Dose and schedule modification are required for long-term continuation of sunitinib in Japanese patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Predictive Factors for Resistant Disease with Medical/Radiologic/Liver-Directed Anti-Tumor Treatments in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Recent Advances and Controversies

Simple Summary

Tumor resistance, both primary and acquired, is leading to increased complexity in the nonsurgical treatment of patients with advanced panNENs, which would be greatly helped by reliable prognostic/predictive factors. The importance in identifying resistance is being contributed to by the increased array of possible treatments available for treating resistant advanced disease; the variable clinical course as well as response to any given treatment approach of patients within one staging or grading system, the advances in imaging which are providing increasing promising results/parameters that correlate with grading/outcome/resistance, the increased understanding of the molecular pathogenesis providing promising prognostic markers, all of which can contribute to selecting the best treatment to overcome resistance disease. Several factors have been identified that have prognostic/predictive value for identifying development resistant disease and affecting overall survival (OS)/PFS with various nonsurgical treatments of patients with advanced panNENs. Prognostic factors identified for patients with advanced panNENs for both OS/PFSs include various clinically-related factors (clinical, laboratory/biological markers, imaging, treatment-related factors), pathological factors (histological, classification, grading) and molecular factors. Particularly important prognostic factors for the different treatment modalities studies are the recent grading systems. Most prognostic factors for each treatment modality for OS/PFS are not specific for a given treatment option. These advances have generated several controversies and new unanswered questions, particularly those related to their possible role in predicting the possible sequence of different anti-tumor treatments in patients with different presentations. Each of these areas is reviewed in this paper.

Abstract

Purpose: Recent advances in the diagnosis, management and nonsurgical treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (panNENs) have led to an emerging need for sensitive and useful prognostic factors for predicting responses/survival. Areas covered: The predictive value of a number of reported prognostic factors including clinically-related factors (clinical/laboratory/imaging/treatment-related factors), pathological factors (histological/classification/grading), and molecular factors, on therapeutic outcomes of anti-tumor medical therapies with molecular targeting agents (everolimus/sunitinib/somatostatin analogues), chemotherapy, radiological therapy with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, or liver-directed therapies (embolization/chemoembolization/radio-embolization (SIRTs)) are reviewed. Recent findings in each of these areas, as well as remaining controversies and uncertainties, are discussed in detail, particularly from the viewpoint of treatment sequencing. Conclusions: The recent increase in the number of available therapeutic agents for the nonsurgical treatment of patients with advanced panNENs have raised the importance of prognostic factors predictive for therapeutic outcomes of each treatment option. The establishment of sensitive and useful prognostic markers will have a significant impact on optimal treatment selection, as well as in tailoring the therapeutic sequence, and for maximizing the survival benefit of each individual patient. In the paper, the progress in this area, as well as the controversies/uncertainties, are reviewed.

Ten years-experience of sunitinib in the treatment of advanced pan-NETs: an update on safety profile

INTRODUCTION

Sunitinib still represents a milestone in the treatment for progressive, well-differentiated, advanced panNETs.

AREAS COVERED

We performed an evidence reappraisal to critically discuss its safety profile. We included nine studies, five clinical trials and four real-world (RW) studies. Within non-real-world (NRW) studies, diarrhea was the most frequent clinical AE. With regard to G3-4 AEs, fatigue and hypertension were the two most frequent, while neutropenia was the most recurrent hematological one. Considering four real-world trials, hand-foot-syndrome (HFS) was the most frequent clinical any-grade AE of any grade and neutropenia was the most common G3-4. Alongside to the AEs rate, the discontinuation rate of sunitinib due to TRAEs was variable among all the nine selected studies, ranging from 10% to 35% in the NRW setting and from 7% to 31% in the RW setting. Conversely, temporary interruption is an accepted strategy to reduce toxicity, even though not specifically tested in pan-NET.

EXPERT OPINION

Till now, sunitinib continues to be one of the main therapeutic options for patients with well differentiated advanced panNETs, potentially covering any line of treatment. Therefore, tolerability plays a crucial role to increase adherence to therapy and maximize QoL.

Update in clinical management for gallbladder neuroendocrine carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Gallbladder neuroendocrine carcinoma (GB-NEC) is rare and there are few reports at present. We sought to review the current knowledge of GB-NEC and provide recommendations for clinical management.

