Ponatinib as second-line treatment in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients in real-life practice

Progress in the study of autophagy-related proteins affecting resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs in leukemia

Leukemia is a life-threatening malignant tumor of the hematopoietic system. Currently, the main treatment modalities are chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. However, increased drug resistance due to decreased sensitivity of leukemia cells to chemotherapeutic drugs presents a major challenge in current treatments. Autophagy-associated proteins involved in autophagy initiation have now been shown to be involved in the development of various types of leukemia cells and are associated with drug resistance. Therefore, this review will explore the roles of autophagy-related proteins involved in four key autophagic processes: induction of autophagy and phagophore formation, phagophore extension, and autophagosome formation, on the development of various types of leukemias as well as drug resistance. Autophagy may become a promising therapeutic target for treating leukemia.

Arterio-occlusive events among patients with chronic myeloid leukemia on tyrosine kinase inhibitors

ABSTRACT

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are standard therapy for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. Each of these drugs has a specific profile of tyrosine kinases that they inhibit and, although all are clinically effective, they each have unique toxicity profiles. With the introduction of ponatinib, arterio-occlusive events were first noted and later found to occur with all TKIs to various extents. The recognition of this "class effect" was delayed considering ponatinib was introduced 10 years after the introduction of imatinib. The reasons for the delay in identification of this class effect are likely multifaceted. Importantly, there is an inconsistency in adverse event reporting criteria among the major clinical trials of the various TKIs, likely resulting in mixed reporting of arterio-occlusive events. Reporting events based on a frequency threshold, lack of sufficient follow-up, attempts at causality attribution, and the primary focus on molecular response may all have played an additional role. Considering the increasing rate of arterio-occlusive events over time, the termination of many trials after only 5 years prevents full assessment of the impact of these events. A comprehensive evaluation of TKI adverse effects using uniform Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities terms and comprehensive adjudication of these events may be helpful in better assessing the real risk for patients with each TKI. Future clinical trials should use a uniform and comprehensive approach to reporting adverse events without attempting to assign causality to the study drug.

Safety and Efficacy of TKIs in very Elderly Patients (≥75 Years) with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

BACKGROUND

While the outcomes of chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) patients aged over 65 years have been extensively evaluated in real-life experiences, limited data exist for the very elderly population (i.e., aged ≥ 75 years), especially for next-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). In this retrospective study, we sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of TKIs in this particular setting of patients.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of a multicenter cohort of 123 newly diagnosed CP-CML very elderly patients.

RESULTS

The median age at diagnosis was 80 years (range: 75-96). In the first line, 86.1% of patients received imatinib, 7.1% dasatinib, 5.6% nilotinib, and 0.81% received bosutinib. A total of 31 patients (25.2%) switched to second-line therapy, nine patients to a third line, and one patient to a fourth line of therapy. Resistance to treatment was the primary reason for switching therapy in both the first (64.5%) and second lines (77.7%). At diagnosis, reduced doses were administered in 36.5% of patients, in 61.2% in the second line, and in all patients in subsequent lines of therapy. In the first-line setting, 71.9% of patients achieved an early molecular response (EMR, i.e., 3-month BCR::ABL1IS < 10%); at 6, 12, and 24 months, MR3 was reached by 35.7%, 55.7%, and 75.0% of patients, respectively, with 16.6%, 35.7%, and 51.7% achieving a deep molecular response (DMR) at the same time points. Treatment-free remission (TFR) was successfully attempted in 11 patients. During the follow-up period, adverse events (AEs) were observed in 78.8% of patients, including 22 cases of cardiovascular AEs. Toxicity grade ≥ 3 was more commonly observed in patients treated with standard doses of TKIs compared to reduced doses (p = 0.033). Overall, the median follow-up was 46.62 months (range: 1.8-206.2), and 43 patients died due to non-CML-related causes. Three patients died due to disease progression to advanced (n = 1) and blastic (n = 2) phases. The 5-year overall survival (OS) for the entire cohort was 71.9% (95% CI: 0.63-0.81), with no significant difference between the patients treated with standard doses of TKIs compared to those treated with reduced doses (p = 0.35).

