Multicentre phase II study using increasing doses of irinotecan combined with a simplified LV5FU2 regimen in metastatic colorectal cancer

Copper-catalyzed cross-coupling and sequential allene-mediated cyclization for the synthesis of 1,2,3-triazolo[1,5-a]quinolines

In this paper, a tandem reaction involving copper-catalyzed cross-coupling and allene-mediated cyclization of 1-(2-ethynylaryl)-1,4-disubstituted-1,2,3-triazole with N-tosylhydrazone has been developed. This method features operational simplicity, excellent functional group compatibility, broad substrate scope, and easily available feedstock, providing an efficient and practical strategy for the synthesis of highly functionalized 1,2,3-triazolo[1,5-a]quinolines.

Hair disorders in patients with cancer

Cytotoxic chemotherapies, molecularly targeted therapies, immunotherapies, radiotherapy, stem cell transplants, and endocrine therapies may lead to hair disorders, including alopecia, hirsutism, hypertrichosis, and pigmentary and textural hair changes. The mechanisms underlying these changes are varied and remain incompletely understood, hampering the development of preventive or therapeutic guidelines. The psychosocial impact of chemotherapy-induced alopecia has been well documented primarily in the oncology literature; however, the effect of other alterations, such as radiation-induced alopecia, hirsutism, and changes in hair color or texture on quality of life have not been described. This article reviews clinically significant therapy-related hair disorders in oncology patients, including the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms, severity grading scales, patient-reported quality of life questionnaires, management strategies, and future translational research opportunities.

A phase I study of UGT1A1 *28/*6 genotype-directed dosing of irinotecan (CPT-11) in Korean patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving FOLFIRI

PURPOSE

A UGT1A1 genotype-directed dose escalation of irinotecan (CPT-11) was performed in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving first-line FOLFIRI chemotherapy.

METHODS

Patients were genotyped for UGT1A1 and stratified according to the number of defective alleles (DA; *28 and *6). The irinotecan dose was escalated with a fixed dose of 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in a standard 3 + 3 design.

RESULTS

In 43 enrolled patients, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 300 mg/m² for the 1 DA group, while the MTD was not reached for the 0 DA group with 1 dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) at 330 mg/m² and for the 2 DA group with 0 DLT at 150 mg/m². Because of the risk of being exposed to unsafe doses, the trial was terminated before the MTD was reached in the 0 DA and 2 DA groups. The recommended doses were 300 (0 DA), 270 (1 DA) and 150 (0 DA) mg/m². The 2 DA group displayed 27% lower SN-38 exposure levels relative to the 0 and 1 DA groups (95% CI, 0.47-1.15).

CONCLUSIONS

The MTD of irinotecan differed according to the UGT1A1 genotype, and higher doses of irinotecan are feasible with sLV5FU2 compared to the present regulatory approved doses.

A genotype-directed phase I-IV dose-finding study of irinotecan in combination with fluorouracil/leucovorin as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer

Background:

Infusional fluorouracil/leucovorin (FU/LV) plus irinotecan (FOLFIRI) is one of the standard first-line options for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Irinotecan is converted into 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38) by a carboxylsterase and metabolised through uridine diphosphate glucuronosyl transferase (UGT1A1). The UGT1A1^*28 allele has been associated with the risk of developing severe toxicities. The present trial was designed to define the maximum tolerated dose according to UGT1A1 genotype. This report focuses on the results of tolerance to different escalated doses of FOLFIRI first-line of chemotherapy.

Patients and methods:

Patients undergoing first-line treatment for mCRC and eligible for treatment with FOLFIRI were classified according to UGT1A1 genotype. A total of 94 patients were eligible for dose escalation of irinotecan. The starting dose of biweekly irinotecan was 180 mg m⁻² for the ^*1/^*1, 110 mg m⁻² for the ^*1/^*28 and 90 mg m⁻² for the ^*28/^*28 genotypes.

Results:

The dose of irinotecan was escalated to 450 mg m⁻² in patients with the ^*1/^*1 genotype, to 390 mg m⁻² in those with the ^*1/^*28 genotype and to 150 mg m⁻² in those with the ^*28/^*28 genotype. Neutropenia and diarrhoea were the most common grade 3 or 4 toxicities.

Conclusions:

Our results demonstrated that the recommended dose of 180 mg m⁻² for irinotecan in FOLFIRI is considerably lower than the dose that can be tolerated for patients with the UGT1A1 ^*1/^*1 and ^*1/^*28 genotypes. The maximum tolerable dose (MTD) in patients with a high-risk UGT1A1 ^*28/^*28 genotype is 30% lower than the standard dose of 180 mg m⁻².

