MiniPDX-guided postoperative anticancer treatment can effectively prolong the survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

Individualized chemotherapy and efficacy analysis of hepatoblastoma in children

PURPOSE

We aimed to assess the clinical utility of the mini patient-derived xenograft (MiniPDX) model in screening individualized chemotherapy regimens for pediatric hepatoblastoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included 31 children with hepatoblastoma who had unsatisfactory decreases in alpha-fetoprotein levels during neoadjuvant chemotherapy or poor clinical control of recurrence with or without metastasis. We established a MiniPDX model using surgically resected tumor tissue specimens. The sensitivities of five chemotherapeutic regimens were tested to determine the one with the lowest tumor proliferation rate, which was then set as the experimental group. We compared the clinical characteristics and efficacy with those of conventional chemotherapy regimens.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period for the experimental group was 27 months, with a complete remission (CR) rate of 80.64%. Among stage IV cases, there was a significant between-group difference in CR rate (experimental [73.68%] vs. control [37.5%]) and 3-year event-free survival rate (79.3% vs. 26.7%). The most effective individualized chemotherapy regimens were ifosfamide + pirarubicin + etoposide + carboplatin (54.84%), followed by pirubicin + cyclophosphamide + cisplatin (16.13%), ifosfamide + carboplatin + etoposide (12.90%), cisplatin + 5-fluorouracil + vincristine + adriamycin (12.90%), and vincristine + irinotecan + cyclophosphamide + cisplatin (3.23%).

CONCLUSION

Using the MiniPDX model to screen individualized chemotherapy regimens for pediatric hepatoblastoma can significantly improve the CR rate.

Advancements and application prospects of three-dimensional models for primary liver cancer: a comprehensive review

Primary liver cancer (PLC) is one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers worldwide and a leading cause of cancer-related deaths. However, traditional liver cancer models fail to replicate tumor heterogeneity and the tumor microenvironment, limiting the study and personalized treatment of liver cancer. To overcome these limitations, scientists have introduced three-dimensional (3D) culture models as an emerging research tool. These 3D models, utilizing biofabrication technologies such as 3D bioprinting and microfluidics, enable more accurate simulation of the in vivo tumor microenvironment, replicating cell morphology, tissue stiffness, and cell-cell interactions. Compared to traditional two-dimensional (2D) models, 3D culture models better mimic tumor heterogeneity, revealing differential sensitivity of tumor cell subpopulations to targeted therapies or immunotherapies. Additionally, these models can be used to assess the efficacy of potential treatments, providing guidance for personalized therapy. 3D liver cancer models hold significant value in tumor biology, understanding the mechanisms of disease progression, and drug screening. Researchers can gain deeper insights into the impact of the tumor microenvironment on tumor cells and their interactions with the surrounding milieu. Furthermore, these models allow for the evaluation of treatment responses, offering more accurate guidance for clinical interventions. In summary, 3D models provide a realistic and reliable tool for advancing PLC research. By simulating tumor heterogeneity and the microenvironment, these models contribute to a better understanding of the disease mechanisms and offer new strategies for personalized treatment. Therefore, 3D models hold promising prospects for future PLC research.

Patient-derived models facilitate precision medicine in liver cancer by remodeling cell-matrix interaction

Liver cancer is an aggressive tumor originating in the liver with a dismal prognosis. Current evidence suggests that liver cancer is the fifth most prevalent cancer worldwide and the second most deadly type of malignancy. Tumor heterogeneity accounts for the differences in drug responses among patients, emphasizing the importance of precision medicine. Patient-derived models of cancer are widely used preclinical models to study precision medicine since they preserve tumor heterogeneity ex vivo in the study of many cancers. Patient-derived models preserving cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions better recapitulate in vivo conditions, including patient-derived xenografts (PDXs), induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), precision-cut liver slices (PCLSs), patient-derived organoids (PDOs), and patient-derived tumor spheroids (PDTSs). In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the different modalities used to establish preclinical models for precision medicine in liver cancer.

