A clinical pharmacokinetic microdosing study of docetaxel with Japanese patients with cancer

A sub-pharmacological test dose does not predict individual docetaxel exposure in prostate cancer patients

PURPOSE

Docetaxel is a cytotoxic drug used for first-line treatment of various malignancies. It has a narrow therapeutic index and shows wide interpatient variability in clearance and toxicity. Tools for individual dose optimization are needed to maximize efficacy and avoid toxicity.

METHODS

We performed a proof-of-concept study (EudraCT 2016-003785-77) to evaluate whether pharmacokinetics after a sub-pharmacological test dose of 1000 µg docetaxel (millidose) could be used to predict therapeutic dose exposure. Thirty prostate cancer patients eligible for treatment with docetaxel as part of routine clinical care were included. An intravenous docetaxel millidose was administered 1-7 days prior to therapeutic docetaxel. After both doses plasma docetaxel concentrations were measured by ultra- high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The docetaxel clearance was estimated with non-linear mixed effects modeling.

RESULTS

Geometric mean docetaxel clearance was 57.9 L/h (GCV 78.6%) after admission of a millidose and 40.3 L/h (GCV 60.7%) after admission of a therapeutic dose. The millidose and therapeutic dose in a single patient were not significantly correlated (Spearman's rho R = 0.02, P = 0.92).

CONCLUSION

Docetaxel pharmacokinetics at milli- and therapeutic dose level showed insufficient correlation for individual dose optimization. However, the clearance of a docetaxel millidose and full dose are within the same order of magnitude. Therefore, docetaxel millidose pharmacokinetics could potentially facilitate prediction of docetaxel pharmacokinetics at a population level in situations where therapeutic dose levels are impractical, such as pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction studies or pediatric studies.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Perampanel in Children With Refractory Epilepsy: Focus on Influencing Factors on the Free-Perampanel Concentration

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to assess the effect of perampanel dose, age, sex, and antiseizure medication cotherapy on steady-state free-perampanel concentration in children with refractory epilepsy, as well as the relationship between inflammation and the pharmacokinetics of perampanel.

METHODS

This prospective study in China included 87 children with refractory epilepsy treated with adjunctive perampanel therapy. Free and total perampanel concentrations in plasma were determined using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Free-perampanel concentration was compared among patients with various potential influencing factors.

RESULTS

A total of 87 pediatric patients (44 female children) aged 2-14 years were enrolled. The mean free-perampanel concentration and free concentration-to-dose (CD) ratio in plasma were 5.7 ± 2.7 ng/mL (16.3 ± 7.7 nmol/L) and 45.3 ± 21.0 (ng/mL)/(mg/kg) [129.6 ± 60.1 (nmol/L)/(mg/kg)], respectively. The protein binding of perampanel in plasma was 97.98%. A linear relationship was observed between perampanel dose and free concentration in plasma, and a positive relationship was found between the total and free-perampanel concentrations. Concomitant use of oxcarbazepine reduced the free CD ratio by 37%. Concomitant use of valproic acid increased the free CD ratio by 52%. Five patients had a plasma high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (Hs-CRP) level of >5.0 mg/L (Hs-CRP positive). The total and free CD ratios of perampanel were increased in patients with inflammation. Two patients with inflammation developed adverse events, which disappeared as the Hs-CRP level returned to normal, and neither required perampanel dose reduction. Age and sex did not influence the free-perampanel concentration.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found complex drug interactions between perampanel and other concomitant antiseizure medications, providing valuable information to enable clinicians to apply perampanel in the future reasonably. In addition, it may be important to quantify both the total and free concentrations of perampanel to assess complex pharmacokinetic interactions.

Phase 0/microdosing approaches: time for mainstream application in drug development?

Phase 0 approaches - which include microdosing - evaluate subtherapeutic exposures of new drugs in first-in-human studies known as exploratory clinical trials. Recent progress extends phase 0 benefits beyond assessment of pharmacokinetics to include understanding of mechanism of action and pharmacodynamics. Phase 0 approaches have the potential to improve preclinical candidate selection and enable safer, cheaper, quicker and more informed developmental decisions. Here, we discuss phase 0 methods and applications, highlight their advantages over traditional strategies and address concerns related to extrapolation and developmental timelines. Although challenges remain, we propose that phase 0 approaches be at least considered for application in most drug development scenarios.

