Incidence, risk factors and outcomes of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome after haploidentical allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome/Veno-Occlusive Disease after Unmanipulated Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation with Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide: A Study on Behalf of the Spanish Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Group (GETH)

Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome/veno-occlusive disease (SOS/VOD) is a life-threatening complication after both autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). However, its characterization after haploidentical HSCT (haplo-HSCT) with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) is scarce. This study aimed to describe characteristics and outcomes of patients with SOS/VOD after haplo-HSCT with PT-Cy. We conducted a retrospective study of 797 patients undergoing a haplo-HSCT with PT-Cy between 2007 and 2019 in 9 centers in Spain. SOS/VOD was defined according to modified Seattle, Baltimore, or revised European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) criteria. Severity was graded retrospectively according to revised EBMT severity criteria into 4 categories: mild, moderate, severe, and very severe. From a total of 797 haplo-HSCTs performed, 46 patients (5.77%) were diagnosed with SOS/VOD at a median of 19 days (range, 4 to 84 days) after transplantation. Based on revised EBMT severity criteria, the SOS/VOD cases were classified as mild (n = 4; 8.7%), moderate (n = 10; 21.7%), severe (n = 12; 26.1%), and very severe (n = 20; 43.5%). Overall, 30 patients (65%) achieved SOS/VOD complete response, 25 (83%) of whom were treated with defibrotide. Twenty patients (43%) died before day +100 post-HSCT. Death was attributed to SOS/VOD in 11 patients, and 5 patients died of other causes without resolution of SOS/VOD. The incidence of SOS/VOD after haplo-HSCT with PT-Cy was comparable to those reported after HLA-identical HSCT series. Most of the patients developed very severe SOS/VOD according to revised EBMT severity criteria. Despite a promising SOS/VOD complete response (CR) rate (65%), 100-day mortality remained high (43%), indicating that further improvement in the management of this potentially fatal complication is needed.

Clinical features and risk factors of hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome in children after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A single-center experience

Hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) is an illness with serious life effects that develops after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We investigated the risk factors and clinical features of hepatic SOS in children following HSCT in 210 children who underwent allogeneic or autologous HSCT between 2009 and 2021 were analyzed in the context of SOS. The syndrome developed in 22 (10.4%) patients:frequently in neuroblastoma [24% (5/21)], hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis [57% (4/7)], and thalassemia major [22% (7/31)]. The median time from HSCT to diagnosis was 16 (6-38) days. Severe disease occurred in 8 (36%) patients, and mild/moderate in 14 (64%) and 4 patients died (18%). In univariate analyses, patient's age ≤ 2 years [odds ratio (OR)= 3.043, P = 0.028], pretransplant AST and ALT levels > 100 U/L (OR=3.576, P = 0.045), and chemotherapy/radiotherapy to abdomen before transplantation (OR = 3.162, P = 0.044) were determined as risk factors. In multivariate analysis, pre-transplant AST and ALT levels > 100 U/L (OR = 16.04, P = 0.010) and ferritin levels over 1000 mg/dl (OR=5.15, P = 0.047) were significant. The only independent risk factor on mortality was the age ≤ 2 years (P = 0.001). Although our study confirmed several risk factors for SOS, we failed to achieve some well-known risk factors. Precautions should be taken considering the factors affecting liver function before transplantation and the risk of SOS in infants receiving chemotherapy and radiotherapy before transplantation, such as neuroblastoma in which comparable results in respect to the chemotherapy only. The risk factors should be fully elucidated in multicenter studies to improve preventive and therapeutic strategies.

Primary Budd-Chiari syndrome versus sinusoidal obstruction syndrome: a review

Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) and sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) are two major vascular disorders of the liver, of which both can cause portal hypertension related complications, but their locations of obstruction are different. BCS refers to the obstruction from the hepatic vein to the junction between the inferior vena cava and right atrium, which is the major etiology of post-sinusoidal portal hypertension; by comparison, SOS is characterized as the obstruction at the level of hepatic sinusoids and terminal venulae, which is a cause of sinusoidal portal hypertension. Both of them can cause hepatic congestion with life-threatening complications, especially acute liver failure and chronic portal hypertension, and share some similar features in terms of imaging and clinical presentations, but they have heterogeneous risk factors, management strategy, and prognosis. Herein, this paper reviews the current evidence and then summarizes the difference between primary BCS and SOS in terms of risk factors, clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment.

Low Plasma Levels of Hyaluronic Acid Might Rule Out Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Background

Sinusoidal obstructive syndrome (SOS) is a potentially fatal complication secondary to hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) conditioning. Endothelial damage plasma biomarkers such as plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), hyaluronic acid (HA), and vascular adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM1) represent potential diagnostic tools for SOS.

Methods

We prospectively collected serial citrated blood samples (baseline, day 0, day 7, and day 14) in all adult patients undergoing HSCT at La Paz Hospital, Madrid. Samples were later analyzed by ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) for HA, VCAM1, and PAI-1 concentrations.

