Switching from zoledronic acid to denosumab increases the risk for developing medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients with bone metastases

Bone complications of cancer treatment

With the advancements in conventional treatment modalities such as radiation, chemotherapy, and surgery, as well as the emergence of immunotherapy, the overall cure rate for solid tumor malignancies has experienced a significant increase. However, it is unfortunate that exposure to cancer treatments can have detrimental effects on the function of osteoblasts and osteoclasts, disturbing bone metabolic homeostasis in patients, as well as causing damage to bone marrow cells and other bone tissues. Consequently, certain tumor treatment options may pose a risk for subsequent bone diseases. Common bone disorders associated with cancer treatment include osteonecrosis, bone loss, and secondary bone tumors. (1)Cancer treatment-related osteonecrosis is primarily linked to the use of radiation therapy and certain chemicals, such as bisphosphonates, denosumab, antiangiogenic agents, and immunomodulators. It has been observed that high-dose radiation therapy is more likely to result in osteonecrosis. (2)Chemicals and hormones, particularly sex hormones, glucocorticoids, and thyroid hormones or thyrotropic hormones, are among the factors that can contribute to cancer treatment-related bone loss. (3)Secondary bone tumors differ from metastases originating from primary tumors, and radiotherapy plays a significant role in their development, while chemotherapy may also exert some influence. Radiogenic secondary bone tumors are predominantly malignant, with osteosarcoma being the most common type. Chemotherapy may be a risk factor for the relatively rare occurrence of secondary Ewing sarcoma of the bone. These treatment-related bone disorders have a considerable adverse impact on the prognosis of cancer patients. Hence, it is imperative to prioritize the bone health of patients undergoing cancer treatment and give it further attention.

Efficacy of submental island flap closing advanced mandibular MRONJ lesion in malignancy patients

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the effectiveness of a submental island flap in closing advanced mandibular medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) wounds in patients with malignant tumors.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A total of 85 patients with stage II and III MRONJ of mandible with malignant tumor as their primary disease were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent surgical treatment, and the soft tissue wound closure was performed either with a submental island flap (SIF) or mucoperiosteal flap (MF). Univariate and multifactorial models were applied to analyze the factors influencing patients' prognosis.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis (p = 0.004, OR 0.075-0.575, 95% CI) and binary logistic regression (p = 0.017, OR 0.032-0.713, 95% CI) suggested that the surgical prognosis of SIF wound closure was significantly better than that of MF.

CONCLUSION

Closure of wound after resection of mandibular MRONJ lesions in patients with malignant tumors using SIF had a better clinical prognosis compared with MF.

Italian position paper (SIPMO-SICMF) on medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ)

OBJECTIVE

This paper aims to describe the 2023 update position paper on MRONJ developed by the Italian Societies of Oral Pathology and Medicine (SIPMO) and of Maxillofacial Surgery (SICMF).

METHODS

This is the second update following the 2013 and 2020 Italian position papers by the Expert panel, which is a representation of the two scientific societies (SIPMO and SICMF). The paper is based on an extensive analysis of the available literature from January 2003 to February 2020, and the subsequent review of literature conducted between March 2020 and December 2022 to include all new relevant published papers to confirm or modify the previous set of recommendations.

RESULTS

This position paper highlights the main issues of MRONJ on risk estimates, disease definition, diagnostic pathway, individual risk assessment, and the fundamental role of imaging in the diagnosis, classification, and management of MRONJ.

CONCLUSION

The Expert Panel confirmed the MRONJ definition, the diagnostic work-up, the clinical-radiological staging system and the prophylactic drug holiday, as recognized by SIPMO-SICMF; while, it presented novel indications regarding the categories at risk of MRONJ, the prevention strategies, and the treatment strategies associated with the therapeutic drug holiday.

Bone health and body composition in prostate cancer: Meet-URO and AIOM consensus about prevention and management strategies

BACKGROUND

Prostate cancer (PCa) treatments are associated with a detrimental impact on bone health (BH) and body composition. However, the evidence on these issues is limited and contradictory. This consensus, based on the Delphi method, provides further guidance on BH management in PCa.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In May 2023, a survey made up of 37 questions and 74 statements was developed by a group of oncologists and endocrinologists with expertise in PCa and BH. In June 2023, 67 selected Italian experts, belonging to the Italian scientific societies Italian Association of Medical Oncology and Italian Network for Research in Urologic-Oncology (Meet-URO), were invited by e-mail to complete it, rating their strength of agreement with each statement on a 5-point scale. An agreement ≥75% defined the statement as accepted.

