Tandem high-dose therapy in relapsed and refractory B-cell lymphoma: results of a prospective phase II trial of myeloablative chemotherapy, followed by escalated radioimmunotherapy with 131I-anti-CD20 antibody and stem cell rescue

Radioligand Therapy in Lymphoma: Past, Present, and Future

In the1980s, radiolabeled cells helped understand the pathology of hemato-oncology. In the 1990s, preclinical trials evaluated radiolabeled immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) such as anti-CD20 agents labeled with Iodine-131 (Bexxar) or Yttrium-90 (Zevalin). Due to the safe and durable responses of radiolabeled MoAbs, the Food and Drug Administration approved these agents in the 2000s. Despite radioimmunotherapy's long journey, its application has recently decreased. This review will discuss the historical timeline of radioimmunotherapy, debate on advantages and difficulties, and explore trials. We will examine future directions of radioligand therapy in hemato-oncology, considering emerging molecules that may become the next theragnostic trend.

Dosimetric Approaches for Radioimmunotherapy of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma in Myeloablative Setting

Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) is a safe and active treatment available for non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs). In particular, two monoclonal antibodies raised against CD20, that is Zevalin (⁹⁰Y-ibritumomab-tiuxetan) and Bexxar (¹³¹I-tositumomab) received FDA approval for the treatment of relapsing/refractory indolent or transformed NHLs. RIT is likely the most effective and least toxic anticancer agent in NHLs. However, its use in the clinical setting is still debated and, in case of relapse after optimized rituximab-containing regimens, the efficacy of RIT at standard dosage is suboptimal. Thus, clinical trials were based on the hypothesis that the inclusion of RIT in myeloablative conditioning would allow to obtain improved efficacy and toxicity profiles when compared to myeloablative total-body irradiation and/or high-dose chemotherapy regimens. Standard-activity RIT has a safe toxicity profile, and the utility of pretherapeutic dosimetry in this setting can be disputed. In contrast, dose-escalation clinical protocols require the assessment of radiopharmaceutical biodistribution and dosimetry before the therapeutic injection, as dose constrains for critical organs may be exceeded when RIT is administered at high activities. The aim of the present study was to review and discuss the internal dosimetry protocols that were adopted for non-standard RIT administration in the myeloablative setting before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with NHLs.

Hematopoietic Progenitor Cell Transplantation in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults With Relapsed Mature B-Cell NHL

Although children, adolescents, and young adults with newly diagnosed B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma enjoy excellent overall survival with current chemoimmunotherapy, those with relapsed and/or refractory disease have a dismal prognosis. Although most clinicians would agree that hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation after reinduction therapy is frontline therapy for these patients, there is no consensus as to what type of hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation promises the best event-free and overall survival. This review outlines the disparate types of stem cell therapy that have been used in this difficult-to-treat population as well as the role of maintenance and CAR T-cell therapy in conjunction with stem cell therapy.

90Y-Daclizumab (Anti-CD25), High-Dose Carmustine, Etoposide, Cytarabine, and Melphalan Chemotherapy and Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Yielded Sustained Complete Remissions in 4 Patients with Recurrent Hodgkin's Lymphoma

