Anti-CD19 CAR-T cell therapy bridge to HSCT decreases the relapse rate and improves the long-term survival of R/R B-ALL patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Efficacy and safety of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy in hematologic malignancies: a living systematic review (protocol)

Objective

To determine the efficacy and safety of CAR-T therapy in the treatment of patients with hematologic malignancies, in comparison with other current therapies.

Design

A living systematic review.

Methods

We will include randomized trials evaluating the effect of CAR-T therapy versus other active treatments, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, best supportive care or any other intervention in patients with hematologic malignancies. Non-randomized primary studies will be searched in case we found no direct evidence from randomized controlled trials. Two reviewers will independently screen each study for eligibility, extract data, and assess the risk of bias. Efficacy measures will include overall survival rate, overall response rate, complete response/remission (CR) rate, partial response/remission (PR) rate, relapse from CR, progression-free survival, and time from CAR-T infusion to transplantation. Safety measures will include serious adverse events, the incidence of cytokine release syndrome, graft-versus-host disease, neurotoxicity, and total adverse events. Quality of life will also be assessed. Meta-analyses will be carried out to summarize the results. We will apply the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of the evidence for each outcome. A living, web-based version of this review will be openly available until there is solid evidence to respond to the review objective. We will resubmit it for publication every time the conclusions change or whenever there are substantial updates.

Quartic CAR-T Cell Bridging to Twice Allo-HSCT Therapy in a Patient with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Introduction

Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy is an effective bridging treatment for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). However, repetitive CAR-T cell therapy and allo-HSCT can only be performed in a few patients because of technical difficulties and patients' physical, economic, and social conditions.

Case Presentation

A 23-year-old female patient with second relapsed B-cell ALL (B-ALL) underwent human-murine chimeric CD19 CAR-T cell therapy twice, human-murine chimeric CD22 CAR-T cell therapy once, and humanized CD19 CAR-T cell therapy once. Moreover, she was sequentially bridged to her mother donor allo-HSCT once and cousin donor allo-HSCT once.

Conclusion

Repetitive CAR-T cell therapy bridging to repetitive allo-HSCT is still a safe and active therapeutic strategy for patients with relapsed or refractory ALL.

Difference in Efficacy and Safety of Anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy Containing 4-1BB and CD28 Co-Stimulatory Domains for B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

This study quantified the differences in the efficacy and safety of different stimulation domains of anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T therapy for B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). Clinical trials related to anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy for B-ALL were searched in public databases from database inception to 13 November 2021. The differences in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of B-ALL patients treated with anti-CAR T-cell therapy containing 4-1BB and CD28 co-stimulatory domains were compared by establishing a parametric survival function. The overall remission rate (ORR), the proportion of people with minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative complete remission (CR), the incidence of cytokine release syndrome (CRS), and the neurotoxicity across different co-stimulatory domains was assessed using a random-effects model. The correlation between the ORR, MRD-negative CR, PFS, and OS was tested. The results showed that the median OS of anti-CAR T-cell treatment containing 4-1BB and CD28 co-stimulatory domains was 15.0 months (95% CI: 11.0-20.0) and 8.5 months (95% CI: 5.0-14.0), and the median PFS was 7.0 months (95% CI: 4.0-11.5) and 3.0 months (95% CI: 1.5-7.0), respectively. Anti-CD19 CAR T-cells in the 4-1BB co-stimulatory domain showed superior benefits in patients who achieved ORR. The incidence of neurotoxicity was significantly higher in the CD28 co-stimulatory domain of anti-CD19 CAR T-cells than in the 4-1BB co-stimulatory domain. In addition, the ORR and MRD-negative CR were strongly correlated with OS and PFS, and PFS and OS were strongly correlated. The 4-1BB co-stimulatory domain suggested a better benefit-risk ratio than the CD28 co-stimulatory domain in B-ALL.

