1
|
Sarıcı A, Erkurt MA, Bahçecioğlu ÖF, Gök S, Kuku İ, Biçim S, Berber İ, Kaya E, Özgül M. Filgrastim alone versus cyclophosphamide and filgrastim for mobilization in multiple myeloma patients. Transfus Apher Sci 2021; 60:103159. [PMID: 34034961 DOI: 10.1016/j.transci.2021.103159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2021] [Revised: 05/13/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is standard treatment approach in most multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Before ASCT, chemomobilization or only granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) mobilization can be preferred in stem cell mobilization. The primary aim of the study is to compare the effect of the two mobilization regimens on hematopoietic engraftment times, CD34+cell counts and number of apheresis required to harvest stem cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS The records of MM patients who applied to our hospital between 2010 and 2020 were analysed retrospectively. Patients were divided into two groups (Group A: Cyclophosphamide plus filgrastim, Group B: Filgrastim alone) according to the mobilization regimen. RESULTS A total of 223 MM patients were included in this study (Group A:153, Group B:70 patients). When the patients in Group A and Group B were compared, the number of collected CD34+ cells were higher in Group A (p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of median times to neutrophil and platelet engraftment, and number of apheresis required to harvest stem cells (p > 0.05). The rate of infection development during mobilization in the patients in group A and the duration of hospitalization of these patients were higher than the patients in group B (p < 0.001). Patients receiving >6 cycles of chemotherapy and immunomodulatory treatment had lower collected CD34+ cells than other patients (p = 0.012 and p = 0.054). CONCLUSION Based on our findings, filgrastim alone seems to provide a sufficient amount of stem cells in MM patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmet Sarıcı
- İnönü University, Turgut Özal Medical Center, Adult Haematology Department, Malatya, Turkey.
| | - Mehmet Ali Erkurt
- İnönü University, Turgut Özal Medical Center, Adult Haematology Department, Malatya, Turkey.
| | - Ömer Faruk Bahçecioğlu
- İnönü University, Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Malatya, Turkey.
| | - Selim Gök
- İnönü University, Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Malatya, Turkey.
| | - İrfan Kuku
- İnönü University, Turgut Özal Medical Center, Adult Haematology Department, Malatya, Turkey.
| | - Soykan Biçim
- İnönü University, Turgut Özal Medical Center, Adult Haematology Department, Malatya, Turkey.
| | - İlhami Berber
- İnönü University, Turgut Özal Medical Center, Adult Haematology Department, Malatya, Turkey.
| | - Emin Kaya
- İnönü University, Turgut Özal Medical Center, Adult Haematology Department, Malatya, Turkey.
| | - Mustafa Özgül
- İnönü University, Turgut Özal Medical Center, Adult Haematology Department, Malatya, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang L, Xiang H, Yan Y, Deng Z, Li H, Li X, Liu J. Comparison of the efficiency, safety, and survival outcomes in two stem cell mobilization regimens with cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF or G-CSF alone in multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis. Ann Hematol 2021; 100:563-573. [PMID: 33404694 PMCID: PMC7817584 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-020-04376-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2020] [Accepted: 12/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Autologous stem cell transplantation as a frontline treatment for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) requires an adequate peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection before processing. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) with or without cyclophosphamide (CTX) is a common regimen for PBSC mobilization; their benefits and risks are controversial. To compare the efficiency, safety, and survival outcomes between the two regimens, we conducted a meta-analysis including 18 studies with 4 prospective and 14 retrospective studies; a total of 2770 patients with MM were analyzed. The CTX plus G-CSF regimen had higher yields of total CD34+ cells (SMD = 0.39, 95% CI (0.30, 0.49)), and higher mobilization rates of the target ⩾ 2 × 106/kg (OR = 3.34, 95% CI (1.82, 6.11)) and 4 × 106/kg (OR = 2.16, 95% CI (1.69, 2.76)) cells. A favorable event-free survival (EFS) (HR = 0.73, 95% CI (0.58, 0.93), p = 0.01) and better 3-year EFS rate (OR = 1.65, 95% CI (1.1, 2.47), p = 0.02) were also reached in the patients with CTX plus G-CSF mobilization, although the risks of admission (OR = 26.49, 95% CI (7.31, 95.97)) and fever (OR = 13.66, 95% CI (6.21, 30.03)) during mobilization were increased, the treatment-related mortality was consistent (p = 0.26). The CTX plus G-CSF regimen was superior to the G-CSF-alone regimen for PBSC mobilization in patients with MM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liwen Wang
