Comparison of the pharmacokinetics of erlotinib administered in complete fasting and 2 h after a meal in patients with lung cancer

Relationship between Biodistribution and Tracer Kinetics of 11C-Erlotinib, 18F-Afatinib and 11C-Osimertinib and Image Quality Evaluation Using Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Analysis in Advanced Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients

Background: Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) driven by activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are best treated with therapies targeting EGFR, i.e., tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). Radiolabeled EGFR-TKI and PET have been investigated to study EGFR-TKI kinetics and its potential role as biomarker of response in NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations (EGFRm). In this study we aimed to compare the biodistribution and kinetics of three different EGFR-TKI, i.e., 11C-erlotinib, 18F-afatinib and 11C-osimertinib. Methods: Data of three prospective studies and 1 ongoing study were re-analysed; data from thirteen patients (EGFRm) were included for 11C-erlotinib, seven patients for 18F-afatinib (EGFRm and EGFR wild type) and four patients for 11C-osimertinib (EGFRm). From dynamic and static scans, SUV and tumor-to-blood (TBR) values were derived for tumor, lung, spleen, liver, vertebra and, if possible, brain tissue. AUC values were calculated using dynamic time-activity-curves. Parent fraction, plasma-to-blood ratio and SUV values were derived from arterial blood data. Tumor-to-lung contrast was calculated, as well as (background) noise to assess image quality. Results: 11C-osimertinib showed the highest SUV and TBR (AUC) values in nearly all tissues. Spleen uptake was notably high for 11C-osimertinib and to a lesser extent for 18F-afatinib. For EGFRm, 11C-erlotinib and 18F-afatinib demonstrated the highest tumor-to-lung contrast, compared to an inverse contrast observed for 11C-osimertinib. Tumor-to-lung contrast and spleen uptake of the three TKI ranked accordingly to the expected lysosomal sequestration. Conclusion: Comparison of biodistribution and tracer kinetics showed that 11C-erlotinib and 18F-afatinib demonstrated the highest tumor-to-background contrast in EGFRm positive tumors. Image quality, based on contrast and noise analysis, was superior for 11C-erlotinib and 18F-afatinib (EGFRm) scans compared to 11C-osimertinib and 18F-afatinib (EGFR wild type) scans.

Influence of Cow's Milk and Esomeprazole on the Absorption of Erlotinib: A Randomized, Crossover Pharmacokinetic Study in Lung Cancer Patients

INTRODUCTION

Erlotinib's gastrointestinal solubility and absorption are decreased by proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Since erlotinib is a lipophilic drug, we hypothesized that concomitant intake with the fatty beverage milk may be a feasible way to increase erlotinib uptake. We performed a two-period, randomized, crossover study to investigate the influence of cow's milk with 3.9% fat on the exposure of erlotinib with and without the PPI esomeprazole in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The effect of esomeprazole was studied in an additional intrapatient comparison.

METHOD

Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed on days 7 and 14 during 24 consecutive hours. During the 7 days prior to pharmacokinetic sampling, erlotinib was taken daily with 250 mL of either water or milk. In the PPI arm, esomeprazole (40 mg once daily 3 h prior to erlotinib) was taken for 3 days.

RESULTS

Erlotinib area under the curve from time zero to 24 h (AUC24) did not significantly change when administered with milk, compared with water, in both non-PPI users (n = 14; - 3%; 95% confidence interval [CI] - 12 to 8%; p = 0.57) and patients who used esomeprazole (n = 15; 0%; 95% CI - 15 to 17%; p = 0.95). Esomeprazole decreased erlotinib AUC24 by 47% (n = 9; 95% CI - 57 to - 34%; p < 0.001) and Cmax by 56% (95% CI - 64 to - 46%; p < 0.001). No differences in toxicities were observed between milk and water.

CONCLUSION

Milk with 3.9% fat has no effect on the exposure to erlotinib in NSCLC patients, independent of PPI use. The combination with milk is safe and well tolerated. Concomitant esomeprazole treatment strongly decreased both erlotinib AUC24 and Cmax and should be avoided if possible.

Clinical implications of food-drug interactions with small-molecule kinase inhibitors

During the past two decades, small-molecule kinase inhibitors have proven to be valuable in the treatment of solid and haematological tumours. However, because of their oral administration, the intrapatient and interpatient exposure to small-molecule kinase inhibitors (SMKIs) is highly variable and is affected by many factors, such as concomitant use of food and herbs. Food-drug interactions are capable of altering the systemic bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of these drugs. The most important mechanisms underlying food-drug interactions are gastrointestinal drug absorption and hepatic metabolism through cytochrome P450 isoenzymes. As food-drug interactions can lead to therapy failure or severe toxicity, knowledge of these interactions is essential. This Review provides a comprehensive overview of published studies involving food-drug interactions and herb-drug interactions for all registered SMKIs up to Oct 1, 2019. We critically discuss US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) guidelines concerning food-drug interactions and offer clear recommendations for their management in clinical practice.

