Combination of novel molecular targeted agent plus R-CHOP-based regimen versus R-CHOP alone in previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Revisiting treatment-related cardiotoxicity in patients with malignant lymphoma-a review and prospects for the future

Treatment of malignant lymphoma has for years been represented by many cardiotoxic agents especially anthracyclines, cyclophosphamide, and thoracic irradiation. Although they are in clinical practice for decades, the precise mechanism of cardiotoxicity and effective prevention is still part of the research. At this article we discuss most routinely used anti-cancer drugs in chemotherapeutic regiments for malignant lymphoma with the focus on novel insight on molecular mechanisms of cardiotoxicity. Understanding toxicity at molecular levels may unveil possible targets of cardioprotective supportive therapy or optimization of current therapeutic protocols. Additionally, we review novel specific targeted therapy and its challenges in cardio-oncology.

Superiority of polatuzumab vedotin over other novel agents in previously untreated ABC-type diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a network meta-analysis of 20 RCTs

Because of lacking of head-to-head comparison among polatuzumab (Pola) vedotin and other novel agents for untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), the optimal option remains undefined. We searched twelve relevant published reports, covering 8376 subjects. Interestingly, the PFS benefit with Pola-R-CHP over other regimens was found prominently in those B-cell-like type (ABC-type) patients. For those ABC-type patients, the PFS advantage with Pola-R-CHP was statistically significant, when compared to R-CHOP+Bort (HR: 0.52, P=0.02), R-CHOP+Ibru (HR: 0.43, P=0.001), R-CHOP+Lena (HR: 0.51, P=0.009), G-CHOP (HR: 0.46, P=0.008), and R-CHOP (HR: 0.40, P<0.001). Meanwhile, for those germinal center B-cell-like (GCB) type patients, no PFS advantage with Pola-R-CHP was found when compared to R-CHOP+Bort (HR: 1.18, P=0.46), R-CHOP+Lena (HR: 1.21, P=0.45), G-CHOP (HR: 1.39, P=0.14), R-CHOP-14 (HR: 0.94, P=0.82), and R-CHOP (HR: 1.00, P=1). The PFS advantage with Pola-R-CHP over other regimens might be confined to those patients of ABC-type DLBCL.

Baseline and progressive adipopenia in newly diagnosed patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with unfavorable features are associated with worse clinical outcomes

We retrospectively analyzed perirenal and subcutaneous fat thickness and their dynamics from baseline to end-of-treatment computerized-tomography scans in a cohort of 118 newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients with unfavorable features treated with R-DA-EPOCH regimen. Higher revised-international-prognostic-index (R-IPI) score was significantly associated with higher baseline perirenal and lower subcutaneous fat thickness. Up to 51% patients experienced perirenal and 40% subcutaneous fat-tissue loss during immunochemotherapy period. R-DA-EPOCH feasibility, toxicity and obtained response to therapy did not significantly differ regarding baseline perirenal and subcutaneous fat measurements whereas higher number of febrile-neutropenia cycles was associated with more pronounced subcutaneous fat loss. In multivariate-analyses subcutaneous fat loss of ≥6% (hazard-ratio (HR) =4.58, p < 0.001) and achieving response to therapy (HR = 0.03, p < 0.001) predicted overall-survival, and baseline subcutaneous fat thickness ≤24 mm (HR = 3.14, p = 0.023), baseline minimal perirenal fat thickness ≤8 mm (HR = 2.44, p = 0.042) and achieving response to therapy (HR = 0.04, p < 0.001) predicted progression-free-survival independently of each other.