An open-label, multicenter, phase Ib study investigating the effect of apalutamide on ventricular repolarization in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer

Prostate Cancer Therapy Cardiotoxicity Map (PROXMAP) for Advanced Disease States: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis with Bayesian Modeling of Treatment Histories

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Recommendations of first-line therapies for metastatic hormone-sensitive (mHSPC), nonmetastatic castrate-resistant (M0CRPC), and metastatic castrate-resistant (mCRPC) prostate cancer do not account for cardiotoxicity due to a lack of clear prior evidence. This manuscript assesses cardiotoxicity of these therapies.

METHODS

We searched Ovid Medline, Elsevier Embase, and the Cochrane Library for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) from database inception to January 14, 2024. Network meta-analyses of first-line mHSPC, M0CRPC, and mCRPC therapies were constructed for the five cardiotoxicity metrics defined by the International Cardio-Oncology Society: heart failure, myocarditis, vascular toxicity, hypertension, and arrhythmias. Additional Bayesian network meta-analyses also accounted for prior treatment history.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

Thirteen RCTs (16 292 patients) were included. For mHSPC, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) plus docetaxel (DTX) plus abiraterone acetate (AA) with prednisone (P) demonstrated a significant increase in hypertension and arrhythmias versus ADT + DTX (risk ratio [RR] 2.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.67-4.89, and RR 2.01, 95% CI 1.17-3.44, respectively); however, no corresponding differences were observed between ADT + DTX plus darolutamide (DAR) and ADT + DTX (RR 1.55, 95% CI 0.73-3.30, and RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.63-1.40, respectively). For mCRPC assuming a history of mHSPC treatment, ADT + AA + P plus olaparib (OLA) demonstrated a statistically significant decrease in hypertension versus ADT + AA + P (RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.16-0.26). M0CRPC results were unremarkable.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

For mHSPC, ADT + DTX + DAR demonstrates less cardiotoxicity than ADT + DTX + AA + P due to a lower risk of hypertension and arrhythmias from decreased mineralocorticoid excess. In addition, OLA counterintuitively offers decreased hypertension when superimposed on ADT + AA + P for mCRPC treatment after prior androgen deprivation from mHSPC therapy.

Exploring novel Apalutamide analogues as potential therapeutics for prostate cancer: design, molecular docking investigations and molecular dynamics simulation

Introduction: Prostate cancer (PC) ranks as the second most frequent type of cancer in men and is the fourth largest cause of mortality worldwide. Androgenic hormones such as testosterone and dihydrotestosterone are crucial for the development and progression of the prostate gland. Androgenic hormones bind to androgen receptors (AR) and trigger the synthesis of many genes that stimulate the growth of prostate cells, initiating PC growth. Apalutamide (APL) is a non-steroidal antiandrogen drug used to treat PC; however, it also causes a variety of toxicities and resistance during the treatment. Methods: The purpose of this study was to computationally identify new and safer analogues of APL, focusing on improved pharmacokinetic properties and reduced toxicity. Drug likeness (DL) and drug score (DS) were also calculated. Docking studies on the designed analogues were conducted to predict their binding affinities and compare their orientations with the ligands in the original crystal structure. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulation of docked ligands was done using Schrödinger suite. Results: We generated a total of 1,415 analogues for different groups of APL using the bioisosteric approach. We selected 80 bioisosteres based on pharmacokinetic profiles, DL and DS score predictions, and found that the designed APL bioisosteres were optimal to good compared to APL. Analogues APL19, APL35, APL43, APL76, and APL80, formed hydrogen bonds with protein (PDB ID: 5T8E) which is similar hydrogen bonding to the standard (APL). The MD simulation result confirmed that APL43 and APL80 complexes were stable during the 100 nS run. Discussion: The results suggest that the APL analogues, particularly APL43 and APL80, are predicted to be potential antiandrogen drugs for the treatment of prostate cancer.