Results

During sixteen months, we prospectively recruited 47 patients. Seven patients (14%) were diagnosed with SOS according to the EBMT criteria for SOS/VOD diagnosis and received treatment with defibrotide. Our study showed a statistically significant elevation of HA on day 7 in SOS patients, preceding clinical SOS diagnosis, with a sensitivity of 100%. Furthermore, we observed a significant increase of HA and VCAM1 levels on day 14. Regarding risk factors, we observed a statistically significant association between SOS diagnosis and the fact that patients received 3 or more previous lines of treatment before HSCT.

Conclusions

The early significant increase in HA levels observed opens the door to a noninvasive peripheral blood test which could have the potential to improve diagnosis and facilitate prophylactic and therapeutic management of SOS before clinical/histological damage is established.

Hepatic veno-occlusive disease development in the hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients: incidence and associated risk factors, a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Now there are no efficient prophylactic or treatment strategies for hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD). Therefore, it is critical to early identify patients at high risk of VOD.

AIM

To analyze the risk factors of VOD in the hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) patients.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of the population was conducted.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies with 27 679 HSCT patients were eligible. The incidence of VOD was 15% [95% confidence interval (CI) 13-17%]. The following were the risk factors for VOD: mismatched HLA [odds ratio (OR) 2.34, 95% CI 1.20-4.57, P = 0.01], history of liver disease (OR 2.72, 95% CI 2.03-3.64, P < 0.00001), elevated AST before transplant (OR 2.49, 95% CI 1.49-4.15, P = 0.0005), months from diagnosis to HSCT > 12 months (OR 1.76, 95% CI 1.15-2.69, P = 0.009), previous radiation (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.49-2.31, P < 0.00001), busulphan (OR 3.69, 95% CI 2.58-5.29, P < 0.00001) and MTX (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.22-2.69, P = 0.003). There were no significant differences for VOD presentation in the patients with regards to sex, number of HSCT, Karnofsky score <90%, unrelated donor, autologous HSCT, CYA and heparin prophylaxis.

CONCLUSION

Mismatched HLA, liver disease (history of liver disease, elevated AST), months from diagnosis to HSCT >12 months, previous radiation and use of hepatotoxic drugs (BU and MTX) are the independent risk factors for VOD in the HSCT patients.

Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt for Very Severe Veno-Occlusive Disease/Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome (VOD/SOS) after Unmanipulated Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation with Post-transplantation Cyclophosphamide

Hepatic veno-occlusive disease or sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (VOD/SOS) is a threatening complication after both autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), with high mortality rates despite early medical treatment, including the use of defibrotide (DF). We retrospectively analyzed 185 unmanipulated haploidentical (haplo-) HSCT with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide as graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis performed consecutively between 2011 and June 2019 in a single center. Seventeen patients (9.2%) were diagnosed with VOD/SOS. Based on revised European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation severity criteria, the VOD/SOS cases were classified as mild in 2 patients (11.7%), moderate in 2 (11.7%), severe in 2 (11.7%), and very severe in 11 (64.9%). Thirteen patients (76%) were treated with DF, including all patients with severe or very severe VOD/SOS, except 1 patient with CNS hemorrhage. Sixteen patients (94%) were alive at day +100 after HSCT. Seven patients (41%) with very severe VOD/SOS were treated with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) owing to rapid clinical or analytical deterioration or refractory hepatorenal syndrome despite medical treatment, including DF. TIPS insertion was performed at a median time since VOD/SOS diagnosis of 4 days (range, 1 to 28 days) without technical complications in any case. The median hepatic venous pressure gradient before and after TIPS treatment was 24 mmHg (range, 14 to 29 mmHg) and 7 mmHg (range, 2 to 11 mmHg), respectively, with a median drop of 16 mmHg (range, 9 to 19 mmHg). Following TIPS insertion, all patients showed clinical improvement with hepatomegaly, ascites, and renal failure resolution, and all showed analytical improvement with reduced alanine aminotransferase (ALT), creatinine, and international normalized ratio values, except for patient 2, whose indication for TIPS was refractory hepatorenal syndrome with a normal ALT level. The 6 patients who had initiated DF before TIPS insertion completed 21 days of treatment. All patients met the criteria for complete remission (CR) at a median of 8 days after TIPS insertion (range, 2 to 82 days). The 100-day overall survival was 100%. For patients with rapid progressive VOD/SOS, early TIPS insertion allowed completion of DF therapy. The use of TIPS together with DF resulted in CR and no associated complications with no VOD/SOS-associated mortality despite high severity. In our experience, timely and individualized use of TIPS significantly improves outcomes of very severe VOD/SOS after haplo-HSCT. Therefore, TIPS should be promptly considered in rapidly progressive cases.