Preliminary evaluation in rheumatoid arthritis activity in patients treated with TNF-alpha blocker plus methotrexate versus methotrexate or leflunomide alone

Morning Stiffness in Elderly Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: What is Known About the Effect of Biological and Targeted Agents?

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects all age groups, but the prevalence appears to increase with age. Elderly-onset RA (after the age of 60 years) has distinct clinical patterns. Treatment of RA in older individuals is confounded by the presence of medical comorbidities, concurrent medications, drug interactions, and the altered pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics related to aging and organ dysfunction. Patients with RA commonly experience morning stiffness, which is associated with reduced quality of life and work disability. However, despite its importance, morning stiffness is seldom assessed in clinical practice and usually only its duration is measured in the research setting. Whether the intensity, timing, location and impact of this symptom should be assessed in future clinical trials requires further evaluation. The biologic and newer targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs have been shown to be effective in reducing the duration of morning stiffness in patients with RA. Glucocorticoids are a double-edged sword in RA. Although they can effectively reduce inflammation and retard radiological damage (disease modifying), the long-term use of glucocorticoids is associated with numerous adverse effects. Thus, glucocorticoids should be used for short-term treatment of RA only. Night-time administration of glucocorticoids has been shown to alleviate morning stiffness and should be considered in patients with serious morning joint stiffness symptoms.

Protective effect of higenamine ameliorates collagen-induced arthritis through heme oxygenase-1 and PI3K/Akt/Nrf-2 signaling pathways

Existing in Ranunculaceae Aconitum and tomato, with the chemical name 1-phydroxybenzyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahy-droisoquinoline, higenamine is widely distributed in China. Higenamine's anti-inflammatory, antioxidant and anti-apoptotic effects have been identified in previous studies. The present study attempted to determine the protective effect of higenamine against collagen-induced arthritis through heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) and PI3K/Akt/Nrf-2 signaling pathways. A type II collagen (CII)-induced arthritis (CIA) model was established and clinical arthritis scores were used to appraise the curative effect of higenamine. Inflammatory reactions, oxidative damage and caspase-3/9 activation were detected using specific ELISA kits. In addition, western blotting was used to evaluate the expression of HO-1, Akt and Nrf-2 protein in CII-induced CIA mice. In CII-induced CIA mice, the clinical arthritis scores, inflammatory reactions, oxidation damage and caspase-3/9 activation were increased and activated. The results demonstrated that treatment with higenamine significantly reduced the elevation of clinical arthritis scores (P<0.01), and suppressed the promotion of inflammatory reactions, oxidation damage and caspase-3/9 activation. Furthermore, higenamine significantly increased HO-1 protein expression (P<0.01) and upregulated the PI3K/Akt/Nrf-2 signal pathway in CII-induced CIA mice. Collectively, it is concluded that higenamine protects against CII-induced CIA through the induction of HO-1 and the upregulation of the PI3K/Akt/Nrf-2 signaling pathway. In conclusion, higenamine may be a beneficial drug for protecting against CIA.

Two-year radiographic and clinical outcomes from the Canadian Methotrexate and Etanercept Outcome study in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Objective. To evaluate radiographic and clinical outcomes up to 24 months in patients with RA enrolled in the Canadian Methotrexate and Etanercept Outcome study.

Methods. In this open-label non-inferiority trial, patients with inadequate response to MTX received etanercept plus MTX for 6 months and then were randomized to either etanercept monotherapy or continued etanercept plus MTX until 24 months. Radiographic data were analysed using the modified total Sharp score (mTSS), joint space narrowing and erosion scores. Secondary outcomes included the 28-joint DAS with ESR (DAS28-ESR), Simplified Disease Activity Index, Clinical Disease Activity Index, HAQ Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and safety.

Results. Two hundred five of 258 patients enrolled were randomized (98 etanercept, 107 etanercept plus MTX). At month 24, the mean increase from baseline to month 24 for the etanercept and etanercept plus MTX arms, respectively, for the mTSS were 0.4 (s.d. 1.9) and 0.0 (s.d. 1.4); for joint space narrowing, 0.1 (s.d. 0.6) and 0.0 (s.d. 0.7) and for erosion, 0.3 (s.d. 1.5) and 0.0 (s.d. 1.0). At month 24, the mean increase from month 6 mean scores/count increases for DAS28-ESR were 0.56 (s.d. 1.26) and 0.08 (s.d. 1.50); for Simplified Disease Activity Index, 4.7 (s.d. 13.1) and 0.9 (s.d. 12.5); for Clinical Disease Activity Index, 4.1 (s.d. 12.3) and 1.0 (s.d. 12.3) and for HAQ-DI, 0.20 (s.d. 0.45) and 0.02 (s.d. 0.54). Patients with DAS28-ESR low disease activity (LDA)/remission at month 6 had numerically better outcomes at month 24 than patients with moderate to high disease activity at month 6. In patients with LDA/remission at month 6, outcomes were similar at month 24 between etanercept monotherapy and etanercept plus MTX, whereas patients with moderate to high disease activity at month 6 had numerically better outcomes with etanercept plus MTX than etanercept at month 24. There were no new safety signals and serious adverse events were not different between groups.

Conclusion. These results support the possibility of discontinuing MTX in patients who have tolerability issues with MTX if they achieve LDA/remission.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov/; NCT00654368).

