Lack of association between cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 gene polymorphisms and lymphoid malignancy risk: evidence from a meta-analysis

Relationship Between Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte-associated Antigen-4: Programmed Death-1 Genes Polymorphisms and Susceptibility to Pediatric B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Programmed death-1 (PD1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) have a vital role in immune checkpoint pathways. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of PD1 and CTLA4 have been reported to be associated with susceptibility to certain autoimmune diseases and cancers. The potential association between SNPs in these immune checkpoint genes and risk of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) still unclear. The aim of this study is to clarify the effect of PD1 and CTLA4 SNPs on the risk of developing ALL and the prognosis of the disease. The study was performed on 100 pediatric B-ALL patients and 100 controls. The PD1 and CTLA4 SNPs were examined by RFLP technique. The study revealed that CTLA4 (rs11571316) was associated with high risk of B-ALL developments OR 1.492 (CI: 1157 to 1924) ( P =0.002). PD1 (rs36084323) GA genotype was significantly associated with protective effect against nonremission ( P =0.007). PD1 (rs36084323) A allele were associated with protective effect against relapse ( P =0.008). CTLA4 and PD1 genotypes did not have significant impact on B-ALL patients outcome. The current study displayed for the first time that genetic variations of the CTLA-4, was associated with susceptibility to B-ALL and that PD1 (rs36084323) GA genotype was significantly associated with protective effect against nonremission, while PD1 (rs36084323) A allele was associated with protective effect against relapse.

The prognostic and therapeutic potentials of CTLA-4 in hematological malignancies

INTRODUCTION

Hematological Malignancies (HMs) are a group of progressive, difficult-to-treat, and highly recurrent diseases. A suppressed phenotype of the immune system is present in HMs and growing evidence indicates the role of Cytotoxic T lymphocyte-Associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) in the course of HMs.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the recent literature on the role of CTLA-4 in different subtypes of HMs. Here, the studies on the expression pattern, its effect on the prognosis of different HMs, and polymorphisms of CTLA-4 have been elaborated. Finally, the effect of targeting CTLA-4 in vitro and in vivo, as well as in clinical trials, is discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

According to the recent literature, CTLA-4 is overexpressed in different HMs, which is correlated with poor survival, while it is associated with better a prognosis in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL). Targeting CTLA-4 in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), Sezary Syndrome (SS), Hodgkin's Lymphoma (HL), and so on, is helpful. While this is not recommended and may even be harmful in multiple myeloma (MM) and CLL. Also, it seems that certain CTLA-4 gene polymorphisms are efficient factors in the course of HMs. Future studies may broaden our knowledge regarding the role of CTLA-4 in HMs.

CTLA-4 polymorphism contributes to the genetic susceptibility of epithelial ovarian cancer

AIM

Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4), an inhibitory molecule on T-cells, plays a key role in tumorigenesis and progression. In the present study, we investigated the effects of three polymorphisms in the CTLA-4 gene on the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer and the clinical outcomes of patients.

METHODS

A case-control study was performed in 527 epithelial ovarian cancer patients and 532 controls. Genotypes of three polymorphisms were determined by polymerase chain reaction/ligase detection reaction. A survival analysis was performed in 346 patients who were followed up for more than 3 years and 208 patients who were followed up for more than 5 years.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in the genotype and allele distribution frequencies of the rs5742909 C/T polymorphism in CTLA-4 between patients and controls (p = 0.009 and p = 0.04, respectively). Compared with the CC genotype, the CT + TT genotype may significantly decrease the risk of developing epithelial ovarian cancer (OR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.52-0.91). However, no significant association between the rs231775 G/A and rs3087243 G/A polymorphisms and epithelial ovarian cancer risk was observed. The survival analysis showed that three polymorphisms may not be related to the clinical outcomes of patients.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggested that the rs5742909 C/T polymorphism of CTLA-4 may decrease the genetic susceptibility to epithelial ovarian cancer among northern Chinese women.

GSTM1 and GSTT1 Null Genotype Polymorphisms and Susceptibility to Arsenic Poisoning: a Meta-analysis

The value of the glutathione S-transferase (GST) null genotype in patients with arsenic poisoning has been recognized, but the conclusions of previous studies remain inconsistent. The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between GST mu 1 (GSTM1) and GST theta 1 (GSTT1) null genotype polymorphisms and susceptibility to arsenic poisoning. PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WanFang, and WeiPu databases were systematically searched for publications up to March 31, 2020. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. The pooled odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to estimate the relationship between GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotype polymorphisms and arsenic poisoning. The meta-analysis was conducted using STATA 14.0 software. Nine articles with 3324 subjects were included in the meta-analysis. A significantly negative correlation was observed between the GSTM1 null genotype and susceptibility to arsenic poisoning (OR = 0.731; 95% CI: 0.536-0.999; P = 0.049; I² = 70.5%). There was no significant correlation between the GSTT1 null genotype (OR = 1.009; 95% CI: 0.856-1.189; P = 0.915, I² = 36.8%) and GSTM1-GSTT1 double null genotype (OR = 1.105; 95% CI: 0.670-1.822; P = 0.695; I² = 64.7%) and the risk of arsenic poisoning. Egger's and Begg's tests indicated no publishing bias. Compared with controls, individuals with the GSTM1 null genotype were less susceptible to arsenic poisoning. The GSTT1 single null genotype and GSTM1-GSTT1 dual-null genotype were not associated with the risk of arsenic poisoning. The GSTM1 single null genotype may have potential as a genotoxic biomarker to identify individuals who are not prone to arsenic poisoning, and as a reference for guiding the prevention of arsenic poisoning.

