Watch-and-wait or immediate immunotherapy/immunochemotherapy in patients with phase IE primary pulmonary MALT lymphoma? A multicenter retrospective study

Evaluation of CT features for differentiating consolidation pattern of pulmonary MALT lymphoma from pneumonic-type lung adenocarcinoma

Purpose

In clinical practice, the consolidation pattern of pulmonary mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (C-MALT) was often misdiagnosed as pneumonic-type lung adenocarcinoma (P-LADC). However, the mainstay of treatment and prognosis of these two diseases are different. The purpose of this study was to distinguish C-MALT from P-LADC by pre-treatment chest computed tomography (CT) features.

Patients and methods

A total of 31 patients with C-MALT (15 men and 16 women; mean age, 61.1 ± 11.2 years) and 58 patients with P-LADC (34 men and 24 women; mean age, 68.6 ± 7.4 years) confirmed by pathology who underwent contrast-enhanced chest CT were retrospectively enrolled from September 2014 to February 2023. Detailed clinical and CT characteristics of the two groups were evaluated. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the effectiveness of statistically significant variables in distinguishing C-MALT from P-LADC.

Results

The average age of C-MALT was younger than P-LADC patients (p<0.001). With regard to CT features, bronchiectasis within the consolidation was more common in the C-MALT group than the P-LADC group [83.87% (26 of 31) vs 20.69% (12 of 58), p<0.001]; whereas lymph nodes enlargement [75.86% (44 of 58) vs 9.68% (3 of 31), p<0.001] and pleural effusion [43.10% (25of 58) vs 19.35% (6 of 31), p=0.025] were more frequently observed in the P-LADC group than C-MALT group. The predictors with p<0.05 (age, bronchiectasis, lymph node enlargement, and pleural effusion) were used to construct a logistic regression model in discriminating C-MALT from P-LADC, the area under curve (AUC), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy were 0.9555, 86.67%, 91.53%, 83.87%, 93.10%, and 89.89%, respectively.

Conclusion

C-MALT and P-LADC have differential clinical and CT features. An adequate understanding of these different characteristics can contribute to the early accurate diagnosis of C-MALT and provide an appropriate therapeutic strategy.

Surgery and chemotherapy cannot improve the survival of patients with early-stage mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue derived primary pulmonary lymphoma

Background

To date, there is no treatment consensus on mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) derived primary pulmonary lymphoma (PPL).

Methods

We identified patients with early-stage MALT-type PPL from the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program database. The patients were divided into four groups according to treatment modalities: None of surgery or chemotherapy (None) group, Surgery alone group, Chemotherapy alone (Chemo alone) group, and Surgery plus chemotherapy (Surgery + chemo) group. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were study endpoints. We performed Cox regression analyses, propensity score-matched analyses (PSM) and Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival curves to compare the survival among different groups.

Results

A total of 953 patients were included in our analysis with 302, 403, 175, and 73 cases in the None, Surgery alone, Chemo alone, and Surgery + chemo groups, respectively. In this cohort, the estimated 3-year, 5-year and 10-year OS rates were 86.95%, 78.91%, and 55.89%, respectively. Meanwhile, the estimated 3-year, 5-year and 10-year CSS rates were 96.71%, 93.73%, and 86.84%, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analyses demonstrated that increasing age, tumors located in the lower lobe, and stage II were significant predictors of poorer OS while increasing age and tumors located in the bilateral lungs were associated with lower CSS. After PSM analyses, the KM survival curves showed no significant differences in OS or CSS among the four groups.

Conclusion

Early-stage MALT-type PPL is indolent in nature. Neither surgery, chemotherapy nor a combination of surgery and chemotherapy can improve OS and CSS, suggesting that “watch and wait” may be a reasonable alternative.

Management of Extranodal Marginal Zone Lymphoma: Present and Upcoming Perspectives

Simple Summary

Extranodal marginal zone lymphoma distinguishes itself from other indolent lymphomas due to its unique pathophysiology and natural history. This is reflected in its management, where next to traditional treatment strategies such as observation, radiotherapy or chemotherapy, eradication of the causal agent and even surgery represent important aspects of therapy. This review focuses on the particular aspects of this indolent lymphoma that affect management and summarizes the current evidence and different guidelines.

Abstract

Extranodal marginal zone lymphoma (EMZL) encompasses a subgroup of non-Hodgkin lymphomas that often present with localized involvement and may manifest in a diversity of organs and tissues. EMZL pathogenesis is in some cases linked to chronic inflammation/infection, which may impose additional diagnostic and clinical challenges. The most studied and established connection is the presence of Helicobacter pylori in gastric EMZL. Due to its heterogeneity of presentation and intricate pathological features, treatment can be complex, and staging systems are decisive for the choice of therapy. Nevertheless, there is no consensus regarding the most suitable staging system, and recommendations vary among different countries. As a rule of thumb, in limited stages, a local therapy with surgery or radiation is the preferred option, and it is potentially curative. Of note, eradicating the causal agent may be an important step of treatment, especially in gastric EMZL, in which Helicobacter pylori eradication remains the first-line therapy for the majority of patients. In patients with more advanced stages, watch-and-wait is a valuable option, especially amongst those without clear indications for systemic therapy, and it may be carried on for several years. If watch-and-wait is not an option, systemic therapy may be needed. Even though several agents have been tested as monotherapy or in combination in recent years, there is no consensus regarding the first-line therapy, and decisions can vary depending on individual factors, such as age, clinical performance and stage. This review aims to discuss the several aspects of EMZL, including genetic milieu, pathogenesis and staging systems, that may influence the choice of therapy. In addition, we present a summary of evidence of several systemic therapies, compare different recommendations worldwide and discuss future perspectives and novelties in its therapy.

Evaluation of HRCT for the Differential Diagnosis of Pneumonia-Like Consolidation Pattern of Pulmonary MALT Lymphoma from Lobar Pneumonia

Purpose

To assess the performance of high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) in discriminating the consolidation pattern of pulmonary mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma from lobar pneumonia.

Patients and Methods

This retrospective study comprised 26 patients with pathologically confirmed consolidation pattern of pulmonary MALT lymphoma (12 men and 14 women; mean age, 59.4±12.1 years) and 36 patients with lobar pneumonia confirmed by body fluids or respiratory secretion culture (16 men and 20 women; mean age, 41.8±26.3 years). Two radiologists independently evaluated the CT images. The effectiveness of these variables in distinguishing lobar pneumonia from MALT lymphoma was analyzed using logistic regression analysis.

Results

The average age of lobar pneumonia patients was younger than that of MALT lymphoma patients (p=0.002). The respiratory symptom was more common in lobar pneumonia than MALT lymphoma (p=0.002). Signs of bronchiectasis within the consolidation and bulging of interlobar fissure occurred significantly more often in MALT lymphoma than pneumonia (69.2% vs 11.1%, p<0.0001; 46.2% vs 19.4%, p=0.024). We used the predictors with p<0.05 (age, respiratory symptoms, bronchiectasis, and bulging of interlobar fissure) to construct a logistic regression model. The area under curve (AUC), negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 0.891, 84.21%, 83.33%, 88.89%, 76.92%, and 83.87% for discriminating lobar pneumonia from MALT lymphoma.

Conclusion

Middle-aged, presence of mild clinical symptoms, bronchiectasis and bulging of the interlobar fissure on chest CT images are potential markers to distinguish pulmonary MALT lymphoma from lobar pneumonia.