Factors influencing platelet transfusion refractoriness in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Establishment and clinical application of the HLA genotype database of platelet-apheresis donors in Suzhou

The establishment of a platelet-apheresis donor database may provide a feasible solution to improve the efficacy of platelet transfusion in patients with immune platelet transfusion refractoriness (PTR). This study aimed to establish HLA genotype database in Suzhou, to provide HLA-I compatible platelets for PTR patients to ensure the safety and effectiveness of platelet transfusions. We used a polymerase chain reaction sequence-based typing (PCR-SBT) method to establish the database by performing high-resolution HLA-A, -B, and -C genotyping on 900 platelet-apheresis donors. HLA-I antibody was detected in patients using a Luminex device, and HLA-I gene matching was performed by an HLA-Matchmaker. We found that the highest frequency of the HLA-A allele was A*11:01 (17.06 %), followed by A*24:02 (14.67 %) and A*02:01 (13.61 %). The highest frequency of the HLA-B allele was B*46:01 (9.78 %), followed by B*40:01 (8.39 %) and B*13:02 (33 %). After the detection of platelet antibodies in 74 patients with immune PTR, we found 30 HLA-A antibodies and 48 HLA-B antibodies, and there were a variety of high frequency antibodies whose alleles were low in the donor database, such as HLA-A*68:02, and B*57:01. After avoiding donor-specific antibodies (DSA) matching, 102 of 209 platelet-compatible transfusions were effective, resulting in an effective rate of 48.8 %, which significantly improved the efficacy of platelet transfusion. The establishment of a platelet donor database is of great significance to improve the therapeutic effect of platelet transfusion in patients with hematologic disorder, and save blood resources, and it is also the premise and guarantee of precise platelet transfusion.

Transfusion Support in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Contemporary Narrative Review

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a cornerstone of modern medical practice, and can only be performed safely and effectively with appropriate transfusion medicine support. Patients undergoing HSCT often develop therapy-related cytopenia, necessitating differing blood product requirements in the pre-, peri-, and post-transplant periods. Moreover, ensuring optimal management for patients alloimmunized to human leukocyte antigens (HLA) and/or red blood cell (RBC) antigens, as well as for patients receiving ABO-incompatible transplants, requires close collaboration with transfusion medicine and blood bank professionals. Finally, as updated transfusion guidelines and novel blood product modifications emerge, the options available to the transplant practitioner continue to expand. Herein, we detail contemporary blood transfusion and transfusion medicine practices for patients undergoing HSCT.

Comparison of platelet antibody screen, crossmatching and HLA antibody testing in patients refractory to platelet transfusions

Patients undergoing recurrent platelet transfusions can become refractory to these transfusions. Platelet antibody screens (Immucor), platelet crossmatching assays (Immucor), and HLA antibody testing are commonly used to test these patients. The relative effectiveness of these tests has not been determined. A higher incidence of strongly positive screen results that did not predict crossmatch results was anecdotally noted. Therefore, the results of the platelet antibody screens and crossmatches were systematically compiled over a 12-year period from 2010 to 2021. Of note, the Immucor Capture-P Ready Screen (platelet antibody) had a recall in March 2013 after which the performance of the test appears to have changed. The positivity rate of the platelet antibody screen increased over the course of the study, and this was statistically significant when analyzing year as a continuous variable and when grouping years by four-year periods (2010-13,2014-17,2018-21). In contrast, platelet crossmatch reactivity decreased slightly throughout this period. During the 2018-21 period, HLA antibody testing was commonly performed and correlated well with the crossmatch testing but not with the screen. These results suggest that the drastic increase in positivity we observed in the platelet antibody screen over this period is due to increased analytic sensitivity (with possible reduced specificity) of the screen and not a change in our patient population. Based on these results, the platelet antibody screen has little clinical utility and directly performing platelet crossmatching or HLA antibody testing is recommended for patients suspected to be refractory to platelet transfusions due to alloimmune-mediated factors.

