Transpedicular screwing of the seventh cervical vertebra: anatomical considerations and surgical technique

Free-hand technique of C7 pedicle screw insertion using a simply defined entry point without fluoroscopic guidance for cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients with C3 to C6 instrumented by lateral mass screws: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Nowadays, both lateral mass screw (LMS) and pedicle screw were effective instrumentation for posterior stabilization of cervical spine. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of a new free-hand technique of C7 pedicle screw insertion without fluoroscopic guidance for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) patients with C3 to C6 instrumented by lateral mass screws.

METHODS

A total of 53 CSM patients underwent lateral mass screws instrumentation at C3 to C6 levels and pedicle screw instrumentation at C7 level were included. The preoperative 3-dimenional computed tomography (CT) reconstruction images of cervical spine were used to determine 2 different C7 pedicle screw trajectories. Trajectory A passed through the axis of the C7 pedicle while trajectory B selected the midpoint of the base of C7 superior facet as the entry point. All these 53 patients had the C7 pedicle screw inserted through trajectory B by free-hand without fluoroscopic guidance and the postoperative CT images were obtained to evaluate the accuracy of C7 pedicle screw insertion.

RESULTS

Trajectory B had smaller transverse angle, smaller screw length, and smaller screw width but both similar sagittal angle and similar pedicle height when compared with trajectory A. A total of 106 pedicle screws were inserted at C7 through trajectory B and only 8 screws were displaced with the accuracy of screw placement as high as 92.5%.

CONCLUSION

In CSM patients with C3 to C6 instrumented by LMS, using trajectory B for C7 pedicle screw insertion is easy to both identify the entry point and facilitate the rod insertion.

Comprehensive analysis of pedicle screw implantation in the C7 vertebra using computed tomography-based three-dimensional models

Background

From a biomechanical point of view, pedicle screws (PS) are better than other kinds of screws for implantation in the seventh cervical vertebra (C7). However, the application of PS is limited because of the high risk of severe complications. It is essential to define the optimal entry point and trajectory. The aim of this study was to comprehensively analyze the starting point and trajectory for C7 PS insertion using three dimensional (3D) models.

Methods

Overall, 60 subjects aged 18 to 67 years old were included. All CT images were used to construct 3D computer models of the C7 vertebrae. A new coordinate system was established for the next evaluation. The pedicle axis was calculated with respect to the entire pedicle; then, the ideal entry point, screw diameter and length, sagittal angle and lateral angle were assessed.

Results

All the ideal entry points were located at the medial superior to lateral notch (LN), and the mean distance between the entry point and LN was 5.86 ± 1.67 mm in the horizontal direction and 3.47 ± 1.57 mm in the vertical direction. The mean distance between the entry point and the middle point of the inferior edge of the C6 articular process (MP) was 0.74 ± 1.83 mm in the horizontal direction. The mean sagittal angle of the pedicle axis was 90.42°, and the mean pedicle transverse angle was 30.70°. The average diameter and length of the PS were 6.51 ± 0.76 mm and 31.58 ± 4.40 mm, respectively.

Conclusions

This study provided a novel method to calculate the ideal starting point and trajectory for C7 PS insertion. These measurements may be helpful for preoperative planning. It is recommended that 3D CT imaging is used preoperatively to carefully evaluate the anatomy of each individual.

The position of the vertebral artery V1 segment relative to the C7 vertebra

BACKGROUND

The vertebral artery (VA) usually enters the transverse foramen at the C6 level. Thus, surgeons prefer to insert pedicle screws (PSs) at C7, but this does not eliminate the risk of VA injury. We aimed to clarify anatomical features of the VA V1 segment at the C7 pedicle level, based on computed tomographic angiography (CTA) of 81 consecutive patients.

METHODS

We examined the course of the VA V1 segment on axial CTA images. VA position was classified according to its alignment with the anterior (A), middle (M), or posterior (P) third of the C7 vertebral body at the pedicle level. We also assessed the prevalence of hypoplastic VA (HVA). We measured the distance (VED) from the optimum C7 PS entry point (Ep) to the center of the VA. We also measured the angles formed by the vertebral midline and a line from the inner edge of the VA to the Ep (the VEA), and by the vertebral midline and a line from the inner edge of the pedicle to the Ep (the PEA).

RESULTS

The variant location of the VA to the C7 vertebra was A in 13 courses (8.1%), M in 123 (76.9%), and P in 20 (12.5%). HVA was present in the contralateral side in 7 of 20 courses (35%) in the P group, and in 8 of 127 courses (6.3%) in the M group (p < 0.05). The mean VED was 20.2 mm, the mean VEA 6.9°, and the mean PEA angle was 36.3°.

CONCLUSION

The 20 VA courses in the P group (12.5% of the total VA courses) were relatively close to the C7 Ep. HVA was present contralateral to the VA in 7 of 20 courses in the P group. CTA should be considered before proceeding with, even if, C7 PS instrumentation, to avoid unexpected pitfall.

How I do it: tapered rod placement across the cervicothoracic junction for augmented posterior constructs

BACKGROUND

Posterior instrumentation techniques are commonly employed for cervicothoracic fixation. The pedicles of the upper thoracic vertebrae can typically accommodate larger diameter screws than the subaxial cervical vertebrae. In many construct systems, this requires the use of a tapered rod, which can be technically challenging to place.

METHOD

Using a three-dimensionally printed biomimetic spine simulator, we illustrate the stepwise process of instrumentation and tapered rod placement across the cervicothoracic junction (CTJ).

CONCLUSION

Tapered rod systems can augment the biomechanical stability of cervicothoracic constructs. Ease of rod placement across the CTJ hinges upon a systematic method of instrumentation.