CONCLUSIONS

TKIs appear to be safe and effective even in very elderly CML patients, and dose optimization strategies yield satisfactory molecular responses for adequate disease control with an improved safety profile.

Real-world Management of CML: Outcomes and Treatment Patterns

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a disease that previously signified a poor prognosis, but treatment options and outcomes have improved over the last several decades. Despite this, challenges remain in optimal management in clinical practice, as the characteristics in trial populations differ from patients who are treated in a real-world setting. This review describes recent updates in real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with CML.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several analyses describing real-world practice patterns show that tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the most commonly prescribed agents in multiple lines of therapy. First-generation (1G) and second-generation (2G) TKIs are the most commonly prescribed, even in the third line and beyond. Third-generation (3G) TKIs are typically utilized in patients with resistant disease who are younger with fewer comorbidities. Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is utilized significantly less, given other treatment options available. The goals of treatment with CML have shifted to quality of life, cost savings, and treatment-free response (TFR). Despite clear guidelines for attempting TFR, discontinuation practice patterns remain inconsistent. TKIs are the mainstay of CML treatment, including those in later lines of therapy. In real-world practice, several challenges still remain with regard to optimal management. Specifically, ideal sequencing of treatments, side effect profiles of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), current role and timing of transplant, and adherence to recommendations for attempting to achieve a treatment-free response (TFR). A national registry could characterize these practice patterns in order to find ways to optimize care for CML patients.

Adverse events and dose modifications of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic myelogenous leukemia

The prognosis of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML-CP) in chronic phase has improved dramatically since the introduction of imatinib. In addition to imatinib, second- and third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and a novel allosteric inhibitor, asciminib, are now available. During long-term TKI therapy, the optimal selection of TKI therapy for individual patients requires the understanding of specific patterns of toxicity profile to minimize chronic toxicity and the risk of adverse events, including pulmonary arterial hypertension, pleural effusion, and cardiovascular events. Given the high efficacy of TKI therapy, dose modifications of TKI therapy reduce the risk of toxicities and improves quality of life during therapy. In this review article, we summarize the characteristics and adverse event profile of each TKI and dose modifications in patients with CML-CP and discuss future perspectives in the treatment of CML-CP.

Management of chronic myeloid leukaemia patients treated with ponatinib in a real-life setting: A retrospective analysis from the monitoring registries of the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA)

Real-world data on daily practice management, treatment modifications and outcome of a large cohort of chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) patients treated with ponatinib was performed through monitoring Registries of the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA). Overall, 666 CML subjects were included in the ponatinib registry from February 2015 to December 2020 and were eligible for analysis: 515 in chronic phase (CP), 50 in accelerated phase (AP) and 101 in blast crisis (BC). Median age at baseline was 58.7 years with a predominance of male subjects (57.1%). The median time from diagnosis to start of ponatinib was 2.35 years: 259 (38.9%) subjects had received two previous lines of treatment, 260 (39.0%) three lines and 147 (22.1%) four or more lines. A molecular response [from major molecular response (MMR) to a score of ≤0.01% on the international reporting scale (IS)] was reported for 59% of patients out of 593 patients analysed. With a median follow-up of 14.4 months, 136 subjects (20.4%) required at least one dose reduction due to adverse events (AEs), whereas 309 patients (46.4%) required dose reduction in the absence of any evidence of side effects. Treatment discontinuation occurred in 261 patients (39%). This real-life analysis shows that dose reductions were made primarily as a precaution rather than due to the occurrence of adverse reactions.

Ponatinib for the treatment of adult patients with resistant or intolerant Chronic-Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

INTRODUCTION

Patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CP-CML) who are resistant or intolerant to second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) may benefit from treatment with a third-generation TKI, like ponatinib.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the authors discuss the role of ponatinib, an oral pan-inhibitor of BCR-ABL1, with potent activity in heavily pretreated patients, including T315I mutation. In the long-term follow-up of the PACE trial, 60% of patients with prior TKIs exposure achieved a major cytogenetic response with ponatinib and 40% a major molecular response; 5-year overall survival was 73%. Cardiovascular adverse events represent the major toxicity associated with ponatinib. Adopting a dose-reduction approach appeared to be safe: starting with 45 or 30 mg and decreasing to 15 mg once BCR-ABL1/ABL1≤1% is achieved. In patients who are not candidates for ponatinib therapy, asciminib or other novel TKIs like HQP1351, represent alternative options.

