphi consensus that involved 43 experts from 18 European countries. Consensus on individual statements and recommendations was established if ≥ 80% of reviewers agreed and <10% disagreed.

Results

The guideline gives an overview over general methodology of ¹³C‐breath testing and provides recommendations for the use of ¹³C‐breath tests to diagnose Helicobacter pylori infection, measure gastric emptying time, and monitor pancreatic exocrine and liver function in adult and pediatric patients. Other potential applications of ¹³C‐breath testing are summarized briefly. The recommendations specifically detail when and how individual ¹³C‐breath tests should be performed including examples for well‐established test protocols, patient preparation, and reporting of test results.

Conclusion

This clinical practice guideline should improve pan‐European harmonization of diagnostic approaches to symptoms and disorders, which are very common in specialist and primary care gastroenterology practice, both in adult and pediatric patients. In addition, this guideline identifies areas of future clinical research involving the use of ¹³C‐breath tests.

Prognostic value of splenic volume in hepatocellular carcinoma patients receiving transarterial chemoembolization

Background

Liver function is a key determinant for the survival of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients receiving transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). However, establishing robust prognostic indicators for liver insufficiencies and patient survival remains an unmet demand. This retrospective study evaluated the prognostic value of splenic volume (SV) in HCC patients undergoing TACE.

Methods

A total of 67 HCC patients who underwent at least two consecutive TACE procedures were retrospectively included in this study. Comprehensive clinical information and follow-up data were collected, and the SV was measured based on dynamic contrast enhanced images. Risk factors of SV enlargement were assessed. The prognostic value of SV on survival was analyzed and compared with Child-Pugh (CP) classification and albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade.

Results

The baseline SV was 299.74±143.63 cm³, and showed a moderate and statistically significant correlation with CP classification (R=0.31, P<0.05). The SV increased remarkably after the first and second TACE procedures (330.16±155.38 cm³, P<0.01, and 355.63±164.26 cm³, P<0.01, respectively). In survival analysis, the optimal cut-off value of SV was determined as 373 cm³ using X-tile software, and the patients were divided into the small SV group and the large SV groups accordingly. Based on the pre-TACE SV, the median overall survival (mOS) for patients in the small SV group and the large SV group was 458 days and 249 days, respectively (P<0.05). After the first and second TACE, the mOS in the small SV group and the large SV group were 454 vs. 266 days (P<0.05) and 526 vs. 266 days (P<0.05), respectively. No prognostic value of CP classification and ALBI grade was identified for these patients. Furthermore, there were no significant differences between the small and large SV groups in age, tumor stage, and ALBI grade, except for CP classification (P<0.05).

Conclusions

SV was correlated with CP classification and was a robust predictor for HCC patients undergoing TACE treatment.

Volume-Function Analysis (LiMAx Test) in Patients with HCC and Cirrhosis Undergoing TACE-A Feasibility Study

BACKGROUND

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is an important therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhosis. In particular in advanced cirrhosis, post-TACE hepatic failure liver (PTHF) failure may develop. Currently, there is no standardization for the periinterventional risk assessment. The liver maximum capacity (LiMAx) test assesses the functional liver capacity, but has not been investigated in this setting.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate periinterventional LiMAx and CT volumetry measurements in patients with cirrhosis and HCC undergoing repetitive TACE.

METHODS

From 06/2016 to 11/2017, eleven patients with HCC and cirrhosis undergoing TACE were included. LiMAx measurements (n = 42) were conducted before and after each TACE. Laboratory parameters were correlated with the volume-function data.

RESULTS

The median LiMAx levels before (276 ± 166 µg/kg/h) were slightly reduced after TACE (251 ± 122 µg/kg/h; p = 0.08). This corresponded to a median drop of 7.1%. Notably, there was a significant correlation between LiMAx levels before TACE and bilirubin (but not albumin nor albumin-bilirubin [ALBI] score) increase after TACE (p = 0.02, k = 0.56). Furthermore, a significantly higher increase in bilirubin in patients with LiMAx ≤ 150 µg/kg/h was observed (p = 0.011). LiMAx levels at different time points in single patients were similar (p = 0.2).

CONCLUSION

In our prospective pilot study in patients with HCC and cirrhosis undergoing multiple TACE, robust and reliable LiMAx measurements were demonstrated. Lower LiMAx levels before TACE were associated with surrogate markers (bilirubin) of liver failure after TACE. Specific subgroups at high risk of PTHF should be investigated. This might facilitate the future development of strategies to prevent occurrence of PTHF.

The technique of 3D reconstruction combining with biochemistry to build an equivalent formula of indocyanine green (ICG) clearance test to assess the liver reserve function

BACKGROUND

The indocyanine green (ICG) clearance test is the main method of evaluating the liver reserve function before hepatectomy. However, some patients may be allergic to ICG or the equipment of ICG clearance test was lack, leading to be difficult to evaluate liver reserve function. We aim to find an alternative tool to assist the clinicians to evaluate the liver reserve function for those who were allergic to the ICG or lack of equipment before hepatectomy.

METHODS

We retrospected 300 patients to investigate the risk factors affecting the liver reserve function and to build an equivalent formula to predict ICG 15 min retention rate (ICG-R15) value.

RESULTS

We found that the independent risk factors affecting ICG clearance test were total bilirubin, albumin, and spleen-to-non-neoplastic liver volume ratio (SNLR). The equivalent formula of the serological index combining with SNLR was: ICG-R15 = 0.36 × TB (umol/L) - 0.78 × ALB(g/L) + 7.783 × SNLR + 0.794 × PT (s) - 0.016 × PLT(/10⁹) - 0.039 × ALT (IU/L) + 0.043 × AST (IU/L) + 23.846. The equivalent formula of serum index was: ICG-R15₂ = 24.665 + 0.382 × TB (umol/L) - 0.799 × ALB(g/L) - 0.025 × PLT(/10⁹) + 0.048 × AST(IU/L) - 0.045 × ALT(IU/L). And the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of predicting ICG-R15 ≥ 10% was 0.861 and 0.857, respectively.

CONCLUSION

We found that SNLR was an independent risk factor affecting liver reserve function. Combining with SNLR to evaluate the liver reserve function was better than just basing on serology.