Bioequivalence of 240 mg Apalutamide Tablets and Preparation in Aqueous Food Vehicles for Alternative Administration

A 240-mg single tablet has been developed with the focus of reducing the pill burden of the apalutamide daily dose of 240 mg (4 × 60-mg tablets). An open-label, randomized, single-dose phase 1 study with a 2-sequence and 2-period crossover design in healthy men determined the bioequivalence of a 240-mg single tablet versus the currently available 4 × 60-mg tablets (Part 1, N = 74) and assessed effect of a high-fat meal (Part 2, N = 21) on apalutamide maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0-72 h). The 90% confidence interval of geometric mean ratios for Cmax and AUC0-72 h fell between 80% and 125% for both Part 1 and Part 2. No new safety concerns with the 240-mg single tablet were observed. To support the use of different food vehicles as well as nasogastric (NG) tubes for alternative administration, we conducted in vitro compatibility studies to evaluate the purity, dose, and stability of 240-mg tablets dispersed in applesauce/yogurt/orange juice/green tea as well as in NG tubes (polyurethane/silicone/polyvinyl chloride). The studies confirmed the alternative administrations do not affect the purity, dose-accuracy, or stability of apalutamide. The apalutamide 240-mg tablet is bioequivalent to 4 × 60-mg tablets and compatible with the tested food vehicles and NG tubes.

A comprehensive regulatory and industry review of modeling and simulation practices in oncology clinical drug development

Exposure-response (E-R) analyses are an integral component in the development of oncology products. Characterizing the relationship between drug exposure metrics and response allows the sponsor to use modeling and simulation to address both internal and external drug development questions (e.g., optimal dose, frequency of administration, dose adjustments for special populations). This white paper is the output of an industry-government collaboration among scientists with broad experience in E-R modeling as part of regulatory submissions. The goal of this white paper is to provide guidance on what the preferred methods for E-R analysis in oncology clinical drug development are and what metrics of exposure should be considered.

Alternatives to rifampicin: A review and perspectives on the choice of strong CYP3A inducers for clinical drug-drug interaction studies

N-Nitrosamine (NA) impurities are considered genotoxic and have gained attention due to the recall of several marketed drug products associated with higher-than-permitted limits of these impurities. Rifampicin is an index inducer of multiple cytochrome P450s (CYPs) including CYP2B6, 2C8, 2C9, 2C19, and 3A4/5 and an inhibitor of OATP1B transporters (single dose). Hence, rifampicin is used extensively in clinical studies to assess drug-drug interactions (DDIs). Despite NA impurities being reported in rifampicin and rifapentine above the acceptable limits, these critical anti-infective drugs are available for therapeutic use considering their benefit-risk profile. Reports of NA impurities in rifampicin products have created uncertainty around using rifampicin in clinical DDI studies, especially in healthy volunteers. Hence, a systematic investigation through a literature search was performed to determine possible alternative index inducer(s) to rifampicin. The available strong CYP3A inducers were selected from the University of Washington DDI Database and their in vivo DDI potential assessed using the data from clinical DDI studies with sensitive CYP3A substrates. To propose potential alternative CYP3A inducers, factors including lack of genotoxic potential, adequate safety, feasibility of multiple dose administration to healthy volunteers, and robust in vivo evidence of induction of CYP3A were considered. Based on the qualifying criteria, carbamazepine, phenytoin, and lumacaftor were identified to be the most promising alternatives to rifampicin for conducting CYP3A induction DDI studies. Strengths and limitations of the proposed alternative CYP3A inducers, the magnitude of in vivo CYP3A induction, appropriate study designs for each alternative inducer, and future perspectives are presented in this paper.

Absence of PSA Flare With Apalutamide Administered 1 Hour in Advance With GnRH Agonists: Case Report

Objective

To examine the effects of apalutamide on endocrine function and flare prevention in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) patients administered GnRH agonists.