EXPERT OPINION

In patients with CP-CML resistant or intolerant to second-generation TKIs, we favor using a third-generation TKI such as ponatinib. Although we initiate a donor search as soon as a patient fails a second-generation TKI, we still prefer treating patients with ponatinib and will only consider transplantation in the event of no response or disease progression.

Retrospective analysis of arterial occlusive events in the PACE trial by an independent adjudication committee

Background

The phase 2 PACE (Ponatinib Ph+ ALL and CML Evaluation) trial of ponatinib showed robust long-term benefit in relapsed Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) leukemia; arterial occlusive events (AOEs) occurred in ≥ 25% of patients based on investigator reporting. However, AOE rates vary depending on the definitions and reporting approach used.

Methods

To better understand clinically relevant AOEs with ponatinib, an independent cardiovascular adjudication committee reviewed 5-year AOE data from the PACE trial according to a charter-defined process and standardized event definitions.

Results

A total of 449 patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) or Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) received ponatinib (median age 59 y; 47% female; 93% ≥ 2 prior tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs); median follow-up, 37.3 months). The adjudicated AOE rate (17%) was lower than the non-adjudicated rate (i.e., rate before adjudication; 25%). The only adjudicated AOE in > 2% of patients was peripheral arterial occlusive disease (4%). Exposure-adjusted incidence of newly occurring adjudicated AOEs decreased over time. Patients with multiple baseline cardiovascular risk factors had higher adjudicated AOE rates than those without risk factors.

Conclusions

This independent adjudication study identified lower AOE rates than previously reported, suggesting earlier overestimation that may inaccurately reflect AOE risk with ponatinib. This trial was registered under ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01207440 on September 23, 2010 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01207440).

Arterial Hypertension and Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Off-target effects in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are associated with cardiovascular toxicity. Hypertension represents an important cardiovascular complication and, if not appropriately managed, can contribute to developing thrombotic events. Third-generation TKI ponatinib is associated with hypertension development, and its use is more restricted than in the past. Few data are reported for second-generation TKI, nilotinib, dasatinib, and bosutinib. The aim of this article was to evaluate with a systematic review and meta-analysis the real incidence of hypertension in CML patients treated with second- or third-generation TKI.

Methods: The PubMed database, Web of Science, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched for studies published between January 1, 2000, and January 30, 2021; the following terms were entered in the database queries: Cardiovascular, Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, CML, Tyrosine kinases inhibitor, TKI, and Hypertension. The study was carried out according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement.

Results: A pooled analysis of hypertension incidence was 10% for all new-generation TKI, with an even higher prevalence with ponatinib (17%). The comparison with the first-generation imatinib confirmed that nilotinib was associated with a significantly increased risk of hypertension (RR 2; 95% CI; 1.39-2.88, I²=0%, z=3.73, p=0.0002). The greatest risk was found with ponatinib (RR 9.21; 95% CI; 2.86-29.66, z=3.72, p=0.0002).

Conclusion: Hypertension is a common cardiovascular complication in CML patients treated with second- or third-generation TKI.

Comparison of incidence/occurrence of cardiovascular events between ponatinib vs bosutinib among patients with at least one prior line of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic myeloid leukemia in a community setting in the United States

INTRODUCTION

In this real-world study, the incidence of cardiovascular events (CV) including major adverse cardiac events (MACE), arterial occlusive events (AOE), and venous occlusive events (VOE) was evaluated in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients treated with ponatinib or bosutinib in a US commercial database population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

CML patients aged ≥18 years with use of 1 or 2 prior tyrosine kinase inhibitors prescribed bosutinib or ponatinib were selected from the IBM® MarketScan® Research database. Cox proportional hazard model analyses were conducted to examine any difference in CV event risk.

RESULTS

Ponatinib and bosutinib was associated with similar incidence and risk of CV events, including MACEs (HR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.35, 3.01), AOEs (HR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.43, 1.85) and VOEs (HR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.44, 1.94).

