1
|
Sieren M, Katoh M, Mahnken AH, Reimer P, Westphalen K, Hoffmann RT, Paprottka P, Rohde S, Wacker FK, Minko P, Molwitz I, Oechtering TH, Afat S, Bucher AM, Gerwing M, Storz C, Ziegler HR, Barkhausen J, Frisch A. Work and Training Conditions of German Residents and Young Radiologists in Interventional Radiology - A Nationwide Survey. ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG 2022; 194:1346-1357. [PMID: 35830856 DOI: 10.1055/a-1853-8549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION With the increasing need for minimally invasive procedures based on lower complication rates, higher patient acceptance, and technical developments, there is a growing focus on the sound interventional training of young radiologists. This survey aimed to analyze the current situation in interventional radiology (IR) training in Germany to detect shortcomings and identify areas for improvement. MATERIALS AND METHODS From November 1-30, 2020, an online questionnaire was distributed to representative radiological associations and societies with the request to forward it to radiology residents and radiologists < 40 years. The 44 questions covered six distinct areas from personal working conditions to the characterization of the IR department, training conditions, role of women in IR, and attendance at congresses/external training. RESULTS A total of 330 participants completed the questionnaire. 77 % of participants expressed a high interest in IR, and 47 % could even imagine subspecializing in interventional radiology. Most institutions provided the necessary learning conditions and infrastructure. The rate of overall satisfaction with IR training conditions was 45 % (vs. a dissatisfaction rate of 39 %). However, females showed a lower satisfaction rate with their training environment than male participants (28 % vs. 51 %; P = 0.06). Positive correlations with work satisfaction were found for the presence and duration of the IR rotation, the number of partly independently/mentored performed interventions, and structured feedback. Moreover, the need for a structured training curriculum was expressed by 67 % of participants. CONCLUSION Radiological residents and young radiologists expressed a high interest in interventional radiology, and they rate the infrastructure of German hospitals regarding IR as sufficient. However, they expressed the need for consistent IR rotations and better-structured resident and postgraduate education (curricula & interviews). KEY POINTS Interest in interventional radiology among radiological residents and young radiologists in Germany is high, but satisfaction with interventional radiology training leaves room for improvement. The most frequently mentioned aspects that can improve IR training were · organized rotations of at least 6 months. · structured curriculums with face-to-face feedback. · structured guidance by senior interventionists during procedures. CITATION FORMAT · Sieren M, Katoh M, Mahnken AH et al. Work and Training Conditions of German Residents and Young Radiologists in Interventional Radiology - A Nationwide Survey. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2022; DOI: 10.1055/a-1853-8549.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malte Sieren
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Marcus Katoh
- Department for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, HELIOS Hospital Krefeld, Germany
| | - Andreas H Mahnken
- Diagnostic & Interventional Radiology, Philipps-University Marburg, Germany
| | - Peter Reimer
- Zentralinstitut für bildgebende Diagnostik, Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - Kerstin Westphalen
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, DRK Hospital Berlin, Germany
| | - Ralf-Thorsten Hoffmann
- Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital, Carl-Gustav-Carus Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Philipp Paprottka
- Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital rechts der Isar, München, Germany
| | - Stefan Rohde
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Dortmund gGmbH, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Frank K Wacker
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Peter Minko
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Isabel Molwitz
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Saif Afat
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen University Hospital, Tubingen, Germany
| | - Andreas Michael Bucher
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Mirjam Gerwing
- Institute of Clinical Radiology, University Hospital Munster, Germany
| | - Corinna Storz
- Neuroradiology, University Hospital Freiburg, Germany
| | - Henrike-Renate Ziegler
- Department for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, HELIOS Hospital Krefeld, Germany
| | - Jörg Barkhausen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Anne Frisch
- Department of Radiology, Charite Medical Faculty Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|