Reconciling event-labeled gene trees with MUL-trees and species networks

Predicting horizontal gene transfers with perfect transfer networks

BACKGROUND

Horizontal gene transfer inference approaches are usually based on gene sequences: parametric methods search for patterns that deviate from a particular genomic signature, while phylogenetic methods use sequences to reconstruct the gene and species trees. However, it is well-known that sequences have difficulty identifying ancient transfers since mutations have enough time to erase all evidence of such events. In this work, we ask whether character-based methods can predict gene transfers. Their advantage over sequences is that homologous genes can have low DNA similarity, but still have retained enough important common motifs that allow them to have common character traits, for instance the same functional or expression profile. A phylogeny that has two separate clades that acquired the same character independently might indicate the presence of a transfer even in the absence of sequence similarity.

OUR CONTRIBUTIONS

We introduce perfect transfer networks, which are phylogenetic networks that can explain the character diversity of a set of taxa under the assumption that characters have unique births, and that once a character is gained it is rarely lost. Examples of such traits include transposable elements, biochemical markers and emergence of organelles, just to name a few. We study the differences between our model and two similar models: perfect phylogenetic networks and ancestral recombination networks. Our goals are to initiate a study on the structural and algorithmic properties of perfect transfer networks. We then show that in polynomial time, one can decide whether a given network is a valid explanation for a set of taxa, and show how, for a given tree, one can add transfer edges to it so that it explains a set of taxa. We finally provide lower and upper bounds on the number of transfers required to explain a set of taxa, in the worst case.

The Theory of Gene Family Histories

Most genes are part of larger families of evolutionary-related genes. The history of gene families typically involves duplications and losses of genes as well as horizontal transfers into other organisms. The reconstruction of detailed gene family histories, i.e., the precise dating of evolutionary events relative to phylogenetic tree of the underlying species has remained a challenging topic despite their importance as a basis for detailed investigations into adaptation and functional evolution of individual members of the gene family. The identification of orthologs, moreover, is a particularly important subproblem of the more general setting considered here. In the last few years, an extensive body of mathematical results has appeared that tightly links orthology, a formal notion of best matches among genes, and horizontal gene transfer. The purpose of this chapter is to broadly outline some of the key mathematical insights and to discuss their implication for practical applications. In particular, we focus on tree-free methods, i.e., methods to infer orthology or horizontal gene transfer as well as gene trees, species trees, and reconciliations between them without using a priori knowledge of the underlying trees or statistical models for the inference of phylogenetic trees. Instead, the initial step aims to extract binary relations among genes.

Clustering systems of phylogenetic networks

Rooted acyclic graphs appear naturally when the phylogenetic relationship of a set X of taxa involves not only speciations but also recombination, horizontal transfer, or hybridization that cannot be captured by trees. A variety of classes of such networks have been discussed in the literature, including phylogenetic, level-1, tree-child, tree-based, galled tree, regular, or normal networks as models of different types of evolutionary processes. Clusters arise in models of phylogeny as the sets [Formula: see text] of descendant taxa of a vertex v. The clustering system [Formula: see text] comprising the clusters of a network N conveys key information on N itself. In the special case of rooted phylogenetic trees, T is uniquely determined by its clustering system [Formula: see text]. Although this is no longer true for networks in general, it is of interest to relate properties of N and [Formula: see text]. Here, we systematically investigate the relationships of several well-studied classes of networks and their clustering systems. The main results are correspondences of classes of networks and clustering systems of the following form: If N is a network of type [Formula: see text], then [Formula: see text] satisfies [Formula: see text], and conversely if [Formula: see text] is a clustering system satisfying [Formula: see text] then there is network N of type [Formula: see text] such that [Formula: see text].This, in turn, allows us to investigate the mutual dependencies between the distinct types of networks in much detail.

Embedding gene trees into phylogenetic networks by conflict resolution algorithms

BACKGROUND

Phylogenetic networks are mathematical models of evolutionary processes involving reticulate events such as hybridization, recombination, or horizontal gene transfer. One of the crucial notions in phylogenetic network modelling is displayed tree, which is obtained from a network by removing a set of reticulation edges. Displayed trees may represent an evolutionary history of a gene family if the evolution is shaped by reticulation events.

RESULTS

We address the problem of inferring an optimal tree displayed by a network, given a gene tree G and a tree-child network N, under the deep coalescence and duplication costs. We propose an O(mn)-time dynamic programming algorithm (DP) to compute a lower bound of the optimal displayed tree cost, where m and n are the sizes of G and N, respectively. In addition, our algorithm can verify whether the solution is exact. Moreover, it provides a set of reticulation edges corresponding to the obtained cost. If the cost is exact, the set induces an optimal displayed tree. Otherwise, the set contains pairs of conflicting edges, i.e., edges sharing a reticulation node. Next, we show a conflict resolution algorithm that requires [Formula: see text] invocations of DP in the worst case, where r is the number of reticulations. We propose a similar [Formula: see text]-time algorithm for level-k tree-child networks and a branch and bound solution to compute lower and upper bounds of optimal costs. We also extend the algorithms to a broader class of phylogenetic networks. Based on simulated data, the average runtime is [Formula: see text] under the deep-coalescence cost and [Formula: see text] under the duplication cost.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite exponential complexity in the worst case, our algorithms perform significantly well on empirical and simulated datasets, due to the strategy of resolving internal dissimilarities between gene trees and networks. Therefore, the algorithms are efficient alternatives to enumeration strategies commonly proposed in the literature and enable analyses of complex networks with dozens of reticulations.

Best match graphs and reconciliation of gene trees with species trees

A wide variety of problems in computational biology, most notably the assessment of orthology, are solved with the help of reciprocal best matches. Using an evolutionary definition of best matches that captures the intuition behind the concept we clarify rigorously the relationships between reciprocal best matches, orthology, and evolutionary events under the assumption of duplication/loss scenarios. We show that the orthology graph is a subgraph of the reciprocal best match graph (RBMG). We furthermore give conditions under which an RBMG that is a cograph identifies the correct orthlogy relation. Using computer simulations we find that most false positive orthology assignments can be identified as so-called good quartets—and thus corrected—in the absence of horizontal transfer. Horizontal transfer, however, may introduce also false-negative orthology assignments.