Methods

The first newly diagnosed mHSPC patient took apalutamide for 2 weeks followed by combination with GnRH agonist, as recommended by clinical guidelines. Serum luteinizing hormone (LH), testosterone, and PSA were detected during the oral administration of apalutamide before and after ADT. Eight newly diagnosed mHSPC patients innovatively took apalutamide 1 hour before GnRH agonist administration; LH, testosterone and PSA were detected before and after ADT.

Results

In the first patient, LH and testosterone levels were increased during apalutamide monotherapy, and serum PSA levels decreased rapidly, demonstrating apalutamide effectively blocked AR signaling. In patients on the 1-hour regimen, combined treatment with apalutamide and GnRH agonists led to peak level of testosterone on day 3 and castration level on day 28, while PSA decreased continuously. No one experienced dysuria or bone pain worsen after ADT.

Conclusion

Taking apalutamide 1 hour in advance may effectively prevent the flare-up effect in prostate cancer patients treated with GnRH agonists. Compared with the 2-week regimen, the 1-hour regimen could simplify the treatment process and bring testosterone to castration levels in advance.

Pharmacokinetic Drug-Drug Interaction of Apalutamide, Part 1: Clinical Studies in Healthy Men and Patients with Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Two phase I studies assessed the drug-drug interaction potential of apalutamide as a substrate and perpetrator.

METHODS

Study A randomized 45 healthy men to single-dose apalutamide 240 mg alone or with strong inhibitors of cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4 (itraconazole) or CYP2C8 (gemfibrozil). In study B, 23 patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer received probes for CYP3A4 (midazolam), CYP2C9 (warfarin), CYP2C19 (omeprazole), and CYP2C8 (pioglitazone), and transporter substrates for P-glycoprotein (P-gp) (fexofenadine) and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP)/organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B1 (rosuvastatin) at baseline and after repeat once-daily administration of apalutamide 240 mg to steady state.

RESULTS

Systemic exposure (area under the plasma concentration-time curve) to single-dose apalutamide increased 68% with gemfibrozil but was relatively unchanged with itraconazole (study A). Apalutamide reduced systemic exposure to midazolam ↓92%, omeprazole ↓85%, S-warfarin ↓46%, fexofenadine ↓30%, rosuvastatin ↓41%, and pioglitazone ↓18% (study B). After a single dose, apalutamide is predominantly metabolized by CYP2C8, and less by CYP3A4.

CONCLUSIONS

Co-administration of apalutamide with CYP3A4, CYP2C19, CYP2C9, P-gp, BCRP or OATP1B1 substrates may cause loss of activity for these medications. Therefore, appropriate mitigation strategies are recommended.

Prospects of Treating Prostate Cancer through Apalutamide: A Mini-Review

BACKGROUND

Prostate cancer is considered the second most diagnosed cancer, and one of the most common causes of death from cancer in men. Apalutamide is an effective, safe, and well-tolerated agent used for the treatment of men with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) and metastatic hormone-naive prostate cancer (mHNPC). Androgen receptor signaling is a leading factor that drives these prostate tumors. USFDA has approved apalutamide on 14 February 2018 as an agent that targets androgen receptor signaling through inhibition causing significant improvement in metastasis-free survival in patients with prostate cancer. <P> Objective: In this review, various aspects related to apalutamide have been summarized which involve the mechanism of action, chemistry, synthesis, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, adverse reactions, and safety parameters. <P> Methods: The literature was thoroughly searched in the relevant databases to identify studies published in this field during recent years. Special attention has been given to apalutamide clinical trials phases and its promising future as one of the first-line agents for the treatment of patients with advanced prostate cancer. <P> Results: Ongoing trials are progressing for apalutamide monotherapy and also for its combinations in other disease settings. The expected results of such trials will shape the future scenario of prostate cancer therapy. <P> Conclusion: This review article has highlighted different aspects of Apalutamide like its mechanism of action, adverse effects, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, clinical trials among others. The contents of this article should make an excellent read for prospective researchers in this field.

