Macroscopic and radiological grading of osteoarthritis correlates inadequately with cartilage height and histologically demonstrable damage to cartilage structure

Effects of sex differences on osteoarthritic changes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in rats

The prevalence of primary osteoarthritis is higher in females than males. However, it remains unclear if there are sex differences in the incidence of post-traumatic osteoarthritis after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effects of sex on osteoarthritic changes after ACL reconstruction using an animal model. Rats were divided into the following four groups: male control, male ACL reconstruction, female control, and female ACL reconstruction. ACL reconstruction surgery was performed on the right knees of rats in the ACL reconstruction groups, while rats in the control groups did not undergo knee surgery. At 1, 4, and 12 weeks after surgery, cartilage degeneration in the medial tibial plateau and osteophyte formation in the proximal tibia were histologically assessed. After ACL reconstruction, an increase in the Mankin score, cartilage fissures, and osteophyte formation were detected within 12 weeks in both male and female rats, with similar degrees of these changes between males and females. However, changes in cartilage thickness and chondrocyte density after ACL reconstruction differed between males and females. Cartilage thickening was observed in male rats but not in female rats. The increase in chondrocyte density in the anterior region was detected in both males and females but was more pronounced in female rats. In conclusion, osteoarthritic changes were observed after ACL reconstruction in both male and female rats, but differences in changes in cartilage thickness and chondrocyte density were observed between males and females.

Assessment of Clinical, Tissue, and Cell-Level Metrics Identify Four Biologically Distinct Knee Osteoarthritis Patient Phenotypes

OBJECTIVE

Clinical heterogeneity of primary osteoarthritis (OA) is a major challenge in understanding pathogenesis and development of targeted therapeutic strategies. This study aims to (1) identify OA patient subgroups phenotypes and (2) determine predictors of OA severity and cartilage-derived stem/progenitor concentration using clinical-, tissue-, and cell- level metrics.

DESIGN

Cartilage, synovium (SYN) and infrapatellar fatpad (IPFP) were collected from 90 total knee arthroplasty patients. Clinical metrics (patient demographics, radiograph-based joint space width (JSW), Kellgren and Lawrence score (KL)), tissue metrics (cartilage histopathology grade, glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)) and cell-based metrics (cartilage-, SYN-, and IPFP-derived cell concentration ([Cell], cells/mg), connective tissue progenitor (CTP) prevalence (PCTP, CTPs/million cells plated), CTP concentration, [CTP], CTPs/mg)) were assessed using k-mean clustering and linear regression model.

RESULTS

Four patient subgroups were identified. Clusters 1 and 2 comprised of younger, high body mass index (BMI) patients with healthier cartilage, where Cluster 1 had high CTP in cartilage, SYN, and IPFP, and Cluster 2 had low [CTP] in cartilage, SYN, and IPFP. Clusters 3 and 4 comprised of older, low BMI patients with diseased cartilage where Cluster 3 had low [CTP] in SYN, IPFP but high [CTP] in cartilage, and Cluster 4 had high [CTP] in SYN, IPFP but low [CTP] in cartilage. Age (r = 0.23, P = 0.026), JSW (r = 0.28, P = 0.007), KL (r = 0.26, P = 0.012), GAG/mg cartilage tissue (r = -0.31, P = 0.007), and SYN-derived [Cell] (r = 0.25, P = 0.049) were weak but significant predictors of OA severity. Cartilage-derived [Cell] (r = 0.38, P < 0.001) and PCTP (r = 0.9, P < 0.001) were moderate/strong predictors of cartilage-derived [CTP].

CONCLUSION

Initial findings suggests the presence of OA patient subgroups that could define opportunities for more targeted patient-specific approaches to prevention and treatment.

The Value of SPECT/CT for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT/CT) is a diagnostic option for knee osteoarthritis patients without osteoarthritic features on X-ray; however, the added value of SPECT/CT remains debatable in the diagnostic algorithm.

OBJECTIVE

To review the added value of SPECT/CT in the diagnostic algorithm of knee osteoarthritis.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

A systematic search was carried out in the databases EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane collaboration. The retrieved articles were screened for relevance on title and abstract. This was followed by a full-text study quality appraisal of the remaining articles. Finally, a total of 9 trials were included.

RESULTS

The use of SPECT/CT might objectify some clinical knee osteoarthritis symptoms. It could correlate with findings on plain radiography and magnetic resonance imaging. Furthermore, there is some evidence SPECT/CT gives additional information compared with these imaging modalities; however, superiority is not proven. The uptake on SPECT could predict the intraoperative macroscopic findings. Yet the clinical relevance remains unclear.