- Department of Hematology, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410013, Hunan Province, China
- Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, 410013, Hunan Province, China
| | - Hongxian Xiang
- Department of Hematology, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410013, Hunan Province, China
- Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, 410013, Hunan Province, China
| | - Yuhan Yan
- Department of Hematology, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410013, Hunan Province, China
- Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, 410013, Hunan Province, China
| | - Zuqun Deng
- Department of Hematology, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410013, Hunan Province, China
- Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, 410013, Hunan Province, China
| | - Hui Li
- Assisted Reproduction Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sir Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310016, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Xin Li
- Department of Hematology, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410013, Hunan Province, China
| | - Jing Liu
- Department of Hematology, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410013, Hunan Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Figueiredo A, Atkins H, Mallick R, Kekre N, Kew A, McCurdy A. Cyclophosphamide-bortezomib-dexamethasone compared with bortezomib-dexamethasone in transplantation-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 27:e81-e85. [PMID: 32489256 DOI: 10.3747/co.27.5385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Cyclophosphamide-bortezomib-dexamethasone (CyBorD) is considered a standard induction regimen for transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (mm). It has not been prospectively compared with bortezomib-dexamethasone (Bor-Dex). We aimed to compare the efficacy of CyBorD and Bor-Dex induction in transplant-eligible patients. Methods In a retrospective observational study at a single tertiary centre, all patients with transplant-eligible mm who received induction with CyBorD or Bor-Dex between March 2008 and April 2016 were enrolled. Progression-free survival (pfs), response, and stem-cell collection for a first autologous stem-cell transplantation (ahsct) were compared. Results Of 155 patients enrolled, 78 (50.3%) had received CyBorD, and 77 (49.7%), Bor-Dex. The patients in the Bor-Dex cohort were younger than those in the CyBorD cohort (median: 57 years vs. 62 years; p = 0.0002) and more likely to have had treatment held, reduced, or discontinued (26% vs. 14.5%, p = 0.11). The stem-cell mobilization regimen for both cohorts was predominantly cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (gcsf). Plerixafor was used more often for the CyBorD cohort (p = 0.009), and more collection failures occurred in the CyBorD cohort (p = 0.08). In patients receiving Bor-Dex, more cells were collected (9.9×106 cells/kg vs. 7.7×106cells/kg, p = 0.007). At day +100, a very good partial response or better was achieved in 75% of the CyBorD cohort and in 73% of the Bor-Dex cohort (p = 0.77). Median pfs was 3.2 years in the Bor-Dex cohort and 3.7 years in the CyBorD cohort (p = 0.56). Conclusions Overall efficacy was similar in our patients receiving CyBorD and Bor-Dex. After ahsct, no difference in depth of response or pfs was observed. Cyclophosphamide-gcsf seems to increase collection failures and hospitalizations in patients receiving CyBorD. Prospective studies are required to examine that relationship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Figueiredo
- Division of Hematology, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON
| | - H Atkins
- Division of Hematology, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON
| | - R Mallick
- School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON
| | - N Kekre
- Division of Hematology, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON
| | - A Kew
- Division of Hematology, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON
| | - A McCurdy
- Division of Hematology, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hus I, Mańko J, Jawniak D, Jurczyszyn A, Charliński G, Poniewierska-Jasak K, Usnarska-Zubkiewicz L, Sawicki M, Druzd-Sitek A, Świderska A, Kopińska A, Grząśko N, Raźny M, Wędłowska A, Perzyński A, Gałązka A, Dytfeld D, Kubicki T, Rodzaj M, Waszczuk-Gajda A, Drozd-Sokołowska J, Pogłódek B, Pasternak A, Długosz-Danecka M, Szymczyk A, Dmoszyńska A. High efficacy and safety of VTD as an induction protocol in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma eligible for high dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation: A report of the Polish Myeloma Study Group. Oncol Lett 2019; 18:5811-5820. [PMID: 31788054 PMCID: PMC6865789 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2019.10929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2019] [Accepted: 08/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