Pharmacokinetics and Use-Testing of Apalutamide Prepared in Aqueous Food Vehicles for Alternative Administration

Patients may have difficulty swallowing a whole daily dose of 240 mg (4 × 60-mg tablets) of apalutamide. One of the unique properties of apalutamide tablets is easy disintegration and dispersion when mixed into aqueous vehicles, avoiding the need to crush/split the tablets. To evaluate whether this method of apalutamide tablet administration would be conducive in a patient setting, different variations in preparation were evaluated, and one preparation was tested in humans. In vitro compatibility studies evaluated purity, dose, or stability of different variations of apalutamide in applesauce/yogurt/orange juice/green tea. An open-label, randomized, crossover phase 1 study in healthy men determined the bioavailability of an apalutamide-applesauce mixture versus whole tablets based on maximum plasma analyte concentration (C_max ), area under the plasma analyte concentration-time curve: AUC_0-72h and AUC_0-168h . Different amounts of applesauce/yogurt/orange juice/green tea as well as durations (up to 6 hours) did not affect the total apalutamide content available. The phase 1 study (n = 12) showed increased total exposure of 5% and peak exposure of 27.6% when comparing the apalutamide-applesauce mixture with whole-tablet administration. Variations in preparation times and total content for applesauce/yogurt/orange juice/green tea did not affect the purity, dose, or stability of apalutamide. An apalutamide-applesauce mixture is a suitable alternative administration method to whole tablets.

Apalutamide: A Review in Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer

Apalutamide (Erleada^®) is an oral selective androgen receptor (AR) inhibitor that binds directly to the ligand-binding domain of the AR. It is approved in the EU and the USA for the treatment of adult men with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). In a multinational, phase III study (TITAN) in this patient population, the addition of apalutamide (240 mg once daily) to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) significantly improved median radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), median overall survival (OS) and the median time to cytotoxic chemotherapy, while maintaining health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) and not substantially differing from placebo plus ADT in safety. Although mature OS data are awaited with interest, the addition of apalutamide to ADT extends the treatment options available for standard of care in adult men with mCSPC.

The Impact of Testosterone on the QT Interval: A Systematic Review

Humans and mammals have sex-specific differences in cardiac electrophysiology, linked to the action of sex hormones in the cardiac muscle. These hormones can upregulate or downregulate the expression of ionic channels modulating the cardiac cycle through genomic and non-genomic interactions. Systematic search in PubMed, Medline and EMBASE including keywords pertaining to testosterone and QT interval. Included experimental studies and observation studies and case reports presenting the results of testosterone administration, excess or deficiency in humans and animals. Testosterone has been shown to shorten the action potential duration, by enhancing the expression of K⁺ channels and downregulating I_CaL increasing the repolarization reserve of the cardiac muscle. This effect has been observed in both genders and animals. Testosterone deficient states can promote arrhythmogenesis. The evidence in this paper may be used to guide clinical considerations, such as increased clinical surveillance of patients in testosterone deficient states using ECG.

Niraparib with androgen receptor-axis-targeted therapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: safety and pharmacokinetic results from a phase 1b study (BEDIVERE)

Purpose

To assess the safety and pharmacokinetics and determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of niraparib with apalutamide or abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AAP) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

Methods

BEDIVERE was a multicenter, open-label, phase 1b study of niraparib 200 or 300 mg/day with apalutamide 240 mg or AAP (abiraterone acetate 1000 mg; prednisone 10 mg). Patients with mCRPC were previously treated with ≥ 2 lines of systemic therapy, including ≥ 1 androgen receptor-axis-targeted therapy for prostate cancer.

