Prediction of Local Tumor Progression After Microwave Ablation in Colorectal Carcinoma Liver Metastases Patients by MRI Radiomics and Clinical Characteristics-Based Combined Model: Preliminary Results

Prognostication of colorectal cancer liver metastasis by CE-based radiomics and machine learning

The liver is the most common organ for the formation of colorectal cancer metastasis. Non-invasive prognostication of colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) may better inform clinicians for decision-making. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography images of 180 CRLM cases were included in the final analyses. Radiomics features, including shape, first-order, wavelet, and texture, were extracted with Pyradiomics, followed by feature engineering by penalized Cox regression. Radiomics signatures were constructed for disease-free survival (DFS) by both elastic net (EN) and random survival forest (RSF) algorithms. The prognostic potential of the radiomics signatures was demonstrated by Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariate Cox regression. 11 radiomics features were selected for prognostic modelling for the EN algorithm, with 835 features for the RSF algorithm. Survival heatmap indicates a negative correlation between EN or RSF risk scores and DFS. Radiomics signature by EN algorithm successfully separates DFS of high-risk and low-risk cases in the training dataset (log-rank test: p < 0.01, hazard ratio: 1.45 (1.07-1.96), p < 0.01) and test dataset (hazard ratio: 1.89 (1.17-3.04), p < 0.05). RSF algorithm shows a better prognostic implication potential for DFS in the training dataset (log-rank test: p < 0.001, hazard ratio: 2.54 (1.80-3.61), p < 0.0001) and test dataset (log-rank test: p < 0.05, hazard ratio: 1.84 (1.15-2.96), p < 0.05). Radiomics features have the potential for the prediction of DFS in CRLM cases.

MRI Radiomics in Imaging of Focal Hepatic Lesions: A Narrative Review

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is generally used to identify, describe, and evaluate treatment responses for focal hepatic lesions. However, the diagnosis and differentiation of such lesions require considerable input from radiologists. In order to reduce these difficulties, radiomics is an artificial intelligence (AI)-based quantitative method that employs the extraction of image features to reliably detect and differentiate focal hepatic lesions. MRI radiomics is a novel technique for the characterization of focal hepatic lesions. It can aid in preoperative evaluation, treatment approach, and forecast microvascular invasion. Although many studies have illustrated its efficiency there are certain limitations such as the absence of a large diverse dataset, comparison with other AI models, integration with histopathological findings, clinical utility, and feasibility.

Predicting Microwave Ablation Early Efficacy in Pulmonary Malignancies via Δ Radiomics Models

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore the value of preoperative and postoperative computed tomography (CT)-based radiomic signatures and Δ radiomic signatures for evaluating the early efficacy of microwave ablation (MWA) for pulmonary malignancies.

METHODS

In total, 115 patients with pulmonary malignancies who underwent MWA treatment were categorized into response and nonresponse groups according to relevant guidelines and consensus. Quantitative image features of the largest pulmonary malignancies were extracted from CT noncontrast scan images preoperatively (time point 0, TP0) and immediately postoperatively (time point 1, TP1). Critical features were selected from TP0 and TP1 and as Δ radiomics signatures for building radiomics models. In addition, a combined radiomics model (C-RO) was developed by integrating radiomics parameters with clinical risk factors. Prediction performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and decision curve analysis (DCA).

RESULTS

The radiomics model using Δ features outperformed the radiomics model using TP0 and TP1 features, with training and validation AUCs of 0.892, 0.808, and 0.787, and 0.705, 0.825, and 0.778, respectively. By combining the TP0, TP1, and Δ features, the logistic regression model exhibited the best performance, with training and validation AUCs of 0.945 and 0.744, respectively. The DCA confirmed the clinical utility of the Δ radiomics model.

CONCLUSIONS

A combined prediction model, including TP0, TP1, and Δ radiometric features, can be used to evaluate the early efficacy of MWA in pulmonary malignancies.

Study of radiomics based on dual-energy CT for nuclear grading and T-staging in renal clear cell carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most lethal subtype of renal cell carcinoma with a high invasive potential. Radiomics has attracted much attention in predicting the preoperative T-staging and nuclear grade of ccRCC.

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to evaluate the efficacy of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) radiomics in predicting ccRCC grade and T-stage while optimizing the models.

METHODS

200 ccRCC patients underwent preoperative DECT scanning and were randomized into training and validation cohorts. Radiomics models based on 70 KeV, 100 KeV, 150 KeV, iodine-based material decomposition images (IMDI), virtual noncontrasted images (VNC), mixed energy images (MEI) and MEI + IMDI were established for grading and T-staging. Receiver operating characteristic analysis and decision curve analysis (DCA) were performed. The area under the curve (AUC) values were compared using Delong test.