The Role of Biological and Small Molecule Therapy in the Management of Psoriatic Arthritis

The therapy of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) has blossomed in the past decade. Inhibition of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) has been at the fore of this approach and has paved the way for the investigation of many other potential pro-inflammatory and signaling pathways. Most of the initial studies of TNF inhibitors in PsA have been conducted in specific populations, largely focusing on those with established, peripheral joint disease. That said, in excess of 10 years’ worth of real world clinical experience has led to increased confidence in the wider use of these agents. We are now faced with an exciting time of discovery of many new molecules; these not only include new, large protein biological agents, but also smaller synthetic chemical molecules, many of which can be administered orally. Those currently under development are discussed within this article. Whilst there is scarce data about their real world efficacy and safety profile, it is evident that the therapeutic armamentarium for treating PsA will greatly increase in the foreseeable future and this is anticipated to improve patient outcomes.

How should morning function in rheumatoid arthritis be assessed? Bibliographic study of current assessment

In patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), symptoms of joint stiffness and pain may be most severe in the morning, resulting in impaired ability to carry out normal morning functions. Although morning stiffness was included in the criteria for classification and remission of RA, defined by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) in 1987, the approach to assessment of this circadian symptom has not been standardized, and other circadian aspects of the disease (i.e. pain, functional ability) were not included. A bibliographic study of papers published in English in the period January 2007 to January 2010 and reporting morning stiffness, pain or function was undertaken to investigate methods of assessing circadian aspects of RA. A total of 73 studies were identified using Medline, including 62 clinical trials. Full papers were obtained for 52 reports of clinical studies (84%), most of which (44/52, 85%) assessed duration of morning stiffness. Only two studies (4%) specified that severity of morning stiffness was assessed, only three (6%) assessed pain in the morning, and none assessed morning functional ability. These findings suggest the need for consistent reporting of a measure to reflect the impaired morning function, arising from joint stiffness and pain that is commonly experienced by patients.

Comparison of combination therapies in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: leflunomide-anti-TNF-alpha versus methotrexate-anti-TNF-alpha

To compare the efficacy and safety of leflunomide (LEF)-anti-TNF-alpha combination therapy to methotrexate (MTX)-anti-TNF-alpha combination therapy in a group of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We have recruited 120 patients with RA with a high disease activity despite being treated with MTX (15 mg/week) or LEF (20 mg/die) for 3 months, without side effects. In each of these patients, therapy with either MTX or LEF was continued and randomly combined with an anti-TNF-alpha drug: etanercept, infliximab, or adalimumab. Patients were assessed at study entry and at 4, 12, and at 24 weeks. The efficacy endpoints included variations in the DAS28-ESR and the ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 responses. At each visit, any side-effect was recorded. There were no statistically significant differences in the DAS28 variations and in the ACR responses between the two groups or among the six subgroups. The number of discontinuation due to the appearance of serious side effects was higher, but not statistically significant, in the LEF-anti-TNF-alpha group than in the MTX-anti-TNF-alpha group. Other adverse events that did not necessitate the discontinuation of therapy occurred much more frequently in patients treated with MTX than in those treated with LEF. Anti-TNF-alpha drugs can be used in combination not only with MTX, but also with LEF, with the same probability of achieving significant clinical improvement in RA patients and without a significantly greater risk of serious adverse events. In contrast, it seems that combination therapy with LEF-anti-TNF-alpha is more readily tolerated than combination therapy with MTX-anti-TNF-alpha.

HE3286: a novel synthetic steroid as an oral treatment for autoimmune disease

HE3286 (17alpha-ethynyl-5-androstene-3beta, 7beta, 17beta-triol) is a synthetic derivative of a natural anti-inflammatory steroid, beta-AET (5-androstene-3beta, 7beta, 17beta-triol). HE3286 is orally bioavailable and treats established disease in models of ulcerative colitis, collagen-induced arthritis, and collagen antibody-induced arthritis, reducing clinical signs of disease and proinflammatory signals, including IL-6 and matrix metallopeptidase 3. HE3286 modulates nuclear factor kappaB through an unknown mechanism but does not interact with any of the steroid-binding nuclear hormone receptors and is not immune suppressive. HE3286 was safe and well tolerated in phase I studies and is under evaluation in multicenter phase I/II clinical trials for ulcerative colitis and arthritis. HE3286 may provide a new treatment option for patients with inflammatory and autoimmune diseases.

Leflunomide for treating rheumatoid arthritis

BACKGROUND

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory joint disease. Leflunomide, as an inhibitor of pyrimidine synthesis, has a different mechanism of action than other existing disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD).

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy and toxicity of leflunomide compared to placebo or other DMARDs in the treatment of RA.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We conducted a search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Current Contents and the Cochrane Controlled Trial Register for trials up to December 2001. We also hand-searched reference lists and consulted content experts.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Two independent reviewers selected the trials that met predetermined inclusion criteria.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed methodologic quality using standardized forms.

MAIN RESULTS

Six trials were included in this review. Using the ACR20 improvement criteria, there was an absolute difference in improvement of 28% (95% confidence interval: 21 - 35%) favouring leflunomide (232 out of 413 leflunomide treated patients compared to 89 out of 311 placebo patients met the criteria). There was no difference in ACR20 response rate between the patients treated with leflunomide and SSZ or MTX at 6 and 12 months. Other clinical outcomes were improved significantly in the leflunomide group compared to placebo but not different from SSZ or MTX. Withdrawals due to adverse events with leflunomide were 10% greater than placebo (70 out of 416 compared to 18 out of 311 respectively). Important adverse events included gastrointestinal symptoms, elevated liver function tests, alopecia, and infections. Overall adverse events and withdrawals in the leflunomide group were not significantly different from SSZ or MTX.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Leflunomide appears to improve all clinical outcomes and delay radiologic progression at both 6 and 12 months of treatment compared to placebo. Its efficacy and adverse events at 2 years of treatment are comparable to SSZ and MTX. Long-term efficacy and toxicity remains to be established.