Transjugular Portosystemic Stent Shunt: Impact of Right Atrial Pressure on Portal Venous Hemodynamics Within the First Week

Unveiling the impact of cirrhotic cardiomyopathy on portal hemodynamics and survival after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: a prospective study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The placement of Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) results in a sudden increase in central circulating blood volume, which requires proper regulation of the cardiovascular system. We aimed to investigate the impact of TIPS on cirrhotic cardiomyopathy (CCM).

METHOD

A consecutive case series of patients with cirrhosis who underwent TIPS were evaluated by echocardiography and pressure measurements before, immediately after TIPS and 2-4 days later (delayed). Furthermore, all patients underwent a one-year follow-up.

RESULTS

In this study, 107 patients were enrolled, 38 (35.5%) with CCM. Echocardiography revealed an increase in postoperative left ventricular filling pressure accompanied by an elevation in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). However, patients in the CCM group exhibited lower LVEF and mean arterial pressure (MAP) compared to the non-CCM group. Post-TIPS, CCM patients showed increased right atrium pressure (RAP) that normalized within 2-4 days, whereas non-CCM patients had lower RAP than baseline. Compared to patient without CCM, CCM patients revealed lower immediate (16.7 ± 4.4 vs. 18.9 ± 4.8, p = 0.022) and delayed 15.9 ± 3.7 vs. 17.7 ± 5.3, p = 0.044) portal vein pressures (PVP) and portal pressure gradients (PPG) (7.7 ± 3.4 vs. 9.2 ± 3.6, p = 0.032 and 10.1 ± 3.1 vs. 12.3 ± 4.9, p = 0.013). The 1-year mortality rates were 13.2% for CCM patients and 4.3% for non-CCM patients (log-rank test, p = 0.093), with MELD score, and preoperative RAP significantly associated with the mortality.

CONCLUSION

Cirrhotic patients with CCM exhibit lower PVP and PPG immediately after TIPS and 2-4 days later, without significantly impacting one-year survival outcomes.

A new computational fluid dynamics based noninvasive assessment of portacaval pressure gradient

Accurate assessment of portacaval pressure gradient (PCG) in patients with portal hypertension (PH) is of great significance both for diagnosis and treatment. This study aims to develop a noninvasive method for assessing PCG in PH patients and evaluate its accuracy and effectiveness. This study recruited 37 PH patients treated with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). computed tomography angiography was used to create three dimension (3D) models of each patient before and after TIPS. Doppler ultrasound examinations were conducted to obtain the patient's portal vein flow (or splenic vein and superior mesenteric vein). Using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation, the patient's pre-TIPS and post-TIPS PCG was determined by the 3D models and ultrasound measurements. The accuracy of these noninvasive results was then compared to clinical invasive measurements. The results showed a strong linear correlation between the PCG simulated by CFD and the clinical invasive measurements both before and after TIPS (R2 = 0.998, P < 0.001 and R2 = 0.959, P < 0.001). The evaluation accuracy of this noninvasive method reached 94 %, and the influence of ultrasound result errors on the numerical accuracy was found to be marginal if the error was less than 20 %. Furthermore, the information about the hemodynamic environment in the portal system was obtained by this numerical method. Spiral flow patterns were observed in the portal vein of some patients. In a conclusion, this study proposes a noninvasive numerical method for assessing PCG in PH patients before and after TIPS. This method can assist doctors in accurately diagnosing patients and selecting appropriate treatment plans. Additionally, it can be used to further investigate potential biomechanical causes of complications related to TIPS in the future.

The impact of right atrial pressure on outcomes in patients undergoing TIPS, an ALTA group study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Single-center studies in patients undergoing TIPS suggest that elevated right atrial pressure (RAP) may influence survival. We assessed the impact of pre-TIPS RAP on outcomes using the Advancing Liver Therapeutic Approaches (ALTA) database.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

Total 883 patients in ALTA multicenter TIPS database from 2010 to 2015 from 9 centers with measured pre-TIPS RAP were included. Primary outcome was mortality. Secondary outcomes were 48-hour post-TIPS complications, post-TIPS portal hypertension complications, and post-TIPS inpatient admission for heart failure. Adjusted Cox Proportional hazards and competing risk model with liver transplant as a competing risk were used to assess RAP association with mortality. Restricted cubic splines were used to model nonlinear relationship. Logistic regression was used to assess RAP association with secondary outcomes.Pre-TIPS RAP was independently associated with overall mortality (subdistribution HR: 1.04 per mm Hg, 95% CI, 1.01, 1.08, p =0.009) and composite 48-hour complications. RAP was a predictor of TIPS dysfunction with increased odds of post-90-day paracentesis in outpatient TIPS, hospital admissions for renal dysfunction, and heart failure. Pre-TIPS RAP was positively associated with model for end-stage liver disease, body mass index, Native American and Black race, and lower platelets.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-TIPS RAP is an independent risk factor for overall mortality after TIPS insertion. Higher pre-TIPS RAP increased the odds of early complications and overall portal hypertensive complications as potential mechanisms for the mortality impact.

