RVD induction and autologous stem cell transplantation followed by lenalidomide maintenance in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a phase 2 study of the Finnish Myeloma Group

Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (IRD) Treatment with Cytogenetic Risk-Based Maintenance in Transplant-Eligible Myeloma: A Phase 2 Multicenter Study by the Nordic Myeloma Study Group

Scarce data exist on double maintenance in transplant-eligible high-risk (HR) newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients. This prospective phase 2 study enrolled 120 transplant-eligible NDMM patients. The treatment consisted of four cycles of ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (IRD) induction plus autologous stem cell transplantation followed by IRD consolidation and cytogenetic risk-based maintenance therapy with lenalidomide + ixazomib (IR) for HR patients and lenalidomide (R) alone for NHR patients. The main endpoint of the study was undetectable minimal residual disease (MRD) with sensitivity of <10-5 by flow cytometry at any time, and other endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). We present the preplanned analysis after the last patient has been two years on maintenance. At any time during protocol treatment, 28% (34/120) had MRD < 10-5 at least once. At two years on maintenance, 66% of the patients in the HR group and 76% in the NHR group were progression-free (p = 0.395) and 36% (43/120) were CR or better, of which 42% (18/43) had undetectable flow MRD <10-5. Altogether 95% of the patients with sustained MRD <10-5, 82% of the patients who turned MRD-positive, and 61% of those with positive MRD had no disease progression at two years on maintenance (p < 0.001). To conclude, prolonged maintenance with all-oral ixazomib plus lenalidomide might improve PFS in HR patients.

Clinical perspectives on the optimal use of lenalidomide plus bortezomib and dexamethasone for the treatment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

To improve the outcomes of patients with the otherwise incurable hematologic malignancy of multiple myeloma (MM), a key paradigm includes initial treatment to establish disease control rapidly followed by maintenance therapy to ensure durability of response with manageable toxicity. However, patients' prognosis worsens after relapse, and the disease burden and drug toxicities are generally more challenging with subsequent lines of therapy. It is therefore particularly important that patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) receive optimal frontline therapy. The combination of lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVd) has consistently demonstrated a tolerable safety profile with significant and clinically relevant benefit, including deep and durable responses with improved survival in patients with NDMM regardless of their transplant eligibility. Furthermore, comparative studies evaluating this triplet regimen against both doublet and other triplet regimens have established RVd as a standard of care in this setting based upon its remarkable and concordant efficacy. Given the breadth of clinical data, physician familiarity, inclusion in treatment guidelines, and the emerging potential of RVd-containing quadruplet regimens, RVd will likely continue as a key cornerstone of the treatment of NDMM, and its role will therefore likely continue to grow as a therapeutic backbone in the initial treatment of MM.

Mobilization Strategies in Myeloma Patients Intended for Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Background

Multiple myeloma is currently the leading indication for autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT). A prerequisite for AHCT is mobilization and collection of adequate blood graft to support high-dose therapy. Current mobilization strategies include granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone or in combination with chemotherapy most commonly cyclophosphamide (CY). More recently, plerixafor has become into agenda especially in patients who mobilize poorly. In the selection of a mobilization method, several factors should be considered.

Summary

Preplanned collection target is important as G-CSF plus plerixafor is more effective in the mobilization of CD34+ cells than G-CSF alone. On the other hand, CY plus G-CSF is superior to G-CSF only mobilization. Previous therapy and age of the patients are important considerations as G-CSF alone may not be effective enough in patients with risk factors for poor mobilization. These factors include extensive lenalidomide exposure, irradiation to bone marrow-bearing sites, higher age, or a previous mobilization failure. Also, local preferences and experiences as well as the number of apheresis needed are important issues as well as cost-effectiveness considerations. Mobilization method used may have implication for cellular composition of collected grafts, which might have an impact on posttransplant events such as hematologic and immune recovery in addition to also potential long-term outcomes.

Key Message

Currently, G-CSF alone and preemptive plerixafor if needed might be considered as a standard mobilization strategy in MM patients intended for AHCT.

