Morphological consistency of bilateral hip joints in adults based on the X-ray and CT data

Hip Axis Length and Femoral Neck-Shaft Angle as Risk Factors for Proximal Femur Fractures in Octogenarians to Centenarians

(1) Background: The prevention of proximal femoral fractures among people of very advanced age is relevant as they are common and increasing in number. The aim of this study was to determine if the hip axis length (HAL) and the neck-shaft angle (caput-collum-diaphyseal CCD) are risk factors for those fractures among people aged 80 years and over. Consequently, it was additionally analysed if these parameters are associated with a certain fracture type. (2) Methods: Anteroposterior radiographs of the pelvis were collected to form three groups (femoral neck fractures (FNFx), trochanteric fractures (TFx) and non-fractured femora (NFx)). Two independent blinded observers separately conducted each measurement of the HAL and CCD. Statistical analysis was performed to determine the association between the measured parameters and type of fracture. (3) Results: One hundred and fifty patients (50 per group) were examined, of which the mean age was 92.7 ± 3.5 (range 81-104) years. Both the HAL and CCD of the FNFx group were significantly larger than in the TFx group (p = 0.013, 0.003). The CCD was higher in the FNFx than that of the NFx group (p = 0.001). No further significant differences of HAL and CCD were observed between the groups. (4) Conclusions: For people aged 80 years and over, an increased HAL represented no risk factor for proximal femur fractures, and a large HAL was associated with an increased occurrence of FNFx instead of TFx. A large CCD was associated with an increased risk of suffering a femoral neck fracture, showing evidence of the CCD being a risk factor for the extremely old population.

Perioperative peri-implant fracture after osteosynthesis for geriatric femoral pertrochanteric fracture with the linear compression integrated screw intramedullary nail system (INTERTAN™): a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Osteosynthesis for geriatric femoral pertrochanteric fractures using the linear compression integrated screw intramedullary nail system (INTERTAN™) has become popular. Nonetheless, cases of perioperative peri-implant fractures have been reported following this surgical technique. The factors responsible for this complication remain unclear. Therefore, we investigated perioperative peri-implant fracture risk factors and incidence, as well as overall outcomes, using the INTERTAN™ system for geriatric femoral pertrochanteric fractures.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 98 consecutive patients with geriatric femoral pertrochanteric fractures after INTERTAN™ fixation, with at least a 12-month follow-up period between May 2020 and April 2022 at a single medical institute. The patients' demographic characteristics, fracture pattern, quality of reduction, quality of fixation, nail length, morphology of the femur, and perioperative complications were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

Among the 98 patients, 92 achieved union during follow-up. Twelve perioperative peri-implant fractures (12.2%) were recorded, all of which occurred during or within 1 month of osteosynthesis. Except for one patient who underwent re-osteosynthesis, the others underwent nonoperative treatment, and all achieved union. Multiple regression analysis revealed morphology of the femur with low-lesser trochanter width (odds ratio (OR) 0.532, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.33-0.86, p = 0.01) to be the only factor contributing to perioperative peri-implant fractures. When the Youden index was used, the optimal cut-off value was 20.2 mm of low-lesser trochanter width. Low-lesser trochanter width < 20.2 mm was found to be a potential factor causing perioperative peri-implant fractures (OR 17.81, 95% CI 1.67-19.76, p = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

Morphology of the femur with a low-lesser trochanter width smaller than 20.2 mm was found to be the only potential contributor to perioperative peri-implant fractures when using INTERTAN™ for geriatric femoral pertrochanteric fractures. Care should be taken during osteosynthesis, focusing not only on the fracture site but also on the femoral cortex around the implant. Although perioperative peri-implant fractures were observed within one month following osteosynthesis, the majority of these cases were effectively treated without surgical intervention.

Risk factors for templating mismatch of uncemented stems in bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture

Preoperative templating needs to be precise to optimize hip arthroplasty outcomes. Unexpected implant mismatches can occur despite meticulous planning. We investigated the risk factors for oversized and undersized stem mismatch during uncemented hemiarthroplasty using a double-tapered wedge rectangular stem for femoral neck fracture. Out of 154 consecutive patients who underwent hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture, 104 patients were divided into three groups: (1) oversized (n = 17; 16.3%), (2) matched (n = 80; 76.9%), and (3) undersized stem group (n = 7; 6.7%). A smaller femoral head offset (odds ratio [OR] = 0.89, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 0.81-0.98, P = 0.017), smaller isthmus diameter (OR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.35-0.92, P = 0.021), and smaller canal flare index (OR = 0.20, 95% CI = 0.04-0.98, P = 0.047) were significantly associated with oversized stem insertion, while older age (OR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.01-1.39, P = 0.037) was associated with undersized stem insertion in logistic regression. In conclusion, when performing hemiarthroplasty for a femoral neck fracture with a double-tapered wedge rectangular stem, surgeons must pay close attention to proximal femoral geometry and patient age during preoperative planning to avoid stem mismatch.