METHODS

A systemic literature research was conducted in the websites of Pubmed, Medline, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang Data using the keywords including gallbladder combined with neuroendocrine carcinoma or neuroendocrine tumor or neuroendocrine neoplasm. Two reviewers independently screened the articles by reading the title, abstract and full-text.

RESULTS

In computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination, a well-defined margin, gallbladder replacing type with larger hepatic and lymphatic metastases could be helpful for differential diagnosis of GB-NEC and gallbladder adenocarcinoma (GB-ADC). Older age, unmarried status, large tumor size (>5 cm), positive margins, and distant Surveillance, Epidemiology and End result (SEER) stage are independently associated with poor survival. Surgical resection remains as the preferred and primary treatment. The potential survival benefit of lymphadenectomy for patients remains controversial. Platinum-based postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy may improve the survival. The efficacy of other treatments including immunotherapy, targeted therapy and somatostatin analogue needs further investigation.

CONCLUSION

Typical imaging features could be helpful for preoperative diagnosis. Age, margin status, tumor size, marital status, histopathologic subtype and SEER stage may be independent predictors for the survival. Remarkable advances regarding the treatment for GB-NEC have been achieved in recent years. Further studies are needed to investigate the survival benefit of lymphadenectomy for patients with GB-NEC.

Oral intake of royal jelly improves anti-cancer effects and suppresses adverse events of molecular targeted therapy by regulating TNF-α and TGF-β in renal cell carcinoma: A preliminary study based on a randomized double-blind clinical trial

Molecular targeted therapies are commonly used in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, the efficacy and safety of these therapeutic interventions require enhancement to improve prognosis in these patients. Royal jelly (RJ) has anti-cancer effects and adverse events across a variety of types of malignancy. The present study investigated the detailed mechanism underlying the effects of oral administration of RJ in patients with advanced RCC that were treated with molecular targeted agents in a randomized clinical trial. The study cohort comprised 16 patients treated with RJ and 17 patients treated with a placebo. Serum levels of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and transforming growth factor (TGF)-β were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. The results of the present study demonstrated a larger decrease in tumor size upon supplementing patients with RJ following molecular targeted therapy compared with that in patients administered with the placebo. Patients exhibited reduced anorexia and fatigue in the RJ group compared with the placebo group. The relative dose intensity for patients in the RJ group was higher than that in patients in the placebo group. Post- and pre-treatment ratios of the serum levels of TNF-α and TGF-β in patients in the RJ group were lower than those in patients in the placebo group, and these ratios correlated with decreasing tumor size and frequency of anorexia or fatigue in patients. In conclusion, the results of the present study indicated that oral intake of RJ improved the efficacy and safety of molecular targeted therapy in patients with RCC and changed the levels of TNF-α and TGF-β in the serum of patients, which is speculated to serve an important role in RJ-induced biological activities.

A case of advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor in which octreotide long-acting repeatable was effective after failure of everolimus and sunitinib

Molecular targeted drugs, such as everolimus and sunitinib, have shown efficacy against advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Octreotide, a somatostatin analogue, improves the hormone-related symptoms in patients with neuroendocrine tumors. Furthermore, it has been reported that octreotide has antitumor activity in patients with metastatic midgut neuroendocrine tumors. However, whether octreotide has anti-proliferative effects in patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors is not fully understood. We report a 71-year-old man with multiple liver metastases of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. He was treated with everolimus 10 mg daily and sunitinib 25 mg daily on days 1-14 every 3 weeks at the physician's discretion. However, these molecular targeted drugs were discontinued due to disease progression or severe adverse effects. Octreotide long-acting repeatable was administered continuously from the initiation of everolimus treatment. The tumor marker level markedly decreased and the metastatic liver lesions showed shrinkage with octreotide treatment. Immunohistochemistry of tumor specimens obtained before treatment showed that somatostatin receptor 2, a high-affinity receptor for octreotide, was highly expressed. The clinical course of this patient suggested that octreotide long-acting repeatable may be a treatment option for advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors after failure of everolimus and sunitinib. Further clinical trials are warranted to determine whether the expression of somatostatin receptor 2 in tumor tissues is predictive of octreotide efficacy.

Efficacy and safety of sunitinib in Japanese patients with progressive, advanced/metastatic, well-differentiated, unresectable pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: final analyses from a Phase II study

Background

In an interim analysis of a Phase II trial in Japanese patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNETs), sunitinib demonstrated antitumor activity with an objective response rate (ORR) of 50% (95% confidence interval [CI], 21–79) and a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 16.8 months (95% CI, 9.3–26.2). Here, we report the final analyses of efficacy and safety, as well as additional analyses, from this Phase II study.

