Pulmonary function abnormalities are common in patients with multiple myeloma and are independently associated with worse outcome

Pharmacy considerations: Use of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies in relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews current evidence for the approved anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies, isatuximab and daratumumab, for the treatment of patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) and the implications for pharmacists.

DATA SOURCES

We conducted a literature search on PubMed/Medline and other sources using the drug names and the terms CD38, multiple myeloma, and pharmacists.

DATA SUMMARY

Monoclonal antibodies targeting the CD38 transmembrane glycoprotein offer a promising treatment approach for patients with RRMM. Isatuximab and daratumumab bind to different epitopes on CD38. In this review, we describe the similarities and differences in their mechanism of action, regulatory labeling, and the current guidelines for isatuximab and daratumumab use in RRMM. We review the current evidence for the efficacy and safety of these agents in combination with pomalidomide or carfilzomib and dexamethasone from the landmark phase 3 clinical trials that led to their approval. We discuss key differences in the eligibility criteria between the clinical trials, and differences in dosing, administration, available formulations, and pre- and post-infusion medications for the two agents. We outline recent data from pharmacoeconomic analyses comparing the cost-effectiveness of isatuximab-based regimens with that of daratumumab-based regimens. A brief overview of other anti-CD38 agents in the pipeline for the treatment of patients with RRMM is presented.

CONCLUSIONS

Given that pharmacists play an integral role in driving cost-effective use of drugs without compromising efficacy and safety for the end user, educating pharmacists on the key differences between isatuximab and daratumumab can guide the selection of the appropriate anti-CD38 antibody.

COVID-19 Patients in the COVID-19 Recovery and Engagement (CORE) Clinics in the Bronx

Background: Early in the pandemic, we established COVID-19 Recovery and Engagement (CORE) Clinics in the Bronx and implemented a detailed evaluation protocol to assess physical, emotional, and cognitive function, pulmonary function tests, and imaging for COVID-19 survivors. Here, we report our findings up to five months post-acute COVID-19. Methods: Main outcomes and measures included pulmonary function tests, imaging tests, and a battery of symptom, physical, emotional, and cognitive assessments 5 months post-acute COVID-19. Findings: Dyspnea, fatigue, decreased exercise tolerance, brain fog, and shortness of breath were the most common symptoms but there were generally no significant differences between hospitalized and non-hospitalized cohorts (p > 0.05). Many patients had abnormal physical, emotional, and cognitive scores, but most functioned independently; there were no significant differences between hospitalized and non-hospitalized cohorts (p > 0.05). Six-minute walk tests, lung ultrasound, and diaphragm excursion were abnormal but only in the hospitalized cohort. Pulmonary function tests showed moderately restrictive pulmonary function only in the hospitalized cohort but no obstructive pulmonary function. Newly detected major neurological events, microvascular disease, atrophy, and white-matter changes were rare, but lung opacity and fibrosis-like findings were common after acute COVID-19. Interpretation: Many COVID-19 survivors experienced moderately restrictive pulmonary function, and significant symptoms across the physical, emotional, and cognitive health domains. Newly detected brain imaging abnormalities were rare, but lung imaging abnormalities were common. This study provides insights into post-acute sequelae following SARS-CoV-2 infection in neurological and pulmonary systems which may be used to support at-risk patients and develop effective screening methods and interventions.

Radiological patterns and pulmonary function values of lung involvement in primary Sjögren’s syndrome: A pilot analysis

Background

Lung involvement in primary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS) may vary from 9 to 90%. Interstitial lung disease and tracheobronchial alterations are the most typical findings. The evidence of primarily emphysematous changes at computed tomography of the chest of pSS patients has occasionally been described but poorly characterized. This study aims to assess pulmonary involvement and the impact on respiratory function in a cohort of pSS patients.

Materials and methods

A total of 22 consecutive patients diagnosed with pSS underwent pulmonary function tests to investigate the presence of ventilatory impairment and evaluate the exchanges of alveolar gases. All patients underwent a chest high-resolution computed tomography (HRTC).

Results

Dynamic volumes were within the normal range in 21 patients (95.4%). A reduction in the diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) was observed in 18 patients (81.8%). Ten (45.5%) patients showed a mild degree deficit, while 8 patients (36%) showed a moderate degree deficit. Analysis of DLCO revealed a significant difference between pSS patients and controls [t(30.98) = −10.77; p < 0.001], showing a higher DLCO value for the healthy controls (mean ± SE; 101.27 ± 6.08) compared to pSS patients (mean ± SE; 65.95 ± 12.78). Emphysema was found in 21 (94.5%) patients and was the most widespread pulmonary injury. Tracheal thickness was reduced in 15 (67%) patients. Micronodules were observed in 10 (45%) patients in all the pulmonary fields. Bronchial wall thickening and bronchiectasis were observed in 8 (36%) patients, mainly in the lower lobes. Ground glass was found in 5 (22.5%) patients in lower and higher lobes. Cysts were observed in two patients (9%).

