Long-term outcome of high risk patients with myelodysplastic syndromes or secondary acute myeloid leukemia receiving intensive chemotherapy

MDS and AML show elevated fractions of CD34-positive blast cell populations with a high anti-apoptotic versus proliferation ratio

This study investigates the intertwined processes of (anti-)apoptosis and cell proliferation in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Utilizing antibodies to Bcl-2 and Ki-67, the CD34-positive blast cell compartments in bone marrow aspirates from 50 non-malignant cases, 25 MDS patients, and 25 AML patients were analyzed for their anti-apoptotic and proliferative cell fractions through ten-color flow cytometry. MDS patients exhibited a significantly increased anti-apoptotic (p=0.0014) and reduced proliferative cell fraction (p=0.0030) in their blast cell population as compared to non-malignant cases. AML patients showed an even more exacerbated trend than MDS patients. The resulting Bcl-2:Ki-67 cell fraction ratios in MDS and AML were significantly increased as compared to the non-malignant cases (p=0.0004 and p<0.0001, respectively). AML patients displayed, however, a high degree of variability in their anti-apoptotic and proliferation index, attributed to heterogeneity in maturation stage and severity of the disease at diagnosis. Using double-labeling for Bcl-2 and Ki-67 it could be shown that besides blast cells with a mutually exclusive Ki-67 and Bcl-2 expression, also blast cells concurrently exhibiting anti-apoptotic and proliferative marker expression were found. Integrating these two dynamic markers into MDS and AML diagnostic workups may enable informed conclusions about their biological behavior, facilitating individualized therapy decisions for patients.

Beyond the horizon: emerging therapeutic approaches in myelodysplastic neoplasms

Management of myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) requires a personalized approach, with a focus on improving quality of life and extending lifespan. The International Prognostic Scoring System-Revised and the molecular International Prognostic Scoring System are key tools for risk stratification and management of MDS. They provide a framework for predicting survival and the risk of transformation to acute myeloid leukemia. However, a major challenge in MDS management remains the limited therapeutic options available, especially after the failure of first-line therapies. In lower-risk MDS, the failure of erythropoietin-stimulating agents often leaves few alternatives, although in higher-risk MDS, the prognosis after hypomethylating agent failure is dismal. This highlights the urgent need for novel, more personalized therapeutic approaches. In this review, we discuss emerging novel therapeutic approaches in the treatment of MDS. Several new therapeutic targets are currently being evaluated, offering hope for improved management of MDS in the future.

Myelodysplastic Syndromes: New Methods of Diagnosis, Prognostication, and Treatment

BACKGROUND

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are malignant diseases arising from hematopoietic stem cells. Their overall incidence is 4 cases per 100 000 persons per year, and they are usually diagnosed when evaluating cytopenia. The median survival time is three years. Myelodysplastic syndromes take a variable course; one-quarter of patients go on to develop acute leukemia.

METHODS

This review is based on publications retrieved by a selective search of the literature from 2013 to 2022, including relevant guidelines, in the PubMed database. The time period was chosen to reflect developments since the publication of the latest EHA guidelines in 2013.

RESULTS

The gold standard of diagnosis is cytomorphology of the blood and bone marrow, supplemented by banding cytogenetics, histomorphology, and somatic mutation analyses. The new classification proposed by the WHO incorporates the molecular and cytogenetic findings. The Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-M), which takes somatic mutations into account, is now available as an aid to prognostication. Quality of life evaluation with standardized instruments is helpful in many ways. Low-risk patients are treated supportively with erythrocyte transfusions and iron chelation therapy. Erythropoietin-a can be given to patients whose erythropoietin level is less than 200ng/mL, lenalidomide to those with a 5q deletion, and luspatercept to those with an SF3B1 mutation. High-risk patients should be evaluated as early as possible for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with curative intent. 5-azacytidine improves outcomes in patients for whom stem cell transplantation is not suitable.

CONCLUSION

Once a precise diagnosis has been established, new prognostic instruments such as the IPSS-M enable risk-adapted treatment based on the biological aspects of the patient's disease as well as his or her age and comorbidities.

Current challenges and unmet medical needs in myelodysplastic syndromes

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) represent a heterogeneous group of myeloid neoplasms that are characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis, variable cytopenias, and a risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia. Most patients with MDS are affected by anemia and anemia-related symptoms, which negatively impact their quality of life. While many patients with MDS have lower-risk disease and are managed by existing treatments, there currently is no clear standard of care for many patients. For patients with higher-risk disease, the treatment priority is changing the natural history of the disease by delaying disease progression to acute myeloid leukemia and improving overall survival. However, existing treatments for MDS are generally not curative and many patients experience relapse or resistance to first-line treatment. Thus, there remains an unmet need for new, more effective but tolerable strategies to manage MDS. Recent advances in molecular diagnostics have improved our understanding of the pathogenesis of MDS, and it is becoming clear that the diverse nature of genetic abnormalities that drive MDS demands a complex and personalized treatment approach. This review will discuss some of the challenges related to the current MDS treatment landscape, as well as new approaches currently in development.