Are we turning to more than a first line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer with high dose irinotecan?: A monocentric institution safety analysis of 46 patients

PURPOSE

Irinotecan (CPT11) at 180 mg/m(2) with LV5FU2 for metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) has response rates (RRs) of 56 and 4% as first- and second-line treatments, respectively [1-2], and higher doses of CPT11 result in higher RRs. The present cohort analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of increasing doses of this combination treatment in clinical practice.

METHODS

Chemo-naive and pretreated patients with MCRC received CPT11 and LV5FU2 (5FU 48-h CI 2400 mg/m(2), D1 bolus leucovorin 200 mg/m(2)), followed by 5FU 400 mg/m(2) (cycles d1-d15). CPT11 dose was increased by 20 mg/m(2) at each cycle, from 180 mg/m(2) up to 260 mg/m(2), unless grade 3 toxicities other than alopecia arose.

RESULTS

Between March 2002 and September 2005, 46 patients were recruited (median age: 62.3 years). A total of 512 cycles of chemotherapy were administered (median: 9 cycles/patient; range: 3-41). Median follow-up was 16.2 months. Altogether, 27 patients had received prior chemotherapy: 24 with an oxaliplatin-based regimen; seven with CPT11; and five with LV5FU2 or oral 5FU. Doses of 260 mg/m(2) were used in 17 patients, 240 mg/m(2) in seven, 220 mg/m(2) in six and 200 mg/m(2) in five, while 11 remained at 180 mg/m(2); 121 cycles used 260 mg/m(2) (24%), with 76 cycles at 240 mg/m(2) (14%), 78 cycles at 220 mg/m(2) and 58 cycles at 200mg/m(2). The objective response (OR) was 40%, with stable disease (SD) in 45% and disease progression (DP) in 11%. In the first-line therapy group, partial/complete responses were 55%, with SD in 30% and DP in 15%. In pretreated patients, OR was 30.5%, SD was 58.5% and DP was 11%. Nine patients (20%) had a therapeutic break (median: 5.1 months; range: 3-10). Overall median survival was 17 months, with 16.5 months in pretreated patients and 19.6 months in the first-line group. Toxicity grades 3-4 and overall incidence per cycle were: neutropenia, 3-22%; diarrhea, 4-22%; vomiting, 2-20%; alopecia, 20-26%; anemia, 0.2-2%; thrombocytopenia, 0-0%; and mucositis, 0.4-2.2%.

CONCLUSION

The toxicity of high-dose CPT11+LV5FU2 chemotherapy was well tolerated when the dose was progressively increased according to individual tolerability, with 37% of patients receiving CPT11 at 260 mg/m(2). Progression-free survival (PFS) increased with higher doses of CPT11. In the chemo-naive and pretreated subgroups, the median PFS was 10.9 and 8.8 months, respectively (P=0.698, NS). Optimization of CPT11 doses in pretreated patients appears to pave the way for new treatment options.

Current place of high-dose irinotecan chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

INTRODUCTION

Irinotecan has an important place in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. It was initially administered as monotherapy, but is now generally used in combination with 5-fluorouracil or targeted therapies (cetuximab or bevacizumab), with various doses.

METHODS

We here review the main studies assessing irinotecan doses escalation, and discuss the potent advantages of this escalation.

RESULTS

Several studies have demonstrated a dose-intensity relationship for irinotecan, and high doses (up to 600 mg/m2 as monotherapy, 260 mg/m2 in combination therapy) have been used with satisfactory safety and higher objective response rates. It is possible that, in practice, some patients receive insufficient doses of irinotecan. Dose escalation could be considered in carefully selected patients: young patients with a good performance status and normal liver function. This approach could be useful in patients with liver metastases, which may become resectable in the case of a major tumour response. It is wise to perform UGT1A1 genotyping prior to dose escalation to detect patients at high risk of toxicity (genotype 7/7). The role of another laboratory parameter, which needs to be evaluated is the KRAS status of the tumour. A KRAS mutation confers resistance to cetuximab, which reduces treatment options, especially in first-line. However, in the CRYSTAL trial comparing FOLFIRI to FOLFIRI-cetuximab as first-line therapy, the presence of a KRAS mutation did not appear to influence the efficacy of FOLFIRI. The value of irinotecan dose escalation needs to be determined in this setting.

CONCLUSION

Irinotecan dose escalation is potentially of interest in highly selected patients, but this concept is only based on phase I or II trials and must be validated by a randomized trial. Its value regarding other regimens such as FOLFIRINOX or combinations with targeted therapies also needs to be determined.