Cmpd10357 to treat B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) is the most common type of cancer found in children. Although the overall survival rates are now >80%, 15%-20% of pediatric patients relapse, with survival rates subsequently dropping to 5%-10%. Cmpd10357, 3-amino-5-arylamino-6-chloro-N- (diaminomethylene) pyrazine-2-carboximide, is a highly potent, cell-permeant compound recently shown to have cytotoxic effects on solid tumors, including human breast cancer and high-grade gliomas, independent of their proliferative status. Cmpd10357 demonstrated concentration-dependent cytotoxicity in two human B-ALL cell lines, JM1 and Reh, at half-maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC₅₀) of 3.2 and 3.3 μM, respectively. Cmpd10357, at a dose of 5 mg/kg, significantly prolonged survival in our B-ALL xenograft mouse model, with a median survival time of 49.0 days compared with 45.5 days in the control group (p < 0.05). The cytotoxicity of Cmpd10357 demonstrated caspase-independent, nonapoptotic cancer cell demise associated with the nuclear translocation of apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF). The cytotoxicity of Cmpd10357 in B-ALL cells was inhibited by Necrostatin-1 but not by Necrosulfonamide. These studies suggest that an AIF-mediated, caspase-independent necrosis mechanism of Cmpd10357 in B-ALL could be used in combination with traditional apoptotic chemotherapeutic agents.

Clinical use of CAR T-cells in treating acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has transformed the treatment landscape for adult patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R B-ALL). However CAR T-cell therapy of R/R T-ALL has unique challenges, such as the lack of specific tumor antigens, cell fratricide and T cell aplasia, in comparison with that of R/R B-ALL. Despite promising therapeutic outcomes in R/R B-ALL, application of this therapy is limited by high relapse rates and immunological toxicities. Recent studies suggest patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation post-CAR T-cell therapy would achieve durable remission and better survival, but this remains controversial. Herein, I briefly review published data on the clinical use of CAR T-cells in treating ALL.

Safety and efficacy of autologous and allogeneic humanized CD19-targeted CAR-T cell therapy for patients with relapsed/refractory B-ALL

BACKGROUND

Murine chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy has demonstrated clinical benefit in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). However, the potential immunogenicity of the murine single-chain variable fragment domain may limit the persistence of CAR-T cell, leading to relapse.

METHODS

We performed a clinical trial to determine the safety and efficacy of autologous and allogeneic humanized CD19-targeted CAR-T cell (hCART19) for R/R B-ALL. Fifty-eight patients (aged 13-74 years) were enrolled and treated between February 2020 and March 2022. The endpoints were complete remission (CR) rate, overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), and safety.

RESULTS

Overall, 93.1% (54/58) of patients achieved CR or CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) by day 28, with 53 patients having minimal residual disease negativity. With a median follow-up of 13.5 months, the estimated 1-year OS and EFS were 73.6% (95% CI 62.1% to 87.4%) and 46.0% (95% CI 33.7% to 62.8%), with a median OS and EFS of 21.5 months and 9.5 months, respectively. No significant increase in human antimouse antibodies was observed following infusion (p=0.78). Duration of B-cell aplasia in the blood was observed for as long as 616 days, which was longer than that in our prior mCART19 trial. All toxicities were reversible, including severe cytokine release syndrome, which developed in 36% (21/58) of patients and severe neurotoxicity, which developed in 5% (3/58) of patients. Compared with our prior mCART19 trial, patients treated with hCART19 had longer EFS without increased toxicity. Additionally, our data also suggest that patients treated with consolidation therapy, including allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation or CD22-targeted CAR-T cell, following hCART19 therapy had a longer EFS than those without consolidation therapy.

CONCLUSION

hCART19 has good short-term efficacy and manageable toxicity in R/R B-ALL patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04532268.

CAR-T therapy followed by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for refractory/relapsed acute B lymphocytic leukemia: Long-term follow-up results

Background

Patients with refractory/relapsed (r/r) acute B lymphocytic leukemia (B-ALL) can achieve complete response (CR) after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, but recurrence occurs in the short term. To reduce recurrence and improve survival, CAR-T therapy followed by transplantation is a feasible option. We analyzed the long-term follow-up outcomes and the risk factors for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) after CR by CAR-T therapy in this study.