An anatomical study of the spinous process of the seventh cervical vertebrae based on the three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction

Palpation of the seventh cervical vertebra (C7) is important for the diagnosis and treatment of neck and chest conditions. However, the spinous process of C7 (C7-SP) displays an anatomical deviation among individuals. The present study aimed to clarify anatomic characteristics of C7-SP by using a three-dimensional (3D) computed tomographic (CT) reconstruction technique. A total of 245 subjects meeting the selection criteria were examined. After CT scanning, the images were reconstructed in 3D. All subjects were grouped according to their deviation of C7-SP: Deviating to the right (DR group), deviating to the left (DL group) and no deviation (ND group). Three distances and three angles were recorded on C7-SP. The vertical distances between the borders of the left and right transverse processes and the tip of the SP, were termed DLTS and DRTS, respectively. The length of the SP was also determined. The angle of the SP deviation was referred to as ∠α, the angle between the SP axis and the line crossing the tips of the transverse processes was referred to as ∠β and the angle between the vertebral body axis and the SP axis was referred to as ∠γ. Among the three groups, differences in ∠α and ∠β were statistically significant (P<0.05). Furthermore, the DLTS was significantly different between the DL and ND groups (P<0.05). In addition, a significant difference in the DRTS was identified between the DR and ND groups (P<0.05). 3D CT reconstruction was reliable for studying anatomic characteristics of C7-SP. Based on this, patients may be preliminarily grouped according to the deviation of their C7-SP and the measurement of the C7-SP may guide clinical diagnoses and treatments.

The C7 pedicle as a superior fixation point in spinal stabilization for spinal metastatic disease

Spinal metastatic disease (SMD) often requires spinal stabilization; however, the cervicothoracic junction can be a challenging area to instrument. An anterior approach may require division of the sternum. A posterior or posterolateral approach may rely on cervical lateral mass screws for superior construct fixation that are more prone to pullout than screws placed in a pedicle. The C7 pedicle is able to support pedicle screw fixation in most instances based on morphological features of the vertebra. When the C7 pedicle is used as a superior fixation point, it aligns with the thoracic pedicles below to create a streamlined posterior construct. In this study, patients undergoing posterior stabilization with C7 pedicle superior fixation were examined. One hundred and thirty-nine consecutive spinal operations at a National Cancer Institute designated cancer center were retrospectively reviewed to identify patients who underwent spinal stabilization for SMD with a C7 pedicle screw placed as the superior fixation point of a posterior construct. Patient age, the primary disease, and clinical and radiographic information were identified. Follow-up duration was noted, and follow-up outcomes were recorded on the basis of the clinical history and the findings on computed tomography (CT) spinal imaging. Three patients were identified who underwent separation surgery for SMD that included posterior spinal stabilization with C7 pedicle screws as the superior fixation point. The average patient age was 70 years and one patient was a woman. The average follow-up time was 20.7 months. There were no occurrences of hardware failure, neurologic deterioration, or protracted pain in the cases analyzed. Overall, there were good surgical outcomes with improvement in pain without neurovascular injury or evidence of hardware failure during follow-up evaluation. These findings add to a small but notable number of studies showing the effectiveness of C7 pedicle screws as a superior fixation point in spinal oncology, specifically in metastatic lesions. In our experience the C7 pedicle has provided a useful superior fixation point solution for the posterior stabilization of high thoracic vertebral body metastases. This surgical option may help spinal surgeons address the stabilization of SMD in the cervicothoracic region.

Posterior Rigid Instrumentation of C7: Surgical Considerations and Biomechanics at the Cervicothoracic Junction. A Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

The cervicothoracic junction is a challenging anatomic transition in spine surgery. It is commonly affected by different types of diseases that may significantly impair stability in this region. The seventh cervical vertebra (C7) is an atypical cervical vertebra with unique anatomic features compared to subaxial cervical spine (C3 to C6). C7 has relatively broader laminae, larger pedicles, smaller lateral masses, and a long nonbifid spinous process. These features allow a variety of surgical methods for performing posterior rigid instrumentation in the form of different types of screws, such as lateral mass screws, pedicle screws, transfacet screws, and intralaminar screws. Many biomechanical studies on cadavers have evaluated and compared different types of implants at C7.

METHODS

We reviewed PubMed/Medline by using specific combinations of keywords to summarize previously published articles that examined C7 posterior rigid instrumentation thoroughly in an experimental fashion on patients or cadavers with additional descriptive radiologic parameters for evaluation of the optimum surgical technique for each type.

RESULTS

A total of 44 articles were reported, including 22 articles that discussed anatomic considerations (entry points, sagittal and axial trajectories, and features of screws) and another 22 articles that discussed the relevant biomechanical testing at this transitional region if C7 was directly involved in terms of receiving posterior rigid implants.

CONCLUSIONS

C7 can accommodate different types of screws, which can provide additional benefits and risks based on availability of bony purchase, awareness of surgical technique, biomechanics, and anatomic considerations.

Morphometric analysis of the seventh cervical vertebra for pedicle screw insertion

BACKGROUND

Anatomy of the pedicles of the seventh cervical vertebra (C7) at the cervicothoracic junction is different from other cervical vertebrae. Fixation of C7 is required during cervical vertebra and upper thoracic injuries in clinical practice. However, the typical pedicle screw insertion methods may have problems in clinical practice based on the anatomical features of C7. This study is to explore a new pedicle screw insertion technique for C7 and to provide anatomical and radiographic basis for clinical application.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

C7 vertebral specimens from six human cadavers were observed for the relative position between the posterior bony landmark and the pedicle projection. Computed tomography (CT) was performed for 30 patients with cervical spondylosis (26-61 years old, mean age was 42.3 years old). The CT scan data were processed by Mimics 8.1 software for associated parameter measurement. Appropriate screw entry points (Eps) and insertion angles were selected. A total of 12 pedicle screws were inserted and then observed. The six specimens were observed after inserting the screw using this method. The junction site of the middle 1/3 and outer 1/3 segment of line G [The junction between point A (the intersection point of the superior margin of the lamina of C7 and the medial margin of the superior articular process) and point B (the intersection point of the lateral margin of the inferior articular process and the transverse process)] was taken as the Ep. The screw insertion direction parallel horizontally to the upper terminal lamina of C7 and the sagittal angle was between 35° and 45°.