RESULTS

In non-metastatic hormone-sensitive PCa, the panel agreed that androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone implies sufficient fracture risk to warrant antifracture therapy with bone-targeting agents (BTAs) for cancer treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL) prevention (79%). Therefore, no consensus was reached (48%) for the treatment with BTAs of patients receiving short-term ADT (<6 months). All patients receiving active treatment for metastatic hormone-sensitive PCa (75%), non-metastatic castration-resistant PCa (89%) and metastatic castration-resistant PCa (mCRPC) without bone metastases (84%) should be treated with BTAs at the doses and schedule for CTIBL prevention. All mCRPC patients with bone metastasis should be treated with BTAs to reduce skeletal-related events (94%). In all settings, the panel analyzed the type and timing of treatments and examinations to carry out for BH monitoring. The panel agreed on the higher risk of sarcopenic obesity of these patients and its correlation with bone fragility.

CONCLUSIONS

This consensus highlights areas lacking major agreement, like non-metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients undergoing short-term ADT. Evaluation of these issues in prospective clinical trials and identification of early biomarkers of bone loss are particularly urgent.

Pre-existing medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw before dental extraction

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a severe adverse event, most commonly associated with dental extractions as a predisposing event. However, it is possible that established MRONJ may be existent before dental extractions and is mistaken for odontogenic disease. The provision of a dental extraction will lead to clinically obvious MRONJ with the cause being attributed to tooth removal. We present a case series of ten patients with pre-existing necrosis of the jaw before dental extraction.Retrospective data were collected on ten patients who presented to the oral surgery department between 2017-2021, diagnosed with pre-existing necrosis. A diagnosis of pre-existing MRONJ was made based on the identification of necrotic bone clinically, either with plain film or cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Patients with pre-existing necrosis presented with a range of symptoms, including pain, swelling and tooth mobility. Plain film imaging revealed a variety of findings, including periapical radiolucency, periodontal ligament widening and bone loss. CBCT imaging confirmed a necrotic pattern of bone destruction confirming a diagnosis of pre-existing MRONJ.There is increasing evidence to suggest that local inflammation can be a predisposing factor for MRONJ development as opposed to surgical intervention. This case series provides early insight into the presentation of pre-existing MRONJ.

Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in Cancer Patients: Result from the OneFlorida Clinical Research Consortium

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a rare but severely debilitating drug-induced bone disorder in the jawbone region. The first MRONJ was reported in 2003 after bisphosphonate (BP) exposure. Recently, other drugs, such as receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL) inhibitor denosumab and antiangiogenic agents, were also associated with MRONJ. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence and risk factors for MRONJ related to BPs or denosumab in cancer patients in real-world clinical settings using data from the OneFlorida Clinical Research Consortium. We queried the electronic health records of participants with prescriptions of intravenous (IV) BPs or denosumab between January 1, 2012, and September 1, 2021, in the OneFlorida Consortium. Time to MRONJ diagnosis was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox regression analysis was performed to estimate the adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for MRONJ. A total of 5689 participants had one or more prescriptions of IV BP or denosumab within this study period and were included in this study. Among these participants, 52 (0.9%) had a diagnosis of MRONJ. The overall rate of MRONJ was 0.73%, 0.86%, and 3.50% in the cancer patients treated with IV BPs, denosumab, and sequential IV BPs and denosumab, respectively. The risk of MRONJ was similar in participants treated with denosumab alone compared to those treated with IV BPs alone (HR: 1.25, 95% CI: 0.66-2.34, p = .49). Patients with sequential prescription of IV BP and denosumab were at much higher risk for MRONJ, with an adjusted HR of 4.49, 95% CI of 1.96-10.28, p = .0004. In conclusion, in real-world clinical settings, the rates of MRONJ associated with IV BPs and denosumab were similar, while the sequential treatment of these two drug classes was associated with a much higher risk of MRONJ. © 2022 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Osteonecrosis of the jaw in primary dental care: Recognition and referral

Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) and medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) are uncommon conditions, however when present they have a significant impact on a patient's quality of life and are notoriously difficult to treat. With medical advances resulting in improved survival rates and increased life expectancy, it is likely that general dental practitioners (GDPs) will more frequently be involved in the oral health management of patients at risk of both ORN and MRONJ. Though management of both diseases is beyond the scope of primary care dentistry, the GDP still has a key role in the patient's overall care. It is therefore important to have a good understanding of these conditions and their consequences for dental treatment in order to provide adequate patient support. Management requires a multidisciplinary approach to treatment and as part of this GDPs are integral in prevention, early recognition and maintenance of oral health following diagnosis. This article aims to refresh the reader's knowledge regarding MRONJ and ORN and support the GDP in managing this patient group.