A meta-analysis of risk factors associated with platelet transfusion refractoriness

BACKGROUND

Platelet transfusion refractoriness (PTR) remains an intractable issue in clinical practice, and is common in hematological patients. At present, it is believed that both immune and non-immune factors play a role. We conducted a meta-analysis of various risk factors which may contribute to PTR.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, and Web of Science were selected as research database platforms. Citations included were further assessed for quality and bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. All analyses were performed using Review Manager Version 5.4 and STATA 16.0.

RESULTS

The preliminary search revealed 1069 publications, and 17 (5929 patients in total) were ultimately included in the quantitative analysis. The following variables were associated with the occurrence of PTR: fever (OR = 2.26, 95%CI 2.00-2.55, p < 0.00001), bleeding (OR = 2.10, 95%CI 1.36-3.24, p = 0.0008), female sex (OR = 2.06, 95%CI 1.13-3.75, p = 0.02), antibiotic use (OR = 2.94, 95%CI 1.54-5.59, p = 0.001), and infection (OR = 2.19, 95%CI 1.20-4.03, p = 0.01). Antibodies involved in immune activation were a higher risk factor (OR = 4.17, 95%CI 2.36-7.36, p < 0.00001), and splenomegaly was nearly significant (OR = 1.73, 95%CI 0.97-3.07, p = 0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

We identified some important risk factors for PTR, but further research is needed to identify the many other possible elements that may contribute to or mediate PTR.

Platelet transfusion in adults: An update

Many patients worldwide receive platelet components (PCs) through the transfusion of diverse types of blood components. PC transfusions are essential for the treatment of central thrombocytopenia of diverse causes, and such treatment is beneficial in patients at risk of severe bleeding. PC transfusions account for almost 10% of all the blood components supplied by blood services, but they are associated with about 3.25 times as many severe reactions (attributable to transfusion) than red blood cell transfusions after stringent in-process leukoreduction to less than 10⁶ residual cells per blood component. PCs are not homogeneous, due to the considerable differences between donors. Furthermore, the modes of PC collection and preparation, the safety precautions taken to limit either the most common (allergic-type reactions and febrile non-hemolytic reactions) or the most severe (bacterial contamination, pulmonary lesions) adverse reactions, and storage and conservation methods can all result in so-called PC "storage lesions". Some storage lesions affect PC quality, with implications for patient outcome. Good transfusion practices should result in higher levels of platelet recovery and efficacy, and lower complication rates. These practices include a matching of tissue ABH antigens whenever possible, and of platelet HLA (and, to a lesser extent, HPA) antigens in immunization situations. This review provides an overview of all the available information relating to platelet transfusion, from donor and donation to bedside transfusion, and considers the impact of the measures applied to increase transfusion efficacy while improving safety and preventing transfusion inefficacy and refractoriness. It also considers alternatives to platelet component (PC) transfusion.

[Incidence and clinical significance of platelet transfusion refractoriness after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia]

Objective: To retrospectively analyze the incidence and clinical significance of platelet transfusion refractoriness (PTR) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) . Methods: A cohort of 55 CMML patients received allo-HSCT at Peking University Institute of Hematology during 2004-2021 were retrospectively assessed. The incidence of PTR within 30 days after allo-HSCT was retrospectively analyzed, and the impact on clinical outcomes and bleeding event were compared between patients with platelet transfusion refractoriness (PTR) or effective platelet transfusion (EPT) . Results: The incidence of PTR after allo-HSCT in CMML patients was 25.5% (14/55) . PTR patients had a lower rate of platelet engraftment than EPT patients (28.6% vs 100%) , and the median time of engraftment was 67 (33-144) days and 21 (9-157) days respectively (P<0.010) . There was no significant difference between two groups in acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) and chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) (P=0.183, P=0.455) . After following-up a median of 684 (24-3978) days, the 1-year overall survival (OS) and 1-year leukemia free survival (LFS) in PTR and EPT patients were (35.4±13.9) % vs (75.1±7.8) % (P=0.037) and (28.1±13.3) % vs (65.3±8.2) % (P=0.072) , respectively. The transplant-related mortality (TRM) were (48.2±2.4) % and (9.0±0.25) %, respectively (P=0.009) . Bleeding events occurred in five patients (35.7%) of PTR and 2 patients (4.9%) of EPT (P=0.009) . Conclusion: In CMML patients with allo-HSCT, the incidence of PTR is 25.5%, which was associated with delayed platelet engraftment, increased bleeding events, inferior OS and increased TRM.