Methods

A total of 144 patients who underwent allo-HSCT after CAR-T therapy in our hospital were enrolled in this study. Target gene analysis was performed in 137 r/r B-ALL patients receiving allo-HSCT after CR by CAR-T therapy. Among the 137 patients, 87 were evaluated for germline predisposition gene mutations, and 92 were evaluated for tumor somatic gene mutations using NGS. The clinical factors, germline predisposition gene and somatic gene mutations associated with the prognosis of patients receiving transplantation after CAR-T therapy were analyzed using univariate Cox regression. Factors related to disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using multivariate Cox regression analysis.

Results

In 137 r/r B-ALL patients, the 2-year cumulative incidence of recurrence (CIR), OS and DFS in patients receiving allo-HSCT after CAR-T therapy was 31.5%, 71.4%, and 60.5%, respectively. The 2-year OS and DFS in MRD-negative patients were 80.9% and 69.3%, respectively. Univariate Cox analysis showed that pretransplant MRD positivity, fungal infection, germline EP300 mutation and somatic TP53 mutation were associated with a poor prognosis after transplantation; a TBI-based regimen was a protective factor for survival and recurrence after transplantation. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that the TBI-based regimen was an independent protective factor for DFS, fungal infection and MRD positivity were independent risk factors for DFS, and tumor somatic TP53 mutation and germline EP300 mutation were independent risk factors for DFS and OS.

Conclusion

Germline EP300 mutation and tumor somatic TP53 mutation are poor prognostic factors for posttransplant recurrence and survival in r/r B-ALL patients achieving CR after CAR-T therapy. The prognostic risk factors should be considered in adjusting treatment strategies to improve the efficacy of clinical diagnosis and treatment.

Efficacy and safety of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy in hematologic malignancies: a living systematic review on comparative studies

Background

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) cell therapies have been claimed to be curative in responsive patients. Nonetheless, response rates can vary according to different characteristics, and these therapies are associated with important adverse events such as cytokine release syndrome, neurologic adverse events, and B-cell aplasia.

Objectives

This living systematic review aims to provide a timely, rigorous, and continuously updated synthesis of the evidence available on the role of CAR-T therapy for the treatment of patients with hematologic malignancies.

Design

A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and comparative non-randomized studies of interventions (NRSI), evaluating the effect of CAR-T therapy versus other active treatments, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, standard of care (SoC) or any other intervention, was performed in patients with hematologic malignancies. The primary outcome is overall survival (OS). Certainty of the evidence was determined using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

Data sources and Methods

Searches were performed in the Epistemonikos database, which collates information from multiple sources to identify systematic reviews and their included primary studies, including Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, LILACS, DARE, HTA Database, Campbell database, JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports, EPPI-Centre Evidence Library. A manual search was also carried out. We included the evidence published up to 1 July 2022.

Results

We included the evidence published up to 1 July 2022. We considered 139 RCTs and 1725 NRSI as potentially eligible. Two RCTs (N = 681) comparing CAR-T therapy with SoC in patients with recurrent/relapsed (R/R) B-cell lymphoma were included. RCTs did not show statistical differences in OS, serious adverse events, or total adverse events with grade ⩾ 3. Higher complete response with substantial heterogeneity [risk ratio = 1.59; 95% confidence interval (CI) = (1.30-1.93); I ² = 89%; 2 studies; 681 participants; very low certainty evidence] and higher progression-free survival [hazard ratio for progression or death = 0.49; 95% CI = (0.37-0.65); 1 study; 359 participants; moderate certainty evidence] were reported with CAR-T therapies. Nine NRSI (N = 540) in patients with T or B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia or R/R B-cell lymphoma were also included, providing secondary data. In general, the GRADE certainty of the evidence for main outcomes was mostly low or very low.