RESULTS

Gross and imaging observations revealed that pedicle projection was on the line (line G) between point A (the intersection point of the superior margin of the lamina of C7 and the medial margin of the superior articular process) and point B (the intersection point of the lateral margin of the inferior articular process and the transverse process) and located at the middle 1/3 and outer 1/3 segments of the line (point L[also it is the screw entry points (Eps)]. No significant difference in the measurements on the left and right sides were observed (P > 0.05). No penetration of the 12 screws through pedicle was observed.

CONCLUSION

The junction site of the middle 1/3 and outer 1/3 segments of line G are the projection points of C7 pedicles on the lateral mass. The junction site anatomical position was simply and easy to be controlled during surgery, simultaneously avoided uncertainty of other methods. This study provides a new method for determining an Ep for C7 pedicle screw insertion.

Morphological study of subaxial cervical pedicles by using three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction image

Malpositioning of cervical screws risks neurovascular injury. A cervical screw fixation system can provide proper rigidity, alignment correction, and high rates of fusion afforded by high pullout biomechanical strength. The objective is to assess the dimensions and axis of the C3–C7 cervical pedicles. A 1-mm slice thickness computed tomography (CT) scan of the cervical spine of 30 patients (15 males, 15 females) were analyzed and reconstructed in three-dimensions using Mimics^® 10.01 software. We measured pedicle axis length (PAL), pedicle and lateral mass length (PL-LM), pedicle length (PL), outer pedicle width (OPW), and pedicle transverse angle (PTA) from the axial image and outer pedicle height (OPH) and pedicle sagittal angle (PSA) from the sagittal image. The OPH and OPW at all subaxial cervical spines were suitable for insertion of 3.5 mm cervical pedicle screws. PSA was directed cranially at C3 to C5 (13.84, 7.09, and 2.71) and directed caudally at C6 and C7 (–4.55, –6.94). PTA was greatest at C5 and smallest at C7. The respective difference between the left and right side for nearly all parameters was not statistically significant (except for C6 PL and C7 OPH). Females had a significantly smaller OPH and OPW than males at nearly all levels. The PTA was not significantly different between the sexes. Cervical pedicle screw fixation in the Thai population can be safely performed and guidelines for insertion at each vertebra documented. Appropriate preoperative planning is necessary to achieve safe and accurate placement of the screws.

Surgical management of multilevel cervical spinal stenosis and spinal cord injury complicated by cervical spine fracture

Background

There are few reports regarding surgical management of multilevel cervical spinal stenosis with spinal cord injury. Our purpose is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of open-door expansive laminoplasty in combination with transpedicular screw fixation for the treatment of multilevel cervical spinal stenosis and spinal cord injury in the trauma population.

Methods

This was a retrospective study of 21 patients who had multilevel cervical spinal stenosis and spinal cord injury with unstable fracture. An open-door expansive posterior laminoplasty combined with transpedicular screw fixation was performed under persistent intraoperative skull traction. Outcome measures included postoperative improvement in Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score and incidence of complications.

Results

The average operation time was 190 min, with an average blood loss of 437 ml. A total of 120 transpedicular screws were implanted into the cervical vertebrae between vertebral C3 and C7, including 20 into C3, 34 into C4, 36 into C5, 20 into C6, and 10 into C7. The mean preoperative JOA score was 3.67 ± 0.53. The patients were followed for an average of 17.5 months, and the average JOA score improved to 8.17 ± 1.59, significantly higher than the preoperative score (t = 1.798, P < 0.05), with an average improvement of 44.7 ± 11.7%. Postoperative complications in four patients included cerebrospinal fluid leakage, delayed wound healing, pulmonary infection, and urinary system infection. All four patients were responsive to antibiotic treatment; one died from respiratory failure 3 months postoperatively.

Conclusions

The open-door expansive laminoplasty combined with posterior transpedicular screw fixation is feasible for treating multilevel cervical spinal stenosis and spinal cord injury complicated by unstable fracture. Its advantages include minimum surgical trauma, less intraoperative blood loss, and satisfactory stable supportive effect for reduction of fracture.

A biomechanical comparison of three different posterior fixation constructs used for c6-c7 cervical spine immobilization: a finite element study

The intralaminar screw construct has been recently introduced in C6–C7 fixation. The aim of the study is to compare the stability afforded by three different C7 posterior fixation techniques using a three-dimensional finite element model of a C6–C7 cervical spine motion segment. Finite element models representing three different cervical anchor types (C7 intralaminar screw, C7 lateral mass screw, and C7 pedicle screw) were developed. Range of motion (ROM) and maximum von Mises stresses in the vertebra for the three screw techniques were compared under pure moments in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. ROM for pedicle screw construct was less than the lateral mass screw construct and intralaminar screw construct in the three principal directions. The maximum von Misses stress was observed in the C7 vertebra around the pedicle in all the three screw constructs. Maximum von Mises stress in pedicle screw construct was less than the lateral mass screw construct and intralaminar screw construct in all loading modes. This study demonstrated that the pedicle screw fixation is the strongest instrumentation method for C6–C7 fixation. Pedicle screw fixation resulted in least stresses around the C7 pedicle-vertebral body complex. However, if pedicle fixation is not favorable, the laminar screw can be a better option compared to the lateral mass screw because the stress around the pedicle-vertebral body complex and ROM predicted for laminar screw construct was smaller than those of lateral mass screw construct.

A Biomechanical Comparison of Intralaminar C7 Screw Constructs with and without Offset Connector Used for C6-7 Cervical Spine Immobilization : A Finite Element Study

OBJECTIVE

The offset connector can allow medial and lateral variability and facilitate intralaminar screw incorporation into the construct. The aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical characteristics of C7 intralaminar screw constructs with and without offset connector using a three dimensional finite element model of a C6-7 cervical spine segment.