Predictive power of portal pressure gradient remeasured shortly after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The portal pressure gradient (PPG) measured at the time of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) completion (immediate PPG) is easily disturbed by many factors. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic value of PPG remeasured 2-4 days after TIPS (delayed PPG) by comparison with immediate PPG.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed cirrhotic patients aged 18-75 years who received TIPS for preventing variceal rebleeding and pressure measurements at different time points.

RESULTS

Of 154 eligible patients, 60 (39.0%), 62 (40.3%), and 32 (20.8%) were categorized into group LL (both immediate and delayed PPG < 12 mmHg), LH (immediate PPG < but delayed PPG ≥ 12 mmHg) and HH (both immediate and delayed PPG ≥ 12 mmHg), respectively. Mean immediate and delayed PPG were 9.2 mmHg and 12.8 mmHg (p < 0.001). During a median follow-up of 22 months, the 1-year probability of variceal rebleeding was significantly lower in group LL (1.7%) compared to LH (9.8%, absolute risk difference [ARD]: - 8.2%, p = 0.028) and HH (12.6%, ARD: - 11.1%, p = 0.014), but was not significantly different between groups LH and HH (ARD: - 2.9%, p = 0.671). Delayed PPG (p < 0.001) was identified as an independent predictor of variceal rebleeding in multivariable Cox regression analysis. The area under curves of delayed and immediate PPG in predicting variceal rebleeding were 0.837 and 0.693 for all patients (p = 0.031), and 0.936 and 0.694 for patients without shunt dysfunction (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In cirrhotic patients with variceal bleeding, delayed PPG has higher predictive power for variceal rebleeding than immediate PPG.

Comparing the predictive ability of portoatrial and portocaval gradient after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation for variceal rebleeding

BACKGROUND

Measuring the portal pressure gradient from the portal vein (PV) to the inferior vena cava (IVC) or to the right atrium (RA) remains controversial. The aim of our study was to compare the predictive ability of portoatrial gradient (PAG) and portocaval gradient (PCG) for variceal rebleeding.

METHODS

The data of 285 cirrhotic patients with variceal bleeding undergoing elective transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in our hospital were analyzed retrospectively. The variceal rebleeding rates were compared between groups categorized by established or modified thresholds. The median follow-up time was 30.0 months.

RESULTS

After TIPS, PAG was equal to (n = 115) or more than (n = 170) PCG. The pressure of IVC was defined as an independent predictor for a PAG-PCG difference of ≥ 2 mmHg (p < 0.001, OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.10-1.37). Using a threshold of 12 mmHg, PAG (p = 0.081, HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.37-1.06) could not predict variceal rebleeding but PCG could (p = 0.003, HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.26-0.77). This pattern was unchanged when a ≥ 50% reduction from baseline was also considered as a threshold (PAG/PCG: p = 0.114 and 0.001). Subgroup analyses showed that only in patients with post-TIPS IVC pressure < 9 mmHg (p = 0.018), PAG could predict variceal rebleeding. Because PAG was on average 1.4 mmHg higher than PCG, patients were classified by a PAG of 14 mmHg, and there was no difference in rebleeding rates between these two groups (p = 0.574).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with variceal bleeding, the predictive ability of PAG is limited. The portal pressure gradient should be measured between the PV and IVC.

Endovascular Assessment of Liver Hemodynamics in Patients with Cirrhosis Complicated by Portal Hypertension

The hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is currently considered the gold standard to assess portal hypertension (PH) in patients with cirrhosis. A meticulous technique is important to achieve accurate and reproducible results, and values obtained during measurement are applied in risk stratification of patients with PH, allocating treatment options, monitoring follow-up, and deciding management options in surgical patients. The use of portosystemic pressure gradients in patients undergoing placement of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts has been studied extensively and has great influence on decisions on shunt diameter. The purpose of this study was to describe the recommended technique to measure HVPG and portosystemic pressure gradient and to review the existing literature describing the importance of these hemodynamic measurements in clinical practice.