Conclusion

So far, assuming important limitations in the level of certainty due to scarce and heterogenous comparative studies, CAR-T therapies have shown some benefit in terms of progression-free survival, but no overall survival, in patients with R/R B-cell lymphoma. Despite one-arm trials have already facilitated approval of CAR-T cell treatments, additional evidence from large comparative studies is still needed to better characterize the benefit-harm ratio of the use of CAR-T in a variety of patient populations with hematological malignancies.

Registration

https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.14390.1.

PROSPERO/OSF Preregistration

10.17605/OSF.IO/V6HDX.

Comparing the efficacy of salvage regimens for relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

The complete remission (CR) rate and overall survival (OS) of relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (B-ALL) are not satisfactory. The available salvage regimens include standard chemotherapy, inotuzumab ozogamicin, blinatumomab and cluster of differentiation (CD)19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR T), and the NCCN guidelines recommend all of these therapies with no preference. Dual CD19/CD22 CAR T-cells have emerged as new treatments and have shown some efficacy, with high CR rates and preventing CD19-negative relapse. However, direct comparisons of the CR rate and long-term survival among the different salvage therapies are lacking. Databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane were searched from inception to January 31, 2022, for relevant studies. The outcomes of interest were complete remission/complete remission with incomplete haematologic recovery (CR/CRi) rates and 1-year overall survival (OS) rates. Odds ratios (ORs) were generated for binary outcomes, and the mean difference (MD) was generated for consecutive outcomes by network meta-analysis. CD19 CAR T-cells demonstrated a significantly better effect in improving the CR/CRi rate than blinatumomab (OR = 8.32, 95% CI: 1.18 to 58.44) and chemotherapy (OR = 16.4, 95% CI: 2.76 to 97.45). In terms of OS, CD19 CAR T-cells and dual CD19/CD22 CAR T-cells both had a higher 1-year OS rate than blinatumomab, inotuzumab ozogamicin and chemotherapy. There was no significant difference between CD19 CAR T-cells and dual CD19/CD22 CAR T-cells in terms of 1-year OS and CR/CRi rates. CD19 CAR T-cells are effective in inducing CR, and CD19 CAR T-cells and dual CD19/CD22 CAR T-cells show benefits for overall survival. More high-quality randomized controlled trials and longer follow-ups are needed to confirm and update the results of this analysis in the future.

Generation and Functional Characterization of PLAP CAR-T Cells against Cervical Cancer Cells

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is one of the cancer treatment modalities that has recently shown promising results in treating hematopoietic malignancies. However, one of the obstacles that need to be addressed in solid tumors is the on-target and off-tumor cytotoxicity due to the lack of specific tumor antigens with low expression in healthy cells. Placental alkaline phosphatase (PLAP) is a shared placenta- and tumor-associated antigen (TAA) that is expressed in ovarian, cervical, colorectal, and prostate cancers and is negligible in normal cells. In this study, we constructed second-generation CAR T cells with a fully human scFv against PLAP antigen andthen evaluated the characteristics of PLAP CAR T cells in terms of tonic signaling and differentiation in comparison with ΔPLAP CAR T cells and CD19 CAR T cells. In addition, by co-culturing PLAP CAR T cells with HeLa and CaSki cells, we analyzed the tumor-killing functions and the secretion of anti-tumor molecules. Results showed that PLAP CAR T cells not only proliferated during co-culture with cancer cells but also eliminated them in vitro. We also observed increased secretion of IL-2, granzyme A, and IFN-γ by PLAP CAR T cells upon exposure to the target cells. In conclusion, PLAP CAR T cells are potential candidates for further investigation in cervical cancer and, potentially, other solid tumors.