CONCLUSION

There is no strong evidence SPECT/CT should play a role in the diagnosing and decision-making processes of knee osteoarthritis. Yet there is evidence suggesting SPECT/CT might give additional information in the diagnosing process. More research would be of added value to answer this research question.

Multimodal evaluation of tissue-engineered cartilage

Tissue engineering (TE) has promise as a biological solution and a disease modifying treatment for arthritis. Although cartilage can be generated by TE, substantial inter- and intra-donor variability makes it impossible to guarantee optimal, reproducible results. TE cartilage must be able to perform the functions of native tissue, thus mechanical and biological properties approaching those of native cartilage are likely a pre-requisite for successful implantation. A quality-control assessment of these properties should be part of the implantation release criteria for TE cartilage. Release criteria should certify that selected tissue properties have reached certain target ranges, and should be predictive of the likelihood of success of an implant in vivo. Unfortunately, it is not currently known which properties are needed to establish release criteria, nor how close one has to be to the properties of native cartilage to achieve success. Achieving properties approaching those of native cartilage requires a clear understanding of the target properties and reproducible assessment methodology. Here, we review several main aspects of quality control as it applies to TE cartilage. This includes a look at known mechanical and biological properties of native cartilage, which should be the target in engineered tissues. We also present an overview of the state of the art of tissue assessment, focusing on native articular and TE cartilage. Finally, we review the arguments for developing and validating non-destructive testing methods for assessing TE products.

Comparison of cartilage histopathology assessment systems on human knee joints at all stages of osteoarthritis development

OBJECTIVE

To compare the MANKIN and OARSI cartilage histopathology assessment systems using human articular cartilage from a large number of donors across the adult age spectrum representing all levels of cartilage degradation.

DESIGN

Human knees (n=125 from 65 donors; age range 23-92) were obtained from tissue banks. All cartilage surfaces were macroscopically graded. Osteochondral slabs representing the entire central regions of both femoral condyles, tibial plateaus, and the patella were processed for histology and Safranin O - Fast Green staining. Slides representing normal, aged, and osteoarthritis (OA) tissue were scanned and electronic images were scored online by five observers. Statistical analysis was performed for inter- and intra-observer variability, reproducibility and reliability.

RESULTS

The inter-observer variability among five observers for the MANKIN system showed a similar good Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC>0.81) as for the OARSI system (ICC>0.78). Repeat scoring by three of the five readers showed very good agreement (ICC>0.94). Both systems showed a high reproducibility among four of the five readers as indicated by the Spearman's rho value. For the MANKIN system, the surface represented by lesion depth was the parameter where all readers showed an excellent agreement. Other parameters such as cellularity, Safranin O staining intensity and tidemark had greater inter-reader disagreement.

CONCLUSION

Both scoring systems were reliable but appeared too complex and time consuming for assessment of lesion severity, the major parameter determined in standardized scoring systems. To rapidly and reproducibly assess severity of cartilage degradation, we propose to develop a simplified system for lesion volume.

Reliability, reproducibility, and validation of five major histological scoring systems for experimental articular cartilage repair in the rabbit model

Histological evaluation of the repair tissue is a main pillar in the advancing field of experimental articular cartilage repair. Despite their widespread use, the major histological scoring systems for cartilage repair have seldom been validated. We tested the hypotheses (1) that elementary scores have a better reproducibility compared with more complex systems and (2) that the data from these different histological scores correlate with the DNA and proteoglycan contents of the repair tissue. A total of 1,165 observations of cartilage repair based on histological sections (n=233) from an experimental investigation on the repair of standardized osteochondral defects in vivo were made by three investigators with different levels of experience in cartilage research to determine the inter- and intra-observer reproducibility of elementary (Pineda and Wakitani score) and complex (O'Driscoll, Sellers, Fortier score) histological grading systems. DNA and proteoglycan contents of the repair tissues from simultaneously created defects were determined and correlated with histological (a) overall score values, (b) matrix staining, and (c) cellular characteristics of the five scores. Finally, applying the proteoglycan content as validating test, sensitivity, and specificity of the grading systems were assessed. All histological scores provided high intra- (Pearson r=0.92-0.99) and inter-observer reliability (intra-class correlation=0.94-0.99), low numerical intra- and inter-observer differences, and high internal correlations (Spearman's ρ=0.63-0.91). No disparity in reliability and reproducibility was detected between elementary and complex scores or between investigators with different levels of experience (all p>0.05). Individual histological overall score values did not correlate with proteoglycan contents but with DNA contents of the repair tissue (O'Driscoll, Wakitani, Sellers score). In all systems, proteoglycan contents did not correlate with matrix staining (all p>0.05), but histological cellular characteristics correlated with total cell numbers (p<0.001). These data indicate that both elementary and comprehensive histological scores are suited to quantify cartilage repair. Histological and biochemical evaluations may serve as complementary tools to assess articular cartilage repair in vivo.