Results

Thirty-three patients were enrolled (niraparib-apalutamide, 6; niraparib-AAP, 27). No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were reported when combinations included niraparib 200 mg; five patients receiving niraparib 300 mg experienced DLTs [niraparib-apalutamide, 2/3 patients (66.7%); niraparib-AAP, 3/8 patients (37.5%)]. Although data are limited, niraparib exposures were lower when given with apalutamide compared with historical niraparib monotherapy exposures in patients with solid tumors. Because of the higher incidence of DLTs, the niraparib–apalutamide combination and niraparib 300 mg combination with AAP were not further evaluated. Niraparib 200 mg was selected as the RP2D with AAP. Of 19 patients receiving niraparib 200 mg with AAP, 12 (63.2%) had grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events, the most common being thrombocytopenia (26.3%) and hypertension (21.1%). Five patients (26.3%) had adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation.

Conclusions

These results support the choice of niraparib 200 mg as the RP2D with AAP. The niraparib–AAP combination was tolerable in patients with mCRPC, with no new safety signals. An ongoing phase 3 study is further assessing this combination in patients with mCRPC.

Trial registration no.

NCT02924766 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00280-021-04249-7.

Concentration-QTc analysis for single arm studies

Concentration-QTc (C-QTc) modeling is being increasingly used in phase 1 studies. For studies without a placebo arm (single arm studies), the scientific whitepaper by Garnett et al. ( https://doi.org/10.1007/s10928-017-9558-5 ) states that time-matched baseline adjustments may minimize the effect of diurnal variation in QTc intervals, and categorical time effects are not needed in the model. However, how diurnal variations can be accounted for when only pre-dose baselines are available is unclear. This research investigates whether including categorical time effects in the model can adjust diurnal variation in single arm studies with pre-dose baselines, where QTc prolongation is evaluated at a concentration of interest based on ΔQTc at 24 h and ΔΔQTc (a model-derived difference in ΔQTc from concentration zero). To understand the operating characteristics for the models with and without categorical time effects, simulations were conducted under various scenarios considering oncology early phase studies. When the C-QTc relationship is linear, models without categorical time effects provided biased estimates for model parameters and inflated or decreased false negative rates (FNRs) depending on the pattern of diurnal variations in QTc intervals, whereas models with categorical time effects caused no biases and controlled the FNRs. For non-linear C-QTc relationships, ΔΔQTc estimations made using the model with categorical time effects were not robust. Thus, for single arm studies where only pre-dose baselines are available, we recommend collecting QTc measurements at 24 h and estimating ΔQTc at a concentration of interest at 24 h using the C-QTc model with categorical time effects.

Androgen receptor inhibitor treatments: Cardiovascular adverse events and comorbidity considerations in patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES

Prostate cancer and cardiovascular (CV) disease share several risk factors, with the incidence of both rising with increasing age. Systemic prostate cancer therapies may increase CV risk. For example, gonadotropic releasing hormone agonists have been associated with increased development of CV risk factors, and potentially with CV disease. For men with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC), the opportunity to mitigate CV risk by appropriate selection of therapy (i.e., use of newer agents such as androgen receptor inhibitors) may be possible. The phase 3 PROSPER, SPARTAN, and ARAMIS trials for enzalutamide, apalutamide, and darolutamide, the 3 approved androgen receptor inhibitors for men with nmCRPC, were all associated with increased metastasis-free survival in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Our objective in writing this review is to improve awareness of the relationship between long-term androgen deprivation and increased risk for CV disease and inform treatment decision making for patients with mCRPC who also have CV comorbidities.

METHODS

The PubMed database was searched from 2010 to November 5, 2019 for articles pertaining to androgen receptor inhibitors, androgen inhibition, apalutamide, darolutamide, enzalutamide, CV, and CaP.

RESULTS

We found literature describing the relationship between androgen inhibition and CV disease and risks. Given the increased risk of CV disease due to exposure to gonadotropic releasing hormone agonist therapy alone, understanding the potential for additional CV risks is important for patients with CV comorbidities when an androgen receptor inhibitor is added to their treatment. Another important consideration is the possibility of drug-drug interactions with comedications.