[Safety and efficacy of humanized CD19-targeted CAR-T cells in patients with relapsed/refractory acute B cell lymphoblastic leukemia]

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of humanized CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) in patients with relapsed/refractory acute B cell lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R B-ALL) . Methods: The clinical data of 41 patients with R/R B-ALL treated with humanized CD19-targeted CAR-T cells in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine from February 2020 to July 2021 were analyzed. Results: Cytokine release syndrome occurred in all patients, and 63.4% (26/41) were grades 1-2. Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome developed in three patients. On median day 15 (9-47) , the complete remission rate was 95.1% (39/41) , of which 38 patients tested negative for bone marrow minimal residual disease detected by flow cytometry. Among the 39 patients with complete remission, 17 patients did not receive further treatment, and 70.6% (12/17) remained in remission at the end of follow-up, with a progression-free survival of 11.6 months of the two patients with the earliest infusion. Another 17 patients underwent consolidation allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (10 cases) or CD22 CAR-T cell sequential therapy (seven cases) after remission, and 76.5% (13/17) of the patients were still in remission at the end of follow-up. The remaining five patients who did not receive consolidation therapy relapsed at a median of 72 (55-115) days after CAR-T cell therapy. Conclusion: In patients with R/R B-ALL, the humanized CD19-targeted CAR-T cells had a high response and manageable toxicity.

Interleukin Inhibitors in Cytokine Release Syndrome and Neurotoxicity Secondary to CAR-T Therapy

Introduction: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy is an innovative therapeutic option for addressing certain recurrent or refractory hematological malignancies. However, CAR-T cells also cause the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines that lead to life-threatening cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity. Objective: To study the efficacy of interleukin inhibitors in addressing cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity secondary to CAR-T therapy. Methodology: The authors conducted a bibliographic review in which 10 articles were analyzed. These included cut-off studies, case reports, and clinical trials involving 11 cancer centers and up to 475 patients over 18 years of age. Results: Tocilizumab is the only interleukin inhibitor approved to address CRS secondary to CAR-T therapy due to its efficacy and safety. Other inhibitors, such as siltuximab and anakinra, could be useful in combination with tocilizumab for preventing severe cytokine release and neurotoxicity. In addition, the new specific inhibitors could be effective in mitigating CRS without affecting the cytotoxic efficacy of CAR-T therapy. Conclusion: More lines of research should be opened to elucidate the true implications of these drugs in treating the side effects of CAR-T therapy.

Improving CAR-T immunotherapy: Overcoming the challenges of T cell exhaustion

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has emerged as a cancer treatment with enormous potential, demonstrating impressive antitumor activity in the treatment of hematological malignancies. However, CAR T cell exhaustion is a major limitation to their efficacy, particularly in the application of CAR T cells to solid tumors. CAR T cell exhaustion is thought to be due to persistent antigen stimulation, as well as an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, and mitigating exhaustion to maintain CAR T cell effector function and persistence and achieve clinical potency remains a central challenge. Here, we review the underlying mechanisms of exhaustion and discuss emerging strategies to prevent or reverse exhaustion through modifications of the CAR receptor or CAR independent pathways. Additionally, we discuss the potential of these strategies for improving clinical outcomes of CAR T cell therapy.

Role of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy: bridge to transplantation or stand-alone therapy in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss the curative potential for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, with or without consolidative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) in the treatment of children and young adults with B lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL).

RECENT FINDINGS

CAR-T targeting CD19 can induce durable remissions and prolong life in patients with relapsed/refractory B-ALL. Whether HCT is needed to consolidate remission and cure relapse/refractory B-ALL following a CD19 CAR-T induced remission remains controversial. Preliminary evidence suggests that consolidative HCT following CAR-T in HCT-naïve children improves leukemia-free survival. However, avoiding HCT-related late effects is a desirable goal, so identification of patients at high risk of relapse is needed to appropriately direct those patients to HCT when necessary, while avoiding HCT in others. High disease burden prior to CAR-T infusion, loss of B-cell aplasia and detection of measurable residual disease by flow cytometry or next-generation sequencing following CAR-T therapy associate with a higher relapse risk and may identify patients requiring consolidative HCT for relapse prevention.

SUMMARY

There is a pressing need to determine when CD19 CAR-T alone is likely to be curative and when a consolidative HCT will be required. We discuss the current state of knowledge and future directions.

