Successful treatment of relapsing autoimmune pancreatitis in primary Sjögren’s syndrome with Rituximab: report of a case and review of the literature

Pancreatic manifestations in rheumatoid arthritis: a national population-based study

OBJECTIVES

RA is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by persistent joint inflammation. Extra-articular manifestations of RA can involve different organs including the gastrointestinal (GI) system. Using a large database, we sought to describe the epidemiology of pancreas involvement in RA.

METHODS

We queried a multicentre database (Explorys Inc, Cleveland, OH, USA), an aggregate of electronic health record data from 26 major integrated US healthcare systems in the US from 1999 to 2019. After excluding patients younger than 18, a cohort of individuals with Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine - Clinical Terms (SNOMED-CT) diagnosis of RA was identified. Within this cohort, patients who developed a SNOMED-CT diagnosis of acute pancreatitis (AP), chronic pancreatitis (CP) and primary pancreatic cancer (PaCa) after at least 30 days of RA diagnosis were identified. Statistical analysis for multivariate model was performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS version 25, IBM Corp) to adjust for several factors.

RESULTS

Of the 56 183 720 individuals in the database, 518 280 patients had a diagnosis of RA (0.92%). Using a multivariate regression model, patients with RA were more likely to develop AP [odds ratio (OR): 2.51; 95% CI: 2.41, 2.60], CP (OR: 2.97; 95% CI: 2.70, 3.26) and PaC (OR: 1.79; 95% CI: 1.52, 2.10).

CONCLUSION

In this large database, we found a modest increased risk of AP and CP among patients with RA after adjusting for the common causes of pancreatitis. Further studies are required to better understand this association and the effect of medications used for RA.

Gastrointestinal and Hepatic Disease in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Gastrointestinal (GI) manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are rare, but can be impactful for patients. Some GI processes are directly related to RA, whereas others may be sequelae of treatment or caused by concomitant autoimmune diseases. This article discusses the role of the GI tract in RA pathogenesis; the presentation, epidemiology, and diagnosis of RA-related GI manifestations; concomitant GI autoimmune diseases that may affect those with RA; and GI side effects of RA treatment. The importance of appropriately considering conditions unrelated to RA in the differential diagnosis when evaluating new GI symptoms in patients with RA is noted.

Autoimmune Pancreatitis: An Update on Diagnosis and Management

There is an evolving understanding that autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is an immunoglobulin (Ig) G4 systemic disease. It can manifest as primarily a pancreatic disorder or in association with other disorders of presumed autoimmune cause. Classic clinical characteristics include obstructive jaundice, abdominal pain, and acute pancreatitis. Thus, AIP can be difficult to distinguish from pancreatic malignancy. However, AIP may respond to therapy with corticosteroids, and has a strong association with other immune mediated diseases. Although primarily a pathologic diagnosis, attempts have been made to reliably diagnose AIP clinically. AIP can be classified as either type 1 or type 2.

Autoimmune pancreatitis: an illustrated guide to diagnosis

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) remains one of the rarer forms of pancreatitis but has become increasingly well recognized and widely diagnosed as it is an important differential, particularly due to the dramatic response to appropriate therapy. It is now best considered as part of a multisystem disease and the notion of "IgG4-related systemic sclerosing disease" has become widely recognized as the number of extra-pancreatic associations of AIP grows. More recently AIP has been classified into two subtypes: lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis (LPSP) and idiopathic duct-centric pancreatitis (IDCP) with distinct geographical, age and sex distributions for the two subtypes, in addition to different pathological characteristics. The role of imaging is crucial in AIP and should be considered in conjunction with clinical, serological, and histopathological findings to make the diagnosis. Radiologists are uniquely placed to raise the possibility of AIP and aid the exclusion of significant differentials to allow the initiation of appropriate management and avoidance of unnecessary intervention. Radiological investigation may reveal a number of characteristic imaging findings in AIP but appearances can vary considerably and the focal form of AIP may appear as a pancreatic mass, imitating pancreatic carcinoma. This review will illustrate typical and atypical appearances of AIP on all imaging modes. Emphasis will be placed on the imaging features that are likely to prove useful in discriminating AIP from other causes prior to histopathological confirmation. In addition, examples of relevant differential diagnoses are discussed and illustrated.

IgG4-related systemic disease as a cause of "idiopathic" orbital inflammation, including orbital myositis, and trigeminal nerve involvement

IgG4-related systemic disease (IgG4-RD) is an inflammatory condition of unknown etiology that has been identified as the cause of tumefactive lesions in a number of tissues and organs. The role of the IgG4 remains to be clarified fully, but the histopathologic diagnosis hinges upon the finding of IgG4-bearing plasma cells in addition to characteristic morphologic features, with or without elevated seum IgG4. We present a 56-year-old man with orbital pseudotumor in whom, after 30 years of intractable disease, biopsy showed IgG4-RD involving the lacrimal gland, extraocular muscles, intraconal fat, and trigeminal nerve. Six months after initiating treatment with rituximab, his disease remained dormant, with improvement in his proptosis and normalization of serum IgG4 levels. We review the differential of idiopathic orbital inflammatory disease, including IgG4-RD, and emphasize the need for biopsy for accurate diagnosis and to guide appropriate treatment.

