XRCC1 and GSTP1 polymorphisms and prognosis of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis

MRI-based radiogenomics analysis for predicting prognosis and XRCC1 gene polymorphism in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the prognostic effects of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values, qualitative MRI findings, and XRCC1 polymorphism in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

METHODS

Between January 2019 and December 2021, 41 PDAC patients (23 males; 66.6 ± 8.9 years) diagnosed with MRI and treated with chemotherapy were included in this prospective, unicenter study. Quantitative b:0-800 ADC values were calculated at the workstation using a circular region of interest with a diameter of 2 cm2. Polymerase chain reaction restriction fragment length polymorphism was used to detect XRCC1 genotypes from blood samples. Demographic data, MRI findings, and survival times were recorded. Sensitivity, specificity of ADCmin values, and relationship between XRCC1 genes in predicting survival were calculated and compared.

RESULTS

The median overall survival time was calculated as 9.27 ± 1.4 months. The cut-off value of ADCmin was found to be 0.996 × 10-3 mm2/s for predicting a 4.6-month survival with 77.3% sensitivity and 84.2% specificity. The distribution of XRCC1 codon 399 polymorphism was determined as 26.8% (n = 11) GG, 65.9% (n = 27) AG, and 7.3% (n = 3) AA. There was no statistical correlation between ADCmin values and XRCC1 gene polymorphism (p > 0.05). ADCmin < 0.996 × 10-3 and the XRCC1 codon 399 AG/AA genotype was the subgroup with the worst prognosis (p = 0.035). The mean age at diagnosis was 71.0 ± 9.1 years in cases with GG genotype, while it was 64.6 ± 8.9 years in cases with AG/AA genotype, which was statistically significant (p = 0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

ADCmin values are useful for predicting prognosis in patients with PDAC. XRCC1 gene polymorphism may affect the age at diagnosis.

Association between XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism with prognosis of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: A meta-analysis

Objective

The X-ray repair cross complementing group 1 (XRCC1) gene is involved in DNA repair. Defects in DNA repair may lead to head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs). Several researches have focused on relationship between XRCC1 Arg399Gln genetic polymorphism with HNSCC's prognosis with conflicting results. So, the aim of the present meta-analysis was evaluation of relationship between XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism with HNSCC's prognosis.

Methods

Published articles up to July 2022 were systematically searched through international databases like PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, etc. I2 test was applied to assess the heterogeneity. Data were analyzed using random effects model. Funnel plots and Egger test were applied for assessing publication biases. The hazard ratios (HRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for evaluation of relationship between the polymorphism with HNSCC's prognosis.

Results

Fifteen articles were included for the systematic review. Six of those articles were considered for inclusion in meta-analysis. The different forms of XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism had not significant association with overall survival (OS) under varied genetic models (heterozygous: Ln (HR) = 0.02, 95 % CI= (-0.33,0.37), p-value = 0.90; homozygous: Ln (HR) = 0.33, 95 % CI= (-0.03,0.69), p-value = 0.07 and dominant: Ln (HR) = 0.06, 95 % CI = (-0.17,0.28), p-value = 0.62). Analysis showed that variants of the polymorphism had no significant relationship with OS in Asian and Caucasian ethnicity under dominant model (Ln (HR) = 0.14, 95 % CI= (-0.13,0.40), p-value = 0.31; Ln (HR) = -0.01, 95 % CI= (-0.41,0.38), p-value = 0.96).

Conclusion

Different forms of XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism had no significant relationship with HNSCC's prognosis under varied genetic models and based on different ethnicity.

Predicting drug response and toxicity in metastatic colorectal cancer: the role of germline markers

INTRODUCTION

Despite the introduction of targeted agents leading to therapeutic advances, clinical management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is still challenged by significant interindividual variability in treatment outcomes, both in terms of toxicity and therapy efficacy. The study of germline genetic variants could help to personalize and optimize therapeutic approaches in mCRC.