Current Status of and Global Trends in Platelet Transfusion Refractoriness From 2004 to 2021: A Bibliometric Analysis

Platelet transfusion refractoriness (PTR) is common in patients with hematology and oncology and is becoming an important barrier in the treatment of thrombocytopenia and hemorrhage. Bibliometrics is an effective method for identifying existing research achievements, important breakthroughs, current research hotspots, and future development trends in any given field. In recent years, research on PTR has received increasing attention, but a bibliometric analysis of this field has not yet been reported. In this study, we applied bibliometrics to analyze the existing literature on PTR research over the past 17 years. On November 1, 2021, we began a publications analysis of PTR research using the Science Citation Index Expanded of the Web of Science Core Collection with collection dates from 2004 to 2021. This research aimed to summarize the state of PTR research using Bibliometrix to identify connections between different elements (i.e., authors, institutions, countries, journals, references, and keywords) using VOS viewer analyses to visualize key topics and trends in PTR research using Cite Space and gCLUTO. The results of all 310 studies showed that the annual number of publications focused on PTR is steadily increasing, with the United States of America and Japan making significant contributions. We noted that the research group led by Dr. Sherrill J. Slichter was prominent in this field, while Estcourt Lise may become the most influential newcomer. Transfusion was the most popular journal, and Blood was the most cited journal. Using various analyses, including co-cited analysis, historiography analysis, citation burst analysis, and factorial analysis, we pointed out and discussed contributing publications. According to occurrence analysis, co-word biclustering analysis, landform map, thematic evolution, and thematic map, we believe that “activation,” “p-selection,” “CD36 deficiency,” “gene-frequencies,” “CD109,” “HPA-1,” and “beta (3) integrin” may become new trends in PTR research. The outcome of our bibliometric analyses has, for the first time, revealed profound insights into the current state and trends in PTR research. The systematic analysis provided by our study clearly demonstrates the field's significant advancements to all researchers who are interested in a quick and comprehensive introduction to the field.

Cytokine Release Syndrome Is an Independent Risk Factor Associated With Platelet Transfusion Refractoriness After CAR-T Therapy for Relapsed/Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Background: Chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy is successful in improving treatment outcomes for relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R ALL). However, toxicities associated with CAR-T therapy are being increasingly identified. Pancytopenia is one of the most common complications after CAR-T therapy, and platelet transfusions are an essential part of its supportive care. Study Design and Methods: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of platelet transfusions for R/R ALL patients at our single center and identify associated risk factors. Overall, 44 R/R ALL patients were enrolled in this study, of whom 26 received CAR-T therapy and 18 received salvage chemotherapy. Result: Patients in the CAR-T group had a higher incidence of platelet transfusion refractoriness (PTR) (15/26, 57.7%) than those in the chemotherapy group (3/18, 16.7%) (p = 0.007). For patients receiving CAR-T therapy, multivariate analysis showed that the grade of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was the only independent risk factor associated with PTR (p = 0.007). Moreover, higher peak serum IL-6 and IFN-γ levels suggested a higher risk of PTR (p = 0.024 and 0.009, respectively). Patients with PTR received more platelet infusion doses than those without PTR (p = 0.0426). Patients with PTR had more grade 3-4 bleeding events than those without PTR (21.4 vs. 0%, p = 0.230), and the cumulative incidence of grade 3-4 bleeding event was different (p = 0.023). Conclusion: We found for the first time that PTR is associated with the CRS grade. Improved knowledge on the mechanisms of PTR after CAR-T therapy is needed to design a rational therapeutic strategy that aims to improve the efficiency of transfusions.

Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-incompatible mean fluorescence intensity-selected platelet products have corrected count increments similar to HLA antigen-matched platelets

BACKGROUND

Donor specific antibody sum mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values have been successfully used in transplant medicine to assess risk for organ rejection. However, little is known regarding whether MFI values could be similarly used to aid in platelet product selection. We have developed a novel protocol where MFI values are used to offer human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-incompatible platelet products when HLA antigen-matched products are not available. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of this protocol.

METHODS

We performed a 4-year retrospective chart review for all patients who received at least one MFI-selected platelet product. A corrected count increment (CCI) was calculated for each transfusion event. A mixed effects model was used to investigate the association between CCIs for MFI-selected, HLA antigen matched, and random donor platelet transfusions. A random effects expectation-maximization regression tree was used to define the extent to which other patient variables, such as age, sex, and diagnosis impacted the CCI for each platelet transfusion.

RESULTS

Twenty highly HLA alloimmunized patients received a total of 591 platelets. MFI-selected platelet (low MFI) transfusions had a significantly higher median CCI 0-6 hour post-transfusion (13,559, interquartile range [IQR]: 8275-18,736) compared to random donor platelets (2121, IQR: 0-10,368, p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in median CCI between HLA antigen matched and MFI selected platelet transfusions (p = 0.2). Mixed effects and regression modeling revealed that MFI-selected platelet products had a significantly higher CCI than non-matched platelets, even when accounting for other significant patient variables.

CONCLUSION

MFI-selected HLA-incompatible platelet products could provide a comparable alternative to traditional HLA antigen-matched platelet products.

The relevance of a bank with genotyped platelets donors

OBJECTIVE

Describe the clinical and laboratory characteristics and the transfusion strategy of patients at Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein with platelet refractoriness and identify their etiological characteristics. Standardize the platelet immunofluorescence technique by flow cytometry as a test for platelet compatibility in immune platelet refractoriness in transfusion support.

METHODS

Review of medical records of refractory platelet patients followed at HIAE from January 2011 to May 2017. Clinical-demographic data, laboratory data and identification of the use of compatible genotyped platelets for patients in need of transfusion therapy were collected. The analyzed patients were classified according to the etiology of their platelet refractoriness. To standardize the FC-PIFT technique, blood group O platelets were incubated with serum from blood group AB donors and anti-IgG monoclonal antibody to determine the negative control. In order to verify the influence of the ABO system, monoclonal anti-IgG antibodies were incubated with blood group A or B platelets and with blood group O donor serum with isohemagglutinins below and above 1/64.

RESULTS

A total of 47 patients were evaluated, a 51% (24/47) preponderance of associated immune and non-immune factors (NIPR + IPR). The most common causes of NIPR + IPR were splenomegaly (54%) and the development of HLA antibodies (88%), consistent with the literature. For patients who required therapeutic transfusion, only a small portion received compatible genotyped platelets.

CONCLUSION

Although 60% of patients could benefit from the therapeutic transfusion of genotyped platelets, only 10% were actually transfused with this type of blood component. This reaffirms the need for investments in a bank of genotyped platelet donors.

Retrospective cohort studies of repeat donors reveal donor-dependent variability in the recovery of transfused platelets

BACKGROUND

The in vivo recovery of transfused platelets is variable and often unpredictable. Although many recipient-dependent factors are well described, donor-dependent variables remain poorly understood.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

To explore donor-dependent variables we conducted 2 retrospective studies of platelet transfusion outcomes in repeat donors. One study analyzed multiple autologous, radiolabeled platelet transfusions, and a second study analyzed multiple clinical platelet transfusions from a small cohort of repeat donors.

