1
|
Wang H, Zhang L, Liu H, Yang Y, Lu W, Cao X, Yang X, Qin Q, Song R, Feng D, Wang S, Bai T, He J. PDZK1 confers sensitivity to sunitinib in clear cell renal cell carcinoma by suppressing the PDGFR-β pathway. Br J Cancer 2024; 131:347-360. [PMID: 38822145 PMCID: PMC11263541 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-024-02725-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Revised: 05/10/2024] [Accepted: 05/14/2024] [Indexed: 06/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sunitinib has emerged as the primary treatment for advanced or metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) due to its significant improvement in patients' average survival time. However, drug resistance and adverse effects of sunitinib pose challenges to its clinical benefits. METHODS The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) associated with sunitinib sensitivity and resistance in ccRCC were investigated. Cell counting kit-8, plate colony formation, flow cytometry and subcutaneous xenograft tumor model assays were employed to explore the effects of PDZK1 on ccRCC. Further research on the molecular mechanism was conducted through western blot, co-immunoprecipitation, immunofluorescence co-localization and immunohistochemical staining. RESULTS We elucidated that PDZK1 is significantly downregulated in sunitinib-resistant ccRCC specimens, and PDZK1 negatively regulates the phosphorylation of PDGFR-β and the activation of its downstream pathways through interaction with PDGFR-β. The dysregulated low levels of PDZK1 contribute to inadequate inhibition of cell proliferation, tumor growth, and insensitivity to sunitinib treatment. Notably, our preclinical investigations showed that miR-15b antagomirs enhance sunitinib cytotoxic effects against ccRCC cells by upregulating PDZK1 levels, suggesting their potential in overcoming sunitinib resistance. CONCLUSIONS Our findings establish the miR-15b/PDZK1/PDGFR-β axis as a promising therapeutic target and a novel predictor for ccRCC patients' response to sunitinib treatment.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Sunitinib/pharmacology
- Sunitinib/therapeutic use
- Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy
- Carcinoma, Renal Cell/genetics
- Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology
- Carcinoma, Renal Cell/metabolism
- Humans
- Receptor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor beta/metabolism
- Receptor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor beta/genetics
- Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Kidney Neoplasms/pathology
- Kidney Neoplasms/genetics
- Kidney Neoplasms/metabolism
- Animals
- Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/genetics
- Mice
- Cell Line, Tumor
- Cell Proliferation/drug effects
- Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays
- MicroRNAs/genetics
- Signal Transduction/drug effects
- Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology
- Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use
- Female
- Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic/drug effects
- Male
- Mice, Nude
- Membrane Proteins/genetics
- Membrane Proteins/metabolism
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haibo Wang
- Beijing Key Laboratory for Tumor Invasion and Metastasis, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
- Beijing Laboratory of Oral Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
- Laboratory for Clinical Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Lijie Zhang
- Center for Endocrine Metabolism and Immune Diseases, Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Hua Liu
- Beijing Key Laboratory for Tumor Invasion and Metastasis, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Yumeng Yang
- Beijing Key Laboratory for Tumor Invasion and Metastasis, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Wenxiu Lu
- Beijing Key Laboratory for Tumor Invasion and Metastasis, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Xuedi Cao
- Beijing Key Laboratory for Tumor Invasion and Metastasis, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaomei Yang
- Beijing Key Laboratory for Tumor Invasion and Metastasis, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
- Laboratory for Clinical Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Qiong Qin
- Beijing Key Laboratory for Tumor Invasion and Metastasis, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
- Laboratory for Clinical Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Ran Song
- Beijing Key Laboratory for Tumor Invasion and Metastasis, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
- Laboratory for Clinical Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Duiping Feng
- Department of Interventional Radiology, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, People's Republic of China
| | - Songlin Wang
- Beijing Key Laboratory for Tumor Invasion and Metastasis, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
- Beijing Laboratory of Oral Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
- Salivary Gland Disease Center and Molecular Laboratory for Gene Therapy and Tooth Regeneration, School of Stomatology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Tao Bai
- Department of Pathology, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, People's Republic of China.
