KRH1 and KRH2 are functionally non-redundant in signaling for pseudohyphal differentiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Trehalose biosynthetic pathway regulates filamentation response in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

BACKGROUND

Diploid cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae undergo either pseudohyphal differentiation or sporulation in response to depletion of carbon and nitrogen sources. Distinct signaling pathways regulate filamentation and sporulation in response to nutrient limitation. How these pathways are coordinated for implementing distinct cell fate decisions in response to similar nutritional cues is an enigma. Although the role of trehalose pathway in sporulation has been extensively studied, it's possible role in pseudohyphal differentiation has been unexplored.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Briefly, tps1 and tps2 mutants were tested for their ability to form pseudohyphae independently as well as in the background of GPR1 and RAS2 mutations. Here, we demonstrate that disruption of TPS1 but not TPS2 inhibits pseudohyphae formation. Interestingly, deletion of GPR1 suppresses the above defect. Further genetic analysis revealed that TPS1 and TPS2 exert opposing effects in triggering filamentation.

CONCLUSION

We provide new insights into the role of an otherwise well-known pathway of trehalose biosynthesis in pseudohyphal differentiation. Based on additional data we propose that downstream signaling, mediated by cAMP may be modulated by nutrient mediated differential regulation of RAS2 by TPS1 and TPS2.

Messengers for morphogenesis: inositol polyphosphate signaling and yeast pseudohyphal growth

In response to various environmental stimuli and stressors, the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae can initiate a striking morphological transition from its classic growth mode as isolated single cells to a filamentous form in which elongated cells remain connected post-cytokinesis in multi-cellular pseudohyphae. The formation of pseudohyphal filaments is regulated through an expansive signaling network, encompassing well studied and highly conserved pathways enabling changes in cell polarity, budding, cytoskeletal organization, and cell adhesion; however, changes in metabolite levels underlying the pseudohyphal growth transition are less well understood. We have recently identified a function for second messenger inositol polyphosphates (InsPs) in regulating pseudohyphal growth. InsPs are formed through the cleavage of membrane-bound phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP₂), and these soluble compounds are now being appreciated as important regulators of diverse processes, from phosphate homeostasis to cell migration. We find that kinases in the InsP pathway are required for wild-type pseudohyphal growth, and that InsP species exhibit characteristic profiles under conditions promoting filamentation. Ratios of the doubly phosphorylated InsP₇ isoforms 5PP-InsP₅ to 1PP-InsP₅ are elevated in mutants exhibiting exaggerated pseudohyphal growth. Interestingly, S. cerevisiae mutants deleted of the mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) Kss1p or Fus3p or the AMP-activated kinase (AMPK) family member Snf1p display mutant InsP profiles, suggesting that these signaling pathways may contribute to the regulatory mechanism controlling InsP levels. Consequently, analyses of yeast pseudohyphal growth may be informative in identifying mechanisms regulating InsPs, while indicating a new function for these conserved second messengers in modulating cell stress responses and morphogenesis.