METHODS

Finite element models representing C7 intralaminar screw constructs with and without the offset connector were developed. Range of motion (ROM) and maximum von Mises stresses in the vertebra for the two techniques were compared under pure moments in flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial rotation.

RESULTS

ROM for intralaminar screw construct with offset connector was less than the construct without the offset connector in the three principal directions. The maximum von Misses stress was observed in the C7 vertebra around the pedicle in both constructs. Maximum von Mises stress in the construct without offset connector was found to be 12-30% higher than the corresponding stresses in the construct with offset connector in the three principal directions.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that the intralaminar screw fixation with offset connector is better than the construct without offset connector in terms of biomechanical stability. Construct with the offset connector reduces the ROM of C6-7 segment more significantly compared to the construct without the offset connector and causes lower stresses around the C7 pedicle-vertebral body complex.

Cervical pedicle screw insertion using the technique with direct exposure of the pedicle by laminoforaminotomy

Objective

To present the accuracy and safety of cervical pedicle screw insertion using the technique with direct exposure of the pedicle by laminoforaminotomy.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 12 consecutive patients. A total of 104 subaxial cervical pedicle screws in 12 patients had been inserted. We also assessed the clinical and radiological outcomes and analyzed the direction and grade of pedicle perforation (grade 0: no perforation, 1: <25%, 2: 20% to 50%, 3: >50% of screw diameter) on the postoperative vascular-enhanced computed tomography scans. Grade 2 and 3 were considered as incorrect position.

Results

The correct position was found in 95 screws (91.3%); grade 0-75 screws, grade 1-20 screws and the incorrect position in 9 screws (8.7%); grade 2-6 screws, grade 3-3 screws. There was no neurovascular complication related with cervical pedicle screw insertion.

Conclusion

This technique (technique with direct exposure of the pedicle by laminoforaminotomy) could be considered relatively safe and easy method to insert cervical pedicle screw.

Safety of cervical pedicle screw insertion in children: a clinicoradiological evaluation of computer-assisted insertion of 51 cervical pedicle screws including 28 subaxial pedicle screws in 16 children

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective clinical and radiological analysis of children with complex cervical deformities for the safety of cervical pedicle screw insertion.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the possibility, safety, and efficacy of cervical pedicle screw insertion in complex pediatric cervical deformities for which conventional stabilization techniques would not have provided rigid fixation.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Although the use of cervical pedicle screws (CPS) in adults has become established, the feasibility and safety of their application in children have not been described previously in the literature.

METHODS

Sixteen children of mean age 9.7 ± 2.6 years (range: 3-13) requiring spinal stabilization for craniovertebral junction anomalies (n = 10), cervicothoracic kyphosis/kyphoscoliosis (n = 5), and cervical tumor excision (n = 1) formed the study group. Feasibility of CPS insertion was assessed by computer tomography (CT) images. Standard 3.0-mm titanium pedicle screws were inserted using intraoperative Iso-C C-arm-based 3-dimensional computer navigation, and the containment was postoperatively evaluated with CT scan.

RESULTS

On the basis of preoperative CT imaging, 55 pedicles were selected for screw fixation. Intraoperatively, CPS was successfully inserted at 51 levels; at 4 sclerosed pedicles (7.3%), screws could not be inserted. At 42 levels, the screws were inserted in the classical description of pedicle screw application; in 9 deformed vertebra, the screws were inserted in a nonclassical fashion, taking purchase in the 3 columns of the cervical vertebra. Forty-five (88.3%) screws were fully contained, 6 (11.7%) had a noncritical breach, and none had a critical breach. No perioperative complications related to pedicle screw insertion were noted.

CONCLUSION

Safe insertion of cervical pedicle screws is possible in children. Iso-C navigation provides real-time virtual imaging and improves the safety and accuracy of successful pedicle fixation even in altered vertebral anatomy. Pedicle width morphometrics do not restrict screw insertion.

Factors affecting lateral mass screw placement at C-7

Object

The C-7 lateral mass has been considered difficult to fit with instrumentation because of its unique anatomy. Of the methods that exist for placing lateral mass screws, none particularly accommodates this anatomical variation. The authors have related 12 distinct morphological measures of the C-7 lateral mass to the ability to place a lateral mass screw using the Magerl, Roy-Camille, and a modified Roy-Camille method.

Methods

Using CT scans, the authors performed virtual screw placement of lateral mass screws at the C-7 level in 25 male and 25 female patients. Complications recorded included foraminal and articular process violations, inability to achieve bony purchase, and inability to place a screw longer than 6 mm. Violations were monitored in the coronal, axial, and sagittal planes. The Roy-Camille technique was applied starting directly in the middle of the lateral mass, as defined by Pait's quadrants, with an axial angle of 15° lateral and a sagittal angle of 90°. The Magerl technique was performed by starting in the inferior portion of the top right square of Pait's quadrants and angling 25° laterally in the axial plane with a 45° cephalad angle in the sagittal plane. In a modified method, the starting point is similar to the Magerl technique in the top right square of Pait's quadrant and then angling 15° laterally in the axial plane. In the sagittal plane, a 90° angle is taken perpendicular to the dorsal portion of the lateral mass, as in the traditional Roy-Camille technique.

Results

Of all the morphological methods analyzed, only a combined measure of intrusion of the T-1 facet and the overall length of the C-7 lateral mass was statistically associated with screw placement, and only in the Roy-Camille technique. Use of the Magerl technique allowed screw placement in 28 patients; use of the Roy-Camille technique allowed placement in 24 patients; and use of the modified technique allowed placement in 46 patients. No screw placement by any method was possible in 4 patients.

