1
|
Laganà M, Grisanti S, Ambrosini R, Cosentini D, Abate A, Zamparini M, Ferrari VD, Gianoncelli A, Turla A, Canu L, Terzolo M, Tiberio GAM, Sigala S, Berruti A. Phase II study of cabazitaxel as second-third line treatment in patients with metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma. ESMO Open 2022; 7:100422. [PMID: 35272132 PMCID: PMC9058897 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2021] [Revised: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare and aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis. No efficacious treatment options are currently available for patients with advanced metastatic disease with disease progression to standard etoposide, doxorubicin, cisplatin and mitotane (EDP-M) therapy. We assessed the activity and tolerability of cabazitaxel as a second/third-line approach in metastatic ACC. Patients and methods Patients included in this single-center, phase II study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03257891) had disease progression to a cisplatin-containing regimen (such as EDP) plus mitotane, plus/minus a further chemotherapy line. Cabazitaxel was administered intravenously at 25 mg/m2 on day 1 of a 21-day cycle, for a maximum of six cycles. The primary endpoint was a disease control rate after 4 months. Results From March 2018 to September 2019, 25 eligible patients were enrolled. A disease control rate after 4 months was obtained in six patients (24%). No patients attained a disease response according to RECIST 1.1, 9 patients (36%) had stable disease and 16 patients (64%) progressive disease. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 1.5 months (range 0.3-7 months) and 6 months (range 1-22.2 months), respectively. Cabazitaxel therapy was well tolerated and only three (12%) patients developed grade 3 toxicity which were nausea in one patient (4%) and anemia in two patients (8%). Conclusions Cabazitaxel has a manageable toxicity profile but is poorly active as second/third-line treatment in advanced ACC patients. These results do not support further evaluation of cabazitaxel in this setting. Cabazitaxel is well tolerated but poorly active as second/third-line treatment in patients with advanced ACC. Combining RECIST and Choi criteria could be of value in the assessment of disease response to chemotherapy in ACC patients. Older age, elevated cortisol and LDH blood level correlate with a greater risk of death in multivariate analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Laganà
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | - S Grisanti
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | - R Ambrosini
- Radiology Unit, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | - D Cosentini
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | - A Abate
- Section of Pharmacology, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - M Zamparini
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | - V D Ferrari
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | - A Gianoncelli
- Section of Pharmacology, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - A Turla
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | - L Canu
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - M Terzolo
- Internal Medicine, Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - G A M Tiberio
- Surgical Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - S Sigala
- Section of Pharmacology, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - A Berruti
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Saltalamacchia G, Frascaroli M, Bernardo A, Quaquarini E. Renal and Cardiovascular Toxicities by New Systemic Treatments for Prostate Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12071750. [PMID: 32630204 PMCID: PMC7407336 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12071750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2020] [Revised: 06/19/2020] [Accepted: 06/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PC) is the most common male cancer in Western Countries. In recent years, the treatment of relapsed or metastatic disease had benefited by the introduction of a variety of new different drugs. In consideration of the relative long survival of PC patients, side effects of these drugs must be considered and monitored. In this review, we analyzed the newly developed therapies for PC treatment, describing the mechanism of action, the metabolism and latest clinical trials that led to the approval of these drugs in clinical practice. We then evaluated the cardiovascular and renal side effects from pivotal phase III and II studies and meta-analyses. Cardiovascular side effects are the most frequent, in particular hypertension, while renal toxicity is rarer and not well described in literature. Therefore, there is a need to better define the effects of these therapies, in order to personalize patient treatment on the basis of their comorbidities and preferences, in addition to their symptoms and disease load.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Saltalamacchia
- Operative Unit of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, 27100 Pavia, Italy; (G.S.); (A.B.)
- Department of Internal Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Mara Frascaroli
- Operative Unit of Translational Oncology, IRCCS Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, 27100 Pavia, Italy;
| | - Antonio Bernardo
- Operative Unit of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, 27100 Pavia, Italy; (G.S.); (A.B.)
| | - Erica Quaquarini
- Operative Unit of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, 27100 Pavia, Italy; (G.S.); (A.B.)
- Experimental Medicine School, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
- Correspondence: ; +39-0382-592671
| |
Collapse
|