Deep Immune Profiling of Multiple Myeloma at Diagnosis and under Lenalidomide Maintenance Therapy

The bone marrow microenvironment interacts with malignant cells and regulates cancer survival and immune evasion in multiple myeloma (MM). We investigated the immune profiles of longitudinal bone marrow samples from patients with newly diagnosed MM (n = 18) using cytometry by time-of-flight. The results before and during treatment were compared between patients with good (GR, n = 11) and bad (BR, n = 7) responses to lenalidomide/bortezomib/dexamethasone-based treatment. Before treatment, the GR group had a lower tumor cell burden and a higher number of T cells with a phenotype shifted toward CD8+ T cells expressing markers attributed to cytotoxicity (CD45RA and CD57), a higher abundance of CD8+ terminal effector cells, and a lower abundance of CD8+ naïve T cells. On natural killer (NK) cells, increased expression of CD56 (NCAM), CD57, and CD16 was seen at baseline in the GR group, indicating their maturation and cytotoxic potential. During lenalidomide-based treatment, the GR patients showed an increase in effector memory CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell subsets. These findings support distinct immune patterns in different clinical contexts, suggesting that deep immune profiling could be used for treatment guidance and warrants further exploration.

Impact of the number of cryopreserved CD34+ cells in the infused blood grafts on hematologic recovery and survival in myeloma patients after autologous stem cell transplantation: Experience from the GOA study

BACKGROUND

Prospective data on the impact of CD34⁺ cell loss during cryopreservation and the amount of cryopreserved CD34⁺ cells infused after high-dose therapy on hematologic recovery and post-transplant outcome in multiple myeloma (MM) are scarce.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This post-hoc study aimed to investigate factors associating with CD34⁺ cell loss during cryopreservation and the effects of the infusion of a very low number (<1.0 × 10⁶ /kg, group A), low number (1-1.9 × 10⁶ /kg, group B), and optimal number (≥2 × 10⁶ /kg, group C) of thawed viable CD34⁺ cells on hematologic recovery, progression free survival, and overall survival after autologous stem cell transplantation among 127 patients with MM.

RESULTS

In group C, pegfilgrastim use (P = 0.001), plerixafor use (P = 0.039), and older age ≥ 60 years (P = 0.026) were associated with less loss of CD34⁺ cells during cryopreservation. Better mobilization efficacy correlated with greater CD34⁺ cell loss in group B (P = 0.013 and P = 0.001) and in group C (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001). Early platelet engraftment was slowest in group A (20 d vs 12 d in group B vs 11 d in group C, P = 0.003). The infused viable CD34⁺ cell count <1.0 × 10⁶ /kg seemed not to have influence on PFS (P = 0.322) or OS (P = 0.378) in MM patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Cryopreservation impacts significantly on the CD34⁺ cell loss. A very low number of graft viable CD34⁺ cells did not affect PFS or OS.

Steps towards a Multiple Myeloma Cure?

Multiple myeloma survival has increased in last 20 years because of new treatments, better clinical management due to novel diagnostic tools such as imaging, and better understanding of the disease, biologically and genetically. Novel drugs have been introduced that act with different therapeutic mechanisms, but so have novel therapeutic strategies such as consolidation and maintenance after autologous stem cell transplant. Imaging (such as PET-CT and MRI) has been applied at diagnosis and after therapy for minimal residual disease monitoring. Multiparametric flow and molecular NGS may detect, with high-sensitivity, residual monoclonal plasma cells in the bone marrow. With this novel therapeutic and biological approach, a considerable fraction of multiple myeloma patients can achieve durable remission or even MGUS-like regression, which can ultimately lead to disease disappearance. The big dogma, “Myeloma is an incurable disease”, is hopefully fading.

Triplet RVd Induction for Transplant-Eligible Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

The combination of lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVd) has become standard of care for transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed MM (NDMM). This study aimed to determine the efficacy of RVd as induction therapy in terms of response rates and survival outcomes of transplant-eligible patients with NDMM.