Effect of Food on the Pharmacokinetics of Quizartinib

Quizartinib is an oral, highly potent, and selective type II FMS‐like tyrosine kinase 3 inhibitor in development for acute myeloid leukemia. This parallel‐group study evaluated potential food effects on quizartinib absorption in healthy subjects who received a single 30‐mg dose after overnight fasting (n = 34) or a high‐fat, high‐calorie meal (n = 30). Blood samples were collected through 504 hours after dosing, and pharmacokinetic parameters calculated were maximum observed concentration (C_max) and area under plasma concentration–time curve from time 0 to last quantifiable concentration (AUC_last) and from time 0 to infinity (AUC_inf). Mean quizartinib pharmacokinetic profiles were similar under fasted and fed conditions. The geometric least squares means ratios (%) for fed/fasted and associated 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for C_max, AUC_last, and AUC_inf were 91.58 (82.15‐102.08), 105.39 (90.79‐122.35), and 108.39 (91.54‐128.34), respectively. The 90%CI for the ratio fell within the 80% to 125% limits for C_max and AUC_last, with 90%CI for AUC_inf slightly outside the limits (ie, 128%). Food delayed quizartinib time to C_max by 2 hours. All adverse events were either mild or moderate; no discontinuations due to adverse events occurred. Based on these results, quizartinib can be administered without regard to food.

EGFR is required for FOS-dependent bone tumor development via RSK2/CREB signaling

Osteosarcoma (OS) is a rare tumor of the bone occurring mainly in young adults accounting for 5% of all childhood cancers. Because of the limited therapeutic options, there has been no survival improvement for OS patients in the past 40 years. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is highly expressed in OS; however, its clinical relevance is unclear. Here, we employed an autochthonous c‐Fos‐dependent OS mouse model (H2‐c‐fosLTR) and human OS tumor biopsies for preclinical studies aimed at identifying novel biomarkers and therapeutic benefits of anti‐EGFR therapies. We show that EGFR deletion/inhibition results in reduced tumor formation in H2‐c‐fosLTR mice by directly inhibiting the proliferation of cancer‐initiating osteoblastic cells by a mechanism involving RSK2/CREB‐dependent c‐Fos expression. Furthermore, OS patients with co‐expression of EGFR and c‐Fos exhibit reduced overall survival. Preclinical studies using human OS xenografts revealed that only tumors expressing both EGFR and c‐Fos responded to anti‐EGFR therapy demonstrating that c‐Fos can be considered as a novel biomarker predicting response to anti‐EGFR treatment in OS patients.

Impact of dosage timing on the bioavailability of oral anticancer medications: Is pre-prandial dosing equivalent to post-prandial dosing

Many oral anticancer agents are recommended to be given either at least 1 h before or 2 h after a meal, according to the prescribing information. However, the effect of dosage timing of an oral anticancer agent with reference to food intake on anticancer treatment remains unclear. As shown by the literature survey and labeling analysis for oral anticancer drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration from 2010 to 2016, labeling information regarding dosage timing for several anticancer drugs appeared not be optimum, leading to suboptimal bioavailability and plasma drug concentrations. This supports a call to regularly recalibrate the labeling information for dosage timing of oral anticancer medications to minimize the risks of compromised efficacy or unintended toxicities.

Development and Validation of a Simultaneous Quantification Method of 14 Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Human Plasma Using LC-MS/MS

BACKGROUND

A sensitive liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) method for the analysis in a small volume of plasma of 14 tyrosine kinase inhibitors currently used (imatinib, dasatinib, ibrutinib, ponatinib, trametinib, sunitinib, cobimetinib, dabrafenib, erlotinib, lapatinib, nilotinib, bosutinib, sorafenib, and vemurafenib) has been developed and validated. This multianalyte liquid chromatography coupled with MS/MS assay is of interest for anticancer drug combination therapy.

METHODS

After a simple protein precipitation of plasma samples, the chromatographic separation was performed using an ultra performance liquid chromatography system coupled with MS/MS in a positive ionization mode. The mobile phase consisted of a gradient elution of 10 mmol/L formate ammonium buffer containing 0.1% (vol/vol) formic acid (phase A) and acetonitrile with 0.1% (vol/vol) formic acid (phase B) at a flow rate of 300 μL/min.