AREAS COVERED

A systematic review of pharmacogenetic studies in mCRC patients published on PubMed between 2011 and 2021, evaluating the role of germline variants as predictive markers of toxicity and efficacy of drugs currently approved for treatment of mCRC, was perfomed.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite the large amount of pharmacogenetic data published to date, only a few genetic markers (i.e., DPYD and UGT1A1 variants) reached the clinical practice, mainly to prevent the toxic effects of chemotherapy. The large heterogeneity of available studies represents the major limitation in comparing results and identifying potential markers for clinical use, the role of which remains exploratory in most cases. However, the available published findings are an important starting point for future investigations. They highlighted new promising pharmacogenetic markers within the network of inflammatory and immune response signaling. In addition, the emerging role of previously overlooked rare variants has been pointed out.

Pharmacogenomic-Guided Therapy in Colorectal Cancer

Approximately 20 drugs have been shown to be effective for the treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC). These drugs are from several classes of agents and include cytotoxic drugs, therapeutics that target cell signaling pathways at the extracellular and/or intracellular levels, and combination therapies that contain multiple targeted agents and/or cytotoxic compounds. Targeted therapeutics can include monoclonal antibodies, fusion proteins, and small molecule drugs. The first introduced into clinical use was 5-fluorouracil in the early 1960s and remains the foundation for most CRC treatments in both adjuvant therapy and in advanced (metastatic) treatment regimens. As with other cancers, the consideration of biomarkers has the potential to improve CRC therapy through patient stratification. The biomarkers can include germline genetic markers, tumor-specific genetic markers, immune markers, and other biomarkers that can predict antitumor efficacy or the likelihood of toxicity prior to administration of a specific drug. Consistent with the benefit of considering biomarkers in treatment, many newer targeted therapies are developed and approved simultaneously with a companion diagnostic test to determine efficacy. This review will focus on biomarkers that have demonstrated clinical utility in CRC treatment; however, it is noted that many additional biomarkers have been theorized to contribute to drug response and/or toxicity based on known biological pathways but thus far have not attained widespread use in the clinic. The importance of pretreatment biomarker testing is expected to increase as future drug development will likely continue to focus on the concurrent development of companion diagnostics.

Hyperuricemia is a Adverse Prognostic Factor for Colon Cancer Patients

Objective

Hyperuricemia is linked to the prognosis of a number of cancers; however, its association with colon cancer survival has not been fully elucidated. To investigate whether hyperuricemia affects the prognosis of colon cancer, we conducted a retrospective study.

Methods

The study included age- and sex-matched colon cancer patients, of whom 60 patients were diagnosed with hyperuricemia, and 120 patients did not have hyperuricemia. The overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of these patients were evaluated by Kaplan–Meier (K-M) analysis. The association between the survival of colon cancer patients and hyperuricemia was analyzed using the Cox regression method after adjusting for tumor stage and grade and vascular infiltration.

Results

The K-M survival analysis supported that patients with hyperuricemia had poor OS (P for the Log rank test = 0.0008) and DFS. As demonstrated by the univariate analysis, the presence of hyperuricemia was correlated with decreased OS (HR_OS = 2.09, P = 0.002). Tumor grade and tumor stage were also found to be independent predictors for the prognosis of colon cancer patients. In addition, poor OS among patients with hyperuricemia was also confirmed in the adjusted analysis (HR_OS = 1.94, P = 0.005).

Conclusion

Hyperuricemia has an adverse effect on the prognosis and survival of patients with colon cancer. Further studies evaluating the cellular and molecular mechanisms are needed to validate the prognostic value of hyperuricemia in colon cancer.

Epigenetic study of global gene methylation in PON1, XRCC1 and GSTs different genotypes in rural and urban pesticide exposed workers

Background Epigenetic represents a study of occurred heritable gene expression changes without changing in the DNA sequence. It includes DNA methylation and miRNA expression that attract increasing attention as potential links between the genetic and environmental determinants of health and disease. Pesticide exposure is associated with adverse health effects and DNA methylation due to oxidative stress induced following its exposure. This study aimed to define the association of genetic polymorphisms of XRCC1, PON1, GSTP1 and GST genes with global genes DNA methylation in urban and rural occupationally pesticides exposed workers. Methods This study included 100 pesticides exposed workers; 50 rural sprayers (RE) and 50 urban researchers (UE). Controls included equal numbers. DNA methylation of global genes was evaluated by pyrosequencing assay. XRCC1, PON1 and GSTP1 genotyping were assessed by PCR-RFLP, and GST M1 and T1 were performed by PCR. Results The results of this study revealed that most genotypes in XRCC1, PON1, GSTP1 and GST genes were associated with LINE-1 hypomethylation among UE group. However, heterozygote genotypes (Gln-Arg and Ile-Val) in XRCC1 and GSTP1 genes, respectively, were associated with LINE-1 hypermethylation among UE compared with other corresponding genotypes. Only GSTT1 polymorphism recorded a significant change in percent methylation of Alu elements among urban and rural groups. Conclusion Urbanization could play an additional risk for epigenetic changes associated with pesticide exposure, and that could be attributed to the quality of life including their dietary habits, working and living in closed areas, and their exposure to extra pollutions emitted from urbanization sources.