RESULTS

In 36 subjects, multiple within-subject determinations of recovery and survival of radiolabeled autologous platelets revealed a relative consistency in platelet recoveries within donors compared to the range of recoveries among donors. Intraclass correlation coefficients for platelet recovery were 43% to 93%. In 524 ABO-compatible clinical platelet transfusions derived from seven donors, a linear mixed-effects model revealed significant donor-dependent differences in corrected count increments for units stored for 4 or 5 days.

CONCLUSIONS

These two studies indicate reproducible donor-dependent differences in transfused platelet recovery, suggesting a possible heritable influence on the quality of transfused platelets.

Clinical and immunological features of platelet transfusion refractoriness in young patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia

Platelet transfusion is important in the prevention and treatment of bleeding in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after receiving intensive chemotherapy. However, platelet transfusion refractoriness (PTR) is an intractable clinical issue occurred in these patients. And its clinical and immunological features remain largely unknown. The potential causes and clinical features of PTR were retrospectively analyzed in 560 patients who were diagnosed as de novo AML in Tongji Hospital from June 2012 through June 2018. A high‐throughput antibody screening for the detection of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and its serotypes was performed in 133 newly diagnosed AML patients. PTR occurred in 11.8% of the de novo AML patients. The median age for patients with PTR was 46 years (range, 15‐70). It frequently manifested in female patients and in patients with splenomegaly, M4 subtype, c‐Kit gene mutation, and rearrangements of RUNX1‐RUNX1T1 or CBFB‐MYH11, commonly referred to as core binding factor AML (CBF‐AML). Notably, CBF‐AML was independently associated with the occurrence of PTR. PTR predominantly developed in patients who had CBF‐AML (P < .001) and in patients who further had better minimal residual disease (MRD) reduction (≥3‐log) before the second consolidation chemotherapy (P = .007). HLA‐I antibodies were detected in the serum of 9.0% of AML patients and markedly enriched in patients with PTR (P < .001) and in patients with CBF‐AML (P = .018). HLA‐B was the most frequently identified serum epitope in PTR patients. Patients with CBF‐AML had higher tendency to develop HLA‐I antibodies and PTR, which depicted novel features of PTR in AML and might provide insights into its efficient managements.

A pilot trial of complement inhibition using eculizumab to overcome platelet transfusion refractoriness in human leukocyte antigen allo-immunized patients

Heavily transfused patients frequently develop human leukocyte antigen (HLA) allo-immunization resulting in platelet transfusion refractoriness and a high risk for life-threatening thrombocytopenia. Data suggest complement activation leading to the destruction of platelets bound by HLA allo-antibodies may play a pathophysiologic role in platelet refractoriness. Here we conducted a pilot trial to investigate the use of eculizumab, a monoclonal antibody that binds and inhibits C5 complement, to treat platelet transfusion refractoriness in allo-immunized patients with severe thrombocytopenia. A single eculizumab infusion was administered to 10 eligible patients, with four (40%) patients overcoming platelet refractories assessed measuring the corrected platelet count increment (CCI) 10-60 min and 18-24 h post transfusion. Responding patients had a reduction in the requirement for subsequent platelet transfusions and had higher post-transfusion platelet increments for 14 days following eculizumab administration. Remarkably, three of the four responders met CCI criteria for response despite receiving HLA-incompatible platelets. Our results suggest that eculizumab has the ability to overcome platelet transfusion refractoriness in patients with broad HLA allo-immunization. This study establishes proof of principle that complement inhibition can treat platelet transfusion refractoriness, laying the foundation for a large multicentre trial to assess the overall efficacy of this approach (ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02298933).