Conclusions

There is only one distinct anatomical ratio that was shown to affect lateral mass screw placement at C-7. This ratio incorporates the overall length of the lateral mass and the amount of space occupied by the T-1 facet at C-7. Based on this virtual study, a modified Roy-Camille technique that utilizes a higher starting point may decrease the complication rate at C-7 by avoiding placement of the lateral mass screw into the T1 facet.

Biomechanical comparison between C-7 lateral mass and pedicle screws in subaxial cervical constructs

Object

The aim of this study was to conduct the first in vitro biomechanical comparison of immediate and postcyclical rigidities of C-7 lateral mass versus C-7 pedicle screws in posterior C4–7 constructs.

Methods

Ten human cadaveric spines were treated with C4–6 lateral mass screw and C-7 lateral mass (5 specimens) versus pedicle (5 specimens) screw fixation. Spines were potted in polymethylmethacrylate bone cement and placed on a materials testing machine. Rotation about the axis of bending was measured using passive retroreflective markers and infrared motion capture cameras. The motion of C-4 relative to C-7 in flexion-extension and lateral bending was assessed uninstrumented, immediately after instrumentation, and following 40,000 cycles of 4 Nm of flexion-extension and lateral bending moments at 1 Hz. The effect of instrumentation and cyclical loading on rotational motion across C4–7 was analyzed for significance.

Results

Preinstrumented spines for the 2 cohorts were comparable in bone mineral density and range of motion in both flexion-extension (p = 0.33) and lateral bending (p = 0.16). Lateral mass and pedicle screw constructs significantly reduced motion during flexion-extension (11.3°–0.26° for lateral mass screws, p = 0.002; 10.51°–0.30° for pedicle screws, p = 0.008) and lateral bending (7.38°–0.27° for lateral mass screws, p = 0.003; 11.65°–0.49° for pedicle screws, p = 0.03). After cyclical loading in both cohorts, rotational motion over C4–7 was increased during flexion-extension (0.26°–0.68° for lateral mass screws; 0.30°–1.31° for pedicle screws) and lateral bending (0.27°–0.39° and 0.49°–0.80°, respectively), although the increase was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). There was no statistical difference in postcyclical flexion-extension (p = 0.20) and lateral bending (0.10) between lateral mass and pedicle screws.

Conclusions

Both C-7 lateral mass and C-7 pedicle screws allow equally rigid fixation of subaxial lateral mass constructs ending at C-7. Immediately and within a simulated 6-week postfixation period, C-7 lateral mass screws may be as effective as C-7 pedicle screws in biomechanically stabilizing long subaxial lateral mass constructs.

Systematic review of cervical pedicle dimensions and projections

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review of the published literature was conducted specifically looking at studies reporting linear dimension and angular projection data on the anatomy of the cervical pedicle (C1-C7) via radiography or direct measurement.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to report a more accurate set of dimension data and identify differences based on race and gender, increasing the sample size by aggregating similar data of prior studies measuring the cervical pedicle in Asian, European/American, male, and female populations.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

A wide variation in the reports of the dimensions and projections of the cervical pedicle exist partly due to the uniqueness of this structure as well as the effects of small sample sizes and variable races and genders of sample populations of previous studies.

METHODS

An extensive literature search was executed, and identified articles were reviewed. A comprehensive database was constructed for synthesis of the identified studies. Subgroups were determined based on the type of population (race, gender, location of study) and radiographic or direct cadaveric measurement. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze and compare these subgroups including: means, standard deviations, and Student t test with the Bonferroni adjustment.

RESULTS

In total, the current study reports on 33 studies with the measurements of 1311 partial and complete cervical spines. At a 95% confidence interval statistically significant differences between races were found only at C3 and C4 levels in the pedicle axis length. Male-to-female significant differences existed only at the pedicle axis length of C5 in the Asian population, while sex differences existed in the outer pedicle width and height of C3, C4, C5, C6, and C7 in the European/American population.

CONCLUSION

The current study has found that there is no statistical difference in measuring the cervical pedicle via radiography (CT) or directly. There are more significant differences comparing the cervical pedicles of males and females in the European/American population than exists in the Asian population (specifically in pedicle width and height). There are also significant differences at C3 and C4 cervical pedicle between the Asian and European/American population (specifically in the pedicle axis length and transverse angle).

C7 posterior fixation using intralaminar screws : early clinical and radiographic outcome

OBJECTIVE

The use of segmental instrumentation technique using pedicle screw has been increasingly popular in recent years owing to its biomechanical stability. Recently, intralaminar screws have been used as a potentially safer alternative to traditional fusion constructs involving fixation of C2 and the cervicothoracic junction including C7. However, to date, there have been few clinical series of C7 laminar screw fixation in the literature. Thus, the purpose of this study is to report our clinical experiences using C7 laminar screw and the early clinical outcome of this rather new fixation technique.

METHODS

Thirteen patients underwent C7 intralaminar fixation to treat lesions from trauma or degenerative disease. Seventeen intralaminar screws were placed at C7. The patients were assessed both clinically and radiographically with postoperative computed tomographic scans.

RESULTS

There was no violation of the screw into the spinal canal during the procedure and no neurological worsening or vascular injury from screw placement. The mean clinical and radiographic follow up was about 19 months, at which time there were no cases of screw pull-out, screw fracture or non-union. Complications included two cases of dorsal breech of intralaminar screw and one case of postoperative infection.

CONCLUSION

Intralaminar screws can be potentially safe alternative technique for C7 fixation. Even though this technique cannot be used in the cases of C7 laminar fracture, large margin of safety and the ease of screw placement create a niche for this technique in the armamentarium of spine surgeons.

The use of pedicle screw-rod system for the posterior fixation in cervico-thoracic junction

OBJECTIVE

In cervico-thoracic junction (CTJ), the use of strong fixation device such as pedicle screw-rod system is often required. Purpose of this study is to analyze the anatomical features of C7 and T1 pedicles related to screw insertion and to evaluate the safety of pedicle screw insertion at these levels.

