Atypical Genetic Locus Associated with the zwf Gene Encoding the Glucose 6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase from Enterococcus mundtii CRL35

Combination of osmotic stress and sugar stress response mechanisms is essential for Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus tolerance to high-sucrose environments

Sugar-rich environments represent an important challenge for microorganisms. The osmotic and molecular imbalances resulting from this condition severely limit microbial metabolism and growth. Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus is one of the most sugar-tolerant prokaryotes, able to grow in the presence of sucrose concentrations up to 30%. However, the mechanisms that control its tolerance to such conditions remain poorly exploited. The present work investigated the key mechanisms of tolerance to high sugar in G. diazotrophicus. Comparative proteomics was applied to investigate the main functional pathways regulated in G. diazotrophicus when cultivated in the presence of high sucrose. Among 191 proteins regulated by high sucrose, regulatory pathways related to sugar metabolism, nutrient uptake, compatible solute synthesis, amino acid metabolism, and proteolytic system were highlighted. The role of these pathways on high-sucrose tolerance was investigated by mutagenesis analysis, which revealed that the knockout mutants zwf::Tn5 (sugar metabolism), tbdr::Tn5 (nutrient uptake), mtlK::Tn5 (compatible solute synthesis), pepN::Tn5 (proteolytic system), metH::Tn5 (amino acid metabolism), and ilvD::Tn5 (amino acid metabolism) became more sensitive to high sucrose. Together, our results identified mechanisms involved in response to high sugar in G. diazotrophicus, shedding light on the combination of osmotolerance and sugar-tolerance mechanisms. KEY POINTS: • G. diazotrophicus intensifies glycolysis to metabolize the excess of sugar. • G. diazotrophicus turns down the uptake of nutrients in response to high sugar. • G. diazotrophicus requires amino acid availability to resist high sugar.

Differential gene expression in Staphylococcus aureus exposed to Orange II and Sudan III azo dyes

We previously demonstrated the effects of azo dyes and their reduction metabolites on bacterial cell growth and cell viability. In this report, the effects of Orange II and Sudan III on gene expression profiling in Staphylococcus aureus ATCC BAA 1556 were analyzed using microarray and quantitative RT-PCR technology. Upon exposure to 6 μg/ml Orange II for 18 h, 21 genes were found to be differently expressed. Among them, 8 and 13 genes were up- and down-regulated, respectively. Most proteins encoded by these differentially expressed genes involve stress response caused by drug metabolism, oxidation, and alkaline shock indicating that S. aureus could adapt to Orange II exposure through a balance between up and down regulated gene expression. Whereas, after exposure to 6 μg/ml Sudan III for 18 h, 57 genes were differentially expressed. In which, 51 genes were up-regulated and 6 were down-regulated. Most proteins encoded by these differentially expressed genes involve in cell wall/membrane biogenesis and biosynthesis, nutrient uptake, transport and metabolite, and stress response, suggesting that Sudan III damages the bacterial cell wall or/and membrane due to binding of the dye. Further analysis indicated that all differentially expressed genes encoded membrane proteins were up-regulated and most of them serve as transporters. The result suggested that these genes might contribute to survival, persistence and growth in the presence of Sudan III. Only one gene msrA, which plays an important role in oxidative stress resistance, was found to be down-regulated after exposure to both Orange II and Sudan III. The present results suggested that both these two azo dyes can cause stress in S. aureus and the response of the bacterium to the stress is mainly related to characteristics of the azo dyes.

mazEF-mediated programmed cell death in bacteria: "what is this?"

Toxin-antitoxin (TA) systems consist of a bicistronic operon, encoding a toxin and an antitoxin. They are widely distributed in the prokaryotic kingdom, often in multiple numbers. TAs are implicated in contradicting phenomena of persistence and programmed cell death (PCD) in bacteria. mazEF TA system, one of the widely distributed type II toxin-antitoxin systems, is particularly implicated in PCD of Escherichia coli. Nutrient starvation, antibiotic stress, heat shock, DNA damage and other kinds of stresses are shown to elicit mazEF-mediated-PCD. ppGpp and extracellular death factor play a central role in regulating mazEF-mediated PCD. The activation of mazEF system is achieved through inhibition of transcription or translation of mazEF loci. Upon activation, MazF cleaves RNA in a ribosome-independent fashion and subsequent processes result in cell death. It is hypothesized that PCD aids in perseverance of the population during stress; the surviving minority of the cells can scavenge the nutrients released by the dead cells, a kind of "nutritional-altruism." Issues regarding the strains, reproducibility of experimental results and ecological plausibility necessitate speculation. We review the molecular mechanisms of the activation of mazEF TA system, the consequences leading to cell death and the pros and cons of the altruism hypothesis from an ecological perspective.