Intrapericardial carboplatin in the management of malignant pericardial effusion in breast cancer: a pilot study

Effects of intrapericardial administration after catheter drainage on malignant pericardial effusion in non-small cell lung cancer: A real-world study

BACKGROUND

Malignant pericardial effusion (MPE) is a serious complication of cancer that can be potentially deadly. It usually occurs in advanced or terminal stages of the disease, and as a result, patients with MPE often have a poor prognosis. There is a limited amount of research available that directly compares the effectiveness and safety of intrapericardial drug administration following pericardial drainage versus catheter drainage alone in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who have MPE.

METHODS

We retrospectively included 86 patients with NSCLC with MPE at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital. Survival and recurrence estimates were determined with the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

We divided the 86 patients with NSCLC into two groups: a pericardial drainage group (34 out of 86, 39.5%) and an intrapericardial administration group (52 out of 86, 60.5%). The response rates were 70.6% and 76.9% (p = 0.510), respectively. The median OS was 132.0 and 234.0 days (p = 0.579), respectively. The median time to recurrent drainage was 43.0 and 104.0 days (p = 0.170), respectively. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) was 44.1% and 61.5% (p = 0.113), respectively. The most frequent AEs were pain (27.9%) and fever (24.4%). Additionally, two patients in the intrapericardial administration group died of cardiac arrest.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with catheter drainage alone, intrapericardial medication infusion during catheter drainage did not have significantly different effects. AEs require close monitoring and management.

Efficacy of Intrapleural or Intrapericardial Injection of Single Bevacizumab in the Treatment of Lung Cancer-Mediated Malignant Effusion

The usage of bevacizumab for malignant pleural effusion (MPE) or malignant pericardial effusion (MPCE) has attracted increasing interest from researchers, but the precise ways of bevacizumab administration remain unknown. Patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with MPE or MPCE were enrolled in the study and treated with a low dose of single bevacizumab (100 mg) intrapleurally or intrapericardially injected after the drainage of the effusions. The Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS), efficacy, and safety of drug administration were used as evaluation parameters in this study. The results indicated that lung cancer-related symptoms were significantly improved following treatment, compared with symptoms before the treatment (LCSS, score 494 ± 78 vs. score 377 ± 77, mean ± SD) (P < 0.001). Malignant effusions were well controlled, and the median time to progression (TTP) was 91 days and 111 days in MPE and MPCE, respectively. In addition, no severe side effects were observed, except in one patient with mild dizziness. In summary, the low dose of single bevacizumab (100 mg) with intrapleural or intrapericardial injection is effective and safe in the treatment of lung cancer-mediated malignant effusion, rapidly improving the malignant effusion-related symptoms and quality of life in patients with NSCLC.

Management of Lung Cancer-Associated Malignant Pericardial Effusion with Intrapericardial Administration of Carboplatin: A Retrospective Study

It has been reported that 5.1–7.0% of acute pericarditis are carcinomatous pericarditis. Malignant pericardial effusion (MPE) can progress to cardiac tamponade, which is a life-threatening condition. The effectiveness and feasibility of intrapericardial instillation of carboplatin (CBDCA; 150 mg/body) have never been evaluated in patients with lung cancer, which is the most common cause of MPE. Therefore, we evaluated the effectiveness and feasibility of intrapericardial administration of CBDCA following catheter drainage in patients with lung cancer-associated MPE. In this retrospective study, 21 patients with symptomatic lung cancer-associated MPE, who were administered intrapericardial CBDCA (150 mg/body) at Gunma Prefectural Cancer Center between January 2005 and March 2018, were included. The patients’ characteristics, response to treatment, and toxicity incidence were evaluated. Thirty days after the intrapericardial administration of CBDCA, MPE was controlled in 66.7% of the cases. The median survival period from the day of administration until death or last follow-up was 71 days (range: 10–2435 days). Grade 1–2 pain, nausea, fever, and neutropenia were noted after intrapericardial CBDCA administration. No treatment-related deaths were noted in the current study. Intrapericardial administration of CBDCA (150 mg/body) did not cause serious toxicity, and patients exhibited promising responses to lung cancer-associated MPE. Prospective studies using larger sample sizes are needed to explore the efficacy and safety of this treatment for managing lung cancer-associated MPE.

Immunotherapy related pericardial effusion on chest CT

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy has become a critical class of anticancer therapy in recent years, functioning by releasing brakes on the immune system that ultimately results in immune cell activation which eliminates cancer cells. Immune related adverse events (IRAEs) are a specific type of adverse event described in patients taking checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy which results from unrestrained immune activation. Immune related pericardial effusion has been described however has not been comprehensively characterized. Here, we present the most extensive report to date detailing this adverse event.

METHODS

We queried our medical record system to retrospectively identify patients on checkpoint inhibitor therapy for lung cancer who subsequently developed pericardial effusion. We analyzed the clinical and radiographic characteristics, prior therapies, treatment for the effusion, and outcomes in patients with immune related pericardial effusion and compared them to similar patients with pericardial effusion not attributable to checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

RESULTS

Our data demonstrate that most of these pericardial effusions were small and not clinically significant. The majority were successfully treated with steroids or resolved spontaneously. Anti-PD-1 inhibitors were the most common checkpoint inhibitor preceding pericardial effusion, and a significant number of patients who went on to develop IRAE pericardial effusion previously had treatment with carboplatin for their cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that IRAE pericardial effusion is not a clinically significant adverse event however it sometimes leads to permanent discontinuation of checkpoint inhibitor therapy which is not necessary.