Evaluation of histological scoring systems for tissue-engineered, repaired and osteoarthritic cartilage

OBJECTIVE

Regeneration of hyaline cartilage has been the focus of an increasing number of research groups around the world. One of the most important outcome measures in evaluation of its success is the histological quality of cartilaginous tissue. Currently, a variety of histological scoring systems is used to describe the quality of osteoarthritic, in vivo repaired or in vitro engineered tissue. This review aims to provide an overview of past and currently used histological scoring systems, in an effort to aid cartilage researchers in choosing adequate and validated cartilage histological scoring systems.

METHODS

Histological scoring systems for analysis of osteoarthritic, tissue engineered and in vivo repaired cartilage were reviewed. The chronological development as well as the validity and practical applicability of the scoring systems is evaluated.

RESULTS

The Histological-Histochemical Grading System (HHGS) or a HHGS-related score is most often used for evaluation of osteoarthritic cartilage, however the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Osteoarthritis Cartilage Histopathology Assessment System seems a valid alternative. The O'Driscoll score and the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) II score may be used for in vivo repaired cartilage. The 'Bern score' seems most adequate for evaluation of in vitro engineered cartilage.

CONCLUSION

A great variety of histological scoring systems exists for analysis of osteoarthritic or normal, in vivo repaired or tissue-engineered cartilage, but only few have been validated. Use of these validated scores may considerably improve exchange of information necessary for advances in the field of cartilage regeneration.

SPECT scan is a reliable tool for selection of patients undergoing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Was to determine the relationship between pre-operative SPECT and intra-operative assessments of tibio-femoral chondral changes.

METHODS

One hundred cases had been selected on the following criteria: (1) marked Tc-99 m uptake on the medial compartment and (2) its normal uptake laterally. The cartilage macroscopic condition of tibio-femoral compartments were then recorded during the surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 73% of Grade 0, 24% of Grade I, and 3% of Grade II chondral injuries were detected laterally; 100% of Grade IV chondral lesions were detected medially. Statistically very significant relationship was demonstrated between SPECT and the mcroscopic cartilage condition.

CONCLUSIONS

SPECT bone scan provides very useful information regarding the degree of osteoarthritis in knee weight-bearing compartments for pre-operative planning.

Bildgebung bei der Arthrose peripherer Gelenke

Pain and loss of function are the clinical signs of osteoarthritis (OA). Conventional x-rays confirm the diagnosis or provide important hints for differential diagnosis. In the natural course of OA, x-rays are performed at longer intervals when pain increases or therapy is without effect, especially if more invasive therapies, or even surgery, becomes necessary. The advantages of x-rays are worldwide availability, cost effectiveness, very long experience with this imaging method and the possibility of storing the images for long periods of time. The typical findings of OA can be detected only roughly by quantitative methods. In many patients, grading of OA does not correlate well with the clinical symptoms. X-ray changes are part of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria for OA of the hand, hip and knee. Ordinary s-rays can depicting bone with a higher local resolution than any other imaging technique. Soft tissues and cartilage can be visualized only indirectly. In OA, ultrasound is the method to depict intra-articular effusion at an early stage. Osteophytes or the degree of synovitis are also visible. Concomitant changes in tendons, bursae or cartilage, such as structures in the hip, shoulder and knee, can be evaluated. MRI is an appropriate tool for describing changes in cartilage volume and concomitant soft-tissue alterations. For qualitative cartilage imaging, MRI has, to date, not been fully validated. Bone scans (bone scintigraphy) allow the differentiation of inflammatory from degenerative joint affections and may add information on the activity of the subchondral bone, which may develop to a prognostic marker of OA. This survey represents recommendations of the Commission "Imaging Techniques" of the German Rheumatology Society regarding the technical and individual conditions, indications, practical guidance and the typical findings of imaging in OA.