Glutathione S-transferases genes variants and chemotherapy efficacy in gastrointestinal cancer patients: a meta-analysis based on 50 pharmacogenetic studies

Background: The role of glutathione s-transferase genes (GSTP1, GSTM1 and GSTT1) variants and the GSTP1 expression level on chemotherapy efficacy of gastrointestinal cancer (GIC) patients were inconsistent. Methods: A meta-analysis about GSTP1, GSTM1 and GSTT1 variants and the GSTP1 expression level on chemotherapy efficacy of GIC patients was performed using data from PubMed, PMC, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Wanfang database. Results: Our meta-analysis enrolled 50 publications including 6518 patients. We found that patients with GIC harboring GSTP1 (IIe105Val) Val locus had higher objective response rates (ORR) than the IIe/IIe genotypic patients (odds ratio (OR) = 1.580, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.159-2.154, P = 0.004). Significant associations were found between the Ile105Val variant and overall survival of Caucasian GIC patients (IIe/Val vs. IIe/IIe: OR = 0.797 (0.674-0.944), P = 0.009). Caucasian GIC patients and gastric cancer patients with GSTT1 null genotype had worse response rates compared to GSTT1 present patients (OR = 0.530 (0.356-0.789), P = 0.002; OR = 0.643 (0.463-0.895), P = 0.009, respectively). Conclusion: This meta-analysis illustrates that GSTP1 IIe105Val and GSTT1 null/present variants could be useful predictors of chemotherapy efficacy in patients with gastrointestinal cancer.

Response prediction to oxaliplatin plus 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer using a four-protein immunohistochemical model

The response of cancer patients to oxaliplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is difficult to predict. It has been reported that carcinoma-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) could induce AKT and ERK phosphorylation, and upregulate survivin expression in colorectal cancer (CRC) cells, which could lead to oxaliplatin plus 5-FU resistance. A total of 71 patients with advanced CRC (aCRC) treated with oxaliplatin plus 5-FU were included in the present study. These patients comprised 46 chemotherapy responders and 25 non-responders. The expression levels of α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), phosphorylated (p)-AKT, p-ERK and survivin were determined by immunohistochemical evaluation of paraffin-embedded samples from patients. A predictive model was established using a Probabilistic Neural Network model. The high expression of α-SMA, p-AKT and survivin in patients with aCRC were associated with oxaliplatin plus 5-FU resistance (P<0.001, P=0.023 and P=0.001, respectively). Furthermore, patients with stage IV CRC exhibiting high expression levels of α-SMA and survivin experienced a reduced progression-free survival time compared with patients with low expressions of α-SMA and survivin (5.5 vs. 15.0 months; 5.5 vs. 15.0 months; P=0.005 and P=0.001, respectively). Stage IV CRC and high survivin expression predicted a reduced overall survival time compared with that for patients with stage IV CRC and low survivin expression (50.0 vs. 15.0 months; P<0.001). Patients with α-SMA, p-AKT, p-ERK and survivin overexpression were more likely to present with intrinsic resistance to the oxaliplatin plus 5-FU regimen (the accuracies of modeling, validation and prediction were 83.7, 92.9 and 85.7%, respectively). In conclusion, the multifactorial predictive biomarker model of α-SMA, p-AKT, p-ERK and survivin expression for patients with aCRC to predict intrinsic resistance to oxaliplatin plus 5-FU regimens is of great efficiency and accuracy. Patients with high expression of this predictive model may be intrinsically resistant to the oxaliplatin and 5-FU regimen.

