Microscopic polyangiitis histologically confirmed by biopsy from nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses: a case report

The role of surgery in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitides affecting the nose and sinuses: A systematic review

Background:

The ear, nose and throat region has been reported to be one of the commonest sites involved in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)–associated vasculitis diseases and often precedes the diagnosis of ANCA–associated vasculitis by many months. Although treatment for ANCA–associated vasculitis primarily requires systemic immunosuppressive therapy, there are specific indications for sinonasal surgery during the course of the disease process. The three major roles for surgery in sinonasal vasculitis are to aid diagnosis through biopsy, enable symptom relief and nasal reconstructive surgery consideration when in remission.

Purpose:

The aim of this systematic review is to provide an overview of the surgical procedures which can be performed in patients with ANCA–associated vasculitis presenting with sinonasal involvement.

Materials and methods:

A systematic literature search was performed for scientific articles on MEDLINE (PubMed Advanced MEDLINE Search) and EMBASE. The search included all articles up to April 2020.

Conclusion:

Surgical intervention during the active phase of ANCA–associated vasculitis disease can improve the patient’s symptoms and enable histological diagnosis. The surgical decision to manage the nose requires a multidisciplinary approach involving the vasculitis specialist and the ear, nose and throat surgeon. Nasal reconstruction can be performed to restore form and function but only when the disease is in remission so as to maximise success and minimise complications.

Should nasal biopsy inevitably be performed for classifying granulomatosis with polyangiitis in patients with rhinosinusitis? A retrospective chart review study

Nasal biopsy is the essential method for differentiating and diagnosing granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. Nevertheless, in the real clinical settings, there are several cases unable for nasal biopsy. Hence, in this study, we investigated initial clinical manifestations and laboratory factors which could be helpful for diagnosing GPA in cases unable for nasal biopsy performance. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 45 patients with GPA. Twenty-five patients exhibited chronic rhinosinusitis, among which 16 patients underwent nasal biopsy. We applied the 2007 European Medicines Agency algorithm for the classification of GPA, the 2012 Chapel Hill Consensus Conferences Nomenclature of Vasculitis and the 2017 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism provisional classification criteria for GPA to them for reclassifying GPA. Among six patients without granuloma on nasal biopsy, three patients with only antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) and chronic rhinosinusitis could be classified as GPA due to proteinase 3 (PR3)-ANCA (or cytoplasmic (C)-ANCA) positivity. Among nine patients without nasal biopsy, three patients with only chronic rhinosinusitis could be classified as GPA due to GPA-specific lung lesions. When we excluded an item of granuloma in ten GPA patients with granuloma on nasal biopsy, four patients without ANCAs could be classified as GPA due to GPA-specific lung lesions and cartilaginous involvement. In conclusion, PR3-ANCA (or C-ANCA) positivity, GPA-specific lung lesions and cartilaginous involvement could help physicians in charge make a final diagnosis of GPA in cases unable for nasal biopsy.

Nasal surgery in patients with systemic disorders

Multisystemic disorders represent a heterogenous group of diseases which can primarily manifest at the nose and paranasal sinuses as limited disease or secondarily as part of systemic involvement. Rhinologists therefore play an important role in the diagnostic but also therapeutic process. Although therapy of multisystemic disorders is primary systemic, additional rhinosurgery may become necessary. The spectrum of procedures consists of sinus surgery, surgery of the orbit and lacrimal duct, septorhinoplasty and closure of nasal septal perforation. Since the prevalence of most systemic diseases is very rare, recommendations are based on the analysis of single case reports and case series with a limited number of patients only. Although data is still limited, experiences published so far have shown that autologous cartilage or bone grafts can be used in nasal reconstruction of deformities caused by tuberculosis, leprosy, Wegener’s granulomatosis, sarcoidosis and relapsing polychondritis. Experiences gained from these diseases support the concept that well-established techniques of septorhinoplasty can be used in systemic diseases as well. However, a state of remission is an essential condition before considering any rhinosurgery in these patients. Even under these circumstances revision surgery has to be expected more frequently compared to the typical collective of patients undergoing septorhinoplasty. In addition, experiences gained from saddle nose reconstruction may in part be of value for the treatment of nasal septal perforations since implantation of cartilage grafts often represents an essential step in multilayer techniques of closure of nasal septal perforations. Aside from the treatment of orbital complications sinus surgery has been proven beneficial in reducing nasal symptoms and increasing quality of life in patients refractory to systemic treatment.

Differentiation between Wegener's granulomatosis and microscopic polyangiitis by an artificial neural network and by traditional methods

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the operating characteristics of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) traditional format criteria for Wegener's granulomatosis (WG), the Sørensen criteria for WG and microscopic polyangiitis (MPA), and the Chapel Hill nomenclature for WG and MPA. Further, to develop and validate improved criteria for distinguishing WG from MPA by an artificial neural network (ANN) and by traditional approaches [classification tree (CT), logistic regression (LR)].

METHODS

All criteria were applied to 240 patients with WG and 78 patients with MPA recruited by a multicenter study. To generate new classification criteria (ANN, CT, LR), 23 clinical measurements were assessed. Validation was performed by applying the same approaches to an independent monocenter cohort of 46 patients with WG and 21 patients with MPA.

RESULTS

A total of 70.8% of the patients with WG and 7.7% of the patients with MPA from the multicenter cohort fulfilled the ACR criteria for WG (accuracy 76.1%). The accuracy of the Chapel Hill criteria for WG and MPA was only 35.0% and 55.3% (Sørensen criteria: 67.2% and 92.4%). In contrast, the ANN and CT achieved an accuracy of 94.3%, based on 4 measurements (involvement of nose, sinus, ear, and pulmonary nodules), all associated with WG. LR led to an accuracy of 92.8%. Inclusion of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies did not improve the allocation. Validation of methods resulted in accuracy of 91.0% (ANN and CT) and 88.1% (LR).

CONCLUSION

The ACR, Sørensen, and Chapel Hill criteria did not reliably separate WG from MPA. In contrast, an appropriately trained ANN and a CT differentiated between these disorders and performed better than LR.