OncoVee™-MiniPDX-guided anticancer treatment for HER2-negative intermediate-advanced gastric cancer patients: a single-arm, open-label phase I clinical study

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy is the main treatment strategy for patients with advanced HER2-negative gastric cancer (GC); yet, many patients do not respond well to treatment. This study evaluated the sensitivity of a mini patient-derived xenograft (MiniPDX) animal model in patients with HER2-negative intermediate-advanced GC.

METHODS

In this single-arm, open-label clinical study, we consecutively recruited patients with HER2-negative advanced or recurrent GC from September 2018 to July 2021. Tumor tissues were subjected to MiniPDX drug sensitivity tests for screening individualized anti-tumor drugs; appropriate drug types or combinations were selected based on drug screening results. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and safety, and the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

A total of 17 patients were screened, and 14 eligible patients were included.The median follow-up time was 9 (2-34) months. The median PFS time was 14.1 (2-34) months, the median OS time was 16.9 (2-34) months, ORR was 42.9% (6/14), and DCR was 92.9% (13/14). The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) were fatigue (14 (100%)), anorexia (13 (93%)) and insomnia (12 (86%)), and the most common grade 3 or worse TRAE was fatigue (6 (43%)), and anorexia (6 (43%)). The occurrence rate of myelosuppression, nausea and vomiting, abnormal liver enzymes, and other grade 3-4 chemotherapy adverse reactions were relatively low, and no grade 5 treatment-related adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSION

Screening HER2-negative medium-advanced GC/GJC chemotherapy regimens and targeted drugs based on MiniPDX animal models showed good tumor activity and safety.

Translation Potential and Challenges of In Vitro and Murine Models in Cancer Clinic

As one of the leading causes of death from disease, cancer continues to pose a serious threat to human health globally. Despite the development of novel therapeutic regimens and drugs, the long-term survival of cancer patients is still very low, especially for those whose diagnosis is not caught early enough. Meanwhile, our understanding of tumorigenesis is still limited. Suitable research models are essential tools for exploring cancer mechanisms and treatments. Herein we review and compare several widely used in vitro and in vivo murine cancer models, including syngeneic tumor models, genetically engineered mouse models (GEMM), cell line-derived xenografts (CDX), patient-derived xenografts (PDX), conditionally reprogrammed (CR) cells, organoids, and MiniPDX. We will summarize the methodology and feasibility of various models in terms of their advantages and limitations in the application prospects for drug discovery and development and precision medicine.

Personalized Treatment of Advanced Gastric Cancer Guided by the MiniPDX Model

Background

The morbidity and mortality of gastric cancer are high in China. There are challenges to develop precise and individualized drug regimens for patients with gastric cancer after a standard treatment. Choosing the most appropriate anticancer drug after a patient developing drug resistance is very important to improve the patient's prognosis. MiniPDX has been widely used as a new and reliable preclinical research model to predict the sensitivity of anticancer drugs.

Methods

The OncoVee® MiniPDX system developed by Shanghai LIDE Biotech Co., Ltd. was used to establish the MiniPDX models using specimens of patients with gastric cancer. The cancer tissues were biopsied under endoscopy, and then, the tumor cell suspension was prepared for a drug sensitivity test by subcutaneously implanting into Balb/c-nude mice. The selected optimal regimen obtained from the MiniPDX assay was used to treat patients with drug-resistant gastric cancer.

Results

We successfully established an individualized and sensitive drug screening system for four patients from January 2021 to July 2021. MiniPDX models identified potentially effective drugs for these four patients, with partial remission in two of the patients after treatment and disease progression in the remaining of two patients. Severe side effects from chemotherapy or targeted therapy were not observed in all patients.

Conclusion

Establishing a personalized drug screening system for patients with drug-resistant gastric cancer can guide the selection of clinical drugs, improve the clinical benefit of patients, and avoid ineffective treatments. It can be an effective supplement for treatment options.