SNPs in predicting clinical efficacy and toxicity of chemotherapy: walking through the quicksand

In the "precision medicine" era, chemotherapy still remains the backbone for the treatment of many cancers, but no affordable predictors of response to the chemodrugs are available in clinical practice. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are gene sequence variations occurring in more than 1% of the full population, and account for approximately 80% of inter-individual genomic heterogeneity. A number of studies have investigated the predictive role of SNPs of genes enrolled in both pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of chemotherapeutics, but the clinical implementation of related results has been modest so far. Among the examined germline polymorphic variants, several SNPs of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD) and uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferases (UGT) have shown a robust role as predictors of toxicity following fluoropyrimidine- and/or irinotecan-based treatments respectively, and a few guidelines are mandatory in their detection before therapy initiation. Contrasting results, however, have been reported on the capability of variants of other genes as MTHFR, TYMS, ERCC1, XRCC1, GSTP1, CYP3A4/3A5 and ABCB1, in predicting either therapy efficacy or toxicity in patients undergoing treatment with pyrimidine antimetabolites, platinum derivatives, irinotecan and taxanes. While formal recommendations for routine testing of these SNPs cannot be drawn at this moment, therapeutic decisions may indeed benefit of germline genomic information, when available. Here, we summarize the clinical impact of germline genomic variants on the efficacy and toxicity of major chemodrugs, with the aim to facilitate the therapeutic expectance of clinicians in the odiern quicksand field of complex molecular biology concepts and controversial trial data interpretation.

Role of depth of response and MTHFR genotype as predictors of fluorouracil rechallenge therapy for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer

There is limited data on the clinical and biological parameters that enable the prediction of the benefits derived from additional chemotherapy after disease progression compared with standard chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The present study evaluated the role of tumor response as a clinical parameter and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) as a biomarker to predict the benefit of additional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) rechallenge chemotherapy in patients with refractory mCRC. Tumor responses were retrospectively reviewed based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, early tumor shrinkage (ETS) and depth of response (DoR) following first-line chemotherapy in patients with stage IV CRC. Together with these parameters, SNPs known to be associated with the response to chemotherapy were analyzed with survival outcomes. In total, the tumor responses of 242 patients with mCRC were evaluated. Overall response and ETS were identified in 110 (45.4%) and 103 patients (42.6%), respectively, and the median DoR was 38.5±30.08%. ETS and DoR were significantly associated with survival outcomes, including progression-free survival, post-progression survival and overall survival. Among these patients, SNPs were analyzed in 171 patients. X-ray repair cross complementing 1 (XRCC1) (AG/AA) with a DoR >60%, good performance status and the absence of bone lesions were associated with improved overall survival. In patients receiving third-line chemotherapy with 5-FU rechallenge therapy, the methylenetretrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) (C677T) CC genotype and a DoR >60% were significantly associated with a good prognosis in multivariate analysis. XRCC1 (AG/AA) was also associated with a good prognosis in patients with mCRC. Patients with a DoR >60% following first-line chemotherapy and a MTHFR (C677T) CC genotype exhibited a survival benefit from 5-FU retreatment. Therefore, the DoR and MTHFR genotype are potential markers for selecting patients with refractory mCRC that would benefit from 5-FU rechallenge therapy.

GSTP1 polymorphism predicts treatment outcome and toxicities for breast cancer

This study aimed to investigate the association of the GSTP1 gene polymorphism with the outcomes and toxicities of treatments in breast cancer. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated for the association of GSTP1 polymorphism with tumour response and toxicities, and the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs were calculated for the association between GSTP1 polymorphism and overall survival (OS). The statistical analysis showed that the GSTP1 polymorphism was not associated with tumour response or OS. A significant increase in the incidence of toxicities was observed (GA vs. AA OR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.04–2.01, P = 0.028; GG vs. AA OR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.03–2.10, P = 0.036; recessive model OR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.13–2.09, P = 0.006; and allele model OR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.07–1.71, P = 0.011), especially in the chemotherapy ± surgery group (GA vs. AA OR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.05–2.56, P = 0.030; recessive model OR = 1.72, 95% CI = 1.17–2.54, P = 0.006; and allele model OR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.11–2.21, P = 0.010). Our results indicate that the GSTP1 polymorphism may be associated with increased toxicity, especially in patients treated with chemotherapy ± surgery.