Deep learning-based workflow for hip joint morphometric parameter measurement from CT images

Objective.Precise hip joint morphometry measurement from CT images is crucial for successful preoperative arthroplasty planning and biomechanical simulations. Although deep learning approaches have been applied to clinical bone surgery planning, there is still a lack of relevant research on quantifying hip joint morphometric parameters from CT images.Approach.This paper proposes a deep learning workflow for CT-based hip morphometry measurement. For the first step, a coarse-to-fine deep learning model is designed for accurate reconstruction of the hip geometry (3D bone models and key landmark points). Based on the geometric models, a robust measurement method is developed to calculate a full set of morphometric parameters, including the acetabular anteversion and inclination, the femoral neck shaft angle and the inclination, etc. Our methods were validated on two datasets with different imaging protocol parameters and further compared with the conventional 2D x-ray-based measurement method.Main results. The proposed method yields high bone segmentation accuracies (Dice coefficients of 98.18% and 97.85%, respectively) and low landmark prediction errors (1.55 mm and 1.65 mm) on both datasets. The automated measurements agree well with the radiologists' manual measurements (Pearson correlation coefficients between 0.47 and 0.99 and intraclass correlation coefficients between 0.46 and 0.98). This method provides more accurate measurements than the conventional 2D x-ray-based measurement method, reducing the error of acetabular cup size from over 2 mm to less than 1 mm. Moreover, our morphometry measurement method is robust against the error of the previous bone segmentation step. As we tested different deep learning methods for the prerequisite bone segmentation, our method produced consistent final measurement results, with only a 0.37 mm maximum inter-method difference in the cup size.Significance. This study proposes a deep learning approach with improved robustness and accuracy for pelvis arthroplasty planning.

Relative lateral wall thickness is an improved predictor for postoperative lateral wall fracture after trochanteric femoral fracture osteosynthesis

Lateral wall thickness is a known predictor for postoperative stability of trochanteric femoral fractures and occurrence of secondary lateral wall fractures. Currently, the AO/OTA classification relies on the absolute lateral wall thickness (aLWT) to distinguish between stable A1.3 and unstable A2.1 fractures that does not take interpersonal patient differences into account. Thus, a more individualized and accurate measure would be favorable. Therefore, we proposed and validated a new patient-specific measure-the relative lateral wall thickness (rLWT)-to consider individualized measures and hypothesized its higher sensitivity and specificity compared with aLWT. First, in 146 pelvic radiographs of patients without a trochanteric femoral fracture, the symmetry of both caput-collum-diaphyseal angle (CCD) and total trochanteric thickness (TTT) was assessed to determine whether the contralateral side can be used for rLWT determination. Then, data of 202 patients were re-evaluated to compare rLWT versus previously published aLWT. Bilateral symmetry was found for both CCD and TTT (p ≥ 0.827), implying that bone morphology and geometry of the contralateral intact side could be used to calculate rLWT. Validation revealed increased accuracy of the rLWT compared with the gold standard aLWT, with increased specificity by 3.5% (Number Needed to Treat = 64 patients) and sensitivity by 1% (Number Needed to Treat = 75 patients). The novel rLWT is a more accurate and individualized predictor of secondary lateral wall fractures compared with the standard aLWT. This study established the threshold of 50.5% rLWT as a reference value for predicting fracture stability in trochanteric femoral fractures.

Digital Templating of THA Using PACS and an iPhone or iPad is as Accurate as Commercial Digital Templating Software

BACKGROUND

Digital templating is a standard preoperative planning method in THA. Unfortunately, many hospitals cannot afford the software or have accessibility barriers owing to a limited number of installed computer workstations. We created a templating method using a picture archiving and communication system and the Keynote program on a mobile phone. The method's accuracy and reliability have not been compared with those of commercial digital templating software.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) How accurate is this novel method on iPhone and iPad mobile devices compared with a commercially available digital templating software program? (2) Is the method reproducible among users with different levels of experience? (3) Are the results similar for different types of femoral prostheses?