Conclusion

The reduction of the DLCO could be related to early emphysematous alterations in the absence of spirometric alterations and relevant respiratory symptoms. In conclusion, emphysema might be seen as an early pulmonary involvement mark in patients suffering from pSS.

Pulmonary function tests reveal unrecognised lung dysfunction and have independent prognostic significance in patients with systemic AL amyloidosis

BACKGROUND

Lung involvement in AL amyloidosis is not very common, but post-mortem data and retrospective studies suggest it is likely underrecognized.

AIM

To perform a comprehensive evaluation of lung function with pulmonary function tests (PFTs) in patients with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis.

METHODS

A prospective, non-interventional study of 139 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis.

RESULTS

PFTs indicated normal breathing physiology in 68% of patients, obstructive in 9% and restrictive in 23%; the latter was associated with worse survival (28.6 vs 76 months for obstructive/normal physiology, p = 0.002) and remained significant after adjustment for Mayo stage and abnormal chest-CT. Forced vital capacity <80% of predicted value, forced expiratory volume <80% of predicted value, and carbon monoxide diffusion capacity <70% were independently associated with poorer survival. Respiratory muscle strength (as assessed by maximal expiratory (Pe) and inspiratory (Pi) pressure) was affected in most patients (64% had Pi < 55% and 57% had Pe < 70% of predicted values). Pe% was an independent prognostic factor for survival (HR: 0.984 per 1% unit increase, p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Pulmonary dysfunction, as assessed with PFTs, is common and underrecognized in patients with systemic AL amyloidosis, with significant prognostic and potentially therapeutic implications, independent of the degree of cardiac dysfunction or chest-CT findings.

Anti-CD38 antibody therapy for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: differential mechanisms of action and recent clinical trial outcomes

CD38 is a transmembrane glycoprotein that functions both as a receptor and an ectoenzyme, playing key roles in the regulation of calcium signaling and migration of immune cells to tumor microenvironments. High expression on multiple myeloma (MM) cells and limited expression on normal cells makes CD38 an ideal target for the treatment of MM patients. Two monoclonal antibodies directed at CD38, isatuximab and daratumumab, are available for use in patients with relapsed and/or refractory MM (RRMM); daratumumab is also approved in newly diagnosed MM and light-chain amyloidosis. Clinical experience has shown that anti-CD38 antibody therapy is transforming treatment of MM owing to its anti-myeloma efficacy and manageable safety profile. Isatuximab and daratumumab possess similarities and differences in their mechanisms of action, likely imparted by their binding to distinct, non-overlapping epitopes on the CD38 molecule. In this review, we present the mechanistic properties of these two antibodies and outline available evidence on their abilities to induce adaptive immune responses and modulate the bone marrow niche in MM. Further, we discuss differences in regulatory labeling between these two agents and analyze recent key clinical trial results, including evidence in patients with underlying renal impairment and other poor prognostic factors. Finally, we describe the limited existing evidence for the use of isatuximab or daratumumab after disease progression on prior anti-CD38 mono- or combination therapy, highlighting the need for additional clinical evaluations to define optimal anti-CD38 antibody therapy selection and sequencing in RRMM.

Real-World Treatment Patterns and Outcomes Among Multiple Myeloma Patients with Asthma and COPD in the United States

Introduction

Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most frequent hematologic malignancy after lymphoma, contributing to approximately 10% of all hematologic malignancies. The prognosis of patients with MM is impacted by the heterogeneity of the disease, with worse outcomes reported in patients classified as International Staging System stage III, those with high-risk cytogenetics and elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase, and among patients who are elderly and have comorbidities. Previous studies have demonstrated an association between the presence of lung disease and worse outcomes; however, this impact in a real-world setting is not well understood.

Methods

This retrospective, observational, cohort study included data from the nationwide US Optum® de-identified electronic health record (EHR) database from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2019. MM patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) were compared with MM patients without asthma or COPD for time to next treatment and overall survival using one-sided log-rank tests stratified by age and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models.

Results

Among 5186 patients with MM, approximately 15% had an asthma or COPD diagnosis (asthma/COPD) at baseline. The most commonly observed comorbidities among all MM patients and among those MM patients with asthma/COPD were cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and renal impairment. Time from first- to second-line treatment was significantly longer for patients with a diagnosis of COPD. Overall survival from first-line therapy was significantly worse among patients with COPD, with numerically worse overall survival from second-line therapy.

Conclusion

These real-world data suggest that patients with asthma or COPD do not experience a shorter time interval to next treatment, but have significantly worse overall survival from start of first-line therapy and numerically worse survival from the start of later lines. Future investigations with larger datasets may improve the understanding of the influence of individual treatments on outcomes in these patients.