| | - Junqi He
- Beijing Key Laboratory for Tumor Invasion and Metastasis, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
- Laboratory for Clinical Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sasaki K, Kanda T, Matsumoto Y, Ishikawa T, Hirota S, Saijo Y. Sunitinib therapy for imatinib-resistant and/or intolerant gastrointestinal stromal tumors: comparison of safety and efficacy between standard and reduced dosage regimens. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2023; 53:297-303. [PMID: 36644881 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyac202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 12/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sunitinib therapy for patients with imatinib-resistant and/or intolerant gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) often causes severe adverse events (AEs) that lead to treatment discontinuation. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of imatinib-resistant and/or intolerant GIST patients who underwent sunitinib therapy in our institutions between 2007 and 2020. Forty-one patients were enrolled and divided into two groups on the basis of the starting dosage: the standard dosage group (50 mg/day, 21 patients) and the reduced dosage group (37.5 mg/day, 20 patients). Tolerability, safety and clinical efficacy of the two groups were compared. RESULTS Three patients (14%) in the standard dosage group and another three (15%) in the reduced dosage group (P = 1.000) discontinued sunitinib therapy because of AEs. The incidences of grade 3 or more severe treatment-related AEs were 90 and 75%, respectively (P = 0.238). Two possible treatment-related deaths were noted in the standard dosage group. Clinical efficacy was comparable between the two groups: median time to treatment failure and overall survival were 4.5 months [interquartile range (IQR), 3.6-9.0] and 13.7 months (IQR, 7.5-22.9) in the standard dosage group and 4.6 months (IQR, 2.7-17.0) and 13.4 months (IQR, 9.3-36.8) in the reduced dosage group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The reduced dosage of 37.5 mg sunitinib tended to decrease toxicity and the incidences of severe AEs and treatment-related deaths. This reduced dosage regimen showed equivalent clinical efficacy including patient survival. The reduced dosage of 37.5 mg sunitinib can be adopted as an alternative therapy for patients with imatinib-resistant and/or intolerant GISTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenta Sasaki
- Department of Medical Oncology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan.,Department of Internal Medicine, Sanjo General Hospital, Sanjo, Japan
| | - Tatsuo Kanda
- Department of Surgery, Sanjo General Hospital, Sanjo, Japan
| | - Yoshifumi Matsumoto
- Department of Medical Oncology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan
| | - Takashi Ishikawa
- Division of Digestive and General Surgery, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan
| | - Seiichi Hirota
- Department of Surgical Pathology, Hyogo Medical University School of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan
| | - Yasuo Saijo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tomita Y, Tatsugami K, Nakaigawa N, Osawa T, Oya M, Kanayama H, Nakayama Kondoh C, Sassa N, Nishimura K, Nozawa M, Masumori N, Miyoshi Y, Kuroda S, Tanaka S, Kimura A, Tamada S. Cabozantinib in advanced renal cell carcinoma: A phase II, open-label, single-arm study of Japanese patients. Int J Urol 2020; 27:952-959. [PMID: 32789967 PMCID: PMC7689847 DOI: 10.1111/iju.14329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2020] [Accepted: 06/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Objectives To evaluate the efficacy and safety of cabozantinib, through a bridging study to METEOR, in Japanese patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who had progressed after prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. Methods This phase II, open‐label, single‐arm study (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT03339219) included adult Japanese patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma and measurable disease who had received one or more tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Patients received cabozantinib 60 mg orally once daily while there was clinical benefit, or until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. The primary end‐point was objective response rate per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1. Secondary end‐points included clinical benefit rate (complete or partial response, or ≥8‐week stable disease), progression‐free survival, overall survival and safety. Results Of the 35 patients enrolled, 68.6%, 22.9% and 8.6% had previously received one, two and three prior tyrosine kinase inhibitors, respectively. The median duration of cabozantinib exposure was 27.0 weeks (range 5.1–43.0 weeks). The objective response rate was 20.0% (90% confidence interval 9.8–34.3%), and the clinical benefit rate was 85.7% (95% confidence interval 69.7–95.2%). The 6‐month estimated progression‐free survival was 72.3% (95% confidence interval 53.3–84.6%); the median progression‐free survival and overall survival were not reached. All patients reported adverse events, which were manageable by supportive treatment or dose modification; two patients (5.7%) discontinued therapy due to adverse events. Conclusions The results showed that findings from METEOR can be extrapolated, and that cabozantinib 60 mg/day is a viable treatment option in Japanese patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who had progressed after prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshihiko Tomita
- Department of Urology, Molecular Oncology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan
| | - Katsunori Tatsugami
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Noboru Nakaigawa
- Department of Urology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Takahiro Osawa
- Department of Renal and Genitourinary Surgery, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Mototsugu Oya
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroomi Kanayama
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan
| | | | - Naoto Sassa
- Department of Urology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Kazuo Nishimura
- Department of Urology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masahiro Nozawa
- Department of Urology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-sayama, Japan
| | - Naoya Masumori
- Department of Urology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Yasuhide Miyoshi
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Shingo Kuroda
- Biostatistics, Japan Development Center, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Akiko Kimura
- Oncology Clinical Science, Oncology Therapeutic Area Unit for Japan and Asia, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Satoshi Tamada
- Department of Urology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|