CONCLUSION

Management strategies for patients with mCRPC also treated for comorbidities including CV disease require appropriate selection of therapy, diet, and exercise to meet the needs of the individual patient profile.

Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Antitumor Effect of Apalutamide with Abiraterone Acetate plus Prednisone in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Phase Ib Study

PURPOSE

Apalutamide is a next-generation androgen receptor (AR) inhibitor approved for patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer. We evaluated the pharmacokinetics, safety, and antitumor activity of apalutamide combined with abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AA-P) in patients with metastatic CRPC (mCRPC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Multicenter, open-label, phase Ib drug-drug interaction study conducted in 57 patients with mCRPC treated with 1,000 mg abiraterone acetate plus 10 mg prednisone daily beginning on cycle 1 day 1 (C1D1) and 240 mg apalutamide daily starting on C1D8 in 28-day cycles. Serial blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were collected on C1D7 and C2D8.

RESULTS

Systemic exposure to abiraterone, prednisone, and prednisolone decreased 14%, 61%, and 42%, respectively, when apalutamide was coadministered with AA-P. No increase in mineralocorticoid excess-related adverse events was observed. Patients without prior exposure to AR signaling inhibitors had longer median treatment duration and greater mean decrease in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) from baseline compared with those who had received prior therapy. Confirmed PSA reductions of ≥50% from baseline at any time were observed in 80% (12/15) of AR signaling inhibitor-naïve patients and 14% (6/42) of AR signaling inhibitor-treated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with apalutamide plus AA-P was well tolerated and showed evidence of antitumor activity in patients with mCRPC, including those with disease progression on AR signaling inhibitors. No clinically significant pharmacokinetic interaction was observed between abiraterone and apalutamide; however, apalutamide decreased exposure to prednisone. These data support development of 1,000 mg abiraterone acetate plus 10 mg prednisone daily with 240 mg apalutamide daily in patients with mCRPC.

Renal and Cardiovascular Toxicities by New Systemic Treatments for Prostate Cancer

Prostate cancer (PC) is the most common male cancer in Western Countries. In recent years, the treatment of relapsed or metastatic disease had benefited by the introduction of a variety of new different drugs. In consideration of the relative long survival of PC patients, side effects of these drugs must be considered and monitored. In this review, we analyzed the newly developed therapies for PC treatment, describing the mechanism of action, the metabolism and latest clinical trials that led to the approval of these drugs in clinical practice. We then evaluated the cardiovascular and renal side effects from pivotal phase III and II studies and meta-analyses. Cardiovascular side effects are the most frequent, in particular hypertension, while renal toxicity is rarer and not well described in literature. Therefore, there is a need to better define the effects of these therapies, in order to personalize patient treatment on the basis of their comorbidities and preferences, in addition to their symptoms and disease load.

Apalutamide: A new agent in the management of prostate cancer

Apalutamide is a competitive inhibitor of the androgen receptor and binds directly to the ligand-binding domain. The US Food and Drug Administration approved apalutamide on 14 February 2018 for use in patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer based upon results from the phase III SPARTAN trial demonstrating significantly longer metastasis-free survival over placebo. The SPARTAN trial evaluated 1207 patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who were randomized 2:1 to apalutamide or placebo in combination with androgen deprivation therapy. Patients who received apalutamide experienced statistically significantly longer metastasis-free survival (40.5 versus 16.2 months, hazard ratio 0.28 (95% confidence interval = 0.23-0.35); P < 0.0001), which was the major efficacy outcome. Rash, hypothyroidism, and fracture were reported to occur more frequently with apalutamide than placebo. Based upon these results, apalutamide was deemed a safe and effective treatment option for patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Clinical trials are ongoing to expand its indication in the metastatic setting, and identify additional roles for apalutamide in the management of prostate cancer such as in the castrate-sensitive metastatic setting.