RESULTS

The analysis time was 5.0 minutes per run, and all analytes and internal standard eluted within 1.45-1.79 minutes. The calibration curves were linear over the range from 1 to 500 ng/mL for bosutinib, cobimetinib, dasatinib, ibrutinib, and trametinib, from 5 to 500 ng/mL for ponatinib and sunitinib; from 50 to 2500 ng/mL for lapatinib; from 750 to 100,000 ng/mL for vemurafenib, and from 10 to 2500 ng/mL for dabrafenib, erlotinib, imatinib, nilotinib, and sorafenib, with coefficients of correlation above 0.99 for all analytes. The intra- and interday imprecisions were below 14.36%.

CONCLUSIONS

This method was successfully applied to therapeutic drug monitoring in clinical practice.

Nanoparticulation improves bioavailability of Erlotinib

OBJECTIVES

Nanoparticulation using fat and supercritical fluid (NUFS^TM) is a drug delivery platform technology enabling efficient and effective formulation of poorly soluble drugs. We performed experiments to examine whether NUFS™ could improve poor bioavailability and reduce fed-fasted bioavailability variances of erlotinib (Ert).

METHODS

NUFS-Ert was prepared using NUFS™ technology; its physical properties were characterized, and drug release was measured. Furthermore, in vitro and in vivo efficacy tests and pharmacokinetic analysis were performed.

RESULTS

NUFS-Ert nanoparticles had an average size of 250 nm and were stable for 2 months at 40 °C, 4 °C, and room temperature. The dissolution rate of NUFS-Ert increased in bio-relevant dissolution media. NUFS-Ert was more potent in inhibiting EGF signaling and in suppressing the proliferation of A549, a human non-small cell lung cancer cell line. Furthermore, A549 xenografts in BALB/c nude mice treated with NUFS-Ert regressed more efficiently than those in the mice treated with vehicle or Tarceva^®. In addition, experimental lung metastasis was more efficiently inhibited by NUFS-Ert than by Tarceva^®. The relative bioavailability of NUFS-Ert compared with that of Tarceva^® was 550% and the ratio of the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of fed state to the AUC of fasted state was 1.8 for NUFS-Ert and 5.8 for Tarceva^®.

CONCLUSIONS

NUFS-Ert could improve poor bioavailability and reduce fed-fasted bioavailability variances of Ert. NUFS-Ert was more efficacious than Tarceva^®.

Dietary restriction: could it be considered as speed bump on tumor progression road?

Dietary restrictions, including fasting (or long-term starvation), calorie restriction (CR), and short-term starvation (STS), are considered a strong rationale that may protect against various diseases, including age-related diseases and cancer. Among dietary approaches, STS, in which food is not consumed during designed fasting periods but is typically not restricted during designated feeding periods, seems to be more suitable, because other dietary regimens involving prolonged fasting periods could worsen the health conditions of cancer patients, being they already naturally prone to weight loss. Until now, the limited amount of available data does not point to a single gene, pathway, or molecular mechanism underlying the benefits to the different dietary approaches. It is well known that the healthy effect is mediated in part by the reduction of nutrient-related pathways. The calorie restriction and starvation (long- and short-term) also suppress the inflammatory response reducing the expression, for example, of IL-10 and TNF-α, mitigating pro-inflammatory gene expression and increasing anti-inflammatory gene expression. The dietary restriction may regulate both genes involved in cellular proliferation and factors associated to apoptosis in normal and cancer cells. Finally, dietary restriction is an important tool that may influence the response to chemotherapy in preclinical models. However, further data are needed to correlate dietary approaches with chemotherapeutic treatments in human models. The aim of this review is to discuss the effects of various dietary approaches on the cancer progression and therapy response, mainly in preclinical models, describing some signaling pathways involved in these processes.

Ramadan Fasting and Patients with Cancer: State-of-the-Art and Future Prospects

Ramadan fasting represents one of the five pillars of the Islam creed. Even though some subjects (among which patients) are exempted from observing this religious duty, they may be eager to share this particular moment of the year with their family and peers. However, there are no guidelines or standardized protocols that can help physicians to properly address the issue of patients with cancer fasting in Ramadan and correctly advising them. Moreover, in a more interconnected and globalized society, in which more and more Muslim patients live in the Western countries, this topic is of high interest also for the general practitioner. For this purpose, we carried out a systematic review on the subject. Our main findings are that (1) very few studies have been carried out, addressing this issue, (2) evidence concerning quality of life and compliance to treatment is contrasting and scarce, and (3) generally speaking, few patients ask their physicians whether they can safely fast or not. For these reasons, further research should be performed, given the relevance and importance of this topic.