Significance of MHC class II haplotypes and IgG Fc receptors in SLE

Biomarkers for systemic lupus erythematosus

The urgent need for lupus biomarkers was demonstrated in September 2011 during a Workshop sponsored by the Food and Drug Administration: Potential Biomarkers Predictive of Disease Flare. After 2 days of discussion and more than 2 dozen presentations from thought leaders in both industry and academia, it became apparent that highly sought biomarkers to predict lupus flare have not yet been identified. Even short of the elusive biomarker of flare, few biomarkers for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) diagnosis, monitoring, and stratification have been validated and employed for making clinical decisions. This lack of reliable, specific biomarkers for SLE hampers proper clinical management of patients with SLE and impedes development of new lupus therapeutics. As such, the intensity of investigation to identify lupus biomarkers is climbing a steep trajectory, lending cautious optimism that a validated panel of biomarkers for lupus diagnosis, monitoring, stratification, and prediction of flare may soon be in hand.

The search for lupus biomarkers

Few biomarkers for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have been validated and employed for making clinical decisions. The lack of reliable, specific biomarkers for SLE hampers the proper clinical management of patients with SLE and impedes the development of new lupus therapeutics. This void has led to renewed enthusiasm for identifying biomarkers that precisely and specifically reflect the pathophysiological and clinical changes of SLE. Several laboratory markers have shown early promise as biomarkers for lupus susceptibility, diagnosis and monitoring. These include polymorphisms and copy-number variations of complement C4 and Fcgamma receptor genes (disease susceptibility), cell-bound complement C4d (diagnosis and/or disease activity), CD27(high) plasma cells (disease activity), 'interferon signature' (disease activity) and anti-C1q and anti-NMDA (disease activity and organ involvement). Although these and other promising candidate biomarkers have been identified, they still need to be validated through rigorous, large-scale multicentre studies. This article briefly reviews the historical aspects of lupus biomarkers and summarises current efforts to advance the field.

Existence of an immunoglobulin G component of naturally occurring HLA class I antibodies that are not directed against self-antigens in human serum

We compared the frequency of immunoglobulin G (IgG) type of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I antibodies between patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and healthy controls using a highly sensitive FlowPRA method. Sixteen of 130 normal healthy males and 2 of 10 normal females without a history of pregnancy (none had ever been transfused) possessed HLA class I antibodies. In SLE, male, but not female patients, showed a significant increase in the frequency of the antibodies compared with the corresponding controls. The antibodies did not appear to be involved in the development of SLE because of no substantial relationship to the incidence of cytopenia or SLE disease activity index score. Each individual had 1-31 types of HLA class I antibodies. Interestingly, HLA class I antibodies did not correspond to the individual's own HLA antigens. Eight of 32 types of HLA class I antigens detected were rare in the Japanese population. These results suggest that an IgG component of naturally occurring HLA class I antibodies exists in human serum and that these antibodies are not antibodies against self-antigens.

Positive association of HLA-DRB1*15 with Dupuytren's disease in Caucasians

Dupuytren's disease (DD) is a permanent nodular condition affecting the palms and digits of the hands, leading to progressive shortening and contractures of the digits often resulting in diminished function and severe deformity. DD is thought to be one of the most common hereditary connective tissue disorders in Caucasians. To elucidate further the aetiology of DD, we compared the HLA-DRB1 phenotype frequencies of DD patients (n=67) against the HLA-DRB1 phenotype frequencies observed in a control population (n=537). HLA-DRB1*15 phenotype frequency was higher in DD positive Caucasoids (37.3%) when compared with control data (20.9%) (corrected P=0.029): we conclude that in Caucasoids of European origin, HLA-DRB1*15 is associated with risk of developing DD.