METHODS

The databases of Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched until February 1, 2021. Both randomized controlled trials (RCT) and non-RCTs from the available literature were extracted as one-arm data to assess the efficacy of each triplet regimen for the target patients in terms of response rates and survival rates for transplant-eligible patients with NDMM. Data was summarized as estimated pooled value regarding each evaluated index. Risk of bias of studies was assessed with standard methods.

RESULTS

The findings of 71 studies published from 2008 to 2020 were analyzed. For RVd induction, the overall response rate (ORR), very good partial response or better (≥ VGPR) rate, and complete response or better (≥ CR) rate after induction were 0.91 (95% CI 0.86-0.95), 0.23 (95% CI 0.17-0.29), and 0.56 (95% CI 0.51-0.61), respectively. Indirect comparisons in efficacy were made between RVd and other traditional triplet regimens. RVd induction led to a better ≥ CR rate than bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (VCd) regimen in both postinduction and post-ASCT phase, ≥ CR rate 0.11 (95% CI 0.08-0.15) and 0.21 (95% CI 0.12-0.32), respectively. The 1-year overall survival (OS) rate and 3-year OS rate of RVd regimen were longer than that of bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (VTd), 0.97 (95% CI 0.94-0.98) vs 0.71 (95% CI 0.61-0.80), and 0.90 (95% CI 0.79-0.98) vs 0.70 (95% CI 0.64-0.75), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The RVd induction demonstrated confident response rates and survival benefits for transplant-eligible patients with NDMM.

Comparison of CD34+ cell mobilization, blood graft cellular composition, and post-transplant outcome in myeloma patients mobilized with filgrastim or pegfilgrastim added to low-dose cyclophosphamide: A prospective multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Scarce data exist on the impact of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) type on the mobilizing capacity of CD34⁺ cells, graft cellular composition, and outcome in myeloma (MM) patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this prospective multicenter study, 70 patients with MM received filgrastim (FIL) and 20 patients received pegfilgrastim (PEG) as a G-CSF after low-dose cyclophosphamide. Flow cytometry was used to analyze the mobilization of CD34⁺ cells and cellular composition of blood grafts, hematologic recovery, and survival after auto-SCT according to the G-CSF choice.

RESULTS

The CD34⁺ cell yield of the first apheresis was higher in the FIL group (5.3 vs. 4.2 × 10⁶ /kg, p = .025). The better mobilizing capacity was observed in the FIL group especially after bortezomib-based induction based on the higher first apheresis yield of CD34⁺ cells (7.5 vs. 4.4 × 10⁶ /kg, p = .001). The median CD19⁺ cell count (1.0 vs. 0.4 × 10⁶ /kg, p = .010) and the number of CD3⁺ T lymphocytes (43.1 vs. 31.8 × 10⁶ /kg, p = .122) in the infused graft were higher in the patients mobilized with FIL. Both early (day +15) (56 vs. 108 × 10⁹ /L, p = .002) and later platelet recovery at 6 months (191 vs. 226 × 10⁹ /L, p = .026) were faster in the PEG group.

CONCLUSION

G-CSF type seems to impact on the mobilization capacity and cellular composition of infused graft and also platelet recovery post-transplant. A randomized study might be warranted to verify the effects of G-CSF choice in the mobilization field.

Autograft cellular composition and outcome in myeloma patients: Results of the prospective multicenter GOA study

BACKGROUND

Autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) is a widely used treatment option in multiple myeloma (MM) patients. The optimal graft cellular composition is not known.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Autograft cellular composition was analyzed after freezing by flow cytometry in 127 MM patients participating in a prospective multicenter study. The impact of graft cellular composition on hematologic recovery and outcome after auto-SCT was evaluated.