RESULTS

For grading, the AUC values of these models ranged from 0.64 to 0.97 during training and from 0.54 to 0.72 during validation. In the validation cohort, the performance of MEI + IMDI model was optimal, with an AUC of 0.72, sensitivity of 0.71, and specificity of 0.70. The AUC value for the 70 KeV model was higher than those for the 100 KeV, 150 KeV, and MEI models. For T-staging, these models achieved AUC values of 0.83 to 1.00 in training and 0.59 to 0.82 in validation. The validation cohort demonstrated AUCs of 0.82 and 0.70, sensitivities of 0.71 and 0.71, and specificities of 0.80 and 0.60 for the MEI + IMDI and IMDI models, respectively. In terms of grading and T-staging, the MEI + IMDI model had the highest AUC in validation, with IMDI coming in second. There were statistically significant differences between the MEI + IMDI model and the 70 KeV, 100 KeV, 150 KeV, MEI, and VNC models in terms of grading (P < .05) and staging (P ≤ .001). DCA showed that both MEI + IDMI and IDMI models outperformed other models in predicting grade and stage of ccRCC.

CONCLUSIONS

DECT radiomics models were helpful in grading and T-staging of ccRCC. The combined model of MEI + IMDI achieved favorable results.

Machine Learning and Radiomics Analysis for Tumor Budding Prediction in Colorectal Liver Metastases Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment

PURPOSE

We aimed to assess the efficacy of machine learning and radiomics analysis using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with a hepatospecific contrast agent, in a pre-surgical setting, to predict tumor budding in liver metastases.

METHODS

Patients with MRI in a pre-surgical setting were retrospectively enrolled. Manual segmentation was made by means 3D Slicer image computing, and 851 radiomics features were extracted as median values using the PyRadiomics Python package. Balancing was performed and inter- and intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated to assess the between observer and within observer reproducibility of all radiomics extracted features. A Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney nonparametric test and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis were carried out. Balancing and feature selection procedures were performed. Linear and non-logistic regression models (LRM and NLRM) and different machine learning-based classifiers including decision tree (DT), k-nearest neighbor (KNN) and support vector machine (SVM) were considered.

RESULTS

The internal training set included 49 patients and 119 liver metastases. The validation cohort consisted of a total of 28 single lesion patients. The best single predictor to classify tumor budding was original_glcm_Idn obtained in the T1-W VIBE sequence arterial phase with an accuracy of 84%; wavelet_LLH_firstorder_10Percentile was obtained in the T1-W VIBE sequence portal phase with an accuracy of 92%; wavelet_HHL_glcm_MaximumProbability was obtained in the T1-W VIBE sequence hepatobiliary excretion phase with an accuracy of 88%; and wavelet_LLH_glcm_Imc1 was obtained in T2-W SPACE sequences with an accuracy of 88%. Considering the linear regression analysis, a statistically significant increase in accuracy to 96% was obtained using a linear weighted combination of 13 radiomic features extracted from the T1-W VIBE sequence arterial phase. Moreover, the best classifier was a KNN trained with the 13 radiomic features extracted from the arterial phase of the T1-W VIBE sequence, obtaining an accuracy of 95% and an AUC of 0.96. The validation set reached an accuracy of 94%, a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 95%.

CONCLUSIONS

Machine learning and radiomics analysis are promising tools in predicting tumor budding. Considering the linear regression analysis, there was a statistically significant increase in accuracy to 96% using a weighted linear combination of 13 radiomics features extracted from the arterial phase compared to a single radiomics feature.

The Role of Artificial Intelligence and Texture Analysis in Interventional Radiological Treatments of Liver Masses: A Narrative Review

Liver lesions, including both benign and malignant tumors, pose significant challenges in interventional radiological treatment planning and prognostication. The emerging field of artificial intelligence (AI) and its integration with texture analysis techniques have shown promising potential in predicting treatment outcomes, enhancing precision, and aiding clinical decision-making. This comprehensive review aims to summarize the current state-of-the-art research on the application of AI and texture analysis in determining treatment response, recurrence rates, and overall survival outcomes for patients undergoing interventional radiological treatment for liver lesions. Furthermore, the review addresses the challenges associated with the implementation of AI and texture analysis in clinical practice, including data acquisition, standardization of imaging protocols, and model validation. Future directions and potential advancements in this field are discussed. Integration of multi-modal imaging data, incorporation of genomics and clinical data, and the development of predictive models with enhanced interpretability are proposed as potential avenues for further research. In conclusion, the application of AI and texture analysis in predicting outcomes of interventional radiological treatment for liver lesions shows great promise in augmenting clinical decision-making and improving patient care. By leveraging these technologies, clinicians can potentially enhance treatment planning, optimize intervention strategies, and ultimately improve patient outcomes in the management of liver lesions.

Machine Learning Combined with Radiomics Facilitating the Personal Treatment of Malignant Liver Tumors

In the realm of managing malignant liver tumors, the convergence of radiomics and machine learning has redefined the landscape of medical practice. The field of radiomics employs advanced algorithms to extract thousands of quantitative features (including intensity, texture, and structure) from medical images. Machine learning, including its subset deep learning, aids in the comprehensive analysis and integration of these features from diverse image sources. This potent synergy enables the prediction of responses of malignant liver tumors to various treatments and outcomes. In this comprehensive review, we examine the evolution of the field of radiomics and its procedural framework. Furthermore, the applications of radiomics combined with machine learning in the context of personalized treatment for malignant liver tumors are outlined in aspects of surgical therapy and non-surgical treatments such as ablation, transarterial chemoembolization, radiotherapy, and systemic therapies. Finally, we discuss the current challenges in the amalgamation of radiomics and machine learning in the study of malignant liver tumors and explore future opportunities.