Factors Impacting Overall and Event-Free Survival following Post-Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Consolidative Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) may be used to consolidate chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy-induced remissions for patients with relapsed/refractory B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), but little is known about the factors impacting overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) for post-CAR hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The present study's primary objective was to identify factors associated with OS and EFS for consolidative HSCT following CAR-induced complete remission (CR) in transplantation-naïve patients. Secondary objectives included evaluation of OS/EFS, relapse-free survival and cumulative incidence of relapse for all patients who proceeded to HSCT, stratified by first and second HSCT, as well as the tolerability of HSCT following CAR-induced remission. This was a retrospective review of children and young adults enrolled on 1 of 3 CAR T cell trials at the National Cancer Institute targeting CD19, CD22, and CD19/22 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers NCT01593696, NCT02315612, and NCT03448393) who proceeded directly to HSCT following CAR T cell therapy. Between July 2012 and February 2021, 46 children and young adults with pre-B ALL went directly to HSCT following CAR therapy. Of these patients, 34 (74%) proceeded to a first HSCT, with a median follow-up of 50.8 months. Transplantation-naïve patients were heavily pretreated prior to CAR T cell therapy (median, 3.5 lines of therapy; range, 1 to 12) with significant prior immunotherapy exposure (blinatumomab, inotuzumab, and/or CAR T cell therapy in patients receiving CD22 or CD19/22 constructs (88%; 15 of /17)). Twelve patients (35%) had primary refractory disease, and the median time from CAR T cell infusion to HSCT Day 0 was 54.5 days (range, 42 to 127 days). The median OS following first HSCT was 72.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.9 months to not estimable [NE]), with a median EFS of 36.9 months (95% CI, 5.2 months to NE). At 12 and 24 months, the OS was 76.0% (95% CI, 57.6% to 87.2%) and 60.7% (95% CI, 40.8% to 75.8%), respectively, and EFS was 64.6% (95% CI, 46.1% to 78.1%) and 50.9% (95% CI, 32.6% to 66.6%), respectively. The individual factors associated with both decreased OS and EFS in univariate analyses for post-CAR consolidative HSCT in transplantation-naïve patients included ≥5 prior lines of therapy (not reached [NR] versus 12.4 months, P = .014; NR versus 4.8 months, P = .063), prior blinatumomab therapy (NR versus 16.9 months, P = .0038; NR versus 4.4 months, P = .0025), prior inotuzumab therapy (NR versus 11.5 months, P = .044; 36.9 months versus 2.7 months, P = .0054) and ≥5% blasts (M2/M3 marrow) pre-CAR T cell therapy (NR versus 17 months, P = .019; NR versus 12.2 months, P = .035). Primary refractory disease was associated with improved OS/EFS post-HSCT (NR versus 21.9 months, P = .075; NR versus 12.2 months, P = .024). Extensive prior therapy, particularly immunotherapy, and high disease burden each individually adversely impacted OS/EFS following post-CAR T cell consolidative HSCT in transplantation-naïve patients, owing primarily to relapse. Despite this, HSCT remains an important treatment modality in long-term cure. Earlier implementation of HSCT before multiply relapsed disease and incorporation of post-HSCT risk mitigation strategies in patients identified to be at high-risk of post-HSCT relapse may improve outcomes.

The consensus from The Chinese Society of Hematology on indications, conditioning regimens and donor selection for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: 2021 update

The consensus recommendations in 2018 from The Chinese Society of Hematology (CSH) on indications, conditioning regimens and donor selection for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) facilitated the standardization of clinical practices of allo-HSCT in China and progressive integration with the world. There have been new developments since the initial publication. To integrate recent developments and further improve the consensus, a panel of experts from the CSH recently updated the consensus recommendations, which are summarized as follows: (1) there is a new algorithm for selecting appropriate donors for allo-HSCT candidates. Haploidentical donors (HIDs) are the preferred donor choice over matched sibling donors (MSDs) for patients with high-risk leukemia or elderly patients with young offspring donors in experienced centers. This replaces the previous algorithm for donor selection, which favored MSDs over HIDs. (2) Patients with refractory/relapsed lymphoblastic malignancies are now encouraged to undergo salvage treatment with novel immunotherapies prior to HSCT. (3) The consensus has been updated to reflect additional evidence for the application of allo-HSCT in specific groups of patients with hematological malignancies (intermediate-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML), favorable-risk AML with positive minimal residual disease, and standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia). (4) The consensus has been updated to reflect additional evidence for the application of HSCT in patients with nonmalignant diseases, such as severe aplastic anemia and inherited diseases. (5) The consensus has been updated to reflect additional evidence for the administration of anti-thymocyte globulin, granulocyte colony-stimulating factors and post-transplantation cyclophosphamide in HID-HSCT.