Pharmacogenetic and ethnicity influence on oxaliplatin therapy for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis

Aims: Oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy for colorectal cancer demonstrates interindividual variability in response, and polymorphisms of ERCC1, ERCC2, XRCC1, GSTP1 and GSTM1 genes may be contributing factors. Additionally, the effect of these genotypes may differ between ethnic groups. Material & Methods: A meta-analysis of the association between these genotypes and response, progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) for patients with colorectal cancer treated with oxaliplatin-based therapy is reported. Results: ERCC1 C118T (TT vs CC OS [hazard ratio (HR): 2.59; p = 0.001]), ERCC2 A2251C (CC or AC vs AA OS [HR: 1.53; p = 0.04]) and GSTP1 A313G (GG vs AA OS, [HR: 0.47; p < 0.001]) polymorphisms were associated with survival. The effect size may be larger for ERCC1 C118T and XRCC1 G1196A in Asian compared with Caucasian populations. No association was apparent for the GSTM1 genotype. Conclusion: ERCC1 C118T, ERCC2 A2251C and GSTP1 A313G polymorphisms were associated with clinical outcomes

Important molecular genetic markers of colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) ranks third in the incidences of cancer morbidity and mortality worldwide. CRC is rather heterogeneous with regard to molecular genetic characteristics and pathogenic pathways. A wide spectrum of biomarkers is used for molecular subtype determination, prognosis, and estimation of sensitivity to different drugs in practice. These biomarkers can include germline and somatic mutations, chromosomal aberrations, genomic abnormalities, gene expression alterations at mRNA or protein level and changes in DNA methylation status. In the present review we discuss the most important and well-studied CRC biomarkers, and their potential clinical significance and current approaches to molecular classification of colorectal tumors.

Predictive value of GSTP1 Ile105Val polymorphism in clinical outcomes of chemotherapy in gastric and colorectal cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Gastric and colorectal cancers remain the major causes of cancer-related death with a bad prognosis. Up to now, platinum combined with fluoropyrimidines has been most commonly used in chemotherapy regimens of gastric and colorectal cancers. Recently, a series of studies have been conducted to investigate the associations of biomarkers, such as GSTP1 Ile105Val polymorphism, with the chemotherapy efficacy in gastric and colorectal cancers; however, the results were not consistent and inconclusive. Here, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the associations of GSTP1 Ile105Val polymorphism with the chemotherapy efficacy in gastric and colorectal cancers.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted to search relevant studies in English databases (PubMed, ISI Web of Science, and EMBASE) up to November 30, 2015. The pooling ORs or HRs were used to assess the strength of the associations of GSTP1 Ile105Val polymorphism with clinical outcomes such as tumor response, toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Forty-one papers containing 8169 cases were finally included in the present meta-analysis study. Of which, 28 articles were performed in colorectal cancers, one in gastrointestinal carcinoma (gastric and colon cancer), 11 in gastric cancers, and one in colorectal and gastroesophageal cancers. After pooling all the eligible studies, we identified significant associations of GSTP1 Ile105Val polymorphism with chemotherapy-related tumor response (G vs. A: OR 1.697, 95 % CI 1.191-2.418; GG vs. AA: OR 2.804, 95 % CI 1.414-5.560; AG vs. AA: OR 1.540, 95 % CI 1.011-2.347; GG vs. AAAG: OR 2.139, 95 % CI 1.256-3.641), PFS (GG vs. AA, HR 0.640, 95 % CI 0.455-0.900; AGGG vs. AA: HR 0.718, 95 % CI 0.562-0.919), and OS (AG vs. AA: HR 0.857, 95 % CI 0.746-0.986; GG vs. AA: HR 0.679, 95 % CI 0.523-0.882; AGGG vs. AA: HR 0.663, 95 % CI 0.542-0.812) in gastric and colorectal cancers and no significant association was found between the polymorphism with toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

GSTP1 Ile105Val polymorphism was associated with tumor response, PFS, and OS in gastric and colorectal cancers after chemotherapy.