The present retrospective analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of the VTD (bortezomib, thalidomide, dexamethasone) regimen in 205 newly-diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma (MM) eligible for high dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (HDT/ASCT) in routine clinical practice. With a median of 6 cycles (range, 1–8), at least partial response was achieved in 94.6% and at least very good partial response (VGPR) was achieved in 67.8% of patients. Peripheral neuropathy (PN) grade 2–4 was observed in 28.7% of patients. In 72% of patients undergoing stem cell mobilization one apheresis allowed the number of stem cells sufficient for transplantation to be obtained. Following HDT/ASCT the sCR rate increased from 4.9 to 14.4% and CR from 27.8 to 35.6%. The results demonstrated that VTD as an induction regimen was highly efficient in transplant eligible patients with MM with increased at least VGPR rate following prolonged treatment (≥6 cycles). Therapy exhibited no negative impact on stem cell collection, neutrophils and platelets engraftment following ASCT. Therapy was generally well tolerated and PN was the most common reason of dose reduction or treatment discontinuation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iwona Hus
- Department of Clinical Transplantology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-081 Lublin, Poland
| | - Joanna Mańko
- Department of Hematooncology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Medical University of Lublin, 20-081 Lublin, Poland
| | - Dariusz Jawniak
- Department of Hematooncology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Medical University of Lublin, 20-081 Lublin, Poland
| | - Artur Jurczyszyn
- Department of Hematology, Collegium Medicum, Jagiellonian University, 30-051 Cracow, Poland
| | - Grzegorz Charliński
- Department of Hematology, Specialist Muncipial Hospital, 87-100 Torun, Poland
| | | | - Lidia Usnarska-Zubkiewicz
- Department of Hematology, Blood Neoplasms and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-367 Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Mateusz Sawicki
- Department of Hematology, Blood Neoplasms and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-367 Wroclaw, Poland
| | | | - Alina Świderska
- Department of Hematology, University Hospital in Zielona Góra, 65-046 Zielona Góra, Poland
| | - Anna Kopińska
- Department of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Medical University of Silesia, 40-032 Katowice, Poland
| | - Norbert Grząśko
- Department of Hematology, St. John of Dukla Lublin Region Cancer Center, 20-090 Lublin, Poland
| | - Małgorzata Raźny
- Department of Hematology, Ludwik Rydygier Memorial Specialized Hospital, 31-826 Cracow, Poland
| | - Aleksandra Wędłowska
- Department of Hematology and Transplantology, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-211 Gdansk, Poland
| | - Aleksander Perzyński
- Department of Hematology, Institute of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, 00-791 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Aleksandra Gałązka
- Department of Hematology, Institute of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, 00-791 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Dominik Dytfeld
- Department of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-569 Poznan, Poland
| | - Tadeusz Kubicki
- Department of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-569 Poznan, Poland
| | - Marek Rodzaj
- Department of Hematology, Ludwik Rydygier Memorial Specialized Hospital, 31-826 Cracow, Poland
| | - Anna Waszczuk-Gajda
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Joanna Drozd-Sokołowska
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Bartłomiej Pogłódek
- Department of Oncologic Hematology, Specialist Hospital, 36-200 Brzozów, Poland
| | - Anna Pasternak
- Department of Hematology, Independent Public Health Care of Ministry of The Interior and Administration, 10-228 Olsztyn, Poland
| | - Monika Długosz-Danecka
- Department of Hematology, Collegium Medicum, Jagiellonian University, 30-051 Cracow, Poland
| | - Agnieszka Szymczyk
- Department of Clinical Transplantology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-081 Lublin, Poland
| | - Anna Dmoszyńska
- Department of Clinical Transplantology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-081 Lublin, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Figueiredo A, Kassis R, Albacker R, McCurdy A, Kekre N, Atkins H. The impact of multiple myeloma induction therapy on hematopoietic stem cell mobilization and collection: 25-year experience. Hematol Transfus Cell Ther 2019; 41:285-291. [PMID: 31412990 PMCID: PMC6978537 DOI: 10.1016/j.htct.2019.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2018] [Revised: 02/20/2019] [Accepted: 03/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