CONCLUSION

Treatment with ponatinib or bosutinib was not associated with significant differences in the incidence of CV events in CML patients.

Clinical outcomes in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemia treated with ponatinib in routine clinical practice-data from a Belgian registry

Data on clinical use of ponatinib are limited. This prospective registry aimed to evaluate outcomes of ponatinib treatment in routine practice over 3 years (2016–2019) in Belgium (NCT03678454). Patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) or Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) were treated with ponatinib per current label. Fifty patients (33 CML and 17 Ph+ ALL) were enrolled. Fifty-five percent of CML and 29% of Ph+ ALL patients had received ≥3 prior tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Reasons for starting ponatinib were intolerance (40%), relapse or refractoriness (28%) to previous TKIs, progression (16%), or T315I mutation (16%). Median follow-up was 15 months for CML and 4.5 months for Ph+ ALL patients. Best response was a major molecular response in 58% of CML and 41% of Ph+ ALL patients. Of 20 patients who started ponatinib due to intolerance to previous TKIs, 9 (64%) CML and 4 (67%) Ph+ ALL achieved a major molecular response. Three-year estimates of overall survival were 85.3% and 85.6%, respectively, in CML and Ph+ ALL patients; estimated progression-free survival was 81.6% and 48.9%. Adverse reactions were reported in 34 patients (68%); rash (26%) and dry skin (10%) were most common. Reported cardiovascular adverse reactions included vascular stenosis (3), arterial hypertension (2), chest pain (1), palpitations (1), and vascular occlusion (1). This Belgian registry confirms results from the PACE clinical trial and supports routine ponatinib use in CML and Ph+ ALL patients who are resistant or intolerant to previous TKIs or with the T315I mutation.

Dosing Strategies for Improving the Risk-Benefit Profile of Ponatinib in Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase

The treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has been advanced by the development of small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), which target the fusion protein BCR-ABL1 expressed by the Philadelphia chromosome. Ponatinib is a 3rd generation TKI that binds BCR-ABL1 with high affinity and inhibits most BCR-ABL1 mutants, including the T315I mutation. The approved starting dose of ponatinib is 45 mg once daily (full dose), however, the need for a full dose, especially in patients with dose adjustments due to tolerability problems, remains undemonstrated. Lower starting doses of ponatinib (30 mg or 15 mg once daily) for patients “with lesser degrees of resistance or multiple intolerances, especially those with an increased cardiovascular risk profile” has been recommended by the 2020 European LeukemiaNet. However, the available literature and guidance on the use of ponatinib at low dosage are limited. The objective of this paper is to describe how we select ponatinib dosage for CML patients in chronic phase in our clinical practice based on the available evidence and our clinical experience. We propose dosing regimens for the optimal starting dose for six generic cases of CML patients in chronic phase eligible for the switch to ponatinib and provide an algorithm to guide ponatinib dosing during treatment.

A Treatment-free Interval Allowed by Ponatinib as Fourth-line Therapy

BACKGROUND

The third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor ponatinib has demonstrated high clinical efficacy in the setting of patients with resistant chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), also inducing deep molecular responses. However, ponatinib-related cardiovascular toxicities make management challenging, especially of those patients with CML with previous cardiovascular comorbidities.

CASE REPORT

We report on the efficacy of ponatinib treatment used as fourth-line therapy in a 55-year-old woman affected by significant comorbidities (mainly cardiovascular) present before the diagnosis of CML. Ponatinib therapy induced a rapid and excellent clinical response, with the achievement of a durable deep molecular response that allowed us to propose a strategy of treatment discontinuation in order to reduce drug-related toxicities.

CONCLUSION

A strategy of a treatment-free interval might represent a useful clinical tool in those patients with CML who achieve a durable deep molecular response but are also affected by significant comorbidities in order to minimize the risk of ponatinib-related toxicities.