The clinical characteristics of patients with acute leukemia or stem cell transplantation exhibiting immune based platelet refractoriness

BACKGROUND

To investigate the related factors influencing immune platelet transfusion refractoriness (PTR) in acute leukemia (AL) from induction to consolidation and compare management for immune PTR, so as to improve the Platelet increment in AL.

METHODS

The primary analysis included 890 patients with AL, 225 of whom were the immune PTR (25 %).They are patients in our center from induction to consolidation or transplantation in the past 10 years. Flow cytometry, karyotype characteristics and other basic information were compared between the immune PTR vs control (no-PTR) groups. We analyzed the treatment outcomes of immune PTR including matched platelets, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), increasing apheresis platelet does.

RESULTS

Immune PTR is more likely to occur in patients with poor prognosis in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) (P = 0.01).There is a relation between NPM1 mutation and occurrence of immune PTR (P = 0.029).The incidence of PTR at 35-59Y was higher than that at <35Y(OR = 0.68, 95 % CI = 0.48-0.96) and ≥60Y(OR = 0.49,95 % CI = 0.28-0.83), and the difference was statistically significant(P = 0.03, P = 0.01).The Platelet increment with 1 unit (u) was 47.12 %, 2 u increased to 71.14 %, and the matched 2 u (75.11 %) had the best effect. IVIG improved the Platelet increment, but there was no difference between 0.4 g/kg IVIG and 1 g/kg IVIG. Immune PTR is more likely to occur in the ages of 35-60 years.

CONCLUSION

There are specific AL patient characteristics which predispose to the phenomenon of immune based PTR. Meanwhile, increasing the IVIG dose could not improve Platelet increment obviously.

Efficacy of HLA virtual cross-matched platelet transfusions for platelet transfusion refractoriness in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

Cross-matched platelet (cross-matched PLT) transfusion is effective for immune-mediated platelet transfusion refractoriness (PTR), but is more costly and time-consuming for physical cross-match than using standard PLT units. Recent studies have reported the utility of human leucocyte antigens (HLA) virtual cross-matched PLT (HLA-matched PLT) that is defined as HLA-A/B matched or no antibody against donor-specific antigen. Here, we evaluated the effect of HLA-matched PLTs for PTR in post hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Our study included a total of 241 PLTs in 16 patients who underwent HSCT at Okayama University Hospital between 2010 and 2017, receiving either HLA-matched or cross-matched PLTs. We calculated the 24-hour corrected count increments (CCI-24) to evaluate the effect of PLTs. A CCI-24 ≥ 4500 was considered to be a successful transfusion.

RESULTS

We analyzed 139 cross-matched PLTs and 102 HLA-matched PLTs. In the immune-mediated PTR, the rate of successful transfusion was 60.5% for cross-matched PLT and 63.4% for HLA-matched PLT (p = 0.825). On the other hand, the median CCI-24 for cross-matched PLT transfusions and HLA-matched PLT transfusions were 1856 and 5824 (p < 0.001), with a success rate of 28.1 and 54.1% in cases with non-immune-mediated PTR, respectively (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The effectiveness of HLA-matched PLT is not inferior to cross-matched PLT. This result indicates that physical cross-match can be omitted in post HSCT PTR.

Platelet Transfusion: And Update on Challenges and Outcomes

Platelet transfusion is a common practice in onco-hematologic patients for preventing or treating hemorrhages. Platelet concentrates can be transfused with therapeutic or prophylactic purposes. With the aim to help clinicians to take the decisions on platelet transfusion, some guidelines have been developed based on the current scientific evidence. However, there are some controversial issues and available scientific evidence is not enough to solve them. There is little information about what is the best platelet product to be transfused: random platelets or single donor apheresis platelets, and plasma-suspended or additive solution suspended platelets. Platelets are often transfused without respecting the ABO compatibility, but influence of this practice on platelet transfusion outcome is not well established. In the prophylactic platelet transfusion set there are some questions unsolved as the platelet threshold to transfuse prior to specific procedures or surgery, and even if platelet transfusion is necessary for some specific procedures as autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. A challenging complication raised from multiple platelet transfusions is the platelet transfusion refractoriness. The study and management of this complication is often disappointing. In summary, although it is a widespread practice, platelet transfusion has still many controversial and unknown issues. The objective of this article is to review the current evidence on platelet transfusion practices, focusing on the controversial issues and challenges.

