Cognitive impairments in breast cancer survivors treated with chemotherapy: a study based on event-related potentials

Evaluation of a Novel Synthetic Peptide Derived from Cytolytic Mycotoxin Candidalysin

The importance of neuroinflammation in neurology is becoming increasingly apparent. In addition to neuroinflammatory diseases such as multiple sclerosis, the role of neuroinflammation has been identified in many non-inflammatory neurological disorders such as stroke, epilepsy, and cancer. The immune response within the brain involves the presence of CNS resident cells; mainly glial cells, such as microglia, the CNS resident macrophages. We evaluated the peptide Ca-MAP1 bioinspired on the C. albicans immature cytolytic toxin candidalysin to develop a less hemolytic peptide with anti-neuroinflammatory, antibacterial, and cytotoxic activity against tumor cells. In silico and in vitro studies were performed at various concentrations. Ca-MAP1 exhibits low hemolytic activity at lower concentrations and was not cytotoxic to MRC-5 and BV-2 cells. Ca-MAP1 showed activity against Acinetobacter baumannii, Escherichia coli ATCC, E. coli KPC, Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC. Furthermore, Ca-MAP1 exhibits anti-neuroinflammatory activity in the BV-2 microglia model, with 93.78% inhibition of nitrate production at 18.1 µM. Ca-MAP1 presents cytotoxic activity against tumor cell line NCI-H292 at 36.3 μM, with an IC₅₀ of 38.4 µM. Ca-MAP1 demonstrates results that qualify it to be evaluated in the next steps to promote the control of infections and provide an alternative antitumor therapy.

Heterogeneity of symptoms and functions among women receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer in China: A multicentre, cross-sectional study

Background

Currently, few studies have explored the heterogeneity of symptoms and functions in patients with breast cancer. This study aimed to identify the subgroups of symptoms and functions in women receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer and determine whether the subgroups differed in demographic and clinical characteristics.

Methods

A cross-sectional multicenter survey involving five hospitals in Zhejiang, Shanghai, Shandong, and Guangxi provinces of Mainland China was implemented between August 2020 to December 2021. Participants completed questionnaires that included the PROMIS-57, PROMIS cognitive function short form, and demographic and clinical characteristics. Latent class analysis was performed, followed by chi-square test and analysis of variance. Subsequently, significant variables were included in multinomial logistic regression.

Results

A total of 1,180 patients were investigated, with an average age of 48.9 years. Three classes were identified: low symptom burdens and functions group (26.2%, Class 1), moderate symptom burdens and functions group (16.9%, Class 2), and low symptom burdens and high functions group (56.9%, Class 3). Compared with patients in Class 1 and 3, those in Class 2 consistently showed a higher tendency of having urban employee health insurance (odds ratio = 2.506, P < 0.05) and rural health insurance (odds ratio = 2.207, P < 0.05). Additionally, patients in Class 2 tended to be in their fourth cycle of chemotherapy. However, receiving chemotherapy and surgery increased the likelihood of belonging to Class 1.

Conclusions

A high proportion of patients experienced varying degrees of symptom and function issues, suggesting that attention is warranted for women with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy. Patients with the urban employee basic medical system, the new rural cooperative medical system and in the early stage of chemotherapy cycles were more likely to have symptom burdens. Middle-aged postmenopausal women reported varying degrees of cognitive issues. Additionally, surgery increased the presence of potential long-term effects in functional levels.

Risk of Dementia in Cancer Survivors: A Meta-Analysis of Population-Based Cohort Studies

Background: A negative association between cancer and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) was revealed. Objective: We aimed to further explore the dementia risk among cancer survivors and then among cancer survivors who received cancer treatment in subsequent subgroup analyses. Methods: Databases of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched from inception to April 1, 2021, following PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. Relative risks (RR) of dementia were pooled by a random-effects model stratifying the data by potential confounding factors to explore the heterogeneity. This study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42021250654. Results: A total of 36 studies were included in this meta-analysis, of which 16 studies were about the risk of dementia in cancer survivors, and 20 studies were about the risk of dementia in survivors who accepted cancer treatment. The pooled RR reached 0.89 ([95% CI = 0.82–0.97], I2 = 97.9%) for dementia and 0.89 ([0.83–0.95], I2 = 92.6%) for AD in cancer survivors compared with non-cancer controls. Notably, both dementia risk and AD risk significantly decreased in survivors of colon, leukemia, small intestine, and thyroid cancers (RR ranged from 0.64 to 0.92). Furthermore, prostate cancer patients treated with androgen deprivation therapy exhibited a significantly increased risk of dementia (RR:1.18 [1.09–1.27], I2 = 89.5%) and AD (RR:1.17 [1.08–1.25], I2 = 81.3%), with evidence of between-study heterogeneity. Conclusion: Currently, available evidence suggests that the risk of dementia among cancer survivors is decreased. However, large-scale prospective cohort studies are warranted to further prove the association.