Large-scale prospective pharmacogenomics study of oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy in colon cancer patients enrolled in the JFMC41-1001-C2 (JOIN Trial)

BACKGROUND

Peripheral sensory neuropathy (PSN) is a dose-limiting toxicity of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. Several genetic markers have been shown to predict oxaliplatin-induced PSN; however, results remain to be validated in a large-scale and prospective pharmacogenomics study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Among 882 patients enrolled in the JFMC41-1001-C2 (JOIN trial), which was designed to investigate the tolerability of adjuvant-modified FOLFOX6 (mFOLFOX6) in Japanese Patients with stage II or III colon cancers undergoing curative resection, 465 patients were eligible for this pharmacogenomics analysis. Twelve single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were selected based on published data. The effect of each genotype on time to PSN onset was evaluated in all patients (n = 465) using the Cox proportional hazard model. For the association analysis between severity of PSN and 12 SNP markers, 84 patients who failed to complete 12 cycles of mFOLFOX6 from grade 0/1 PSN group were excluded because the termination of the protocol treatment had been caused by reasons other than PSN.

RESULTS

Comparison of grade 0/1 PSN with grade 2/3 PSN or grade 3 PSN showed no significant associations with any of the 12 SNP markers after adjustment for total dose of oxaliplatin. Time-to-onset analysis also failed to reveal any significant differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Our large-scale and prospective pharmacogenomics study of Japanese patients receiving protocol treatment of adjuvant mFOLFOX6 could not verify a role for any of the 12 SNP markers reported as being significantly associated with PSN. Considering the OR observed in this study (range: 0.76-1.89), further evaluation of these 12 SNP markers in the context of L-OHP-induced PSN is unlikely to be clinically informative.

Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms as Prognostic and Predictive Factors of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Colorectal Cancer of Stages I and II

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a highly heterogeneous disease regarding the stage at time of diagnosis and there is special attention regarding adjuvant chemotherapy in unselected patients with stage I and stage II. The clinicohistologically based TNM staging system with emphasis on histological evaluation of primary tumor and resected regional lymph nodes remains the standard of staging, but it has restricted sensitivity resulting in false downward stage migration. Molecular characteristics might predispose tumors to a worse prognosis and identification of those enables identifying patients with high risk of disease recurrence. Suitable predictive markers also enable choosing the most appropriate therapy. The current challenge facing adjuvant chemotherapy in stages I and II CRC is choosing patients with the highest risk of disease recurrence who are going to derive most benefit without facing unnecessary adverse effects. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are one of the potential molecular markers that might help us identify patients with unfavorable prognostic factors regarding disease initiation and recurrence and could determine selection of an appropriate chemotherapy regimen in the adjuvant and metastatic setting. In this paper, we discuss SNPs of genes involved in the multistep processes of cancerogenesis, metastasis, and the metabolism of chemotherapy that might prove clinically significant.

Pharmacologic resistance in colorectal cancer: a review

Colorectal cancer (CRC) persists as one of the most prevalent and deadly tumor types in both men and women worldwide. This is in spite of widespread, effective measures of preventive screening, and also major advances in treatment options. Despite advances in cytotoxic and targeted therapy, resistance to chemotherapy remains one of the greatest challenges in long-term management of incurable metastatic disease and eventually contributes to death as tumors accumulate means of evading treatment. We performed a comprehensive literature search on the data available through PubMed, Medline, Scopus, and the ASCO Annual Symposium abstracts through June 2015 for the purpose of this review. We discuss the current state of knowledge of clinically relevant mechanisms of resistance to cytotoxic and targeted therapies now in use for the treatment of CRC.

Long Survival and Severe Toxicity Under 5-Fluorouracil-Based Therapy in a Patient With Colorectal Cancer Who Harbors a Germline Codon-Stop Mutation in TYMS

We report the first clinical description of a patient with cancer with a heterozygous germline codon-stop mutation in the TYMS gene. The mutation g.657795_657826del, c.53_84del (NM_001071.2), p.Gln18Argfs*42 causes loss of function of one of the TYMS alleles, resulting in a truncated protein. This gene codifies for the target enzyme of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), the basic treatment in colorectal cancer. The patient, diagnosed with metastatic colorectal cancer, had diarrhea and neutropenia grade 4 and mucositis and neurological toxicity grade 3 under 5-FU-based therapy and exceeded by more than 50% the average survival after metastasectomy. On the basis of the patient's characteristics and the key role of TYMS in 5-FU activity, we hypothesize that this mutation may contribute to the drug response and toxicities suffered by the patient.