From CAR-T Cells to CAR-NK Cells: A Developing Immunotherapy Method for Hematological Malignancies

The approval of CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-engineered T (CAR-T) cell products in B-cell malignancies represents a breakthrough in CAR-T cell immunotherapy. However, the remaining limitations concerning the graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and other adverse effects (e.g., cytokine release syndromes [CRS] and neurotoxicity) still restrict their wider applications. Natural killer (NK) cells have been identified as promising candidates for CAR-based cellular immunotherapy because of their unique characteristics. No HLA-matching restriction and abundant sources make CAR-engineered NK (CAR-NK) cells potentially available to be off-the-shelf products that could be readily available for immediate clinical use. Therefore, researchers have gradually shifted their focus from CAR-T cells to CAR-NK cells in hematological malignancies. This review discusses the current status and applications of CAR-NK cells in hematological malignancies, as well as the unique advantages of CAR-NK cells compared with CAR-T cells. It also discusses challenges and prospects regarding clinical applications of CAR-NK cells.

CD19 CAR-T cell treatment conferred sustained remission in B-ALL patients with minimal residual disease

The persistence or recurrence of minimal residual disease (MRD) after chemotherapy predicts relapse of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T (CD19 CAR-T) cells have shown promising responses in B-ALL. However, their role in chemotherapy-refractory MRD-positive B-ALL remains unclear. Here we aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of CD19 CAR-T cells in MRD-positive B-ALL patients. From January 2018, a total of 14 MRD-positive B-ALL patients received one or more infusions of autogenous CD19 CAR-T cells. Among them, 12 patients achieved MRD-negative remission after one cycle of CAR-T infusion. At a median follow-up time of 647 days (range 172–945 days), the 2-year event-free survival rate in MRD-positive patients was 61.2% ± 14.0% and the 2-year overall survival was 78.6 ± 11.0%, which were significantly higher than patients with active disease (blasts ≥ 5% or with extramedullary disease). Moreover, patients with MRD had a lower grade of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) than patients with active disease. However, the peak expansion of CAR-T cells in MRD positive patients showed no statistical difference compared to patients with active disease. Five patients received two or more CAR-T cell infusions and these patients showed a decreased peak expansion of CAR-T cell in subsequent infusions. In conclusion, pre-emptive CD19 CAR-T cell treatment is an effective and safe approach and may confer sustained remission in B-ALL patients with chemotherapy-refractory MRD. The trials were registered at www.chictr.org.cn as ChiCTR-ONN-16009862 (November 14, 2016) and ChiCTR1800015164 (March 11, 2018).

Case Report: Combined Intravenous Infusion and Local Injection of CAR-T Cells Induced Remission in a Relapsed Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Patient

Relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a disease with a poor prognosis. Recent clinical trials results showed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has a promising role in treating relapsed DLBCL. Unfortunately, patients with extranodal lesions respond poorly to CAR-T cells administered intravenously. Herein, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of a new treatment strategy of CAR-T cells, combining intravenous infusion with local injection of CAR-T cells, in a relapsed DLBCL patient with extranodal lesions. The patient achieved durable remission and without severe adverse effects after CAR-T cells treatment. During the follow-up period of one year, the patient remained in good condition. In conclusion, combining intravenous injection with a local injection for CAR-T cell is a feasible strategy for relapsed DLBCL patients with extranodal lesions.