Correlation between Immunohistochemical Markers in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells and In Vitro High-Throughput Drug Sensitivity Screening

AIM

This study analyzed the correlation between immunohistochemical markers in hepatocellular carcinoma cells and the results of in vitro high-throughput drug sensitivity screening, to provide a reference for individualized drug treatment in patients with liver cancer.

METHODS

Seventy-four patients with hepatocellular carcinoma were included in this study from December 2019 to June 2021, and their liver cancer cells were used for in vitro high-throughput drug sensitivity screening. According to the screening results, the patients were divided into relatively sensitive and insensitive groups, and the correlations between sensitivity and immunohistochemistry results were analyzed statistically.

RESULTS

Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP)-positive liver cancer cells were significantly more sensitive to gemcitabine than AFP-negative cells (χ ² = 6.102, P=0.014). AFP was also positively correlated with sensitivity of liver cancer cells to three combined regimens containing oxaliplatin (L-OHP) and epirubicin (EPI) : L-OHP + EPI + irinotecan + 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), L-OHP + irinotecan + EPI, and L-OHP + EPI (χ ² = 8.168, P=0.004, χ ² = 5.705, P=0.017, and χ ² = 8.275, P=0.004, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Gemcitabine and L-OHP + EPI + irinotecan + 5-FU, L-OHP + EPI, and L-OHP + irinotecan + EPI were more effective against AFP-positive compared with AFP-negative liver cancer cells according to in vitro high-throughput drug sensitivity screening. These results may guide the selection of personalized drug treatments for patients with advanced liver cancer in the future but still need further clinical studies to confirm.

OncoVee™-MiniPDX-Guided Anticancer Treatment for Gastric Cancer Patients With Synchronous Liver Metastases: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis

Background

It is estimated that 35% of gastric cancer patients appear with synchronous distant metastases—the vast majority of patients presenting with metastatic hepatic disease. How to choose the most appropriate drugs or regimens is crucial to improve the prognosis of patients. We conducted this retrospective cohort analysis to evaluate the efficacy of OncoVee™-MiniPDX-guided treatment for these patients.

Methods

Gastric cancer patients with liver metastases (GCLM) were enrolled. Patients were divided into MiniPDX and control group according to their wishes. In the observation group, the OncoVee™-MiniPDX model was conducted to screen the most sensitive drug or regimens to determine the clinical administration. Meanwhile, patients were treated with regular medications in the control group according to the guidelines without the MiniPDX model. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

A total of 68 patients with GCLM were included, with the observation and control groups of 21 and 47 patients, respectively. The baseline characteristics of patients were balanced between these two groups. MiniPDX drug sensitivity tests were associated with the increased use of targeted drugs when compared with the control group (33.3 vs. 0%, p=0.032). Median OS was estimated to be 9.4 (95% CI, 7.9–11.2) months and 7.9 (95% CI, 7.2–8.7) months in the observation and control group, respectively. Both univariate (control group vs. MiniPDX group: HR=2.586, 95% CI= 1.362–4.908, p=0.004) and multivariate regression analyses (Control group vs. MiniPDX group: adjusted HR (aHR)=4.288, 95% CI= 1.452–12.671, p=0.008) showed the superiority of the observation group on OS. Similarly, MiniPDX-based regiments significantly improve the PFS of these cases (median PFS 6.7 months vs. 4.2 months, aHR=2.773, 95% CI=1.532–3.983, p=0.029). ORR and DCR were also improved in MiniPDX group comparing with control group (ORR, 57.14 vs. 25.53%, p=0.029; DCR: 85.71 vs. 68.08%, p=0.035).

Conclusion

OncoVee™-MiniPDX model, which was used to select drugs to guide antitumor treatment, was promising to prolong survival and improve the response rate of patients with GCLM. Further well-designed studies are needed to confirm the clinical benefits of MiniPDX.