[Predictive biomarkers in oncologic uropathology]

Diagnostische und prädiktive Marker in der Harntraktzytologie

In der Routinediagnostik spielt die Mehrfach-Fluoreszenz-in-situ-Hybridisierung (FISH) nach wie vor die führende Rolle in der Abklärung unklarer Atypien in der Harntraktzytologie. Die Paris-Klassifikation (The Paris System, TPS) bildet eine wichtige Grundlage zur gezielten Indikationsstellung der FISH und untermauert die Bedeutung der morphologischen Korrelation für eine integrative Diagnosestellung. Die Next-Generation-Sequencing-Technologie, welche durch gleichzeitigen Nachweis multipler genetischer Alterationen eine hohe Sensitivität erzielt, wird in naher Zukunft auch in der Harntraktzytologie Anwendung finden.

[Predictive biomarkers in bladder cancer]

BACKGROUND

In the last few years, significant progress has been achieved in the therapeutic options for advanced urothelial bladder cancer.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this work was to give an overview of the status and future perspective of the therapeutic options in this setting. Its focus is on the discussion of tissue-based therapy-predictive markers, which are evaluated through (molecular) pathology and thereby strengthening the role of pathology itself.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Current (clinical study) data, the literature, and our own expertise were considered and summarized in the areas of therapy prediction of platinum-based chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and other therapeutic approaches.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Molecular subtypes exhibit a predictive value both in platinum-based chemotherapy as well as in immunotherapy. However, further work is required to elucidate the predictive role of molecular subtypes in both settings. Changes in the DNA damage repair enzyme (DDR) genes, ERCC2, and ERBB2 as well as differences in the expression of EMMPRIN, survivin, and HMGA2 show promising results as further markers of chemotherapy efficacy. In the prediction of immunotherapy success, this mainly relates to the evaluation of the tumor mutation burden (TMB), tumor neoantigen burden (TNB), APOBEC signatures (MSig1; 3A/3B), and CD8-positive T‑effector cell signature. When using the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitor erdafitinib, which has not yet been approved in Germany, the evaluation of specific FGFR mutations and/or gene fusions by a companion diagnostic test is mandatory in the USA.