Inferior outcome of allogeneic stem cell transplantation for secondary acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission as compared to de novo acute myeloid leukemia

Following chemotherapy, secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML), occurring after antecedent hematologic diseases, previous chemotherapy or radiation, has an inferior prognosis compared with de novo AML. To define the outcome of sAML in the context of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT), a retrospective, registry-based comparison was performed, including 11,439 patients with de novo and 1325 with sAML. Among transplants in first complete remission (CR1) (n = 8,600), the 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse (RI) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 28.5% and 16.4% for de novo, and 35% and 23.4% for sAML. Three-year overall survival (OS), leukemia-free survival (LFS) and Graft-versus-Host Disease/relapse-free survival (GRFS) was 60.8%, 55.1%, and 38.6% for de novo, and 46.7%, 41.6%, and 28.4% for sAML, respectively. In multivariate analysis, sAML was associated with a lower OS (HR = 1.33 [95% CI = 1.21–1.48]; p < 10⁻⁵), LFS (HR = 1.32 [95% CI = 1.19–1.45]; p < 10⁻⁵) and GRFS (HR = 1.2 [95% CI = 1.1–1.31]; p < 10⁻⁴) and higher NRM (HR = 1.37 [95% CI = 1.17–1.59]; p < 10⁻⁴) and RI (HR = 1.27 [95% CI = 1.12–1.44]; p < 10⁻³). Results of the Cox model were confirmed in a matched-pair analysis. In contrast, results did not differ between de novo and sAML after alloSCT in induction failure or relapse. Hence, this analysis identified sAML as an independent risk factor for outcome after alloSCT in CR1.

Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Primary Challenge of Diagnosis and Treatment

Secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) is a complex diagnosis that includes AML caused by either an antecedent hematologic disease (AML-AHD) or from previous treatment with chemotherapy or radiation. This disease carries a poor prognosis and is historically chemorefractory; additionally, often patients are ineligible for standard chemotherapy because of advanced age and other comorbidities. The advances of molecular diagnostics and reclassification of World Health Organization criteria have aided in the categorization of this disease. This article describes the etiology and pathophysiology of sAML, and delves into past successful treatments as well as promising new treatments.

The impact of iron chelation therapy on patients with lower/intermediate IPSS MDS and the prognostic role of elevated serum ferritin in patients with MDS and AML: A meta-analysis

Serum ferritin (SF) has been identified as a potential prognostic factor for patients undergoing stem cell transplantation, but the prognostic value of SF in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) patients and the impact of iron chelation therapy (ICT) on MDS patients are controversial. The present meta-analysis aimed to better elucidate these relationships.Three electronic databases were searched systematically to identify reports on the prognostic role of SF in MDS and AML patients, and those investigating the impact of ICT on prognosis of MDS patients. The hazard ratios (HRs) and its 95% confidence interval (95%CI) were extracted from the identified studies using Cox proportional hazard regression model for overall survival (OS) and progression of MDS to AML.Twenty reports including 1066 AML patients and 4054 MDS patients were included in present study. The overall pooled HRs for OS of AML and MDS patients with elevated SF prior to transplantation was 1.73 (1.40-2.14), subgroup analyses stratified by the cut-off value of SF ≥1400/1000 ng/mL showed that the pooled HRs were 1.45 (0.98-2.15) and 1.65 (1.30-2.10), respectively. The pooled HRs for ICT in MDS patients was 0.30 (0.23-0.40). For ICT, the pooled HRs for the progression of MDS to AML was 0.84 (0.61-1.61).SF has a negative impact on the OS of AML and MDS patients when it is higher than 1000 ng/mL. ICT can improve the OS of MDS patients with iron overload but it is not associated with the progression of MDS to AML.

Novel therapies in low- and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome

Introduction: Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) comprise a heterogeneous group of myeloid neoplasms with diverse clinical courses. The revised version of the international prognostic scoring system (IPSS-R) provides risk stratification into 5 different groups. Areas covered: For lower-risk patients, red blood cell transfusions and iron chelation are the backbone of supportive care. In addition, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) are used to ameliorate anemia. Lenalidomide is approved for the treatment of lower-risk patients with del(5q) who are transfusion-dependent. Patients with higher-risk disease should be offered allogeneic stem cell transplantation whenever possible. If they are unfit for transplantation or an appropriate donor cannot be found, hypomethylating agents may be used. Expert opinion: New therapeutic options for lower-risk patients include thrombopoietin analogues, the TGF-beta family ligand trapping drug Luspatercept, and the telomerase inhibitor Imetelstat. Combinations of hypomethylating agents (HMA) with other compounds, and inhibitors of bcl2, such as venetoclax are being developed for higher-risk patients. Finally, hypomethylating agents in combination with donor lymphocytes may lead to long-term remission following molecular or hematological relapse after allogeneic SCT.