Cardiovascular safety of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor nintedanib

The intracellular tyrosine kinase inhibitor nintedanib has shown great efficacy for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and other interstitial lung diseases. However, the incidence rate of myocardial infarction (MI) among participants in landmark IPF trials was remarkable, peaking at 3/100 patient-years. Although subjects with IPF often have a high cardiovascular (CV) risk profile, the occurrence of MI in nintedanib-treated patients may not be fully explained by clustering of CV risk factors. Nintedanib inhibits the vascular endothelial growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor and fibroblast growth factor pathways, which play important roles in the biology of the atherosclerotic plaque and in the response of the heart to ischaemia. Hence, unwanted CV effects may partly account for nintedanib-related MI. We review the evidence supporting this hypothesis and discuss possible actions for a safe implementation of nintedanib in clinical practice, building on the experience with tyrosine kinase inhibitors acquired in cardio-oncology.

Dose Optimization of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: A New Therapeutic Challenge

The chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) therapeutic landscape has dramatically changed with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) development, which allows a near-normal life expectancy. However, long-term TKI exposure has been associated with persistent adverse events (AEs) which negatively impact on quality of life (QoL) and have the potential to cause significant morbidity and mortality. In clinical practice, TKI dose reduction is usually considered to reduce AEs and improve QoL, but dose optimization could have also another aim, i.e., the achievement and maintenance of cytogenetic and molecular responses. While therapy cessation appeared as a safe option for about half of the patients achieving an optimal response, no systematic assessment of long-term TKI dose de-escalation has been made. The present review is focused on the most recent evidences for TKIs dose modifications in CML clinical studies and in the real-life setting. It will consider TKI dose modifications in newly diagnosed patients, dose reduction for AEs, or in deep molecular response, either as a prelude to treatment-free remission (TFR) or as continuous maintenance therapy in those patients not wishing to attempt TFR. In addition, it will focus on patients not achieving a molecular response deep enough to go to TFR, and for whom dose reduction could be an option to avoid AEs.

Ponatinib and other CML Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Thrombosis

Abl1 kinase has important biological roles. The Bcr-Abl1 fusion protein creates undesired kinase activity and is pathogenic in 95% of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and 30% of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients. Targeted therapies to these diseases are tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The extent of a tyrosine kinase inhibitor’s targets determines the degree of biologic effects of the agent that may influence the well-being of the patient. This fact is especially true with tyrosine kinase inhibitor effects on the cardiovascular system. Thirty-one percent of ponatinib-treated patients, the tyrosine kinase inhibitor with the broadest inhibitory spectrum, have thrombosis associated with its use. Recent experimental investigations have indicated the mechanisms of ponatinib-associated thrombosis. Further, an antidote to ponatinib is in development by re-purposing an FDA-approved medication.

Current Treatment Options for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Failing Second-Generation Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

Despite the excellent overall survival (OS) of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), a significant proportion will not achieve optimal response to imatinib or second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (2GTKI). For patients with inadequate response to 2GTKIs, alternative 2GTKIs or ponatinib are widely available treatment options in daily clinical practice. Treatment decisions should be guided by correct identification of the cause of treatment failure and accurate distinction between resistant from intolerant or nonadherence patients. This review aims to provide practical advice on how to select the best treatment option in each clinical scenario.

The multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor ponatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia: Real-world data

Development of the highly selective targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has expanded the therapeutic options for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Patients undergoing TKI therapy should be closely monitored to ensure that the best therapeutic response and quality of life are achieved, and to control suboptimal responses and adverse events. Despite the high rate of response using current first-line TKIs, treatment failure may still occur, and resistance is considered a challenge in the treatment of patients with CML. The third-generation TKI, ponatinib, is a potent orally bioavailable pan BCR-ABL inhibitor that inhibits both wild-type and mutant BCR-ABL1 kinase, including the "gatekeeper" T315I mutation, which is resistant to all other currently available TKIs. This paper reviews the effectiveness, feasibility, and safety of ponatinib in the real-life clinical management of CML. Potential prognostic factors in identifying patients most likely to benefit from ponatinib treatment will be discussed, and case presentations illustrating situations encountered in real-life clinical practice are described. Ponatinib is effective in patients who have received prior TKIs in clinical studies as well as under real-life conditions. Nevertheless, the risk/benefit balance must be evaluated for each patient, particularly considering disease state, mutational status, treatment line, intolerance/resistance to prior TKIs, age, frailty, and specific comorbidities.