Predictive Value of Microdose Pharmacokinetics

Phase 0 microdose trials are exploratory studies to early assess human pharmacokinetics of new chemical entities, while limiting drug exposure and risks for participants. The microdose concept is based on the assumption that microdose pharmacokinetics can be extrapolated to pharmacokinetics of a therapeutic dose. However, it is unknown whether microdose pharmacokinetics are actually indicative of the pharmacokinetics at therapeutic dose. The aim of this review is to investigate the predictive value of microdose pharmacokinetics and to identify drug characteristics that may influence the scalability of these parameters. The predictive value of microdose pharmacokinetics was determined for 46 compounds and showed adequate predictability for 28 of 41 orally administered drugs (68%) and 15 of 16 intravenously administered drugs (94%). Microdose pharmacokinetics were considered predictive if the mean observed values of the microdose and the therapeutic dose were within twofold. Nonlinearity may be caused by saturation of enzyme and transporter systems, such as intestinal and hepatic efflux and uptake transporters. The high degree of success regarding linear pharmacokinetics shows that phase 0 microdose trials can be used as an early human model for determination of drug pharmacokinetics.

Clinical pharmacokinetics and drug exposure-toxicity correlation study of docetaxel based chemotherapy in Chinese head and neck cancer patients

Background

Area under time-concentration curve (AUC) of docetaxel is related with its toxicity and efficacy. The aim of this study is to investigate the target range of docetaxel AUC in Chinese head and neck cancer (HNC) patients.

Methods

Eligible HNC patients were enrolled and received at least 2 cycles of docetaxel-based chemotherapy. A simplified pharmacokinetic (PK) strategy (2 monitored samples) was developed to simulate docetaxel AUC using the nonlinear mixed-effect modelling program. Preliminary target range of AUC was pre-set as 2.5–3.7 µg·hr/mL according to pooled analysis from 8 previous studies. Fisher exact test was used to analyze the relationship between AUC with neutropenia and efficacy, and to verify the target range.

Results

Thirty-nine eligible patients were enrolled. Grade 3-4 and grade 4 neutropenia rate in 1^st cycle was 64% and 36%, respectively. AUC simulation by simplified PK strategy was acceptable compared to full sampling method from the analysis of archived 300 patients’ data, with −5.67% of mean prediction error (MPE). Median AUC of all patients was 2.58 µg·hr/mL (range from 1.28 to 9.39). A significant correlation (P=0.007) was detected between AUC and body surface area (BSA)-dosage, but BSA contributed only 18.3% of AUC inter-individual variability. Docetaxel AUC was significantly related with the severity (grade 3–4) of neutropenia (correlation of coefficient was 0.452, P=0.004). Fourteen patients (36%) were within the target AUC range. Patients with AUC above the target experienced more severe neutropenia (grade 3–4 rate 100% vs. 56%, P=0.036; grade 4 rate 86% vs. 25%, P=0.005). No significant difference of response rate was found between patients within the target or not.

Conclusions

A simplified samples PK strategy was developed for docetaxel AUC simulation. The target range of docetaxel AUC in Chinese HNC patients was suggested at 2.5–3.7 µg·hr/mL for reduced toxicity without compromising efficacy of docetaxel treatment.

Influence of Inflammation on the Pharmacokinetics of Perampanel

BACKGROUND

It is well-known that the pharmacokinetics of various drugs are influenced by inflammation. This study evaluated the relationship between C-reactive protein (CRP; an inflammation marker) and the pharmacokinetics of perampanel.

METHODS

Among 111 patients who underwent measurement of both CRP and perampanel, 23 patients had a serum CRP level exceeding 1.5 mg/dL (CRP-positive). We compared the concentration/dose ratio (CD ratio) of perampanel in these 23 patients between the times when they were CRP-positive and CRP-negative. To evaluate the effect of CRP on the CD ratio, multiple regression analysis was performed with the following covariates: CRP-positive status, body weight, and use of phenytoin, carbamazepine, or phenobarbital, and combinations of these drugs.