Background: Despite advances in therapy of Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL), a proportion of patients will not respond or relapse. The authors had previously identified CD25, IL-2Rα, as a target for systemic radioimmunotherapy of HL since most normal cells do not express CD25, but it is expressed by a minority of Hodgkin/Reed-Sternberg (HRS) cells and most Tregs rosetting around HRS cells. Study Design and Treatment: This was a single institution, nonrandomized, open-label phase I/II trial of radiolabeled ⁹⁰Y-daclizumab, an anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody, BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan) conditioning treatment followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (ASCT). Four patients with refractory and relapsed HL were treated in this trial with 3 patients receiving a single dose of 564.6-574.6 MBq ⁹⁰Y-daclizumab and the fourth patient receiving two doses of 580.9-566.1 MBq ⁹⁰Y-daclizumab followed by high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT. Results: All 4 evaluable patients treated with ⁹⁰Y-daclizumab obtained complete responses (CRs) that are ongoing 4.5-7 years following their stem cell transplant. The spectrum and severity of adverse events were mild and more importantly none of the patients, including several with multiple therapies before this treatment, developed the myelodysplastic syndrome. Discussion: Targeting by daclizumab was not directed primarily at tumor cells, but rather the nonmalignant CD25-expressing T cells adjacent to the HRS cells and ⁹⁰Y-daclizumab provided strong enough β emissions to kill CD25-negative tumor cells at a distance by a crossfire effect. Furthermore, the strong β irradiation killed normal cells in the tumor microenvironment. Conclusions: ⁹⁰Y-daclizumab (anti-CD25), high-dose BEAM chemotherapy and ASCT was well tolerated and yielded sustained complete remissions in all 4 patients with recurrent HL patients who completed their treatment. Significance: Despite advances, a proportion of patients with HL will not have a CR to their initial treatment, and some with CRs will relapse. They demonstrated that the addition of ⁹⁰Y-daclizumab into the preconditioning regimen for refractory and relapsed HL patients with high-dose BEAM chemotherapy and ASCT provided sustained CRs in the 4 patients studied. Two of these patients were highly refractory to multiple prior treatments with bulky disease at entry into this study, including 1 patient who never entered a remission and had failed 6 different therapeutic regimens. Despite the small number of patients treated in this study, the sustained clinical benefit in these patients indicates a highly effective treatment. The daclizumab was directed primarily not at HRS cells themselves but toward nonmalignant T cells rosetting around malignant cells. ⁹⁰Y provided strong β emissions that killed antigen nonexpressing tumor cells at a distance by a crossfire effect. Furthermore, the strong β radiation killed normal cells in the tumor microenvironment that nurtured the malignant cells in the lymphomatous mass. The present study supports expanded analysis of ⁹⁰Y-daclizumab as part of the regimen of ASCT in patients with refractory and relapsed HL.

Strategies to improve outcomes of autologous hematopoietic cell transplant in lymphoma

High-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HDT-AHCT) remains an effective therapy in lymphoma. Over the past several decades, HDT with BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan) and CBV (cyclophosphamide, carmustine, and etoposide) have been the most frequently used preparatory regimens for AHCT in Hodgkin (HL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). This article reviews alternative combination conditioning regimens, as well as novel transplant strategies that have been developed, to reduce transplant-related toxicity while maintaining or improving efficacy. These data demonstrate that incorporation of maintenance therapy posttransplant might be the best way to improve outcomes.

Aptamers as quality control tool for production, storage and biosimilarity of the anti-CD20 biopharmaceutical rituximab

Detailed analysis of biopharmaceuticals is crucial for safety, efficacy and stability. Aptamers, which are folded, single-stranded oligonucleotides, can be used as surrogate antibodies to detect subtle conformational changes. We aimed to generate and assess DNA aptamers against the therapeutic anti-CD20 antibody rituximab. Six rituximab-specific aptamers with Kd = 354-887 nM were obtained using the magnetic bead-based systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment (SELEX) technology. Aptamer folds were analysed by online prediction tools and circular dichroism spectroscopy suggesting quadruplex structures for two aptamers while others present B-DNA helices. Aptamer binding and robustness with respect to minor differences in buffer composition or aptamer folding were verified in the enzyme-linked apta-sorbent assay. Five aptamers showed exclusive specificity to the Fab-fragment of rituximab while one aptamer revealed a broader recognition pattern to other monoclonal antibodies. Structural differences upon incubation at 40 °C for 72 h or UV exposure of rituximab were uncovered by four aptamers. High similarity between rituximab originator and biosimilar lots was demonstrated. The most sensitive aptamer (RA2) detected signal changes for all lots of a copy product suggesting conformational differences. For the first time, a panel of rituximab-specific aptamers was generated allowing the assessment of conformational coherence during production, storage, and biosimilarity of different products.

A pioneer experience in Malaysia on In-house Radio-labelling of (131)I-rituximab in the treatment of Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma and a case report of high dose (131)I-rituximab-BEAM conditioning autologous transplant

Radioimmunotherapy is an established treatment modality in Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The only two commercially available radioimmunotherapies - (90)Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan is expensive and (131)I-tositumomab has been discontinued from commercial production. In resource limited environment, self-labelling (131)I-rituximab might be the only viable practical option. We reported our pioneer experience in Malaysia on self-labelling (131)I-rituximab, substituting autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and a patient, the first reported case, received high dose (131)I-rituximab (6000MBq/163mCi) combined with BEAM conditioning for autologous HSCT.