Ponatinib therapy in recurrent Philadelphia chromosome-positive central nervous system leukemia with T315I mutation after Allo-HSCT

Central nervous system leukemia (CNSL) relapse is relatively common among Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) leukemia patients who undergo allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). The prognosis of patients is dismal for those with a BCR-ABL T315I mutation, which is resistant to TKIs including second-generation drugs. We assessed ponatinib for nine patients with recurrent Ph+ CNSL and a T315I mutation after allo-HSCT, including five patients with Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia and four with chronic myelogenous leukemia. Five patients experienced isolated CNSL relapse, and four experienced CNSL with hematologic relapse. All patients received ponatinib combined with intrathecal chemotherapy, and four patients with hematologic relapse received systemic chemotherapy and/or donor lymphocyte infusion. All patients achieved a deep molecular response and central nervous system remission (CNSR) at a median time of 1.5 (range: 0.7-3) months after ponatinib treatment. Two patients experienced a second CNSL relapse due to ponatinib reduction, but they achieved CNSR again after an increase to the standard dosage. Six patients developed graft versus host disease. By April 1, 2019, eight patients were alive, and one died of pneumonia. The median time of survival after the first CNSL relapse posttransplantation was 18 (range: 11.2-48.5) months. Our data from a small number of samples suggests that ponatinib is effective for recurrent Ph+ CNSL patients with a BCR-ABL T315I mutation after allo-HSCT and warrants broader clinical evaluation.

Towards a Personalized Treatment of Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Treatment goals and ambitions have even been upwardly revised since demonstration was made that under certain conditions, treatment-free remission was possible. Herein, we will discuss on how to try tailoring treatment choices to the unique characteristics of each patient.

RECENT FINDINGS

Since the first-generation ATP-competitive TKI imatinib was made available in the clinic in 2001, second-generation drugs such as dasatinib, nilotinib and bosutinib and the third-generation TKI ponatinib have broadened the therapeutic armamentarium, providing effective salvage against intolerance and different types of resistance, or as frontline options. Management and outcomes of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia have been revolutionized by the discovery, development, and approval of BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Most patients can now expect a near-to normal life expectancy and acceptable quality of life on life-long treatment, providing awareness and avoidance of harmful adverse events, which depend on each TKI safety profile and patient personal background.

Ponatinib in the Treatment of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia and Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Leukemia: Recommendations of a German Expert Consensus Panel with Focus on Cardiovascular Management

Treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute leukemia (Ph+ ALL) has been revolutionized with the advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Most patients with CML achieve long-term survival similar to individuals without CML due to treatment with TKIs not only in frontline but also in further lines of therapy. The third-generation TKI ponatinib has demonstrated efficacy in patients with refractory CML and Ph+ ALL. Ponatinib is currently the most potent TKI in this setting demonstrating activity against T315I mutant clones. However, ponatinib's safety data revealed a dose-dependent, increased risk of serious cardiovascular (CV) events. Guidance is needed to evaluate the benefit-risk profile of TKIs, such as ponatinib, and safety measures to prevent treatment-associated CV events. An expert panel of German hematologists and cardiologists summarize current evidence regarding ponatinib's efficacy and CV safety profile. We propose CV management strategies for patients who are candidates for ponatinib.

Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Available for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Efficacy and Safety

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is currently a disease in which patients can enjoy a near normal life-expectancy. However, since the majority of patients will need to remain on treatment indefinitely, physicians in care of CML patients need be familiar with the indications and toxicities of all approved tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). In clinical practice, there are five TKI (imatinib, nilotinib, dasatinib, bosutinib, and ponatinib) that are available in different scenarios and have distinct safety profiles. Decisions regarding first line treatment must be based on CML risk, comorbidities, and patients expectations. Despite the excellent outcome, half of the patients will eventually fail (due to intolerance or resistance) to first line treatment, with many of them requiring a third or even further lines of therapy. When selecting for such patients, it is essential to distinguish between failure and intolerance to previous TKIs. In the present review, we will address all these issues from a practical point of view.

Arterial occlusive events in chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with ponatinib in the real-life practice are predicted by the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) chart

Arterial occlusive events (AOEs) represent emerging complications in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients treated with ponatinib. We identified 85 consecutive CML adult patients who were treated with ponatinib in 17 Italian centers. Patients were stratified according to the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) assessment, based on sex, age, smoking habits, systolic blood pressure, and total cholesterol levels.

