Study of phase separation behavior of poly(N,N-diethylacrylamide) in aqueous solution prepared by RAFT polymerization

Synthesis, Thermoresponsive Behavior, and Catalytic Properties of Amphiphilic Diblock Copolymers of N-Vinylcaprolactam and N-Vinylimidazole

Abstract

Thermoresponsive diblock copolymers (DCs) were prepared by two-stage reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer/macromolecular design by interchange of xanthate (RAFT/MADIX) polymerization of N-vinylcaprolactam and N-vinylimidazole (VI). The poly(N-vinylcaprolactam) (PVCL) blocks were first synthesized and used as macro-chain transfer agent in VI polymerization. The temperature behavior of PVCL and DCs in aqueous media has been studied by static and dynamic light scattering. It has been shown that the phase separation temperature of both PVCLs and DCs depends on the length of the PVCL chain and the composition of aqueous solvent. The temperature range above the PVCL θ temperature and below the cloud point is characterized by the conformational rearrangements leading to the formation of mesoglobules. The study of catalytic activity of DCs in the hydrolysis reaction of p-nitrophenyl propionate has shown that their activity substantially increases in this transitional temperature region owing to the formation of highly developed hydrophilic–hydrophobic interfaces inside the mesoglobules.

Thermoresponsive Poly(N,N-diethylacrylamide-co-glycidyl methacrylate) Copolymers and Its Catalytically Active α-Chymotrypsin Bioconjugate with Enhanced Enzyme Stability

Responsive (smart, intelligent, adaptive) polymers have been widely explored for a variety of advanced applications in recent years. The thermoresponsive poly(N,N-diethylacrylamide) (PDEAAm), which has a better biocompatibility than the widely investigated poly(N,N-isopropylacrylamide), has gained increased interest in recent years. In this paper, the successful synthesis, characterization, and bioconjugation of a novel thermoresponsive copolymer, poly(N,N-diethylacrylamide-co-glycidyl methacrylate) (P(DEAAm-co-GMA)), obtained by free radical copolymerization with various comonomer contents and monomer/initiator ratios are reported. It was found that all the investigated copolymers possess LCST-type thermoresponsive behavior with small extent of hysteresis, and the critical solution temperatures (CST), i.e., the cloud and clearing points, decrease linearly with increasing GMA content of these copolymers. The P(DEAAm-co-GMA) copolymer with pendant epoxy groups was found to conjugate efficiently with α-chymotrypsin in a direct, one-step reaction, leading to enzyme-polymer nanoparticle (EPNP) with average size of 56.9 nm. This EPNP also shows reversible thermoresponsive behavior with somewhat higher critical solution temperature than that of the unreacted P(DEAAm-co-GMA). Although the catalytic activity of the enzyme-polymer nanoconjugate is lower than that of the native enzyme, the results of the enzyme activity investigations prove that the pH and thermal stability of the enzyme is significantly enhanced by conjugation the with P(DEAAm-co-GMA) copolymer.

Dynamics of the Phase Separation in a Thermoresponsive Polymer: Accelerated Phase Separation of Stereocontrolled Poly( N, N-diethylacrylamide) in Water

We studied the dependence on tacticity of the dynamic phase separation behavior of thermoresponsive poly( N, N-diethylacrylamide) (PDEA) in an aqueous solution. Using a laser temperature-jump technique combined with transient photometry, we determined the time constants of the phase separation and found that both atactic and isotactic-rich PDEAs had fast and slow phase separation processes (τ_fast and τ_slow). The fast process (τ_fast) was independent of the tacticity, irrespective of the concentration. On the other hand, the slow process had a strong dependence on the tacticity. We found the slow phase separation process got considerably faster with increasing isotacticity in dilute solutions. This effect due to the tacticity of the PDEA is totally different from that of poly( N-isopropylacrylamide) and can be explained on the basis of the difference between the hydrophobicity of atactic PDEA and that of isotactic-rich PDEA.