A molecular perspective on rituximab: A monoclonal antibody for B cell non Hodgkin lymphoma and other affections

Rituximab (a chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody) is the first Food and Drug Administration approved anti-tumor antibody. Immunotherapy by rituximab, especially in combination-therapy, is a mainstay for a vast variety of B-cell malignancies therapy. Its therapeutic value is unquestionable, yet the mechanisms of action responsible for anti-tumor activity of rituximab and rituximab resistance mechanisms are not completely understood. Investigation of the mechanisms of action that contribute to the rituximab activity have eventually directed to a suite of novel combinations and novel treatment schedules, and also have resulted new generations of antibodies with more desired effects. Although, further investigations are needed to define the mechanisms of rituximab resistance and prominent effector activity of the altered next generation anti-CD20 to improve their efficacies and develop new anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies in NHL treatment. This article focuses on the properties of CD20 which led scientists to select it as an effective therapeutic target and the molecular details of mechanisms of rituximab action and resistance. We also discuss about the impact of rituximab in monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapy regimens. Finally, we comparatively summarize the next generations of anti CD20 monoclonal antibodies to highlight their advantages relative to their ancestor: Rituximab.

Monoclonal antibodies in conditioning regimens for hematopoietic cell transplantation

Monoclonal antibodies are increasingly being incorporated in conditioning regimens for autologous or allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). The benefit of adding rituximab to autologous HCT regimens is purportedly related to in vivo purging of clonal B cells. Randomized trials comparing the addition (or not) of rituximab to high-dose therapy regimens are lacking. No benefit of standard-dose radioimmunotherapy-based regimens for autografting in aggressive lymphomas was seen in a randomized controlled study. The incorporation of rituximab into allogeneic HCT regimens aims to improve responses while reducing nonrelapse mortality resulting from acute graft-versus-host disease. The optimal dose and administration schedule of rituximab in this setting are unknown, and potentially serious complications from increased infections owing to prolonged (and profound) cytopenias or persistent hypogammaglobulinemia are of concern. Radioimmunotherapy-based conditioning for allografting holds promise as a modality to optimize tumor control and synergize adoptive immunotherapy effects, but it remains experimental at this time. The addition of alemtuzumab to allogeneic HCT regimens is associated with prolonged lymphopenia and impaired immune reconstitution, high relapse rates, and serious infections. The optimal dose and schedule of alemtuzumab to avoid prolonged immune paresis remain elusive. It is anticipated that additional monoclonal antibodies will soon become available that can be incorporated into HCT regimens after safety and clinical efficacy are demonstrated.

Iodine-131 rituximab radioimmunotherapy with BEAM conditioning and autologous stem cell transplant salvage therapy for relapsed/refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma

A standard salvage therapy of relapsed/refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) comprises autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) after chemotherapy conditioning with carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan (BEAM) regimen. However, the achievement of long-term disease-free survival remains challenging. We have introduced concomitant (131)I-rituximab radioimmunotherapy (RIT) in an attempt to effect the elimination of lymphoma cells. Our phase II physician-sponsored study of 16 consecutive patients with relapsed, refractory, aggressive B-cell NHL reports a median 44 month follow-up after (131)I-rituximab-BEAM conditioning therapy and ASCT. Prospective personalized dosimetry performed in each patient limited the whole body radiation absorbed dose to 0.75 Gy. RIT (131)I-rituximab was administered on an outpatient basis on day -15 before ASCT. The BEAM conditioning regimen was commenced on day -6. Evaluable engraftment data are available for 15 patients who had 16 ASCTs. Engraftment was achieved in all patients, 15 out of 16 ASCTs achieved a complete response, and 1 out of 15 ASCTs achieved a partial response. Twelve out of sixteen patients remained alive and disease free at a median of 44 months (range 4-108 months) post-ASCT. This study suggests that the addition of (131)I-rituximab RIT to BEAM conditioning, before ASCT, for relapsed or primary refractory B-cell NHL improves disease eradication, compared with BEAM conditioning alone, without significant additional toxicity. In particular, there is an impression of improved disease control in the subset of patients with transformed follicular and mantle cell lymphomas.