METHODS

Between January 2017 and May 2020, we treated 209 patients for hip disease or trauma with primary cementless THA. We considered patients with a normal contralateral hip as potentially eligible for this retrospective study. Thus, 91% (191 of 209 hips) were eligible; a further 13% (27 hips) were excluded because of postoperative leg length discrepancy > 5 mm, femoral offset discrepancy > 5 mm (9% [18 hips]), intraoperative periprosthetic fracture (4% [eight hips]), and proximal femoral deformity (0.5% [one hip]), leaving 78% (164 hips) for analysis here. Their preoperative radiographs were evaluated by three independent assessors, including one senior orthopaedic surgeon, one senior resident, and one junior resident, using three methods. The first was digital templating using OrthoView software, which is a commercially available digital templating software program used worldwide and known to possess high accuracy. The other two methods were technically similar to one another, with the only difference being the interface: iPhone versus iPad. In both of those approaches, using the picture archiving and communication system measurement tool, we drew a circle on an acetabular radiograph to depict the cup. We took a photograph of the computer display and imported the photograph into slides of the Keynote program, a presentation software application for Mac computers, on both devices. It was then underlaid on transparent digital templates of the femoral stem, which were scanned from plastic templates and positioned at the center of each slide. We scaled the image to the template by adjusting the image size until a 15-cm straight line on the hip photograph was equal to the 15-cm scale markers of the template. All templating results were compared with the actual implanted cementless THA components to assess accuracy. All assessors were blinded to the information about the actual implants, and they were not involved in performing the surgical procedures. The intrarater and interrater reliabilities were analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficients and kappa values. The accuracy for predicting stem size for each type of the four stem designs was compared among the three methods.

RESULTS

We were able to predict the acetabular cup size within one size in 92% of hips (151 of 164) using OrthoView and in 92% (150 of 164) using the novel method (p > 0.99). The accuracies of the three methods were comparable for predicting a femoral stem size within one size (OrthoView: 90% [148 hips], iPhone: 93% [152 hips], and iPad: 91% [149 hips]; p = 0.78), and neck length (OrthoView: 96% [157 hips], iPhone: 96% [158 hips], and iPad: 97% [159 hips]; p = 0.95). Using OrthoView, the neck offset was correctly predicted in 80% (132 hips), compared to 85% (139 hips) when using the iPhone and 82% (134 hips) when using the iPad (p = 0.57). All methods showed substantial or excellent agreement regarding intrarater and interrater reliability. There was no difference in accuracy regarding any of the four femoral stem designs we evaluated (Avenir, Excia, ML taper, and Metha).

CONCLUSION

The digital templating technique for THA using an iPhone or iPad combined with a picture archiving and communication system demonstrated high accuracy, comparable to that of commercial digital templating software. This technique is reliable and reproducible for predicting a cementless prosthesis size, neck length, and offset in different types of femoral stems. It may be useful as an alternative in resource-constrained centers where commercial software programs are too expensive to be used in practice.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, diagnostic study.

Imaging in Hip Arthroplasty Management-Part 1: Templating: Past, Present and Future

Hip arthroplasty is a frequently used procedure with high success rates. Its main indications are primary or secondary advanced osteoarthritis, due to acute fracture, osteonecrosis of the femoral head, and hip dysplasia. The goals of HA are to reduce pain and restore normal hip biomechanics, allowing a return to the patient’s normal activities. To reach those goals, the size of implants must suit, and their positioning must meet, quality criteria, which can be determined by preoperative imaging. Moreover, mechanical complications can be influenced by implant size and position, and could be avoided by precise preoperative templating. Templating used to rely on standard radiographs, but recently the use of EOS^® imaging and CT has been growing, given the 3D approach provided by these methods. However, there is no consensus on the optimal imaging work-up, which may have an impact on the outcomes of the procedure. This article reviews the current principles of templating, the various imaging techniques used for it, as well as their advantages and drawbacks, and their expected results.

Impact of Femoral Neck Cortical Bone Defect Induced by Core Decompression on Postoperative Stability: A Finite Element Analysis

Objective

To analyze the impact of femoral neck cortical bone defect induced by core decompression on postoperative biomechanical stability using the finite element method.

Methods

Five finite element models (FEMs) were established, including the standard operating model and four models of cortical bone defects at different portions of the femoral neck (anterior, posterior, superior, and inferior). The maximum stress of the proximal femur was evaluated during normal walking and walking downstairs.

Results

Under both weight-bearing conditions, the maximum stress values of the five models were as follows: femoral neck (inferior) > femoral neck (superior) > femoral neck (posterior) > femoral neck (anterior) > standard operation. Stress concentration occurred in the areas of femoral neck cortical bone defect. Under normal walking, the maximum stress of four bone defect models and its increased percentage comparing the standard operation were as follows: anterior (17.17%), posterior (39.02%), superior (57.48%), and inferior (76.42%). The maximum stress was less than the cortical bone yield strength under normal walking conditions. Under walking downstairs, the maximum stress of four bone defect models and its increased percentage comparing the standard operation under normal walking were as follows: anterior (36.75%), posterior (67.82%), superior (83.31%), and inferior (103.65%). Under walking downstairs conditions, the maximum stress of bone defect models (anterior, posterior, and superior) was less than the yield strength of cortical bone, while the maximum stress of bone defect model (inferior) excessed yield strength value.

Conclusions

The femoral neck cortical bone defect induced by core decompression can carry out normal walking after surgery. To avoid an increased risk of fracture after surgery, walking downstairs should be avoided when the cortical bone defect is inferior to the femoral neck except for the other three positions (anterior, posterior, and superior).