While first-line induction therapy for patients with multiple myeloma has changed over the years, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation still plays a significant role, improving both depth of response and progression-free survival of myeloma patients. Our 25-year experience in mobilizing hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells for 472 transplant-eligible myeloma patients was retrospectively reviewed. Patients were stratified according to the remission induction therapy received, and the outcomes were compared among the cohorts that received vincristine, adriamycin and dexamethasone (VAD) (n = 232), bortezomib and dexamethasone (BD) (n = 86), cyclophosphamide, bortezomib and dexamethasone (CyBorD) (n = 82) and other regimens (n = 67). Cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was the predominant mobilization regimen given. A greater number of CD34+ cells (9.9 × 10E6/kg, p = 0.026) was collected with less hospital admissions in BD patients (13%, p = 0.001), when compared to those receiving VAD (7.5 × 10E6/kg, 29%), CyBorD (7.6 × 10E6/kg, 19%), or other regimens (7.9 × 10E6/kg, 36%). Induction therapy did not influence the overall rate of unscheduled visits or the length of hospitalization because of complications following mobilization. The myeloma response was not significantly deepened following the cyclophosphamide administered for mobilization. This analysis demonstrates the importance of monitoring the impact of initial treatment on downstream procedures such as stem cell mobilization and collection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Rashed Albacker
- College of Medicine King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Park Y, Kim DS, Jeon MJ, Lee B, Yu ES, Kang K, Lee SR, Sung HJ, Nam M, Yoon S, Choi CW, Kang E, Cho D, Kim K, Kim BS, Kim D, Kim SJ. Single‐dose etoposide is an effective and safe protocol for stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma. J Clin Apher 2019; 34:579-588. [DOI: 10.1002/jca.21734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2019] [Revised: 06/20/2019] [Accepted: 06/26/2019] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Yong Park
- Division of Hematology‐Oncology, Department of Internal MedicineAnam Hospital, Korea University School of Medicine Seoul South Korea
| | - Dae Sik Kim
- Division of Hematology‐Oncology, Department of Internal MedicineGuro Hospital, Korea University School of Medicine Seoul South Korea
| | - Min Ji Jeon
- Division of Hematology‐Oncology, Department of Internal MedicineGuro Hospital, Korea University School of Medicine Seoul South Korea
| | - Byung‐Hyun Lee
- Division of Hematology‐Oncology, Department of Internal MedicineAnam Hospital, Korea University School of Medicine Seoul South Korea
| | - Eun Sang Yu
- Division of Hematology‐Oncology, Department of Internal MedicineGuro Hospital, Korea University School of Medicine Seoul South Korea
| | - Ka‐Won Kang
- Division of Hematology‐Oncology, Department of Internal MedicineAnam Hospital, Korea University School of Medicine Seoul South Korea
| | - Se Ryeon Lee
- Division of Hematology‐Oncology, Department of Internal MedicineAnsan Hospital, Korea University School of Medicine Seoul South Korea
| | - Hwa Jung Sung
- Division of Hematology‐Oncology, Department of Internal MedicineAnsan Hospital, Korea University School of Medicine Seoul South Korea
| | - Myung‐Hyun Nam
- Division of Hematology‐Oncology, Department of Laboratory MedicineAnsan Hospital, Korea University School of Medicine Seoul South Korea
| | - Soo‐Young Yoon
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Guro HospitalKorea University School of Medicine Seoul South Korea
| | - Chul Won Choi
- Division of Hematology‐Oncology, Department of Internal MedicineGuro Hospital, Korea University School of Medicine Seoul South Korea
| | - Eun‐Suk Kang
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Samsung Medical CenterSungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Seoul South Korea
| | - Duck Cho
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Samsung Medical CenterSungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Seoul South Korea
| | - Kihyun Kim
- Division of Hematology‐Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical CenterSungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Seoul South Korea
| | - Byung Soo Kim
- Division of Hematology‐Oncology, Department of Internal MedicineAnam Hospital, Korea University School of Medicine Seoul South Korea
| | - Dae‐Won Kim
- Department of Laboratory MedicineAnam Hospital, Korea University School of Medicine Seoul South Korea
| | - Seok Jin Kim
- Division of Hematology‐Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical CenterSungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Seoul South Korea
- Department of Health Sciences and TechnologySAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University Seoul 06351 South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Peripheral blood stem cell mobilisation with G-CSF alone versus G-CSF and cyclophosphamide after bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone induction in multiple myeloma. Bone Marrow Transplant 2018. [DOI: 10.1038/s41409-018-0152-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|