METHODS

Nineteen patients underwent posterior CTJ fixation with C7 and/or T1 included in fixation levels. Seventeen patients had tumorous conditions and two with post-laminectomy kyphosis. The anatomical features were analyzed for C7 and T1 pedicles in 19 patients using computerized tomography (CT). Pedicle screw and rod fixation system was used in 16 patients. Pedicle violation by screws was evaluated with postoperative CT scan.

RESULTS

The mean values of the width, height, stable depth, safety angle, transverse angle, and sagittal angle of C7 pedicles were 6.9 +/- 1.34 mm, 8.23 +/- 1.18 mm, 30.93 +/- 4.65 mm, 26.42 +/- 7.91 degrees, 25.9 +/- 4.83 degrees, and 10.6 +/- 3.39 degrees. At T1 pedicles, anatomic parameters were similar to those of C7. The pedicle violation revealed that 64.1% showed grade I violation and 35.9% showed grade II violation, overall. As for C7 pedicle screw insertion, grade I was 61.5% and grade II 38.5%. At T1 level, grade I was 65.0% and grade II 35.0%. There was no significant difference in violation rate between the whole group, C7, and T1 group.

CONCLUSION

C7 pedicles can withstand pedicle screw insertion. C7 pedicle and T1 pedicle are anatomically very similar. With the use of adequate fluoroscopic oblique view, pedicle screw can be safely inserted at C7 and T1 levels.

Pedicle screw fixation of the C7 vertebra using an anteroposterior fluoroscopic imaging technique

Cervical pedicle screws have been reported to be biomechanically superior to lateral mass screws. However, placement of these implants is a technical challenge. The purpose of this investigation was to use an anatomic and a clinical study to evaluate a technique for placement of the pedicle screws in the C7 vertebra using fluoroscopic imaging in only the anteroposterior (A/P) plane. Ten adult cadaver C7 vertebrae were used to record the pedicle width, inclination and a suitable entry point for placement of pedicle screws. A prospective study of 28 patients undergoing posterior instrumentation of the cervical spine with C7 pedicle screw placement was also performed. A total of 55 C7 pedicle screws were placed using imaging only in the A/P plane with screw trajectory values obtained by the anatomic study. Radiographs and CT scans were performed post-operatively. The average posterior pedicle diameter of C7 vertebra was 9.5 ± 1.2 mm in this study. The average middle pedicle diameter was 7.1 mm and the average anterior pedicle diameter was 9.2 mm. The average transverse pedicle angle was 26.8 on the right and 27.3 on the left. CT scans were obtained on 20 of 28 patients which showed two asymptomatic cortical wall perforations. One screw penetrated the lateral wall of the pedicle and another displayed an anterior vertebral penetration. There were no medial wall perforations. The preliminary results suggest that this technique is safe and suitable for pedicle screw placement in the C7 vertebra.

The vertebral artery and the cervical pedicle: morphometric analysis of a critical neighborhood

Object

The purpose of this retrospective study was to quantify the anatomical relationship between the vertebral artery (VA), the cervical pedicle, and its surrounding structures, including the incidence of irregularities. Additionally, data delineating a “safe zone,” and these data's application during instrumentation with transpedicular cervical screw fixation were considered. The anatomical proximity of the VA to the cervical pedicle prevents spine surgeons from preferring cervical pedicle screws (CPSs) over lateral mass screws at levels C3–6. Accurate placement of CPSs is often difficult to determine, because this definition can vary between 1 and 4 mm of lateral “noncritical” and “critical” pedicle breaches. No previous study in a western population has investigated the VA's proximity to the cervical pedicle, its percentage of occupancy in the transverse foramen (TF), and the incidence of irregular VA pathways.

Methods

One hundred twenty-seven consecutive patients who underwent CT angiography of the neck were enrolled in this study. The measurements included the following: medial pedicle border to VA; lateral pedicle border to VA; pedicle diameter (PD); sagittal diameter of the VA; coronal diameter of the VA; sagittal diameter of the TF; and coronal diameter of the TF. The cross-sections of the VA and the TF were measured to determine the occupation ratio of the VA. In addition, a safe zone was defined based on all lateral pedicle border to VA measurements in which the VA was within the TF. The level of entry of the VA into the TF as well as irregularities of the VA and the cervical pedicles were recorded.

Results

Vertebral artery dominance on the left side was seen in 69.3% of cases. The mean PD increased from 4.9 to 6.5 mm (from C-3 to C-7, respectively). Statistically significantly bigger PDs were seen in males. The mean PD at C-2 was 5.6 mm. Entry of the VA at C-6 was seen in approximately 80% of cases. The TF occupation ratio of the VA was found to be the greatest in C-4 and C-7 (37.1 and 74.2%, respectively). The safe zone increased from C-2 to C-6 (1.1 to 1.7 mm, respectively), but was only 0.65 mm at C-7. In 23.6% of cases, an irregular pathway of the VA or irregular anatomy of a cervical pedicle was seen, with the highest incidence of irregularities found at C-2.

Conclusions

Computed tomography angiography is a valuable tool that can help determine the relationships between cervical pedicles and the VA as well as irregular VA pathways. Pedicle diameter, safe zone, and occupational ratio of the VA in the foramen determine the risk associated with instrumentation and should be assessed individually. Based on the authors' measurements, C-4 and C-7 can be considered critical levels for CPS placement. Because of this and the high incidence of irregular VA pathways and different entry points, it may be helpful to review neck CT angiography studies before considering posterior instrumentation procedures in the cervical spine.

The ipsilateral lamina-pedicle angle: can it be used to guide pedicle screw placement in the sub-axial cervical spine?