Therapeutic management and clinical outcome of autoimmune pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune pancreatitis, in comparison to other benign chronic pancreatic diseases, is characterized by the possibility of curing the illness with immunosuppressant drugs. The open question is whether to differentiate autoimmune pancreatitis as a primary or secondary disease based on the presence or absence of other autoimmune diseases or whether to consider autoimmune pancreatitis a clinical and pathological systemic entity, called IgG4-related sclerosing disease, since this aspect is also very important from a therapeutic point of view.

METHODS

In this paper, we reviewed the conventional therapeutic approach used to treat autoimmune pancreatitis patients and the clinical outcome related to each treatment modality. We also reviewed some aspects which are important for the correct management of autoimmune pancreatitis, such as the surgical approach, the outcome of surgically treated autoimmune pancreatitis patients, whether medical treatment is always necessary, and, finally, when medical treatment should be initiated.

CONCLUSIONS

Steroids are useful in alleviating the symptoms of the acute presentation of autoimmune pancreatitis, but some questions remain open such as the dosage of steroids in the acute phase and the duration of steroid therapy; finally, it should be assessed if other immunosuppressive non-steroidal drugs may become the first-line therapy in patients with AIP without jaundice and without atrophic pancreas.

Review article: autoimmune pancreatitis - management of an emerging disease

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune pancreatitis is a steroid-responsive inflammatory pancreatic disease considered to be part of an immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4)-associated systemic disease.

AIM

To review the management of autoimmune pancreatitis.

METHODS

We conducted a PubMed search using the following key words: autoimmune pancreatitis, IgG4-associated systemic disease, IgG4-associated cholangitis, diagnosis, natural history, treatment.

RESULTS

Although there are reports of spontaneous resolution of autoimmune pancreatitis, steroids have been shown to be effective in inducing remission, reducing the frequency of relapse and that of long-term unfavourable events compared to historical controls. There are no randomised data on autoimmune pancreatitis treatment. Oral steroids are used for induction of remission. Reported response results are excellent with variable proportions of patients achieving remission in different studies. After a period of 2-4 weeks, steroids are tapered and usually withdrawn within several months, although long-term maintenance therapy for all autoimmune pancreatitis patients has also been proposed. Disease relapse occurs in more than 40% of patients and can be effectively treated with additional immunosuppression, including azathioprine.

CONCLUSIONS

Steroids are effective in inducing remission and in treating relapse in patients with autoimmune pancreatitis. Randomised trials on autoimmune pancreatitis therapy are lacking. To date, questions concerning the timing, choice and duration of long-term immunosuppression remain unanswered.

Outcome of patients with type 1 or 2 autoimmune pancreatitis

OBJECTIVES

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is better described than before, but there is still no international consensus for definition, diagnosis, and treatment. Our aims were to analyze the short- and long-term outcome of patients with focus on pancreatic endocrine and exocrine functions, to search for predictive factors of relapse and pancreatic insufficiency, and to compare patients with type 1 and type 2 AIP.

METHODS

All consecutive patients followed up for AIP in our center between 1999 and 2008 were included. Two groups were defined: (a) patients with type 1 AIP meeting HISORt (Histology, Imaging, Serology, Other organ involvement, and Response to steroids) criteria; (b) patients with definitive/probable type 2 AIP including those with histologically confirmed idiopathic duct-centric pancreatitis ("definitive") or suggestive imaging, normal serum IgG4, and response to steroids ("probable"). AIP-related events and pancreatic exocrine/endocrine insufficiency were looked for during follow-up. Predictive factors of relapse and pancreatic insufficiency were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 44 patients (22 males), median age 37.5 (19-73) years, were included: 28 patients (64%) with type 1 AIP and 16 patients (36%) with type 2 AIP. First-line treatment consisted of steroids or pancreatic resection in 59 and 27% of the patients, respectively. Median follow-up was 41 (5-130) months. Steroids were effective in all treated patients. Relapse was observed in 12 patients (27%), after a median delay of 6 months (1-70). Four patients received azathioprine because of steroid resistance/dependence. High serum IgG4 level, pain at time of diagnosis, and other organ involvement were associated with relapse (P<0.05). At the end point, pancreatic atrophy was observed in 35% of patients. Exocrine and endocrine insufficiencies were present in 34 and 39% of the patients, respectively. At univariate analysis, no factor was associated with exocrine insufficiency, although female gender (P=0.04), increasing age (P=0.006), and type 1 AIP (P=0.001) were associated with the occurrence of diabetes. Steroid/azathioprine treatment did not prevent pancreatic insufficiency. Type 2 AIP was more frequently associated with inflammatory bowel disease than type 1 AIP (31 and 3%, respectively), but relapse rates were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Relapse occurs in 27% of AIP patients and is more frequent in patients with high serum IgG4 levels at the time of diagnosis. Pancreatic atrophy and functional insufficiency occur in more than one-third of the patients within 3 years of diagnosis. The outcome of patients with type 2 AIP, a condition often associated with inflammatory bowel disease, is not different from that of patients with type 1 AIP, except for diabetes.