Methods

This was a multicenter, open-label, Phase II trial (NCT01121562) of sunitinib in Japanese patients with panNETs. Patients received oral sunitinib 37.5 mg/day on a continuous daily dosing schedule. Dose modifications were permitted. The primary endpoint was clinical benefit rate (CBR). Secondary endpoints included ORR, PFS, overall survival (OS), safety and pharmacokinetics.

Results

Of 12 patients enrolled and treated, all discontinued treatment—the majority (n = 8) owing to disease progression. Most patients were male (n = 8), <65 years of age (n = 11) and had a non-functional tumor (n = 10). The median (range) number of days on drug was 323.5 (22–727). The CBR (95% CI) was 75.0% (42.8–94.5). ORR (95% CI) was 50.0% (21.1–78.9). Median (95% CI) PFS was 16.8 (9.3–26.2) months; however, median (95% CI) OS was not reached (22.0–not estimable). Most common adverse events (AEs; all-causality) were diarrhea (n = 10; 83.3%), hand-foot syndrome (n = 8; 66.7%) and hypertension (n = 8; 66.7%).

Conclusions

These results support the efficacy and safety of sunitinib in Japanese patients with panNETs. Appropriate AE management through dose reduction and interruption may prolong sunitinib treatment and maximize its efficacy.

Real-world use of sunitinib in Japanese patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: results from a post-marketing surveillance study

BACKGROUND

Sunitinib is approved for the treatment of progressive, well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) in patients with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic disease. Safety and efficacy data in Japanese patients are limited. We report outcomes from a post-marketing surveillance study of sunitinib treatment in Japanese patients.

METHODS

Sunitinib 37.5 mg once daily was orally administered in Japanese patients aged ≥ 15 years with pNETs. The primary endpoints included adverse events (AEs) occurring during the observation period of 168 days and objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

Sunitinib was administered in 62 patients with pNETs. The median duration of treatment was 165 days. At 168 days from the start of treatment, 31 patients were still receiving sunitinib treatment and treatment continuation rate was 50.0%. Of the 31 patients who discontinued treatment, 18 (58.1%) discontinued because of AEs and 16 (51.6%) patients discontinued due to insufficient clinical effect. Of the 18 patients who discontinued due to AEs, 10 did so within 42 days of treatment initiation. The most common all-grade AEs were platelet count decreased (33.9%), diarrhea (29.0%), neutrophil count decreased (27.4%), hypertension (24.2%), and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (24.2%). In the 51 patients eligible for the efficacy analysis, ORR was 13.7% (95% confidence interval, 5.7-26.3) and clinical benefit rate was 70.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no new safety concerns in real-world use of sunitinib in Japanese patients with pNETs. The short treatment duration likely led to low tumor response. Appropriate AEs management through dose interruption/reduction is essential for sunitinib treatment success in this patient population.

Sunitinib shrinks NET-G3 pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

PURPOSE

The 2017 revised World Health Organization classification of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms classified conventional G3 tumors into well-differentiated (NET-G3) and poorly differentiated (NEC-G3) tumors. However, guidelines for selection of drug therapy were not established in the 2017 revision. This study aimed to elucidate the rates of maximum tumor reduction of sunitinib, progression-free survival, and overall survival in the new classification.

METHODS

We investigated the reduction rate over time using computed tomography for 60 patients with unresectable or distant metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms who received 37.5 mg of sunitinib in our department from April 2013 to November 2017.

RESULTS

Of the 60 cases, 42, 10, and 5 were NET-G1/G2, NET-G3, and NEC-G3, respectively. The prognostic factors were analyzed according to clinicopathological factors using the Cox hazard model. The median observation period was 19 months, and the median duration of sunitinib administration was 7 months. The median maximum reduction rate of sunitinib was 18.3%. Tumor response was classified according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors: 20 cases (33.3%) showed partial response, 29 cases (48.3%) showed stable disease, and 11 cases (18.3%) showed progressive disease. In a multivariate analysis of factors contributing to progression-free survival from the start of sunitinib administration, only histologically poor differentiation was a significant factor (p = 0.010). Progression-free survival and overall survival were significantly better in patients with NET-G3 than that in patients with NEC-G3 (p = 0.005, p = 0.012), while it was not different between those with NET-G3 and those with NET-G1/2.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that sunitinib is as effective for NET-G3 as for NET-G1/2.