Germline TYMS genotype is highly predictive in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal malignancies receiving capecitabine-based chemotherapy

PURPOSE

This work was initiated to extend data on the effect of pharmacogenetics and chemotherapy pharmacokinetics (PK) on clinical outcome in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies.

METHODS

We assessed 44 gene polymorphisms in 16 genes (TYMS, MTHFR, GSTP1, GSTM1, GSTT1, DPYD, XRCC1, XRCC3, XPD, ERCC1, RECQ1, RAD54L, ABCB1, ABCC2, ABCG2 and UGT2B7) in 64 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) receiving capecitabine/oxaliplatin and 76 patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer (GEC) receiving epirubicin/cisplatin/capecitabine, respectively. Plasma concentrations of anticancer drugs were measured for up to 24 h, and results were submitted to population PK analysis. We calculated the association between gene polymorphisms, chemotherapy exposure, tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and chemotherapy-related toxicity using appropriate statistical tests.

RESULTS

Patients with a low clearance of 5FU were at increased risk of neutropenia (P < 0.05) and hand-foot syndrome (P = 0.002). DPYD T85C, T1896C and A2846T mutant variants were associated with diarrhea (P < 0.05) and HFS (P < 0.02), and IVS14+1G>A additionally with diarrhea (P < 0.001). The TYMS 2R/3G, 3C/3G or 3G/3G promoter variants were associated with worse PFS in the CRC (HR = 2.0, P < 0.01) and GEC group (HR = 5.4, P < 0.001) and worse OS in the GEC group (HR = 4.7, P < 0.001). The GSTP1 A313G mutant variant was associated with a higher PFS (HR = 0.55, P = 0.001) and OS (HR = 0.60, P = 0.002) in the CRC group.

CONCLUSIONS

Germline polymorphisms of DPYD, TYMS and GSTP1 have a significant effect on toxicity and clinical outcome in patients receiving capecitabine-based chemotherapy for advanced colorectal or gastroesophageal cancer. These data should further be validated in prospective clinical studies.

Pharmacogenetics research on chemotherapy resistance in colorectal cancer over the last 20 years

During the past two decades the first sequencing of the human genome was performed showing its high degree of inter-individual differentiation, as a result of large international research projects (Human Genome Project, the 1000 Genomes Project International HapMap Project, and Programs for Genomic Applications NHLBI-PGA). This period was also a time of intensive development of molecular biology techniques and enormous knowledge growth in the biology of cancer. For clinical use in the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), in addition to fluoropyrimidines, another two new cytostatic drugs were allowed: irinotecan and oxaliplatin. Intensive research into new treatment regimens and a new generation of drugs used in targeted therapy has also been conducted. The last 20 years was a time of numerous in vitro and in vivo studies on the molecular basis of drug resistance. One of the most important factors limiting the effectiveness of chemotherapy is the primary and secondary resistance of cancer cells. Understanding the genetic factors and mechanisms that contribute to the lack of or low sensitivity of tumour tissue to cytostatics is a key element in the currently developing trend of personalized medicine. Scientists hope to increase the percentage of positive treatment response in CRC patients due to practical applications of pharmacogenetics/pharmacogenomics. Over the past 20 years the clinical usability of different predictive markers has been tested among which only a few have been confirmed to have high application potential. This review is a synthetic presentation of drug resistance in the context of CRC patient chemotherapy. The multifactorial nature and volume of the issues involved do not allow the author to present a comprehensive study on this subject in one review.

Changes in T lymphocyte subsets in mice with CT26 colon tumors after treatment with donor lymphocyte infusion