Pedicle screws in the sub-axial spine are infrequently used because of concerns over their safety and difficulty in placement, despite their superior pullout strength. In the sub-axial cervical vertebrae, we have observed that the lamina appears to project at right angles to the ipsilateral pedicle axis. The aim of this investigation was to confirm the lamina orientation as a reliable landmark for pedicle screw placement. 80 digital cervical spine CT were analysed. The angle formed by the ipsilateral outer lamina cortex to the pedicle axis was recorded. A total of 398 vertebrae were analysed from patients with a mean age of 39.5 years (range 18-78). Average axial lamina-pedicle angle ranged from 96.6 degrees at C3 to 87.2 degrees at C7 in males, and from 95.6 degrees to 87.5 degrees in females. The angle formed by the posterior cortex of the lamina and the ipsilateral pedicle shows a high level of consistency for sub-axial cervical vertebrae ranging from 96 degrees at C3 to 87 degrees at C7. Although the angle is not exactly 90 degrees at all levels as hypothesised, the orientation of the lamina, nevertheless, forms a useful reference plane for insertion of pedicle screws in the sub-axial cervical spine.

Clinical and radiologic outcome of laminar screw at C2 and C7 for posterior instrumentation--review of 25 cases and comparison of C2 and C7 intralaminar screw fixation

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is 2-fold: to analyze a clinical case series in which we used laminar screws for cervical posterior instrumentation and to describe the difference between C2 and C7 laminar screws in terms of technique and anatomy.

METHODS

Data were obtained from 25 patients who underwent cervical posterior fixation with intralaminar screws at C2 or C7. C2 intralaminar screw instrumentation was used for 7 patients requiring occipitocervical fixation (basilar invagination [3 patients], C1 unstable bursting fracture [1 patient], C1-C2 instability with occipital assimilation [2 patients], and dystopic os odontoideum [1 patient]), 13 patients with C1-C2 instability, 1 patient with C2-C3 subluxation, and 4 patients undergoing C7 fixation due to pseudoarthrosis or cervical instability after trauma. A total of 34 laminar screws were placed including 1 thoracic laminar screw, and the patients were assessed both clinically and radiographically.

RESULTS

There were no instances where a screw violated the spinal canal nor any hardware fractures noted during the follow-up period. As for perioperative complications, there were 2 cases of postoperative wound infection, 1 case of dural laceration during dissection, and 2 cases of partial dorsal laminar breach. However, there was no neurologic compromise in any of the cases. The fusion success rate was 100%.

CONCLUSION

These preliminary results support the use of intralaminar screws for posterior instrumentation at C2 and C7.

Preoperative imaging of cervical pedicles: comparison of accuracy of oblique radiographs versus axial CT scans

In spite of concerns about safety during their insertion, cervical spine pedicle screws have demonstrated biomechanical superiority over lateral mass screws in several biomechanical studies. One of the concerns for placement of cervical pedicle screws is their small size. Preoperative planning with computed tomography to assess pedicle width has been shown to be extremely accurate and is recommended by several authors. To date there has been no study assessing the accuracy of oblique radiographs for pedicle measurement. We sought to compare accuracy of the oblique radiographic measurements of cervical pedicle width with axial CT scan measurements. Five fresh-frozen human cadaveric cervical spines C3-C7 were studied. Thin cut 1.25 mm computed tomography axial cuts were made through the pedicle isthmus. Oblique radiographs at 35 degrees , 45 degrees , and 55 degrees angles were taken of the right and left pedicles of each specimen using a standardized technique. Each radiograph contained a pin of known length to correct for magnification. All pedicles were again measured and corrected for magnification using the standard pin. Corrected oblique radiograph measurements were compared to CT for each specimen. The outer pedicle width was measured and agreed upon by consensus. The radiograph measurements were on average significantly larger than CT measurements for the pedicles indicating that the pin standard did not completely correct magnification. Plain radiographic data failed to reveal that one oblique angle was favorable to another in terms of magnification or precision. Plain radiographs at oblique angles do not provide accurate measurements of subaxial cervical pedicles at 35 degrees , 45 degrees , or 55 degrees angles. We recommend that thin cut axial CT scans be obtained on all patients prior to transpedicular fixation in the cervical spine.

Significance of laminar screw fixation in the subaxial cervical spine

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively reviewed 11 patients who underwent laminar screw fixation in the subaxial cervical spine. In 4 patients, laminar screws were inserted for posterior cervical arthrodesis, and in 7 patients it was used for fixation of the open laminae during laminoplasty.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, the author describes the technique and surgical results of translaminar screw placement in the subaxial cervical spine.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The use of laminar screws for fixation of the second cervical vertebra and upper thoracic vertebrae has been introduced as an important technique in spinal surgery because they can avoid injury to adjacent neurovascular structures. However, there have been no reports of translaminar screw use in the subaxial spine including C7. In this study, we describe the use of translaminar screws for fixation of the subaxial cervical spine in cases of degenerative or traumatic spine disease.

METHODS

Between June 2006 and March 2007, 34 translaminar screws were placed in 11 patients to treat trauma or degenerative disease: 6 at C7, 6 at C6, 7 at C5, 7 at C4, 7 at C3, and 1 at T1. There were 6 women and 5 men. The ages ranged from 23 to 87 years with a mean age of 61.3 years. All patients were evaluated at 6 weeks, as well as at 3 and 6 months using flexion and extension lateral radiographs. Patients requiring fusion were also evaluated with computed tomography at 3 and 6 months to verify arthrodesis.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 5.7 months, at which time there was no significant complications from laminar screw placement, except for 2 asymptomatic breaches of the dorsal lamina cortex. Sound bone fusion was identified in cases where arthrodesis was the goal. No screw pullout or avulsion was identified in the laminoplasty cases.

CONCLUSION

The translaminar screw method avoided damaging vascular structures, especially when the vertebral artery courses in the C7 transverse foramen, and it maintains solid stabilization of the subaxial cervical spine. This technique has 2 important advantages to currently used techniques: it is simpler and is not limited by the position of vascular structures. Therefore, it may be applicable to a wider number of patients, especially as it may be used in the subaxial cervical spine.