Immune Checkpoint Molecules-Inherited Variations as Markers for Cancer Risk

In recent years, immunotherapy has been revolutionized by a new approach that works by blocking receptors called immune checkpoints (IC). These molecules play a key role in maintaining immune homeostasis, mainly by suppressing the immune response and by preventing its overactivation. Since inhibition of the immune response by IC can be used by cancer to avoid recognition and destruction by immune system, blocking them enhances the anti-tumor response. This therapeutic approach has brought spectacular clinical effects. The ICs present heterogeneous expression patterns on immune cells, which may affect the effectiveness of immunotherapy. The inherited genetic variants in regulatory regions of ICs genes can be considered as potential factors responsible for observed inter-individual differences in ICs expression levels on immune cells. Additionally, polymorphism located in exons may introduce changes to ICs amino acid sequences with potential impact on functional properties of these molecules. Since genetic variants may affect both expression and structure of ICs, they are considered as risk factors of cancer development. Inherited genetic markers such as SNPs may also be useful in stratification patients into groups which will benefit from particular immunotherapy. In this review, we have comprehensively summarized the current understanding of the relationship between inherited variations of CTLA-4, PDCD1, PD-L1, BTLA, TIM-3, and LAG-3 genes in order to select SNPs which can be used as predictive biomarkers in personalized evaluation of cancer risk development and outcomes as well as possible response to immunotherapy.

GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotype increase the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma: evidence based on 46 studies

Background

It is well known that hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been one of the most life-threatening diseases all over the world. Plenty of internal and extrinsic factors have been proven to be related to HCC, such as gene mutation, viral hepatitis, and Nitrosamines. Though previous studies demonstrated that glutathione S-transferase (GST) genotypes are associated with HCC, the conclusions are inconsistent. Therefore, we carried on a renewed meta-analysis to expound the connection between the null GSTM1, GSTT1 polymorphisms and the risk of HCC.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and CNKI databases to select qualified researches which satisfied the inclusion criteria up to July 31, 2018. Finally, we selected 41 articles with 6124 cases and 9781 controls in this meta-analysis. We use ORs and 95% confidence interval (CI) to evaluate the correlation intension between the GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genes and the risk of HCC. All the statistical processes were executed by Stata (version 12.0).

Results

The pooled analysis showed that both GSTM1 null genotypes (OR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.18–1.59) and GSTT1 null genotypes (OR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.23–1.66) increased the risk of HCC. And GSTM1–GSTT1 dual-null genotypes also increased the risk of HCC (OR = 1.58, 95% CI = 1.22–2.05). In the subgroup analysis, we obtained significant results among Asians when stratified by race, and the results are GSTM1 null OR = 1.44, 95% CI = (1.22–1.71), GSTT1 null OR = 1.48, 95% CI = (1.25–1.77), GSTM1–GSTT1 null OR = 1.58, 95% CI = (1.19–2.09), while we didn’t obtain significant results among Caucasians or Africans. Stratified analyses on the type of control indicated a higher risk of HCC associated with GSTM1, GSTT1 single null genotypes and GSTM1–GSTT1 dual-null genotypes in healthy people. No evidence of significant connection was discovered in chronic liver disease (CLD) except in GSTT1 single null.

Conclusions

Our study indicated that an individual who carries the GSTM1, GSTT1 single null genotypes and GSTT1–GSTM1 dual-null genotypes is more likely to develop HCC.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12935-019-0792-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Genetic Variation of Costimulatory Molecules, Including Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Antigen 4, Inducible T-Cell Costimulator, Cluster Differentiation 28, and Programmed Cell Death 1 Genes, in Iranian Patients With Leukemia

OBJECTIVES

There are limited studies about the possible relationship between genetic variations of costimulatory genes and susceptibility to hematologic malignancies like leukemia and lymphoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This cross-sectional study included 59 leukemia patients. The polymorphisms of costimulatory molecules, including the CTLA-4 gene (-318 C/T, -1722 T/C, -1661 A/G, +49 A/G), PD-1 gene (1.3 A/G, 1.9 C/T), ICOS gene (1720 C/T), and CD28 gene (17 C/T), were analyzed by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism methods.

RESULTS

Our results showed that the TT genotype and T allele of the CTLA-4 -318 T/C polymorphism, the AA genotype of CTLA-4 +49 A/G polymorphism, and the CT genotype of PD-1 1.9 C/T polymorphism were significantly higher in healthy controls (P < .05). However, the AG genotype of the CTLA-4 +49 A/G, the CC genotype of the PD-1 1.9 C/T, and the CT genotype of the CD28 +17C/T polymorphism were significantly increased in patients with leukemia (P < .05). When the genotype frequency of costimulatory genes was compared between different leukemia groups, we observed that the A allele of the CTLA-4 +49 A/G and the CC genotype and C allele of the CD28 +17 C/T polymorphism were significantly higher in patients with acute leukemia than in those with chronic leukemia (P < .05). Among leukemia patients, the AA genotype of CTLA-4 +49A/G polymorphism was significantly increased in patients with acute myeloid leukemia, whereas the AG genotype was more prevalent in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

We show for the first time that genetic variations of costimulatory molecules CTLA-4, CD28, and PD-1 may be associated with susceptibility of Iranian patients to leukemia.