Rifaximin use favoured micafungin-resistant Candida spp. infections in recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

Risk factors for invasive fungal infections after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are common infectious complications after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), seriously threatening the survival of patients.

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review aimed to investigate risk factors associated with IFIs following HSCT.

METHODS

Two authors independently conducted the selection of studies and extraction of data. Risk factors for IFIs, invasive aspergillosis or invasive mould infections and invasive candida infection after HSCT were compiled separately by meta-analysis using RevMan 5.4 and R language 4.1.2.

DATA SOURCES

Pubmed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library until April 2023.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Case-control or cohort studies that assessed risk factors for IFIs among HSCT recipients were included.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients experiencing HSCT.

TEST/S

None.

REFERENCE STANDARD

The IFIs were defined according to the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Mycosis Study Group (EORTC/MSG) criteria, or a similar definition.

ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF BIAS

A modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used.

METHODS OF DATA SYNTHESIS

A random-effects model with the Mantel-Haenszel method was used to pool results from primary studies.

RESULTS

Out of 1637 studies screened, 51 studies involving 109 155 patients were included, with 45 studies providing adequate data for meta-analysis. Identified risk factors for IFIs included prolonged neutropenia, intensified therapy for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), previous transplantation, previous proven or probable IFI, acute GVHD ≥ grade II, extensive or severe chronic GVHD, use of anti-thymocyte globulin during transplantation, haploidentical transplantation, high-dose glucocorticoids, Epstein-Barr virus infection, cytomegalovirus infection or reactivation, and lower albumin. Conversely, antifungal prophylaxis emerged as the sole preventive factor. For invasive aspergillosis or invasive mould infections, the top risk factors were extensive or severe chronic GVHD, respiratory viral infection, high-dose glucocorticoids, acute GVHD ≥ grade II, and human leukocyte antigen mismatch. Cord blood transplantation was the sole significant risk factor for invasive candidiasis. However, there was likely a high degree of interdependence among various risk factors.

DISCUSSION

This meta-analysis provides a thorough review of risk factors for IFIs infection after HSCT. The achieved insights can aid in stratifying patients who are at an elevated risk of IFIs and promoting antifungal preventive strategies.

Open-Label Randomized Controlled Study of Ciprofloxacin vs Rifaximin as Neutropenia Prophylaxis in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Loss of microbiota diversity has been clearly associated with poor outcomes in the allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation setting. However, the choice of the optimal antibiotic prophylaxis during the pre-engraftment phase remains unclear. We designed a prospective randomized study to compare our standard-of-care neutropenia prophylaxis (ciprofloxacin) with rifaximin. We enrolled 38 consecutive adult patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation setting and were randomly assigned to receive ciprofloxacin (20 patients) or rifaximin (18 patients) at day -1. Pretransplant and transplant characteristics did not differ between groups. Cumulative incidence (CI) of acute graft-vs-host disease grade II to IV and moderate/severe chronic graft-vs-host disease was similar in both groups. With a median follow-up of 13.2 months (range, 6.8-30.2) in surviving patients, the 1-year CI of relapse was 20.8% in ciprofloxacin vs 17.8% in rifaximin (P = .616). Importantly, the 1-year CI of treatment-related mortality was significantly reduced in the ciprofloxacin group (10.2% vs 27.8%, P = .032), leading to higher 1-year overall survival (88.9% vs 74.6%, P = .038). In Cox-regression multivariate analysis, antibiotic prophylaxis remained the only predictor of overall survival, independently of donor type, disease risk index, and moderate/severe chronic graft-vs-host disease. Further studies are needed to assess the effects on microbiota diversity and confirm these outcomes.

Role of Gut Microbiota and Oxidative Stress in the Progression of Transplant-Related Complications following Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), also known as bone marrow transplantation, has curative potential for various hematologic malignancies but is associated with risks such as graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), severe bloodstream infection, viral pneumonia, idiopathic pneumonia syndrome (IPS), lung fibrosis, and sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS), which severely deteriorate clinical outcomes and limit the wide application of HSCT. Recent research has provided important insights into the effects of gut microbiota and oxidative stress (OS) on HSCT complications. Therefore, based on recent studies, we describe intestinal dysbiosis and OS in patients with HSCT and review recent molecular findings underlying the causal relationships of gut microbiota, OS, and transplant-related complications, focusing particularly on the involvement of gut microbiota-mediated OS in postengraftment complications. Also, we discuss the use of antioxidative and anti-inflammatory probiotics to manipulate gut microbiota and OS, which have been associated with promising effects in improving HSCT outcomes.