A systematic review assessing occurrence of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw following dental procedures

Aim: This study aimed to systematically review existing literature regarding the association between dental procedures—such as tooth extractions and periodontal therapy—and occurrence of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) in individuals using bone-modifying drugs. Methods: Search strategies were performed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane Library for a timeframe ending in December 2021. Study selection, data extraction and risk of bias were analyzed independently by two researchers. Three meta-analyses were performed, estimating the crude risk ratio (RR), the adjusted odds ratio (OR) and the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for the association between tooth extraction and MRONJ. Results: Of the 1,654 studies initially retrieved, 17 were ultimately included. The majority of patients with MRONJ in these studies were female, with a mean age of 64 years. Zoledronic acid was the most commonly used drug among patients with MRONJ, and cancer was the most frequent underlying health condition. Regarding the performed meta-analyses, crude and adjusted analyses demonstrated that tooth extraction increased the risk for MRONJ by 4.28 (95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1.73–10.58), the OR for MRONJ by 26.94 (95%CI: 4.17–174.17), and the HR for MRONJ by 9.96 (95%CI: 4.04–24.55). Conclusion: It was concluded that performing dental procedures, especially tooth extraction, in patients using bone-modifying drugs increased the risk of MRONJ occurrence and, therefore, should be avoided. Further studies, using adjusted data, are warranted.

Osteonecrosis of the Jaw Caused by Denosumab in Treatment-Naïve and Pre-Treatment with Zoledronic Acid Groups: A Time-to-Onset Study Using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) Database

BACKGROUND

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw is a serious adverse event associated with bone-modifying agents, such as injectable bisphosphonate (zoledronic acid) and the anti-receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand antibody (denosumab).

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate and compare the time-to-onset profile for medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw associated with denosumab between treatment-naïve (naïve group) and pre-treatment with zoledronic acid (post-zoledronic acid group) patients using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database.

METHODS

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw was defined according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities. The medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw onset profiles were evaluated using the Weibull shape parameter and the log-rank test.

RESULTS

The Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database contains 632,409 reports published between April 2004 and March 2020. In the time-to-onset analysis, after extracting the combinations with complete information for the treatment start date and the medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw onset date, 272 reports of the naïve group and 86 reports of the post-zoledronic acid group were analyzed. The median onset in the naïve and post-zoledronic acid groups was 487.0 (25-75%: 274.0-690.8) and 305.5 (25-75%: 158.3-508.5) days, respectively. Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw occurred earlier in the post-zoledronic acid group than in the naïve group, and the log-rank test demonstrated a significant difference in their time transitions (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicated a risk of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw in naïve and post-zoledronic acid groups and a shorter onset time in the latter than in the former. Thus, healthcare professionals should take the early risk of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw into account when switching patients from zoledronic acid to denosumab treatment.

Osteonecrosis of the Jaw and Antiresorptive Agents in Benign and Malignant Diseases: A Critical Review Organized by the ECTS

CONTEXT

Antiresorptive therapy significantly reduces fracture risk in patients with benign bone disease and skeletal-related events (SREs) in patients with bone metastases (BM). Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) is a rare but severe condition manifested as necrotic bone lesion or lesions of the jaws. ONJ has been linked to the use of potent antiresorptive agents, termed medication-related ONJ (MRONJ).

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to identify the differences various aspects of MRONJ among distinct patient categories and provide recommendations on how to mitigate the risk and optimally manage MRONJ in each of them.

METHODS

A working group of the European Calcified Tissue Society (ECTS) and 2 experts performed an updated detailed review of existing literature on MRONJ incidence, characteristics, and treatment applied in bone diseases with variable severity of skeletal insult, ranging from osteoporosis to prevention of cancer treatment-induced bone loss and SREs in cancer patients with BM.

RESULTS

The risk for MRONJ is much higher in patients with advanced malignancies compared to those with benign bone diseases because of the higher doses and more frequent administration of antiresorptive agents in individuals with compromised general health, along with coadministration of other medications that predispose to MRONJ. The overall risk for MRONJ is considerably lower than the benefits in all categories of patients.

CONCLUSION

The risk for MRONJ largely depends on the underlying bone disease and the relevant antiresorptive regimen applied. Physicians and dentists should keep in mind that the benefits of antiresorptive therapy far outweigh the risk for MRONJ development.