RESULTS

In 10 patients using enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), the mean CD ratio increased by 53.5% [from 1389 to 2132 (ng/mL)/(mg/kg)] when they were CRP-positive. In 13 patients without enzyme-inducing AEDs, the mean CD ratio increased by 100.8% [from 3826 ng/mL to 7683 (ng/mL)/(mg/kg)] when they were CRP-positive. By multiple regression analysis, the CRP level was a significant independent determinant of the CD ratio of perampanel. Despite a marked increase of the CD ratio, no adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Irrespective of concomitant administration of enzyme-inducing AEDs, the serum perampanel concentration showed a marked increase in patients with inflammation. However, this increase was not associated with central nervous system toxicity. Although it is unknown whether the concentration of free and/or bound perampanel was increased, it seems likely that dose reduction is unnecessary for elevation of the serum perampanel level in patients with inflammation.

Synthesis and Characterization of Cetuximab-Docetaxel and Panitumumab-Docetaxel Antibody-Drug Conjugates for EGFR-Overexpressing Cancer Therapy

The safety and efficacy of anticancer antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) depend on the selection of tumor-targeting monoclonal antibody (mAb), linker, and drug, as well as their specific chemical arrangement and linkage chemistry. In this study, we used a heterobifunctional cross-linker to conjugate docetaxel (DX) to cetuximab (CET) or panitumumab (PAN). The resulting ADCs were investigated for their in vitro EGFR-specific cytotoxicity and in vivo anticancer activity. Reaction conditions, such as reducing agent, time, temperature, and alkylation buffer, were optimized to yield potent and stable ADCs with consistent batch-to-batch drug-to-antibody ratios (DARs). ADCs were synthesized with DARs from 0.4 to 3.0, and all retained their EGFR affinity and specificity after modification. ADCs were sensitive to cell surface wildtype EGFR expression, demonstrating more cytotoxicity in EGFR-expressing A431 and MDA-MB-231 cell lines compared to U87MG cells. A431 tumor-bearing mice treated once weekly for four weeks with 100 mg/kg cetuximab-docetaxel ADC (C-SC-DX, DAR 2.5) showed durable anticancer responses and improved overall survival compared to the same treatment regimen with 1 mg/kg DX, 100 mg/kg CET, or a combination 1 mg/kg DX and 100 mg/kg CET. New treatment options are emerging for patients with both wild-type and mutated EGFR-overexpressing cancers, and these studies highlight the potential role of EGFR-targeted ADC therapies as a promising new treatment option.

Drug-drug interaction of microdose and regular-dose omeprazole with a CYP2C19 inhibitor and inducer

PURPOSE

A microdose drug-drug interaction (DDI) study may be a valuable tool for anticipating drug interaction at therapeutic doses. This study aimed to compare the magnitude of DDIs at microdoses and regular doses to explore the applicability of a microdose DDI study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Six healthy male volunteer subjects were enrolled into each DDI study of omeprazole (victim) and known perpetrators: fluconazole (inhibitor) and rifampin (inducer). For both studies, the microdose (100 μg, cold compound) and the regular dose (20 mg) of omeprazole were given at days 0 and 1, respectively. On days 2-9, the inhibitor or inducer was given daily, and the microdose and regular dose of omeprazole were repeated at days 8 and 9, respectively. Full omeprazole pharmacokinetic samplings were performed at days 0, 1, 8, and 9 of both studies for noncompartmental analysis.

RESULTS

The magnitude of the DDI, the geometric mean ratios (with perpetrator/omeprazole only) of maximum concentration (C_max) and area under the curve to the last measurement (AUC_t) of the microdose and the regular dose were compared. The geometric mean ratios in the inhibition study were: 2.17 (micro) and 2.68 (regular) for C_max, and 4.07 (micro), 4.33 (regular) for AUC_t. For the induction study, they were 0.26 (micro) and 0.21 (regular) for C_max, and 0.16 (micro) and 0.15 (regular) for AUC_t. There were no significant statistical differences in the magnitudes of DDIs between microdose and regular-dose conditions, regardless of induction or inhibition.

CONCLUSION

Our results may be used as partial evidence that microdose DDI studies may replace regular-dose studies, or at least be used for DDI-screening purposes.