Cervical pedicle screw placement: feasibility and accuracy of two new insertion techniques based on morphometric data

This morphometric and experimental study was designed to assess the dimensions and axes of the subaxial cervical pedicles and to compare the accuracy of two different techniques for subaxial cervical pedicle screw (CPS) placement using newly designed aiming devices. Transpedicular fixation is increasingly used for stabilizing the subaxial cervical spine. Development of the demanding technique is based on morphometric studies of the pedicle anatomy. Several surgical techniques have been developed and evaluated with respect to their feasibility and accuracy. The study was carried out on six conserved human cadavers (average age 85 years). Axes and dimensions of the pedicles C3-C7 (60 pedicles) were measured using multislice computed tomography (CT) images prior to surgery. Two groups consisting of 3 specimens and 30 pedicles each were established according to the screw placement technique. For surgical technique 1 (ST1) a para-articular mini-laminotomy was performed. Guidance of the drill through the pedicle with a handheld aiming device attached onto the medial aspect of the pedicle inside the spinal canal. Screw hole preparation monitored by lateral fluoroscopy. In surgical technique 2 (ST2) a more complex aiming device was used for screw holes drilling. It consists of a frame with a fully adjustable radiolucent arm for carrying the instruments necessary for placing the screws. The arm was angled according to the cervical pedicle axis as determined by the preoperative CT scans. Drilling was monitored by lateral fluoroscopy. In either technique 3.5 mm screws made of carbon fiber polyetheretherketone (CF-PEEK) were inserted. The use of the CF-PEEK screws allowed for precise postoperative CT-assessment since this material does not cause artifacts. Screw placement was qualified from ideal to unacceptable into four grades: I = screw centered in pedicle; IIa = perforation of pedicle wall less than one-fourth of the screw diameter; IIb = perforation more than one-fourth of the screw diameter without contact to neurovascular structures; III = screw more than one-fourth outside the pedicle with contact to neurovascular structures. Fifty-six pedicle screws could be evaluated according to the same CT protocol that was used preoperatively. Accuracy of pedicle screw placement did not reveal significant differences between techniques 1 and 2. A tendency towards less severe misplacements (grade III) was seen in ST2 (15% in ST2 vs. 23% in ST1) as well as a higher rate of screw positions graded IIa (62% in ST2 vs. 43% in ST1). C4 and C5 were identified to be the most critical vertebral levels with three malpositioned screws each. Because of the variability of cervical pedicles preoperative CT evaluation with multiplanar reconstructions of the pedicle anatomy is essential for transpedicular screw placement in the cervical spine. Cadaver studies remain mandatory to develop safer and technically less demanding procedures. A similar study is projected to further develop the technique of CPS fixation with regard to safety and clinical practicability.

Quantitative anatomic evaluation of cervical lateral mass fixation with a comparison of the Roy-Camille and the Magerl screw techniques

STUDY DESIGN

An anatomic and computed tomography (CT) study of the Roy-Camille and the Magerl techniques with quantitative comparison of the safety zones of the two surgical techniques.

OBJECT

The purpose of this study was to compare quantitatively the safety zones of the Roy-Camille and the Magerl techniques as a function of the vertebral level from C3-C6.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The two most popular techniques for lateral mass screws are the Roy-Camille and the Magerl technique. Nerve roots, vertebral artery, facet joints, and the spinal cord are at risk during the placement of lateral mass screws. Several anatomic studies are reported, but there is no comparative and quantitative evaluation. The influence of the vertebral level was never reported.

METHODS

Lateral mass screws were first implanted on four cervical spines according to the two surgical techniques. Screws were then extracted and their cavities filled with a blue casting medium. To determine the precise limits of each safety zone in the sagittal plane, the specimens were sectioned according to the sagittal angulation of the two screwing techniques. The correlations between the anatomic landmarks on the specimen and the anatomic landmarks on the CT scan were established. One hundred and sixty lateral mass screws were then implanted in 20 cervical spines from C3-C6. A CT was done before and after placing lateral mass screws. On the morphologic CT scan, we measured the sagittal safety angle (SSA) for each surgical technique and also performed a morphometry of lateral masses. On the control CT scan, we analyzed screws placement in relation to the sagittal safety zone.

RESULTS

The mean SSA was 15.8 +/- 6.3 degrees for the Roy-Camille technique and 18.7 +/- 3.8 degrees for the Magerl technique, P < 0.005. With respect to the vertebral level, the Roy-Camille safety zone decreased from C3-C6 with a greater angulation at C3-C4 (20.4 +/- 4.7 degrees ) than at C5-C6 (11.6 +/- 4.3 degrees ), P < 0.001. Such variations were not observed for the Magerl technique, the SSA of which was 19.4 +/- 3.6 degrees at C5-C6 and 17.9 +/- 4 degrees at C3-C4, P < 0.01. Lateral masses became more elongated and thinner at the lower segment of the cervical spine with a C3-C4 height/thickness ratio = 1.1 +/- 0.3 and a C5-C6 height/thickness ratio = 1.3 +/- 0.2, P < 0.005. Roy-Camille screws (19%) were found out of the safety zone at C3-C4 whereas 37.5% were found outside at C5-C6, P < 0.05. We observed opposite results for Magerl screws with 38% screws out of the safety zone at C3-C4 and only 17.5% outside at C5-C6, P < 0.05.

CONCLUSION

The Roy-Camille technique demonstrated a progressive decrease of its safety zone from C3-C6. At C5 and C6 there is a great probability to have a transarticular screw with a Roy-Camille screw. A similar variation was not observed for the Magerl technique. These anatomic results seem to be in relation with the morphologic variability of lateral masses from C3-C6 as demonstrated by an increase of the height/thickness ratio at the lower part of the cervical spine. According to these anatomic considerations and previously published biomechanical data, Roy-Camille technique appears to be the best option at C3 and C4. On the opposite at C5 and C6, the choice is more difficult considering that there is no biomechanical difference between the two techniques and that the Magerl technique is safer but a more demanding procedure.