Risk of Osteonecrosis of the Jaw Under Denosumab Compared to Bisphosphonates in Patients With Osteoporosis

Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) is a rare but serious adverse event associated with antiresorptive treatment. There is little evidence regarding the incidence of ONJ among patients with osteoporosis who are treated with denosumab versus bisphosphonates (BPs). The aim of this study was to determine the risk of ONJ in a real-world population. Subjects who underwent at least one dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) examination were included in the osteoporosis register of the Swiss Society of Rheumatology between January 1, 2015, and September 30, 2019. Statistical analyses included incidence rates, rate ratios, and hazard ratios for ONJ, considering sequential therapies and drug holidays as covariates. Among 9956 registered patients, 3068 (89% female, median age 69 years [63 to 76]) were treated with BPs or denosumab for a cumulative duration of 11,101 and 4236 patient-years, respectively. Seventeen cases of ONJ were identified: 12 in patients receiving denosumab at the time of ONJ diagnosis and 5 in patients receiving oral or intravenous BP therapy. The diagnosis of ONJ was confirmed by independent and blinded maxillofacial surgeons, using the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons case definition of ONJ. The incidence of ONJ per 10,000 observed patient-years was 28.3 in patients receiving denosumab and 4.5 in patients with BP-associated ONJ, yielding a rate ratio of 6.3 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.1 to 22.8), p < 0.001. Nine of 12 patients who developed ONJ during denosumab treatment had been pretreated with BPs, but none of the 5 patients with BP-related ONJ had previously received denosumab. The risk of ONJ was higher in patients receiving denosumab therapy compared with BPs (hazard ratio 3.49, 95% CI 1.16 to 10.47, p = 0.026). Previous BP therapy before switching to denosumab may be an additional risk factor for ONJ development. © 2021 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

[Management of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw-a review of recent study results in comparison to established strategies]

Hintergrund

Antiresorptiva gehören weltweit zu den am häufigsten applizierten Arzneimitteln. Ihr Haupteinsatzbereich liegt in der Osteologie und Onkologie. Trotz allgemein guter Verträglichkeit treten bei Patienten unter Therapie unerwünschte Arzneimittelwirkungen (UAW) auf. Eine spezifische UAW im Bereich der Kiefer ist die sog. medikamentenassoziierte Osteonekrose („medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw“, MRONJ) der Kiefer.

Ziel der Arbeit

Diese Arbeit stellt neuesten Entwicklungen in Ätiologie, Diagnostik und Therapie der MRONJ im Vergleich zu bereits bestehenden Erkenntnissen zusammen.

Methodik

Es wurde eine systematische Literaturübersicht der Jahre 2016–2021 zu diesem Thema durchgeführt. Prospektive Therapiestudien, Diagnostikstudien mit Vergleichsgruppe und innovative Studien zur Pathogenese der MRONJ wurden eingeschlossen und nach den MINORS-Kriterien („methodological index for non-randomized studies“) bewertet.

Ergebnisse und Diskussion

Die MRONJ tritt bei ca. 2–12 % der Patienten, die aus onkologischer Indikation mit Antiresorptiva behandelt werden, auf (osteologische Indikation ca. 0,1–1 %). Die Therapie der MRONJ sollte frühzeitig und operativ erfolgen. Die Heilungsrate ist bei einem operativen Therapieansatz mit über 85 % sehr gut.

Zoledronic acid inhibits osteoclastogenesis and bone resorptive function by suppressing RANKL‑mediated NF‑κB and JNK and their downstream signalling pathways

Targeting excessive osteoclast differentiation and activity is considered a valid therapeutic approach for osteoporosis. Zoledronic acid (ZOL) plays a pivotal role in regulating bone mineral density. However, the exact molecular mechanisms responsible for the inhibitory effects of ZOL on receptor activator of nuclear factor (NF)-κB ligand (RANKL)-induced osteoclast formation are not entirely clear. The present study aimed to investigate the role of ZOL in osteoclast differentiation and function, and to determine whether NF-κB and mitogen-activated protein kinase, and their downstream signalling pathways, are involved in this process. RAW264.7 cells were cultured with RANKL for differentiation into osteoclasts, in either the presence or absence of ZOL. Osteoclast formation was observed by tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase staining and bone resorption pit assays using dentine slices. The expression of osteoclast-specific molecules was analysed using reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction and western blotting assays to deduce the molecular mechanisms underlying the role of ZOL in osteoclastogenesis. The results showed that ZOL significantly attenuated osteoclastogenesis and bone resorptive capacity in vitro. ZOL also suppressed the activation of NF-κB and the phosphorylation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase. Furthermore, it inhibited the expression of the downstream factors c-Jun, c-Fos and nuclear factor of activated T cells c1, thereby decreasing the expression of dendritic cell-specific transmembrane protein and other osteoclast-specific markers. In conclusion, ZOL may have therapeutic potential for osteoporosis.