Development of a Calculated Panel Reactive Antibody Web Service with Local Frequencies for Platelet Transfusion Refractoriness Risk Stratification

BACKGROUND

Calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) scoring is used to assess whether platelet refractoriness is mediated by human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies in the recipient. cPRA testing uses a national sample of US kidney donors to estimate the population frequency of HLA antigens, which may be different than HLA frequencies within local platelet inventories. We aimed to determine the impact on patient cPRA scores of using HLA frequencies derived from typing local platelet donations rather than national HLA frequencies.

METHODS

We built an open-source web service to calculate cPRA scores based on national frequencies or custom-derived frequencies. We calculated cPRA scores for every hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) patient at our institution based on the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) frequencies and local frequencies. We compared frequencies and correlations between the calculators, segmented by gender. Finally, we put all scores into three buckets (mild, moderate, and high sensitizations) and looked at intergroup movement.

RESULTS

2531 patients that underwent HSCT at our institution had at least 1 antibody and were included in the analysis. Overall, the difference in medians between each group's UNOS cPRA and local cPRA was statistically significant, but highly correlated (UNOS vs. local total: 0.249 and 0.243, ρ = 0.994; UNOS vs. local female: 0.474 and 0.463, ρ = 0.987, UNOS vs. local male: 0.165 and 0.141, ρ = 0.996; P < 0.001 for all comparisons). The median difference between UNOS and cPRA scores for all patients was low (male: 0.014, interquartile range [IQR]: 0.004-0.029; female: 0.0013, IQR: 0.003-0.028). Placement of patients into three groups revealed little intergroup movement, with 2.96% (75/2531) of patients differentially classified.

CONCLUSIONS

cPRA scores using local frequencies were modestly but significantly different than those obtained using national HLA frequencies. We released our software as open source, so other groups can calculate cPRA scores from national or custom-derived frequencies. Further investigation is needed to determine whether a local-HLA frequency approach can improve outcomes in patients who are immune-refractory to platelets.

Platelet Transfusion Refractoriness in Single-Unit Cord Blood Transplantation for Adults: Risk Factors and Clinical Outcomes

Platelet transfusion refractoriness (PTR) is frequently observed after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). However, the incidence of and risk factors for PTR, and impact of PTR on transplant outcomes after cord blood transplantation (CBT) have not been fully investigated. We retrospectively analyzed 185 adult patients who received single-unit CBT in our institute. The mean 16-hour corrected count increment (CCI) for the 5840 platelet transfusions was 3.68 × 10⁹/L. Among them, 3196 transfusions (54.7%) were associated with a PTR with 16-hour-CCI <4.5 × 10⁹/L. Results of multivariate analysis indicated that the following factors were significantly associated with decreased platelet transfusion responses: female sex with pregnancy history, male sex, the presence of HLA class I antibody, lower cord blood total nucleated cell dose, lower cord blood CD34⁺ cell dose, 3 locus HLA disparities, body temperature ≥38°C, C-reactive protein ≥10 mg/dL, cytomegalovirus reactivation, use of foscarnet, and use of liposomal amphotericin B. By contrast, graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis including methotrexate, ABO minor mismatch, use of ganciclovir, and use of linezolid were significantly associated with better platelet transfusion responses. PTR had a significant effect on poor neutrophil and platelet recovery, and overall mortality after CBT. These data suggest that early phase PTR may be predictive of engraftment and mortality after single-unit CBT for adults.