The 60‐month cumulative incidence rate of AOEs excluding hypertension was 25.7%. Hypertension was reported in 14.1% of patients. The median time of exposure to ponatinib was 28 months (range, 3‐69 months). Patients with a high to very high SCORE risk showed a significantly higher incidence rate of AOEs (74.3% vs 15.2%, P < 0.001). Patients aged ≥60 years showed a significantly higher incidence rate of AOEs (51.5% vs 16.9%, P = 0.008). In multivariate analysis, no association was found between AOEs and positive history of CV disease, age, dose of ponatinib, previous exposure to nilotinib, and comorbidities. Only the SCORE risk was confirmed as a significant predictive factor (P = 0.01; HR = 10.9; 95% C.I. = 1.7‐67.8). Patients aged ≥60 years who were treated with aspirin had a lower incidence rate of AOEs (33.3% vs 61.8%). Among the 14 reported AOEs, 78.6% of them showed grade 3 to 4 toxicity. This real‐life study confirmed the increased incidence of AOEs in CML patients treated with ponatinib, with high to very high SCORE risk. We suggest that patients aged ≥60 years who were treated with ponatinib should undergo prophylaxis with 100 mg/day of aspirin. Our findings emphasize personalized prevention strategies based on CV risk factors.

Deciphering role of FGFR signalling pathway in pancreatic cancer

Recently, fibroblast growth factors are identified to play a vital role in the development and progression of human pancreatic cancer. FGF pathway is critical involved in numerous cellular processes through regulation of its downstream targets, including proliferation, apoptosis, migration, invasion, angiogenesis and metastasis. In this review article, we describe recent advances of FGFR signalling pathway in pancreatic carcinogenesis and progression. Moreover, we highlight the available chemical inhibitors of FGFR pathway for potential treatment of pancreatic cancer. Furthermore, we discuss whether targeting FGFR pathway is a novel therapeutic strategy for pancreatic cancer clinical management.

Metabolic underpinnings of leukemia pathology and treatment

BACKGROUND

Carcinogenic transformation of white blood cells during hematopoiesis leads to the development of leukemia, a cancer characterized by incompetent immune cells and a disruption of normal bone marrow function. Leukemias are diverse in type, affected population, prognosis, and treatment regimen, yet a common theme in leukemia is the dysregulated metabolism of leukemic cells and leukemic stem cells with respect to their noncancerous counterparts.

RECENT FINDINGS

In this review, we highlight current findings that elucidate metabolic traits unique to the four major types of leukemia, which confer carcinogenic survival but can be potentially exploited for therapeutic intervention. These metabolic features can work in conjunction with or be independent of unique aspects of the bone marrow microenvironment that can also influence cell survival and proliferation, thus sustaining carcinogenesis.

CONCLUSION

Deepening our understanding of the interactions of leukemias with their niche environments in vivo will inform future treatments for leukemia, particularly for those that are refractive to tyrosine kinase inhibitors and other therapeutic mainstays.

Insights into the optimal use of ponatinib in patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukaemia

There are five tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) that are currently approved (in the European Union and the United States) for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) in the chronic phase (CP) and each of them has its own efficacy and toxicity profile. Oral ponatinib (Iclusig^®) is a third-generation TKI structurally designed to inhibit native BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase and several BCR-ABL1 mutants, including T315I. Ponatinib is now approved for patients with CML who are resistant or intolerant to prior TKI therapy (European Union) or for whom no other TKI therapy is indicated (United States). Despite achieving results in heavily treated patients, which led to its approval, the drug may induce cardiovascular events, requiring a careful baseline assessment of predisposing risk factors and specific management during treatment. Pharmacokinetic analysis has indicated the possibility of reducing the starting dose of ponatinib to 15 mg/day and preliminary data showed advantages in terms of safety while maintained its efficacy. This review summarizes the results achieved and drug-related side effects reported in all clinical trials and real-life experiences, testing ponatinib in patients with CP-CML. In addition, we focus on the appropriate use of ponatinib in clinical practice suggesting some useful recommendations on the proper management of this drug.