RESULTS

A higher graft CD34⁺ cell content predicted faster platelet recovery after auto-SCT in both the short and long term. In patients with standard-risk cytogenetics, a higher graft CD34⁺ count (>2.5 × 10⁶ /kg) was linked with shorter progression-free survival (PFS; 28 vs. 46 months, p = 0.04), but there was no difference in overall survival (OS) (p = 0.53). In a multivariate model, a higher graft CD34⁺ CD133⁺ CD38^- (>0.065 × 10⁶ /kg, p = 0.009) and NK cell count (>2.5 × 10⁶ /kg, p = 0.026), lenalidomide maintenance and standard-risk cytogenetics predicted better PFS. In contrast, a higher CD34⁺ count (>2.5 × 10⁶ /kg, p = 0.015) predicted worse PFS. A very low CD3⁺ cell count (≤20 × 10⁶ /kg, p = 0.001) in the infused graft and high-risk cytogenetics remained predictive of worse OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Autograft cellular composition may impact outcome in MM patients after auto-SCT. More studies are needed to define optimal graft composition.

Advances in maintenance strategy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients eligible for autologous transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Multiple myeloma (MM) lacks curative therapy. Therefore, researchers continue to conduct studies in an effort to improve progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Maintenance therapy (MT) after autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) was extensively studied in the last decade and now considered a standard approach.

AREAS COVERED

This review evaluated the evidence and updates on various maintenance agents in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) after ASCT. Articles were searched on PubMed and Embase that were published in last 10 years. Both clinical trials and observational studies were evaluated.

EXPERT OPINION

Maintenance strategy after ASCT has consistent PFS benefit but lacks conclusive OS improvement. Lenalidomide is superior to thalidomide given reduced neurotoxicity. OS advantage is controversial for both due to inconsistent evidence. Lenalidomide may confer a PFS advantage even at lower doses due to toxicity with higher doses. Bortezomib-based maintenance has some evidence for OS benefit in high-risk MM (HRMM) and renal dysfunction. Ixazomib has preliminary promising results. Two or three drug combinations for MT are potentially safe and more effective, particularly in HRMM although data on this subject is still evolving. Efficacy of various MT regimens in terms of minimal residual disease status needs to be further investigated.

Minimal Residual Disease in Multiple Myeloma: State of the Art and Applications in Clinical Practice

Novel drugs have revolutionized multiple myeloma therapy in the last 20 years, with median survival that has doubled to up to 8–10 years. The introduction of therapeutic strategies, such as consolidation and maintenance after autologous stem cell transplants, has also ameliorated clinical results. The goal of modern therapies is becoming not only complete remission, but also the deepest possible remission. In this context, the evaluation of minimal residual disease by techniques such as next-generation sequencing (NGS) and next-generation flow (NGF) is becoming part of all new clinical trials that test drug efficacy. This review focuses on minimal residual disease approaches in clinical trials, with particular attention to real-world practices.

CD34+ cell mobilization, blood graft composition, and posttransplant recovery in myeloma patients compared to non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients: results of the prospective multicenter GOA study

BACKGROUND

Autologous stem cell transplantation is an established treatment option for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL).

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

In this prospective multicenter study, 147 patients with MM were compared with 136 patients with NHL regarding the mobilization and apheresis of blood CD34+ cells, cellular composition of infused blood grafts, posttransplant recovery, and outcome.

RESULTS

Multiple myeloma patients mobilized CD34+ cells more effectively (6.3 × 10⁶ /kg vs. 3.9 × 10⁶ /kg, p = 0.001). The proportion of poor mobilizers (peak blood CD34+ cell count <20 × 10⁶ /L) was higher in NHL patients (15% vs. 3%, p < 0.001). Plerixafor was added to rescue the mobilization failure in 17 MM patients (12%) and in 35 NHL patients (26%; p = 0.002). The infused grafts contained more natural killer (NK) and CD19+ cells in MM patients. Blood platelet and NK-cell counts were higher in MM patients posttransplant. Early treatment-related mortality was low in both groups, but NHL patients had a higher late (>100 days) nonrelapse mortality (NRM; 6% vs. 0%, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and MM patients differ in terms of mobilization of CD34+ cells, graft cellular composition, and posttransplant recovery. Thus, the optimal graft characteristics may also be different.