Vorinostat in combination with bortezomib in patients with advanced malignancies directly alters transcription of target genes

Phase I Study of an AKT Inhibitor (MK-2206) Combined with Lapatinib in Adult Solid Tumors Followed by Dose Expansion in Advanced HER2+ Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

Preclinical data support combining AKT inhibitors with HER2-targeted therapies to overcome resistance to treatment. This phase I study combined the investigational AKT inhibitor, MK-2206, with lapatinib to determine the MTD.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

The dose escalation cohort enrolled adults with advanced solid tumors, who received MK-2206 dosed 30 to 60 mg every other day and lapatinib 1,000 to 1,500 mg daily continuously, escalated using a 3+3 design. Cycles were 28 days except cycle 1 (35 days, including an initial 8 days of MK-2206 alone to evaluate pharmacokinetic interactions). The dose expansion cohort enrolled adults with advanced HER2(+) breast cancer.

RESULTS

Twenty-three participants enrolled in the dose escalation cohort. Dose-limiting toxicities were hyponatremia, fatigue, rash, hypocalcemia, and mucositis. Common toxicities included diarrhea, nausea, and rash. The MTD was reached at MK-2206 45 mg orally every other day and lapatinib 1,500 mg orally daily. Two participants maintained stable disease for >4 months, including a colorectal cancer participant with substantial carcinoembryonic antigen decrease. Of 5 participants in the dose expansion cohort, 2 maintained stable disease for >6 months, including one with prior progression on single-agent lapatinib. Plasma MK-2206 concentrations decreased after addition of lapatinib, but in vitro studies indicate lapatinib increases the intracellular levels of MK-2206.

CONCLUSIONS

MK-2206 combined with lapatinib can be tolerated with both drugs above biologically active single-agent doses. Overlapping toxicities result in significant diarrhea and rash, which can be managed medically. Antitumor activity was promising and supports evaluation of AKT inhibitors combined with HER2-targeted therapies. Clin Cancer Res; 22(11); 2659-67. ©2016 AACR.

Epigenetic treatment of solid tumours: a review of clinical trials

Epigenetic treatment has been approved by regulatory agencies for haematological malignancies. The success observed in cutaneous lymphomas represents a proof of principle that similar results may be obtained in solid tumours. Several agents that interfere with DNA methylation-demethylation and histones acetylation/deacetylation have been studied, and some (such as azacytidine, decitabine, valproic acid and vorinostat) are already in clinical use.

The aim of this review is to provide a brief overview of the molecular events underlying the antitumour effects of epigenetic treatments and to summarise data available on clinical trials that tested the use of epigenetic agents against solid tumours. We not only list results but also try to indicate how the proper evaluation of this treatment might result in a better selection of effective agents and in a more rapid development.

We divided compounds in demethylating agents and HDAC inhibitors. For each class, we report the antitumour activity and the toxic side effects. When available, we describe plasma pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic evaluation in tumours and in surrogate tissues (generally white blood cells).

Epigenetic treatment is a reality in haematological malignancies and deserves adequate attention in solid tumours. A careful consideration of available clinical data however is required for faster drug development and possibly to re-evaluate some molecules that were perhaps discarded too early.

Dual roles of orphan nuclear receptor TR3/Nur77/NGFI-B in mediating cell survival and apoptosis

As a transcriptional factor, Nur77 has sparked interests across different research fields in recent years. A number of studies have demonstrated the functional complexity of Nur77 in mediating survival/apoptosis in a variety of cells, including tumor cells. Conflicting observations also exist in clinical reports, in that TR3 behaves like an oncogene in tumors of the GI tract, lung, and breast, that is negatively associated with tumor stage and patient prognosis; while functions as a tumor suppressor gene in malignancies of the hematological and lymphatic system, skin, and ovary whose malfunction results in carcinogenesis. This chapter summarizes the apparent opposing effects of Nur77 on cells and explicates the mechanisms that determine the functional preference of Nur77. We conclude that in addition to cell type and agent context, other factors such as cellular localization, signaling pathway, and posttranslational modification also determine the final effects of Nur77 on cells.