Prognostische Biomarker für das metastasierte kolorektale Karzinom

Which patients are prone to suffer liver metastasis? A review of risk factors of metachronous liver metastasis of colorectal cancer

Background

In recent years, with the increasing incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) and its high fatality rate, CRC has seized the attention of the world. And liver metastasis, as the main cause of death of CRC, has become the leading cause of treatment failure in CRC, especially metachronous liver metastasis, have caused patients who underwent bowel resection to experience multiple tortures.

Main body

Metachronous liver metastasis has severely affected the quality of life and prognosis of patients. Therefore, in this review, we discuss risk factors for metachronous liver metastasis of CRC, which is the premise for effective intervention for CRC patients who suffer metachronous liver metastasis after undergoing surgery, as well as the signaling pathways associated with CRC.

Conclusion

The occurrence of metachronous liver metastasis is closely related to histology-based prognostic biomarkers, serum-based biomarkers, tumor microenvironment, pre-metastatic niche, liquid biopsy and tissue-based biomarkers. Further research is required to explore the risk factors associated with liver metastasis of CRC.

Emerging paradigms in the treatment of liver metastases in colorectal cancer

Efforts to combat colorectal cancer have benefited from improved screening and surveillance, which facilitates early detection. The survival rate associated with diagnosis at stage I is approximately 90%. However, progress in improving survival in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has been minimal. This review focuses on mCRC with special emphasis on the molecular aspects of liver metastases, which is one of the most frequently involved organ site. Better molecular evidence is required to guide the decisions for surgical and other interventions used in the clinical management of mCRC. Results from different treatment modalities have exposed significant gaps in the existing paradigms of the mCRC management. Indeed there is a critical need to better understand molecular events and pathways that lead to colorectal cancer liver metastasis. Such a focused approach may help identify biomarkers and drug targets that can be useful in the clinical applications. With this focus, we provide an account of the molecular pathways involved in the spread of CRC to the liver. Specifically, the molecular changes at the DNA and RNA levels that are associated with liver metastases are discussed. Similarly, we describe relevant microRNAs that are identified as regulators of gene expression and can also serve as biomarkers. Conventionally applied biomarkers are not yet specific and sensitive enough to be relied in routine clinical decision making. Hence search for novel biomarkers is critically needed especially if these can be utilized using liquid biopsies. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of current molecular evidence along with potential future directions that could reshape the diagnostic and management paradigms and thus mitigate the devastating impact of colorectal cancer metastasis to the liver.

Prediction of tumor biological characteristics in different colorectal cancer liver metastasis animal models using 18F-FDG and 18F-FLT

BACKGROUND

Positron emission tomography (PET) is a noninvasive method to characterize different metabolic activities of tumors, providing information for staging, prognosis, and therapeutic response of patients with cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of ¹⁸F-fludeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) and 3'-deoxy-3'-¹⁸F-fluorothymidine (¹⁸F-FLT) PET in predicting tumor biological characteristics of colorectal cancer liver metastasis.

METHODS

The uptake rate of ¹⁸F-FDG and ¹⁸F-FLT in SW480 and SW620 cells was measured via an in vitro cell uptake assay. The region of interest was drawn over the tumor and liver to calculate the maximum standardized uptake value ratio (tumor/liver) from PET images in liver metastasis model. The correlation between tracer uptake in liver metastases and VEGF, Ki67 and CD44 expression was evaluated by linear regression.

RESULTS

Compared to SW620 tumor-bearing mice, SW480 tumor-bearing mice presented a higher rate of liver metastases. The uptake rate of ¹⁸F-FDG in SW480 and SW620 cells was 6.07% ± 1.19% and 2.82% ± 0.15%, respectively (t = 4.69, P = 0.04); that of ¹⁸F-FLT was 24.81% ± 0.45% and 15.57% ± 0.66%, respectively (t = 19.99, P < 0.001). Micro-PET scan showed that all parameters of FLT were significantly higher in SW480 tumors than those in SW620 tumors. A moderate relationship was detected between metastases in the liver and ¹⁸F-FLT uptake in primary tumors (r = 0.73, P = 0.0019). ¹⁸F-FLT uptake was also positively correlated with the expression of CD44 in liver metastases (r = 0.81, P = 0.0049).

CONCLUSIONS

The uptake of ¹⁸F-FLT in metastatic tumor reflects different biological behaviors of colon cancer cells. ¹⁸F-FLT can be used to evaluate the metastatic potential of colorectal cancer in nude mice.