Actual, Personalized Approaches to Preserve Cognitive Functions in Brain Metastases Breast Cancer Patients

Simple Summary

Breast cancer is the one of most common causes of brain metastases among solid malignancies, being responsible for 10–16% of all brain metastases in oncological patients. Brain metastases in the course of breast cancer significantly worsen quality of life of patients, especially in the aspect of neurocognitive domains. The review aims to summarize and integrate the current knowledge about breast cancer brain metastases, focusing on indications of certain types of treatment, and with special attention to the role of hippocampus sparing in preserving neurocognitive functions in irradiated patients.

Abstract

Breast cancer (BC) is the most often diagnosed cancer among women worldwide and second most common cause of brain metastases (BMs) among solid malignancies being responsible for 10–16% of all BMs in oncological patients. Moreover, BMs are associated with worse prognosis than systemic metastases. The quality of life (QoL) among brain metastases breast cancer (BMBC) patients is significantly influenced by cognitive functions. Cancer-related cognitive deficits and the underlying neural deficits in BMBC patients can be caused via BMs per se, chemotherapy administration, brain irradiation, postmenopausal status, or comorbidities. Brain RT often leads to cognitive function impairment by damage of neural progenitor cells of the hippocampus and hence decreased QoL. Sparing the hippocampal region of the brain during RT provides protective covering of the centrally located hippocampi according to the patient’s clinical requirements. This article discusses the personalized strategies for treatment options to protect cognitive functions in BMBC patients, with special emphasis on the innovative techniques of radiation therapy.

Four decades of chemotherapy-induced cognitive dysfunction: comprehensive review of clinical, animal and in vitro studies, and insights of key initiating events

Cognitive dysfunction has been one of the most reported and studied adverse effects of cancer treatment, but, for many years, it was overlooked by the medical community. Nevertheless, the medical and scientific communities have now recognized that the cognitive deficits caused by chemotherapy have a strong impact on the morbidity of cancer treated patients. In fact, chemotherapy-induced cognitive dysfunction or 'chemobrain'  (also named also chemofog) is at present a well-recognized effect of chemotherapy that could affect up to 78% of treated patients. Nonetheless, its underlying neurotoxic mechanism is still not fully elucidated. Therefore, this work aimed to provide a comprehensive review using PubMed as a database to assess the studies published on the field and, therefore, highlight the clinical manifestations of chemobrain and the putative neurotoxicity mechanisms.In the last two decades, a great number of papers was published on the topic, mainly with clinical observations. Chemotherapy-treated patients showed that the cognitive domains most often impaired were verbal memory, psychomotor function, visual memory, visuospatial and verbal learning, memory function and attention. Chemotherapy alters the brain's metabolism, white and grey matter and functional connectivity of brain areas. Several mechanisms have been proposed to cause chemobrain but increase of proinflammatory cytokines with oxidative stress seem more relevant, not excluding the action on neurotransmission and cellular death or impaired hippocampal neurogenesis. The interplay between these mechanisms and susceptible factors makes the clinical management of chemobrain even more difficult. New studies, mainly referring to the underlying mechanisms of chemobrain and protective measures, are important in the future, as it is expected that chemobrain will have more clinical impact in the coming years, since the number of cancer survivors is steadily increasing.

Doxorubicin-Induced Cognitive Impairment: The Mechanistic Insights

Chemotherapy can significantly prolong the survival of patients with breast cancer; Nevertheless, the majority of patients receiving chemotherapy such as doxorubicin may have cognitive deficits that manifest as impairments in learning, reasoning, attention, and memory. The phenomenon of chemotherapy-induced cognitive decline is termed as chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) or chemo-brain. Doxorubicin (DOX), a commonly used drug in adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with breast cancer, has been reported to induce chemo-brain through a variety of mechanisms including DNA damage, oxidative stress, inflammation, dysregulation of apoptosis and autophagy, changes in neurotransmitter levels, mitochondrial dysfunction, glial cell interactions, neurogenesis inhibition, and epigenetic factors. These mechanisms do not operate independently but are inter-related, coordinately contributing to the development of chemo-brain. Here we review the relationships of these mechanisms and pathways in attempt to provide mechanistic insights into the doxorubicin-induced cognitive impairment.