The objective of this study was to detect changes in T lymphocyte subpopulations in mice with CT26 subcutaneous colon cancer after treatment with donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) and cyclophosphamide (CP) chemotherapy. A colon cancer model was established by subcutaneous injection of CT26 carcinoma cells into BALB/C mice. The mice were randomized into different treatment groups. We recorded survival times, tumor growth inhibition rates, histopathological changes, and T lymphocyte subsets in peripheral blood of the mice. Mice treated with DLI and CP survived 33.5 ± 5.02 days, which was significantly longer than the survival time of untreated control mice (16.7 ± 2.98 days, P < 0.01). In addition, the tumor inhibitory rate was higher in mice treated with DLI and CP (89.3 %) than that in mice treated with CP or DLI alone (67.1 and 34.5 %, respectively). There were higher levels of T lymphocytes that were CD3(+) and CD4(+) in mice treated with DLI alone or the combination of CP and DLI (P < 0.05), and the ratio of CD4(+)/CD8(+) cells was significantly improved in these mice (P < 0.05). DLI combined with chemotherapy significantly prolonged survival and inhibited tumor growth in mice with CT26 colon cancer. This treatment might also improve immune function in these mice. Donor spleen cells that include high numbers of allogeneic lymphocytes and a few stem cells could induce a graft-versus-tumor effect, leading to elimination of residual cancer cells. This indicates that it is potentially a feasible adoptive cellular immunotherapy strategy for the management of solid tumors.

Association between polymorphisms in XRCC1 gene and treatment outcomes of patients with advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Many reports have shown inconsistent results on the relationship between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of X-ray repair cross complementing protein (XRCC1) gene and platinum-based chemotherapeutic efficacy. This meta-analysis aimed to summarize published data about the association between two SNPs of XRCC1 (Arg194Trp and Arg399Gln) and treatment outcomes of patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Methodology/Principal Findings

We retrieved the relevant articles from MEDLINE, Web of Knowledge, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases. Studies were selected according to specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Study quality was assessed according to the guidelines outlined by Hayden, et al. and PRISMA guidelines. We estimated the odds ratio (OR) for response rate versus no response after platinum-based chemotherapy. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated by pooled Cox proportional hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We found that none of the XRCC1 Arg194Trp and Arg399Gln polymorphisms was significantly associated with tumor response. Stratified analysis by ethnicity or sensitivity analysis also showed that XRCC1 SNPs were not related with chemotherapy response. Patients with minor variant A allele were likely to have poorer 2-year survival rate than those with G/G genotype. However, in the group of 5-year follow up, there was no significant association between the A allele and OS yet.

Conclusions/Significance

There is no evidence to support the use of XRCC1 Arg194Trp and Arg399Gln polymorphisms as prognostic predictors of TR and PFS in gastric patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. The relationship between minor variant A allele and OS requires further verification.

Tumor site- and stage-specific associations between allelic variants of glutathione S-transferase and DNA-repair genes and overall survival in colorectal cancer patients receiving 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy

Introduction

Our retrospective cohort study investigated the effect of tumor site and stage on the associations between the allelic variants of glutathione S-transferase (GST) and DNA-repair genes and overall survival (OS) in CRC patients treated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based adjuvant chemotherapy.

Material and Methods

We genotyped GSTM1, GSTT1, GSTP1 Ile105Val, XRCC1 Arg399Gln, XRCC3 Thr241Met, and XPD Lys751Gln in 491 CRC patients between 1995 and 2001. A Cox proportional-hazards model was used to calculate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the relationships between the allelic variants and OS. Survival analyses were performed for each allelic variant by using the log-rank test and Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Results

The CRC patients with the XPD Gln allelic variants had poorer survival than patients with the Lys/Lys genotype (HR  = 1.38, 95% CI  = 1.02–1.87), and rectal cancer patients had the poorest survival among them (HR  = 1.87, 95% CI  = 1.18–2.95). A significantly shorter OS was observed among stage II/III colon cancer patients with the XRCC1 Gln allelic variants (HR  = 1.69, 95% CI  = 1.06–2.71), compared to those with XRCC1 Arg/Arg genotype. In the combined analysis of the XRCC1 and XPD genes patients with stage II/III tumors, the poorest OS occurred in colon cancer patients with the XRCC1 Gln and XPD Gln allelic variants (HR  = 2.60, 95% CI  = 1.19–5.71) and rectal cancer patients with the XRCC1 Arg/Arg and XPD Gln allelic variants (HR  = 2.77, 95% CI  = 1.25–6.17).

Conclusion

The XPD and XRCC1 allelic variants may be prognostic markers for CRC patients receiving 5-FU based chemotherapy. The contributions of the XPD and XRCC1 allelic variants to OS are tumor site- and/or stage-dependent.