Clinical and prognostic role of 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT and sarcopenia in treatment-naïve patients with T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma

Prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET radiomics and sarcopenia in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Oral cancer is one of the most common malignancies in the head and neck region. Approximately 90% of oral cancers are oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCC). 18F-FDG PET/CT has been used in OSCC patients for its high value in detecting metastatic lymph nodes and distant metastases. PET radiomics and sarcopenia can be measured on the PET and CT components of 18F-FDG PET/CT.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of radiomics and sarcopenia measured on the PET and CT components of pre-operation 18F-FDG PET/CT in OSCC.

METHODS

A total of 116 patients eventually enrolled in our study were randomly divided into two cohorts: training cohort (n = 58) and validation cohort (n = 58). The Cox model combined with the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm was applied to construct the radiomics score (Rad_score). The third lumber skeletal muscle index (L3 SMI) was calculated to identify sarcopenia. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify the independent prognostic factors. Based on the clinical factors, the clinical model was constructed, and the combined model was developed through the combination of the clinical model and Rad_score. C index, time-dependent C-index curves, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis were used to evaluate the performance of prediction models.

RESULTS

Three radiomics features constitute the Rad_score for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that Rad_score was an independent prognostic factor, whereas sarcopenia was not. The combined models showed satisfactory performance in both the training cohort (C-index: OS:0.836, PFS:0.776) and the validation cohort (C-index: OS:0.744, PFS:0.712). The combined models were visualized as nomograms. Nomogram scores can realize the risk stratification of OSCC patients. Lower nomogram score is significantly related to the poorer OS (training cohort: p < 0.0001, validation cohort: p < 0.0001, overall cohort: p < 0.0001) and PFS (training cohort: p < 0.0001, validation cohort: p = 0.00017, overall cohort: p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Rad_score, but not sarcopenia, was an independent prognostic factor for patients with OSCC. The nomograms had a satisfactory performance, which might be helpful for OSCC patients and clinicians in personalized prognostic prediction and treatment decision-making.

Prevalence and prognostic value of baseline sarcopenia in hematologic malignancies: a systematic review

Background

The correlation between sarcopenia and hematological malignancy prognosis is still controversial. Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Objectives: To explore sarcopenia's prevalence and prognostic value in hematologic malignancies.

Data sources and methods

We searched Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library through Ovid SP using an appropriate search strategy on August 28, 2022, and updated the search results on January 9, 2023. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The pooled prevalence of sarcopenia was calculated with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Relationships between sarcopenia and prognostic value were expressed as hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CI. HR means the probability of something undesirable, i.e., death or disease progression.

Results

The search identified more than 3992 studies, and 21 (3354 patients, median or mean age ranging from 36 to 78 years) were finally included. The risk of bias in the studies was low to medium. All included studies were diagnosed based on low muscle mass (LMM). Muscle mass was assessed mainly through imaging technologies, and different cut-offs were applied to determine LMM. The prevalence of sarcopenia was 44.5%, which could fluctuate by age. Subgroup analysis showed that older people had a higher sarcopenic rate than the non-elderly group. Sarcopenia resulted in an inferior prognosis [overall survival: HR 1.821, 95% CI 1.415-2.343; progression-free survival: HR 1.703, 95% CI 1.128-2.571).

Conclusion

Sarcopenia has a prevalence of over 30% in malignant hematologic patients and is associated with a poorer prognosis. Future studies with a standardized sarcopenia diagnostic criterion were needed to investigate sarcopenia's prevalence and prognostic effects in hematologic malignancies.