Analysis of the impact of adherence to guidelines and expert advice in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes

Treatment patterns in older patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: A population-based analysis reflecting the real world

INTRODUCTION

Treatment for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) is complex, options are limited, and insight into consecutive treatments is lacking. We performed this study to assess the outcomes in a real-world cohort of patients with MDS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An observational population-based study was performed using the HemoBase registry. Treatment patterns and overall survival (OS) were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier analyses.

RESULTS

In 144 of 280 (51.4%) patients with MDS >50 years, first-line treatment was initiated. The median age was 75.1 years (range: 52.6-92.0); the majority were male (72.2%). Hypomethylating agents (HMA), intensive chemotherapy, lenalidomide, and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) were given as first-line treatment to 31.1% (n = 45), 12.5% (n = 18), 2.8% (n = 4), and 53.5% (n = 77) of the population, respectively. The median treatment duration was 5.8 months (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.1-10.4) for HMA, 1.7 months (95%CI: 0.9-2.6) for intensive chemotherapy, 10.8 months (95%CI: 4.7-17.0) for lenalidomide, and 14.8 months (95%CI: 11.4-18.1) for ESA. Consecutive treatments were given to 27.2% of patients. The main reasons for first-line treatment discontinuation were treatment failure (45.8%), toxicity (6.9%), or death (20.1%). Median OS after termination of the initial, second, and third treatment was 5.8 months (95%CI: 3.2-8.5), 9.3 months (95%CI: 0.0-19.6), and 1.0 months (95%CI: 0.0-5.1), respectively.

DISCUSSION

This study shows the treatment outcomes in a real-world population of older patients with MDS. Treatment duration and median OS after treatment discontinuation were relatively limited. There is still an urgent need for new treatment options, strategies to further optimize duration of existing treatments, and communication of realistic treatment goals and expectations, especially for older, higher-risk patients with MDS with a poor prognosis.

Clinical view versus guideline adherence in ferritin monitoring and initiating iron chelation therapy in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes

OBJECTIVES

In patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) with >20 transfusions and ferritin levels >1000 μg/L, international guidelines recommend iron chelation therapy (ICT). The study's objective was to determine guideline adherence and the intensity of ferritin monitoring in clinical practice.

METHODS

We performed an observational population-based study using the HemoBase Registry, which contains data of all MDS patients diagnosed since 2005 in Friesland, the Netherlands. Clinical information on transfusions, ferritin measurements, ICT, and clinical performance as defined by age ≤ 80 years, Charlson Comorbidity Index <2 and lower-risk MDS was collected from health records.

RESULTS

Two hundred and thirty seven of 292 patients (81.1%) received ≥1 transfusion, and 121 (41.4%) received >20 transfusions. In 57 of these 121 patients (47.1%), ferritin measurements were performed at least once. Clinical performance was significantly associated with monitoring ferritin around the 20th transfusion (RR: 2.49, p = .016). Clinical performance was also associated with initiating ICT (RR: 5.99, p < .001). ICT was offered to 22.3% (n = 25) of eligible patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In this population-based study, ferritin levels were measured in <50% of MDS patients who received >20 transfusions, and clinical performance was significantly associated with measuring ferritin. Our study suggests that in heavily transfused MDS patients, ferritin monitoring is primarily based on patients' clinical performance rather than guideline recommendations.

Assessing the Prognosis of Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS)

Prognostic stratification in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) relies on a number of key factors. Combining such patient-related and disease-related prognostic parameters into useful assessment tools remains a challenge. The most widely used scoring systems include the international prognostic scoring system (IPSS), the revised IPSS (IPSS-R), the World Health Organization (WHO) Prognostic Scoring System (WPSS), and the new molecular IPSS (IPSS-M). Similar to the IPSS-R and the IPSS-M, the chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) prognostic scoring system (CPSS) and the CPSS molecular (CPSS-mol) are powerful and reliable prognostic tools that help to assess the individual prognosis of patients with CMML. The well-established prognostic assessment of MDS and CMML may be further augmented by additional disease-related parameters, such as somatic mutations, or patient-related factors, such as comorbidities. In this article, we briefly describe useful prognostic scoring systems for myelodysplastic syndromes and identify some open questions that require further investigation.

Guidelines for Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Converting Evidence into Action?

The heterogeneous group of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) needs an individualized and patient-tailored therapeutic approach. Consensus-based guidelines for diagnosis and treatment provide a basis for clinical decision making. MDS guidelines are issued by expert panels. Our main objective was to examine how guidelines influence patients’ adherence to expert recommendations and how they ensure healthcare quality. To approach this question, we reviewed the most common guidelines for diagnosing and treating MDS in adult patients. Furthermore, we critically looked at quality indicators for everyday practice and studied adherence in an everyday outpatient setting. Finally, we also paid close attention to patient-reported outcome measures and studied how they are used as endpoints in clinical trials. We can conclude that the combination of evidence-based diagnostic tools, standardized treatment recommendations, and patient-centered shared decision making will eventually lead to a healthcare standard that will significantly improve outcomes in adult patients with MDS.

Survey on Recommended Health Care for Adult Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes Identifies Areas for Improvement

The impact on health care of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) is continuously rising. To investigate the perception of hemato-oncologists concerning the recommended MDS patient care in Switzerland, we conducted a web-based survey on diagnosis, risk-stratification and treatment. 43/309 physicians (13.9%) replied to 135 questions that were based on current guidelines between 3/2017 and 2/2018. Only questions with feedback-rates >50% were further analysed and ratios >90% defined “high agreement”, 70–90% “agreement”, 30–70% “insufficient agreement” and <30% “disagreement”. For diagnosis, we found insufficient agreement on using flow-cytometry, classifying MDS precursor conditions, performing treatment response assessment after hypomethylating agents (HMA) and evaluating patients with suspected germ-line predisposition. For risk-stratification, we identified agreement on using IPSS-R but insufficient agreement for IPSS and patient-based assessments. For treatment, we observed disagreement on performing primary infectious prophylaxis in neutropenia but agreement on using only darbepoetin alfa in anaemic, lower-risk MDS patients. For thrombopoietin receptor agonists, insufficient agreement was found for the indication, preferred agent and triggering platelet count. Insufficient agreement was also found for immunosuppressive treatment in hypoplastic MDS and HMA dose adjustments. In conclusion, we identified areas for improvement in MDS patient care, in need of further clinical trials, information, and guiding documents.